Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Research Articles

The diagnosis of endometrial cancer in women with asymptomatic endometrial polyp does not increase survival rates: an israel gynecologic oncology group study

To compare outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic women with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp. An Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multi-center retrospective cohort study. Of 635 patients with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014 in one of 11 centers in Israel were divided into two groups according to the presence of bleeding symptoms. Outcome measures included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Survival data were plotted according to the method of Kaplan and Meier and compared using the log-rank test. There were 513 symptomatic and 122 asymptomatic women with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12-120 months). There were no differences between patients who experienced bleeding and those who did not in 5-year recurrence-free survival (85.2 % vs. 85.7 %; p=0.83, respectively), disease-specific survival (88.2 % vs. 89.2 %; p=0.71, respectively), or overall survival (80.2% vs. 78.4 %; p=0.97, respectively). The diagnosis of endometrial cancer in patients with asymptomatic endometrial polyps is not associated with improved outcomes as compared with patients with bleeding. In the absence of factors indicating a high risk of endometrial cancer, clinical and sonographic follow-up is the advised management strategy for these patients.

A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1082)

BackgroundThe standard treatment for stage IB–IIB cervical cancer is radiotherapy or radical hysterectomy; after radical hysterectomy, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with high risk factors. However, adjuvant concurrent...

A retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in Japan during the early years following its introduction: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1081S).

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for cervical cancer, in terms of morbidity and short-term oncologic outcome following LRH's introduction into Japan. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO staging IA2, IB1, and IIA1) who underwent LRH from Dec 2014 to Dec 2016. We assessed the morbidity, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and prognostic factors for RFS. A total of 251 patients were included from 22 facilities across Japan. There were 8 cases of stage IA2 cervical cancer, 226 of IB1, and 17 of IIA1. The median operating time was 343min and the median blood loss was 190ml. Two patients (0.8%) had a postoperative complication with a Clavien-Dindo classification of grade 3 or higher. After a median follow-up time of 15.6months, the 2-year RFS was 87.4%, and the 2-year OS was 97.8%. When the 2-year RFS rate was compared with whether the patient pathologically had tumors of less than 2cm, versus 2cm or more, the RFS was 95.8% and 80.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that tumor size and the route of lymph node removal were independent prognostic factors for recurrence. When LRH was first introduced into Japan, we found that the route of lymph node removal was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in addition to large tumors (≥ 2cm). Our results suggest that prognosis may be secured by paying attention to the lymph node removal route.

The presence of an endometrioid component does not alter the clinicopathologic profile or survival of patients with uterine serous cancer: A gynecologic oncology group (GOG/NRG) study of 934 women

ObjectiveWhile most cases of endometrial cancer can readily be classified as pure endometrioid, pure serous, or another type, others show an apparent mixture of serous and endometrioid components, or indeterminate serous versus endometrioid features. Since serous histology carries a worse prognosis than endometrioid, Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol GOG-8032 was established to examine whether the presence of a non-serous component is a favorable feature in an otherwise serous cancer. Methods934 women with serous cancer were prospectively identified among a larger group enrolled in GOG-0210. Six expert gynecologic pathologists classified each case as pure serous (SER, n=663), mixed serous and endometrioid (SER-EM-M, n=138), or indeterminate serous v. endometrioid (SER-EM-I, n=133) by H&E morphology. Follow-up data from GOG-0210 were analyzed. ResultsThe subgroups did not differ on BMI, race, ethnicity, lymphovascular invasion, cervical invasion, ovary involvement, peritoneal involvement, omental involvement, FIGO stage, or planned adjuvant treatment. SER-EM-M patients were younger (p=0.0001) and less likely to have nodal involvement (p=0.0287). SER patients were less likely to have myoinvasion (p=0.0002), and more likely to have adnexal involvement (p=0.0108). On univariate analysis, age, serous subtype, race, and components of FIGO staging predicted both progression-free and overall survival. On multiple regression, however, serous subtype (SER, SER-EM-M, or SER-EM-I) did not significantly predict survival. ConclusionsThere were few clinicopathologic differences between cases classified as SER, SER-EM-M, and SER-EM-I. Cases with a mixture of serous and endometrioid morphology, as well as cases with morphology indeterminate for serous v. endometrioid type, had the same survival as pure serous cases.NCT#: NCT00340808

Hospital volume-outcome relationship in vulvar cancer treatment: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Hospital volume-outcome relationship in vulvar cancer treatment: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Comparisons of survival outcomes between bevacizumab and olaparib in BRCA-mutated, platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3052).

