Gynecology In Germany Research Articles

Is there an association between mastitis and breast cancer? a retrospective cohort study from Germany.

The aim of the study was to explore the association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer. This retrospective cohort study included women aged ≥ 18years with an initial mastitis diagnosis from 315 office-based gynecologists in Germany between January 2005 and December 2021. Women without mastitis were matched to women with mastitis using propensity score matching based on age, index year, average yearly consultation frequency during the follow-up period, and coexisting diseases such as obesity, benign mammary dysplasia, hypertrophy of the breast, unspecified lump of breast, and other disorders of the breast. The 10-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer for the mastitis-cohort and non-mastitis-cohort was studied with Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. The association between mastitis and breast cancer was studied separately for four age groups with univariable Cox regression analyses. In the follow-up period of 7months to 10years after the index date, 2.9% of mastitis patients and 2.4% of matched non-mastitis patients were diagnosed with breast cancer. A Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11-1.70). According to the age-stratified analyses, a strong and significant association was only observed in the age group > 50years (HR: 1.73; 95% 1.25-2.40). The findings of our retrospective cohort study support an association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer diagnoses in women aged > 50years. The pathophysiological basis and possibility of confounders however requires further investigation.

Enhancing ultrasound education in obstetrics and gynecology in Germany: insights and innovations from postgraduate training

BackgroundUltrasound (US) has become integral to obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn), necessitating proficient training during residency. Despite its clinical importance, there is a perceived gap in the quality and structure of postgraduate ultrasound education in Germany.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Ob/Gyn residents in Germany from October 2023 to March 2024, using the LimeSurvey platform. The survey, distributed via email, social media, and physical flyers, garnered 211 participants, with 115 completing all sections. The questionnaire covered demographic details, US training experiences, and the perceived importance of US in clinical practice.ResultsAlthough US was highly valued by respondents, with an average of 26.1% of their clinical activity devoted to it, there was significant dissatisfaction with the training quality. Key issues included inadequate supervision, the necessity of self-training, and low participation in certification courses. Despite 93.0% awareness of professional US organizations like the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM), engagement with structured training programs was minimal.DiscussionThe study highlights a critical need for standardized US training protocols and curricular reform in Ob/Gyn residencies in Germany. The discrepancy between the recognized importance of US and the quality of training indicates a pressing need for improvements. Addressing these gaps through comprehensive, structured educational reforms could significantly enhance the proficiency and confidence of future Ob/Gyn specialists, ultimately improving patient care.

Training in obstetrics and gynecology between reality and vision: results of a JAGO–NOGGO survey in 601 physicians (NOGGO—Monitor-12 trial)

PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to establish a benchmark by collecting baseline data on surgical education in obstetrics and gynecology in Germany, including factual number of operations performed.Materials and methodsA nationwide anonymous survey was conducted in Germany between January 2019 and July 2019 utilizing a specially designed questionnaire which addressed both residents and senior trainers.ResultsA total of 601 participants completed the survey, comprising 305 trainees and 296 trainers. The trainees reported performing a median of 125 non-obstetric surgeries (IQR: 41–332) and 75 obstetric procedures (IQR: 27–168) independently. While most last-year residents managed to meet the targeted numbers for minor surgical procedures outlined in the logbook, they fell short of achieving the required numbers for major operations, such as hysterectomies or more complex laparoscopies. Although both trainees and trainers emphasized the significance of surgical training, the overall quality of the training was rated poorly, particularly by trainees. This was attributed to a high proportion of administrative tasks and a deficiency in teaching time within the operating theater. External fellowship and mentoring programs, as well as the implementation of regular, centralized reviews of residency training, were identified as potentially beneficial by both trainees and trainers.ConclusionThe findings of this survey should serve as a wake-up call both within and outside of Germany, highlighting the importance of comprehensive and structured surgical training to enhance long-term patient care and increase satisfaction among obstetrics and gynecology trainees.

