AbstractThree simulated hail damage experiments were conducted to compare realized grain yields with those predicted by current hail adjustment procedures. Treatments included reductions in plant density and defoliation. Population density reduction was studied for 3 yr. An initial population of 6.4 plants m−2 was reduced to 5.9, 4.9, 4.0, and 3.0 plants m−2 at the 6‐, 9‐, 12‐, and 15‐leaf stages. Leaf stage did not affect grain yield, but yield decreased −2, 2, 6, and 19%, respectively, with each reduction in population. Yield losses due to population density reduction were less than those predicted by hail insurance procedures, especially for losses after the 10‐leaf stage. One‐hundred percent defoliation at the 4‐, 5‐ and 6‐leaf stages did not significantly reduce grain yield. One‐hundred percent defoliation from the sixth through the ninth leaf stages showed a linear decrease (regression coef. = −1.15) in grain yield with later leaf stage. The effects of early season complete defoliation varied with year. These results generally agree with the hail loss charts for very early season, 100% defoliation. Defoliation of 0, 33, 66, and 100% at the 6‐, 12‐, tassel, and blister stages was performed over four environments. Grain yield was reduced with increasing severity of defoliation, and with growth stages near the tassel stage. Five treatments produced a greater yield reduction than predicted by the hail adjustment procedures, while one treatment showed less yield reduction than predicted. Later treatments tended to show greater yield loss than predicted.
Read full abstract