ObjectiveTo compare survival outcomes between bevacizumab (BEV) and olaparib (OLA) maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated, platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC).MethodsFrom 10 institutions, we identified HGSOC patients with germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, who experienced platinum-sensitive recurrence between 2013 and 2019, and received second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were divided into BEV (n=29), OLA (n=83), and non-BEV/non-OLA users (n=36). The OLA and non-BEV/non-OLA users were grouped as the OLA intent group. We conducted 1:2 nearest neighbor-matching between the BEV and OLA intent groups, setting the proportion of OLA users in the OLA intent group from 65% to 100% at 5% intervals, and compared survival outcomes among the matched groups.ResultsOverall, OLA users showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than BEV users (median, 23.8 vs. 17.4 months; p=0.004). Before matching, PFS improved in the OLA intent group but marginal statistical significance (p=0.057). After matching, multivariate analyses adjusting confounders identified intention-to-treat OLA as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS in the OLA 65P (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.505; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.280−0.911; p=0.023) to OLA 100P (aHR=0.348; 95% CI=0.184−0.658; p=0.001) datasets. The aHR of intention-to-treat OLA for recurrence decreased with increasing proportions of OLA users. No differences in overall survival were observed between the BEV and OLA intent groups, and between the BEV and OLA users.ConclusionCompared to BEV, intention-to-treat OLA and actual use of OLA maintenance therapy were significantly associated with decreased disease recurrence risk in patients with BRCA-mutated, PSR HGSOC.

Surgical margin status and recurrence pattern in invasive vulvar Paget’s disease: A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study

ObjectiveTo examine the association between surgical margin status and recurrence pattern in invasive vulvar Paget’s disease. MethodsThis is a preplanned secondary analysis of a previously organized nationwide retrospective study in Japan (JGOG-1075S). Women with stage I-IV invasive vulvar Paget’s disease who received surgical treatment from 2001-2010 were examined (n=139). Multivariable analysis was performed to assess local-recurrence, distant-recurrence, and all-cause mortality based on surgical margin status. ResultsThe median age was 70 years. The majority had stage I disease (61.2%), and the median tumor size was 5.0cm. Nodal metastasis was observed in 15.1%. Simple vulvectomy (46.0%) was the most common surgery type followed by radical vulvectomy (28.1%). More than half received vulvar reconstructive surgery (59.0%). Positive surgical margin was observed in 35.3%, and close margin <1cm was observed in 29.5%. Vulvectomy type was not associated with surgical margin status (P=0.424). The median follow-up was 5.8 years. Positive surgical margin was associated with increased local-recurrence (5-year cumulative rates for positive versus negative margin: 35.8% versus 15.0%, P=0.010) but not distant-recurrence (18.3% versus 16.0%, P=0.567). Positive surgical margin was also associated with increased all-cause mortality (5-year overall survival rates for positive versus negative margin: 72.6% versus 88.2%, P=0.032). In multivariable analysis, positive surgical margin remained an independent factor associated with increased risk of local-recurrence (hazard ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval 1.18-6.63) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.20-6.83). ConclusionPositive surgical margin appears to be common in invasive vulvar Paget’s disease that is associated with increased local-recurrence and all-cause mortality risks. Role of alternative surgical technique or adjuvant therapy merits further investigation to improve local disease control.

Can risk groups accurately predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive endometrial cancer patients? A Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (TRSGO-SLN-004).

The purpose of this study was to find out the risk factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis and determine the incidence of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis according to risk groups in sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive endometrial cancer patients. Patients who underwent at least bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy after SLN mapping were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into low, intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups defined by ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO. Out of 395 eligible patients, 42 patients had SLN metastasis and 16 (38.1%) of them also had non-SLN metastasis. Size of SLN metastasis was the only factor associated with non-SLN metastasis (p = .012) as 13/22 patients with macrometastasis, 2/10 with micrometastasis and 1/10 with isolated tumor cells (ITCs) had non-SLN metastasis. Althoughall 4 metastases (1.8%) among the low-risk group were limited to SLNs, the non-SLN involvement rate in the high-risk group was 42.9% and all of these were seen in patients with macrometastatic SLNs. Non-SLN metastasis was more frequent in higher-risk groups and the risk of non-SLN metastasis increased with the size of SLN metastasis. Proceeding to complete lymphadenectomy when SLN is metastatic should further be studied as the effect of leaving metastatic non-SLNs in-situ is not known.