National and International Comparisons of Gynecological Research in Germany Based on a Bibliometric Analysis of Publications.

Recent years have seen a considerable shift from male doctors to female doctors in the field of gynecology. Female doctors are traditionally more involved with planning and maintaining their family. For gynecology, this could be associated with a risk that research activities will decrease, particularly if results are published in scientific journals. In view of this shift, a comparative observational study was carried for 2022 in which 1306 publications were matched to 1786 female and male doctors reported on the websites of the 44 locations of university gynecology departments in Germany. In addition, the volume of publications issued between 2014 and 2022 was compared for Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In Germany, the volume of publications in Gynecology was additionally compared with the publication outputs of the specialties Urology and Trauma Surgery. Since 2014, the increase in the numbers of publications in the field of Gynecology in Germany was lower (225%) than that of the countries with which it was compared (238%/252%/260% for F/UK/USA). When Gynecology was compared with other medical specialties in Germany, the number of publications in Urology were found to have increased at a lower rate (196%) while the number of publications in the field of Trauma Surgery increased by more (286%) than that of Gynecology. At the start of 2023, the percentage of women who were working as doctors at the lowest hierarchical level (junior doctor) was 81%. The publication output per capita of female doctors working at lower levels in the medical hierarchy, i.e., working as junior doctors and senior physicians, was between 40% and 80% lower than that of male doctors working at the same level. However, female directors published as much as male directors did. In the lower hierarchy levels, men were up to 14% more likely to be without an academic title. Predictors for more extensive publication activities by young female and male doctors include the extent and quality of publications by doctors in senior positions, the presence of a comprehensive cancer center or an institute for human genetics at the location where the young doctors were working, and joint publications with foreign authors. For the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the results suggest a number of approaches to promote young researchers. The support provided to young female doctors is especially important as this should help to retain them as junior researchers over the long term.

Talking about Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk-Evaluation of a Psychosocial Training Module for Gynecologists in Germany.

Primary care gynecologists are increasingly integrated into the care of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risks. These physicians should not only have basic genetic knowledge; they should also feel able to sensitively address an increased HBOC risk and deal with emotional, stressful situations in this context. Our project aimed at developing a training module, 'iKNOWgynetics', addressing psychosocial challenges in the context of HBOC care for primary care gynecologists. We developed the psychosocial training module in three phases: first, we conducted an online survey with n = 35 women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer to assess patients' experiences and needs. Second, based on the results of the needs assessment, we developed the training module. Third, we evaluated the training by assessing physicians' (n = 109) self-efficacy with regard to communication skills in the context of HBOC before and after the training. In the needs assessment, seven psychosocial themes emerged. These themes, complementing a review of the literature, informed the training curriculum. The training was divided into two parts: (1) communicating with women before genetic testing and (2) care co-management for women with HBOC after genetic testing. After the training, participants reported a significant increase in self-efficacy in three domains: communicating empathetically, educating patients in a comprehensible way and dealing with emotionally challenging situations. Our results highlight the relevance of psychosocial issues for patients with HBOC. A genetic literacy training module that integrates aspects of psychosocial care increases physicians' confidence in dealing with emotionally challenging situations before and after their patients' genetic testing. Thus, such trainings may improve the care of women with hereditary cancer risks.

Is there an association between endometriosis and subsequent breast cancer? A retrospective cohort study from Germany