Increased ultrasonographic endometrial thickness is associated with poor survival in patients with endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study

BackgroundWe aimed to assess the association of pre-operatively evaluated ultrasonographic endometrial thickness with outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. MethodsAn Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014 in one of eleven academic centers. Patients were categorized by endometrial thickness into two groups: ≤20 mm and >20 mm. Clinical and pathological features were compared using Student T-test for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Survival measures were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable comparison of associations. Results1113 patients in whom endometrial thickness data was recorded were the subject of this study and included 2 groups: ≤20 mm (n = 930), >20 mm (n = 183). The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12–120 months). Patients with endometrial thickness >20 mm had significantly lower recurrence-free survival (log rank, p < .0001), disease-specific survival (log rank, p = .01), and overall survival (log rank, p < .0001). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, endometrial thickness >20 mm remained independently associated with an increased hazard of recurrence and death (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.07–2.96, p = .03 for recurrence; and HR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.07–2.65; p = .03 for overall survival). ConclusionIn patients with endometrial cancer, endometrial thickness>20 mm as measured preoperatively by ultrasound, is independently associated with decreased recurrence-free and overall survival. This finding suggests that thick endometrium may be considered as one of the risk factors for poor prognosis.

Combination of sentinel lymph node mapping and uterine frozen section examination to reduce side-specific lymphadenectomy rate in endometrial cancer: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group study (TRSGO-SLN-002)

ObjectiveThis study aimed to find out whether side-specific pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted without compromising diagnostic efficacy according to “reflex frozen section” analysis of the uterus in case of sentinel...

A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for postoperative cervical cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1082).

TPS6094 Background: Cervical cancer is one of the common gynecologic cancer and the incidence of invasive cervical cancer has increased over the past few decades, particularly in younger women. The standard treatment for stage IB to IIB cervical cancer is a radical hysterectomy. In Japan, more than 80% of institutions, radical hysterectomy is chosen as the primary treatment for patients with stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer. Patients with high-risk factors would be recommend adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, adjuvant CCRT might not reduce distant metastasis and might cause of severe gastrointestinal and urinal toxicity. To avoid those adverse events of adjuvant CCRT, many Japanese gynecologic oncologists perform chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy. In the first multi-institutional phase II trial conducted in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis (JGOG1067), we found a 5-years disease free-survival rate of 86.5%, suggesting the adjuvant chemotherapy had promising efficacy and would be feasible for a long time. No prospective study reported that adjuvant chemotherapy would improve overall survival in patients with the high-risk cervical cancer. Methods: High risk stage IB-IIB cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy are eligible for the study. Patients with high risk are defined as those with pelvic lymph-node metastasis and/or parametrial invasion. Patents with SCC, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma are eligible for the study. After providing informed consent, patients are randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive CCRT or chemotherapy. Randomization is stratified by the faculty, FIGO stage, and pathological subtype (SCC or non-SCC). Treatment have to be started within 6 weeks after surgery. CCRT group is given whole pelvis irradiation 50.4Gy and cisplatin (40mg/m2/week). Chemotherapy group is given paclitaxel (175mg/m2) plus cisplatin (50mg/m2) or paclitaxel (175mg/m2) plus carboplatin(AUC of 6). The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease free survival (DFS), adverse events and QOL. This study began in November 2019 and a total of 290 patients will be accrued within 5 years. The study is coordinated by of the JGOG cervical cancer committee. Clinical trial information: 041190042.