PurposeGiven the relatively high incidence of both endometriosis and breast cancer, investigating the potential connection between these gynecological diseases is of substantial clinical significance. However, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the extent to which the risk of breast cancer is increased in patients with endometriosis. Therefore, we conducted a large-scale observational study investigating the association between endometriosis and breast cancer risk.MethodsThis study included women aged ≥ 18 years with an initial endometriosis diagnosis from one of 315 office-based gynecologists in Germany between January 2005 and December 2021. Non-endometriosis patients were matched 1:1 to patients with endometriosis based on age, index year, average yearly consultation frequency, and predefined co-diagnoses within 12 months before or on the index date, including obesity and benign breast disorders. The association between endometriosis and the 10-year incidence of breast cancer was studied using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. Finally, a univariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between endometriosis and breast cancer.ResultsOver a follow-up period of up to 10 years, no significant difference was observed between the endometriosis (2.4%) and the matched non-endometriosis group (2.5%) with regard to breast cancer diagnoses. Furthermore, the regression analysis revealed no significant association between endometriosis and subsequent breast cancer.ConclusionIn summary, our comprehensive 10-year study involving a substantial sample of women indicates that endometriosis is not significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer.

Gender gap-Gender-specific development in the field of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany in the last 20 years.

Gender Gap refers to differences between men and women in terms of access to medical education, career development, and leadership positions in medical practice and research. Although women now make up most medical school graduates in many countries, they are often underrepresented in higher positions. The aim of this study is therefore to analyze the gender-specific development in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany over the past 20 years and to survey the current status quo. An narrative review was carried out on the development of female graduates of human medicine, the proportion of women in contract medical care and clinical care, as well as the gender-specific evaluation of obtaining a gynecological/obstetric additional qualification. habilitation figures in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology were evaluated about gender distribution. All data were received from federal institutes. A total of 46.7% (n = 95,234) of all inpatient doctors were female. A total of 46.7% (n = 95,234) of the physicians in hospitals were female. A total of 46% (1,832/3,958) were the portion of females as assistant physicians, 39.8% (n = 45.551) as specialists, 35.3% (n = 18789) as senior physicians, 25.1% (n = 2394) as first senior physicians and 25% (n = 10) as chief physicians in hospital. A total of 64.6% (n = 3958) of the physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology were female. A total of 46% (1,832/3,958) were the portion of females as assistant physicians, 64.6% (n = 3958) as specialists, 65.0% (n = 1919) as senior physicians, 26.4% (n = 207) first senior physicians and 25% (n = 10) as chief physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology. The problem with the gender gap in medicine, does not seem to be access to teaching or starting a residency. But in the functions with increasing responsibility and management functions, e.g., as senior physicians, women are already rarely seen. In Obstetrics and Gynecology, too, there is a shortage of women in leading positions, despite the relatively high numbers, for example as senior physicians. Factors like maternity and establishing a family are points mentioned therefore, but also stereotypes seem to be considerable facts. However, it is important to recognize the need for more women in higher positions in medicine and actively work to encourage more women to choose a career in medicine.

Recommendation and intake of dietary supplements periconceptional and during pregnancy: results of a nationwide survey of gynaecologists

BackgroundMicronutrient supplementation during pregnancy is a controversial issue. For some micronutrients, for example folic acid or iodine, the evidence regarding supplementation is clear, whereas for others, such as zinc or vitamin E, it is not. Studies show that a large number of pregnant women have deficient levels of folic acid and iodine. However, especially with folic acid, starting supplementation during the preconception period is crucial. It is, therefore, important that gynaecologists explain this to their pregnant or preconceptional patients. Our goal was to find out how gynaecologists make their recommendations on this topic, how they assess the compliance of their patients and which micronutrients they consider to be important before/during pregnancy and during breastfeeding.Method and ResultsWe sent about 12,000 questionnaires to all registered resident gynaecologists in Germany, with a response rate of 12.2%. Regarding which micronutrients gynaecologists consider to be particularly important during pregnancy, there was a broad agreement for both folic acid and iodine (> 88% answered yes). According to the questionnaire, doctors rate other micronutrients, such as vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids, as less essential. The controversial evidence level for many micronutrients certainly plays a role here. Overall, the intake rate, especially for preconceptional women, is classified as rather low (< 60%). The most widely valued reason is the high price of dietary supplements. It was also noticeable that doctors consider certain micronutrients to be particularly important but then do not include them in the products they recommend.ConclusionOverall, there seems to be uncertainty about micronutrients in pregnancy and their supplementation. The study situation is often ambiguous and there are no official guidelines, leading to ambiguous recommendations from doctors and therefore low intake rates for pregnant or preconceptional women.

Migraine and Hormonal Contraception in Gynecological Outpatient Care-Cross-Sectional Study among Practicing Gynecologists in Germany.

Hormonal contraception (HC) can influence the migraine burden and should be considered in the comprehensive management of women with migraine. In this study, we aim to investigate the influence of migraine and migraine aura on the prescribing behavior of combined oral contraception (COC) and progestogen monotherapy (PM) in gynecological outpatient care. From October 2021 to March 2022, we performed an observational, cross-sectional study using a self-administered online-based survey. The questionnaire was distributed by mail and e-mail among 11,834 practicing gynecologists in Germany using the publicly available contact information. A total of 851 gynecologists responded to the questionnaire, of whom 12% never prescribe COC in the presence of migraine. Further 75% prescribe COC depending on the presence of limiting factors such as cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. When deciding to start PM, migraine appears to be less relevant, as 82% prescribe PM without restrictions. In the presence of aura, 90% of gynecologists do not prescribe COC at all, while PM is prescribed in 53% without restrictions. Almost all gynecologists reported to be actively involved in migraine therapy by having already initiated (80%), discontinued (96%), or changed (99%) HC due to migraine. Our results reveal that participating gynecologists actively consider migraine and migraine aura before and while prescribing HC. Gynecologists appear cautious in prescribing HC in patients with migraine aura.

Staging for Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Survey about Adherence to Guidelines in German Breast Centers

Introduction: The risk for metastasis at primary diagnosis of breast cancer is about 4%. The German guidelines give clear indications on when, who, and how to stage breast cancer patients. Ideally, this should be done via computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan of the thorax and abdomen and an additional bone scan. But daily practice shows that the way health-care providers handle staging recommendations can vary. To objectify adherence to guidelines we started a nation-wide survey. Methods: Between July and September 2020, we sent out a survey via email to all certified and noncertified breast centers and in addition to all Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany. We asked for timing of staging, conditions that cause staging, and the applied method. In case we did not get any reply, we sent out a reminder. Results: A total of 220 certified breast centers, 28 noncertified breast centers, and 48 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology who care for breast cancer patients took part in our survey. A general pretherapeutic staging was performed in 16.4%, 39.3%, and 66.7% of all institutions and a general postoperative staging was performed in 4.1%, 0%, and 6.3% of each institutional type, respectively. In terms of the applied method, 75% of all certified breast centers used a CAT scan and bone scan, while 23.3% primarily used chest X-ray, ultrasound of the abdomen (27.7%), or MRI. As a potential reason for using X-ray and ultrasound, the presence of a “low-risk” breast cancer was mentioned. Summary: Although certified breast centers show the highest adherence to current guidelines, some still perform a general staging or do not use the recommended staging method. The low probability of primary metastatic breast cancer and the use of a reasonable exposure to radiation warrant a critical discussion.

Digitization in gynecology and obstetrics in times of COVID-19: Results of a national survey