Is the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of endometrial cancer associated with the yield of metastatic nodes? An Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group study

ObjectivesPrimary, to explore correlation between the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer and the number of nodes with metastasis. Secondary, evaluate survival measures in relation to the number of excised nodes. MethodsA retrospective multi-center study of prospectively collected information of 2014 women with endometrial cancer, 1032 of whom underwent lymph node staging. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the number of pelvic nodes excised and the number of metastatic nodes. Women's data were dichotomized by the median number of excised pelvic nodes. Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests were used to examine the effect of the number of pelvic nodes excised on survival. ResultsThere was no significant correlation between the number of pelvic nodes harvested and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (r = 0.301; p = 0.28). The median number of excised pelvic nodes was 9 (range 1–77). There was no difference between women with up to 9 and women with more than 9 lymph nodes excised in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (82.4% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.90), disease-specific survival (83.6% vs. 86.7%; p = 0.37), or overall survival (75.8% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.11). ConclusionsThe extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer is not associated with a higher yield of metastatic nodes or with longer survival. Current focus should be on sentinel node procedures that offer women the benefit of accurate staging without the complications associated with extensive lymphadenectomy.

Optimal Cytoreduction is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Carcinosarcoma: A Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Optimal Cytoreduction is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Carcinosarcoma: A Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between endometrial curettage and aspiration biopsy in patients treated with progestin for endometrial hyperplasia: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of dilatation and curettage (D&C) versus endometrial aspiration biopsy in follow-up evaluation of patients treated with progestin for endometrial hyperplasia (EH)MethodsA prospective multicenter study was conducted from 2015 to 2018. Patients with EH were treated with progestin, one of the following three treatment regimens: oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg/day for 14 days per cycle, continuous MPA 10 mg/day or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). At 3 or 6 months of treatment, endometrial tissues were obtained via 2 methods in each patient: aspiration biopsy, followed by D&C. The primary outcome was the consistency of the histologic results between the 2 methods. The secondary outcome was the regression rate at 6 months of treatment.ResultsThe study population comprised 65 patients (55 with non-atypical hyperplasia, 10 with atypical hyperplasia). During the follow-up, a comparison of the pathologic results from aspiration biopsy and D&C was carried out for the 65 cases. Thirty-eight cases were diagnosed as EH by D&C. Among these, only 24 were diagnosed with EH from aspiration biopsy, for a diagnostic concordance of 63.2% (ĸ=0.59). Forty-four patients were followed up at 6 months, and the regression rate was 31.8% (14/44). Responses were obtained for 41.7% (5/12) of the cyclic MPA group, 58.3% (7/12) of the continuous MPA group and 10% (2/20) of the LNG-IUS group.ConclusionAs a follow-up evaluation of patients treated with progestin for EH, aspiration biopsy is less accurate than D&C and might not be a reliable method.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02412072

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-001)

ObjectiveThe aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in clinically uterine confined endometrial cancer.MethodsPatients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer...

Significance of Malignant Peritoneal Cytology on the Survival of Women with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

This study examined the association between peritoneal cytology and survival in early-stage cervical cancer. This is a nationwide multicenter retrospective study, examining consecutive women with clinical stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with available peritoneal cytology results from 2004–2008. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to assess the impact of malignant peritoneal cytology on survival. Among 1409 analyzed cases, 88 (6.2%) had malignant peritoneal cytology. On weighted models, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36–2.32) and overall survival (OS, HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.44–2.59). On sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased OS in adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma, high-risk early-stage disease and those who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. However, among women who received postoperative systemic chemotherapy, malignant peritoneal cytology was not associated with OS (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.72–2.04). A systematic review, including our results, showed that malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased OS (HR 4.03, 95% CI 1.81–8.99) and increased recurrence in squamous carcinoma (odds ratio 1.89, 95% CI 1.05–3.39) and adenocarcinoma (odds ratio 4.30, 95% CI 2.30–8.02). In conclusion, the presence of malignant cells in peritoneal cytology is associated with decreased survival in early-stage cervical cancer. The possible benefit of systemic chemotherapy in this subgroup merits further investigation.