IntroductionIn the COVID-19 pandemic, many consultations had to be cancelled, postponed, or converted to a virtual format. The use of telemedicine in the management of Women's Health Care could support doctors (tele-gynecology). This study analyses the use and perception of telemedicine applications among gynecologists in Germany. Materials and methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study was based on a survey of gynecologists in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and regression analyses were performed to show correlations. ResultsThe gynecologists expect telemedicine to be used in gynecology and obstetrics. 76.4% (365/478) of the respondents rated their knowledge of telemedicine as insufficient. The majority of respondents (437/478, 91.6%) said they did not currently use telemedicine, although 67.3% (321/478) would like to do so. Obstacles to the introduction of telemedicine include the purchase of technical equipment (325/478, 68.1%), administration (305/478, 64.0%) and poor reimbursement (233/478, 48.9%). Gynecologists surveyed would prefer telemedicine to communicate directly with other doctors (388/478, 81.2%) rather than to communicate with patients (228/478, 47.8%). In the treatment phases, 73.2% (349/478) of the respondents would use telemedicine during follow-up. Half of the respondents would choose tele counseling as a specific approach to improving care (246/478, 51.5%). ConclusionTelemedicine in gynecology finds little use but high acceptance. The absence of a structured framework is an obstacle to effective implementation. Training courses should be introduced to improve the limited knowledge in the use of telemedicine. More research in tele-gynecology is needed. These include large-scale randomized controlled trials, economic analyses and the exploration of user preferences.

Access to Prenatal Testing and Ethically Informed Counselling in Germany, Poland and Russia.

The development of new methods in the field of prenatal testing leads to an expansion of information that needs to be provided to expectant mothers. The aim of this research is to explore opinions and attitudes of gynecologists in Germany, Poland and Russia towards access to prenatal testing and diagnostics in these countries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with n = 18 gynecologists in Germany, Poland and Russia. The interviews were analyzed using the methods of content analysis and thematic analysis. Visible in all three countries is a connection of prenatal medicine with the politically and socially contentious issue of pregnancy termination. Respondents in Poland and Russia concentrated on the topic of inadequate resources. Quality of information for expectant mothers is an important point in all three countries. Only in Germany was the issue of language barriers in communication raised. With regard to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) respondents in Germany focused on the ethical issues of routinization of testing; in Poland and Russia they concentrated on fair access to NIPT. Challenges in all three countries arise from structural factors such as imprecise and prohibitive regulations, lack of resources or organization of healthcare services. These should be addressed on a political and medico-ethical level.

A. Martin's clinic

Martin is undoubtedly one of the outstanding gynecologists in Germany. He was one of the first supporters of the operational direction in gynecology, a direction that has become dominant in the last 10-20 years. Martin's work, in almost all branches of gynecology, made him a reputation not only as an experienced and courageous operator, but also as an outstanding scientist.

Incidence of unexpected uterine malignancies after electromechanical power morcellation: a retrospective multicenter analysis in Germany.

During the last decade, electromechanical power morcellation (EMM) was more frequently used but it may be associated with the dissemination of occult malignancies. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of unexpected uterine malignancies after EMM. This retrospective study consisted of patients who were treated at three departments of Gynecology in Germany from 2008 to 2017. We identified women who underwent an operation with the use of EMM. Clinical records, risk factors, and the outcomes of the patients were reviewed. We performed an analysis of 1683 patients who had undergone laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH), total hysterectomy, or myomectomy (LM) (48.6%, 8.4%, and 43.0%, respectively). Unexpected malignancies were detected in 4 of 1683 patients (0.24%). In all cases, the malignancy proved to be a sarcoma and was detected after LASH. All patients with occult sarcomas were older than 45years and the most common (75%) risk factor was the appearance of a solitary tumor. The patients underwent secondary laparotomy for complete oncological staging, and no histological dissemination of the sarcoma was registered. Two patients had a recurrence. At the final follow-up investigation all four patients were in good general health. Occult malignancies are liable to spread after EMM, although the overall risk of being diagnosed with an occult malignancy and the risk of dissemination appear to be low. Once the preoperative diagnostic investigation has yielded no suspicious findings, laparoscopic morcellation may be considered a safe method, especially LM in patients of reproductive age.