GOG 244 - The LymphEdema and Gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: The association between the gynecologic cancer lymphedema questionnaire (GCLQ) and lymphedema of the lower extremity (LLE)

ObjectiveTo explore whether patient-reported lymphedema-related symptoms, as measured by the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ), are associated with a patient-reported diagnosis of lymphedema of the lower extremity (LLE) and limb volume change (LVC) in patients who have undergone radical surgery, including lymphadenectomy, for endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study 244. MethodsPatients completed the baseline and at least one post-surgery GCLQ and LVC assessment. The 20-item GCLQ measures seven symptom clusters—aching, heaviness, infection-related, numbness, physical functioning, general swelling, and limb swelling. LLE was defined as a patient self-reported LLE diagnosis on the GCLQ. LVC was measured by volume calculations based on circumferential measurements. A linear mixed model was fitted for change in symptom cluster scores and GCLQ total score and adjusted for disease sites and assessment time. ResultsOf 987 eligible patients, 894 were evaluable (endometrial, 719; cervical, 136; vulvar, 39). Of these, 14% reported an LLE diagnosis (endometrial, 11%; cervical, 18%; vulvar, 38%). Significantly more patients diagnosed versus not diagnosed with LLE reported ≥4-point increase from baseline on the GCLQ total score (p < 0.001). Changes from baseline were significantly larger on all GCLQ symptom cluster scores in patients with LLE compared to those without LLE. An LVC increment of >10% was significantly associated with reported general swelling (p < 0.001), heaviness (p = 0.005), infection-related symptoms (p = 0.002), and physical function (p = 0.006). ConclusionsPatient-reported symptoms, as measured by the GCLQ, discerned those with and without a patient-reported LLE diagnosis and demonstrated predictive value. The GCLQ combined with LVC may enhance our ability to identify LLE.

The oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study

ObjectiveTo compare survival measures of women with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent either hysteroscopy or a non-hysteroscopic procedure as a diagnostic procedure. Study designAn Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multicenter study of 1324 patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups: hysteroscopy and non-hysteroscopy (curettage or office endometrial biopsy). Clinical, pathological, and survival measures were compared between the groups. ResultsThere were 355 patients in the hysteroscopy group and 969 patients in the non-hysteroscopy group. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12–120 months). There were no differences between the groups in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (90.2% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.53), disease-specific survival (93.4% vs. 91.7%; p = 0.5), and overall survival (86.2% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.22). ConclusionOur findings affirm that hysteroscopy does not compromise the survival of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

An Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group study of statin use and endometrial cancer prognosis.

To assess whether statin use by endometrial cancer patients was associated with a survival advantage. A retrospective chart review study, by the Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group, of consecutive endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgery in one of 11 medical centers between 2002 and 2014. Clinical and pathological reports, and measures of survival were compared between statin users and nonusers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of using statins on survival measures. Over a mean follow-up period of 6.2years (range, 1-12years) for 2017 endometrial cancer patients with complete data, 663 (32.8%) used statins prior to diagnosis and 1354 (67.1%) did not. No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed for most demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference between statin users and nonusers in 5-year recurrence-free survival (82% vs 83%; P=0.508), disease-specific survival (86% vs 84%; P=0.549), or overall survival (77% vs 75%; P=0.901). In this large cohort of patients with endometrial cancer, no significant associations were found between use of statins and endometrial cancer survival.

1061TiP - An umbrella study of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3045), AMBITION

BackgroundA pilot study of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer has been started in Korea. Archival tumor samples were tested for HRD and PD-L1 status. Treatment arms will be allocated according to the test results. For HRD+ patients, we tested the synergistic effects of olaparib and other agents; treatment arms will randomly be allocated. (Arm 1: olaparib and cediranib; Arm 2: olaparib and durvalumab). For HRD- patients, we tested the role of biomarker-driven immunotherapy according to PD-L1 expression (Arm 3: durvalumab and chemotherapy in patients with high PD-L1 expression; Arm 4: durvalumab, tremelimumab, and chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1 expression). Sixty-eight patients will be included from three Korean institutions within 1 year. The primary endpoint is the response rate according to RECIST 1.1 (6 months after treatment initiation). This trial has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov, and the registration number is NCT03699449. Trial designWe designed the present study as biomarker-driven targeted therapy in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Each arm has the following specific hypothesis. Arm 1: olaparib and cediranib have synergistic activity in patients with HRD+. Arm 2: olaparib and durvalumab have synergistic activity in patients with HRD+. Arm 3: durvalumab and chemotherapy (SOC; standard of care) is effective in patients with high PD-L1 expression. Arm 4: durvalumab, tremelimumab, and chemotherapy (SOC; standard of care) have synergistic activity even in patients with low PD-L1 expression. Clinical trial identificationNCT03699449. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingSeverance Hospital Research Fund for Clinical Excellence and Handok Jeseok Foundation. DisclosureJ. Lee: Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.