Thromboprophylaxis following cesarean section – a nation-wide survey from Germany

Objective: Our study aimed to assess current practice related to thromboprophylaxis following cesarean section (c.s.) among obstetricians in Germany taking account of the German and international guidelines.Study design: A nation-wide survey using a structured 22-item questionnaire was conducted in Germany. The questionnaire was sent to head of all registered departments of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany, followed by a single reminder followed 3 weeks after the first return deadline. The respondents’ answers were related to the different levels of care (1–4) of German perinatal centers.Results: In total 726 obstetric departments were invited to participate. Questionnaires were returned by 389 (54%) of departments. Of the respondents 162 (41%) stated to undertake risk assessment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using a structured checklist or interview. Compared to level 4 centers risk assessment was significantly more often performed by perinatal centers level 1 (47 versus 35%, p = .05). The majority of responding hospitals preferred universal heparin thromboprophylaxis following elective and emergency caesarean section, regardless of additional risk factors (n = 362; 93%). The “usual” prophylactic dose of heparin was given by the majority of hospitals (n = 280, 72%), while 98 (25%) hospitals used heparin doses adjusted to patients’ body weight. In women at increased risk for VTE (e.g. previous VTE) there was a considerable variation in the recommended doses; 140 responding hospitals (36%) used 50–75% of the therapeutic heparin dose, 139 hospitals (36%) the “usual” prophylactic dose, and 97 hospitals (25%) preferred a therapeutic dose. In women at low risk for VTE 64% (n = 248) of hospitals recommended heparin thromboprophylaxis only during the hospital stay, 16% (n = 62) for at least 7 days after c.s., 4% (n = 15) for 10 days, 6% (n = 23) for 2–5 weeks, and 3% (n = 14) for 6 weeks postpartum. In women at increased risk level 1 centers prescribed heparin for VTE prophylaxis significantly more often for 6–8-week postpartum compared to level 4 centers (p = .02) whereas Level 4 centers used prophylactic heparin significantly more often <6 weeks (p = .01).Conclusion: Our survey reveals that the vast majority of hospitals (93%) used heparin prophylaxis after any c.s., irrespective of individual risk factors and the mode of c.s. (elective or emergency). This is in remarkable contrast to the recommendations from the German and other international guidelines. As well, we found a wide variation among respondents in dosing and duration of heparin related to the risk profile of VTE. This demonstrates, that there is little awareness and/or adherence to the German and other guideline recommendations which mirrors the inconsistencies between current guidelines. There is an urgent need to clarify optimal prophylaxis strategies after c.s. and the true magnitudes of benefits and harms associated with heparin prophylaxis by randomized controlled trials with sufficient statistical power.

Social Freezing in Medical Practice. Experiences and Attitudes of Gynecologists in Germany

Surveys of the German public have revealed a high acceptance of social freezing, i.e. oocyte conservation without medical indication. Up to now, there are no investigations available on the experiences and attitudes of health professionals towards social freezing. Between August 2015 and January 2016, we surveyed gynecologists Germany-wide on the topic social freezing. Five gynecologists specialized in reproductive medicine and five office-based gynecologists in standard care were chosen for the survey. The survey was conducted with an explorative, qualitative research design. The demand for social freezing in Germany is low. With regard to their fertility age, most women attend consultations too late, they have only little previous knowledge and false expectations. The gynecologists consider it the duty of society and politics to provide for the compatibility of family and work. They relate late parenthood to disadvantages primarily for the children. A majority of the gynecologists interviewed tend to advise natural reproduction. Social freezing is often mistaken as a kind of fertility insurance. Thus, it is necessary that physicians inform women early about the possibilities and limitations of social freezing. In the first place, social freezing is not a medical or medical-ethical topic. Women consider the method as a possibility to ensure the compatibility of family and work. This compatibility should be mostly perceived as a political topic. It cannot be a medical task to solve this issue. In fact, a debate in society as a whole is necessary that includes all relevant actors.

Prevalence and predictors of prescription of antibiotics in pregnant women treated by gynecologists in Germany .

The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence and potential predictors of the prescription of antibiotics in pregnant women treated by gynecologists in Germany. The current study included 90,312 women aged between 18 and 45 years with a full-term documented pregnancy during the index period (2005-2014). The primary outcome was the proportion of pregnant women with antibiotic prescriptions. Potential predictors of antibiotic prescriptions considered in the present analysis were age, index year, and gynecological/urinary disorders. Disorders included in this analysis were frequent gynecological and urinary conditions that are often treated with antibiotics. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the probability of antibiotic use depending on age, index year, and codiagnoses. In this population, 14.7% of pregnant women had antibiotic prescriptions. Pregnant women in the age groups ≤20 and 21-25 years were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics than pregnant women in the age group 41-45 years (odds ratios equal to 1.55 and 1.27, respectively). Pregnant women analyzed in 2009-2011 and 2012-2014 received prescriptions for antibiotics more frequently compared to those analyzed in 2005-2008 (odds ratios equal to 1.12 and 1.08, respectively). Finally, being affected by chlamydial infection, cystitis, urinary tract infection (site not specified), genitourinary tract infections in pregnancy, acute vaginitis, and other noninflammatory disorders of the vagina was associated with a higher chance of being prescribed antibiotics. Approximately 15% of pregnant women received antibiotic prescriptions. Age, index year, and gynecological/urinary disorders were all found to be associated with these prescriptions. .

Gestational diabetes mellitus: an evaluation of gynecologists' knowledge of guidelines and counseling behavior.

Knowledge of risks, adequate pre- and post-partum care, and counseling is essential to reduce short- and long-term consequences for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their offspring. Our study explored the current GDM guideline knowledge and practiced patient counseling of private gynecologists in Germany. A survey assessing the GDM guidelines and patient counseling was mailed to 775 practicing gynecologists. We evaluated the knowledge of maternal and offspring disease risks, counseling practice, and guideline awareness. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the responses and Chi-Square or Fisher exact test to explore differences between groups. Of the 418 private gynecologists (54.1% response rate) who responded, the majority was aware of obesity and GDM in the previous pregnancy as risk factors for GDM. To a lesser extent, risk factors like recurrent miscarriages and stillbirth were recalled. Eighty percent stated that GDM was associated with a higher risk for the development for hypertension and 96% with type 2 diabetes in the mother. Respondents with knowledge of the current GDM guidelines were more often aware of the development of chronic diseases, counseled patients more frequently, and performed post-partum glucose screenings more regularly compared with private gynecologists with no knowledge of the guidelines. The majority of participants incorporated recent recommendations into their practice patterns for GDM. Providing private gynecologists with additional training may further improve care for women with GDM-affected pregnancies.

Complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients – a survey among gynecologists in Germany

Complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients – a survey among gynecologists in Germany

Off-label use of misoprostol for labor induction in Germany: a national survey

ObjectiveMisoprostol is safe and effective for labor induction in viable pregnancies. Little is known about the prevalence of off-label use of misoprostol, and the reasons for using or not using misoprostol for labor induction. As such, a national survey was conducted in Germany to assess reliable data about the use of misoprostol in clinical practice. Study designA prospective study was performed in 2013 using a standardized survey questionnaire. All registered departments of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany were targeted. ResultsOut of 783 questionnaires, 542 (69%) were returned. Three hundred and fifty-five (66%) respondents reported that they use misoprostol for labor induction in viable term pregnancies, and 183 (34%) respondents reported that they never use misoprostol for this indication. The most common reasons given for using misoprostol in labor induction were: effectiveness (40%), good patient acceptance (35%), established/well proven in clinical practice (35%) and cost-effectiveness (32%). The most common reasons given for not using misoprostol were lack of licence (off-label use, 69%) and uncertainty of the legal situation (27%). ConclusionAlthough misoprostol is not licensed in Germany for obstetric indications, the vast majority of respondents (66%) reported that they use misoprostol for labor induction. The main reasons for not using misoprostol for labor induction in Germany are legal concerns rather than lack of scientific evidence. Cost-effective medications with evidence-based effectiveness and safety should be supported by a clear statement from national medical societies.