Society Of Gynecologic Oncology Research Articles

Advancements in Endometrial Cancer Research in 2023

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynaecological cancers in developed countries, and the incidence is rising significantly. The staging of this disease is evolving from anatomic staging and risk stratification to a more molecular-based stratification. Treatment of endometrial cancer is also evolving. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is the standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer; however, there is new evidence that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has synergistic effects in the treatment of this disease. This article discusses the latest advancements in endometrial cancer research in 2023, including highlights from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancers 2023 in March, the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in June, the 24th European Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Congress in September and October, and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2023 in October. The article highlights the unprecedented progression-free survival (PFS) data from two Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: RUBY with dostarlimab, and NRG-GY018 with pembrolizumab, which created a buzz at SGO 2023 in the spring, and stimulated discussion throughout the remainder of the year. The overall survival (OS) results, the clinically meaningful benefits regardless of mismatch repair status, and health-related quality of life (QOL) in these studies are also discussed. Further topics covered in this year-in-review article include the implications of the results from RUBY and NRG-GY018 on first-line treatment and recurrent settings, and the effect of adding a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor to immunotherapy–chemotherapy combinations in the Phase III trial, DUO-E. Disparities in endometrial cancer care, research on fertility-sparing, and the importance of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) in endometrial cancer management are also explored. Following the announcement of practice-changing findings from RUBY and NRG-GY018 in March, data presented and published throughout the remainder of 2023 show that research in endometrial cancer continues at a pace.

Germline and somatic testing for ovarian Cancer: An SGO clinical practice statement

Germline and somatic genetic testing have become critical components of care for people with ovarian cancer. The identification of germline and somatic pathogenic variants as well as homologous recombination deficiency can contribute to the prediction of treatment response, prognostic outcome, and suitability for targeted agents (e.g. poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors). Furthermore, identifying germline pathogenic variants can prompt cascade genetic testing for at-risk relatives. Despite the clinical benefits and consensus recommendations from several organizations calling for universal genetic testing in ovarian cancer, only about one third of patients complete germline or somatic genetic testing. The members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee have composed this statement to provide an overview of germline and somatic genetic testing for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, focusing on available testing modalities and options for care delivery.

Clinical guidelines for ovarian cancer: the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines.

Since the latest practice guidelines for ovarian cancer were developed by the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) in 2021, many studies have examined the efficacy and safety of various treatments for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Therefore, the need to develop recommendations for EOC treatments has been raised. This study searched the literature using 4 key items and the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome: the efficacy and safety of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors in newly diagnosed advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy in optimally debulked advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer; and the efficacy and safety of the addition of bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy in first platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC patients who received prior bevacizumab. The evidence for these recommendations, according to each key question, was evaluated using a systematic review and meta-analysis. The committee of ovarian cancer of the KSGO developed updated guidelines for treatments of EOC.

Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement.

The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) had been making an effort to standardize and enhance the quality of domestic uterine corpus cancer treatment by developing updated clinical practice guidelines in 2021. The KSGO revised the guidelines based on a literature search using 4 key elements: Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework. These elements include the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy, as well as the effect of combined treatment with trastuzumab in patients with HER2/neu-positive endometrial cancer. Additionally, the guideline assessed the efficacy and safety of omitting lymph node dissection in low-risk endometrial cancer patients, investigated the effect of sentinel lymph node mapping in early-stage endometrial cancer surgery, addressed the outcome of chemoradiation therapy as a postoperative treatment in patients with advanced (stage III-IVA) endometrial cancer, and explored the impact of initial treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients.

The 8th Biennial Meeting of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, December 1st to 3rd, 2023.

The 8th Biennial Meeting of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, December 1st to 3rd, 2023.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment.

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms. The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer.

227 Satisfaction of placenta accreta training during maternal-fetal medicine versus gynecologic oncology fellowship.

227 Satisfaction of placenta accreta training during maternal-fetal medicine versus gynecologic oncology fellowship.

Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice

We aimed to examine the preparedness of recent gynecologic oncology fellowship graduates for independent practice.We conducted a web-based survey study using REDCap targeting Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members who graduated gynecologic oncology fellowship within the last six years. The survey included 52 items assessing fellowship training experiences, level of comfort in performing core gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and administering cancer-directed therapies. Questions also addressed factors driving participants’ selection of fellowship programs, educational experience, research and preparedness for independent practice. A total of 296 participants were invited to complete the survey. Response rate was 42% with n = 124 completed surveys included for analysis. The highest ranked factor for fellowship selection was fit with program 36% (n = 45). Upon completing fellowship, most were uncomfortable performing ureteral conduit formation 84% (n = 103), ureteroneocystostomy 77% (n = 94), exenteration 68% (n = 83), splenectomy 67% (n = 83) and lower anterior resection 41% (n = 51). Most were comfortable managing intraoperative complications 85% (n = 104) and standard cancer staging procedures (range: 61%–99%). Majority were comfortable providing cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy 99% (n = 123), immunotherapy 84% (n = 104), and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors 97% (n = 120). Upon completing fellowship, 77% (n = 95) report having mentorship that met their expectations during fellowship and 94% (n = 116) felt they were ready for independent practice. Majority of fellowship graduates were prepared for independent practice and felt comfortable performing routine surgical procedures and cancer directed treatment. However, most are not comfortable with ultra-radical gynecologic oncology procedures. Maximizing surgical opportunities during fellowship training and acquiring early career mentorship may help.

Vulvar cancer management and wrangling recurrent disease: A report from the society of gynecologic oncology journal club

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Journal Club webinar series is an open forum that invites national experts to discuss the literature pertaining to important topics in the management of gynecologic cancers. On August 14th, 2023, SGO hosted a journal club focused on the management of upfront and recurrent vulvar cancer. Our discussants included Dr. Brian M Slomovitz from Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Dr. Emi Yoshida from the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dr. Lilian Gien from the University of Toronto Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center. During the discussion,we reviewed the progression of vulvar cancer surgery from en bloc resection of the vulva and groins, to partial radical vulvectomy and sentinel lymph nodes. We also reviewed the management of node positive vulvar cancer including published and accruing Groningen International Study on Sentinel Nodes in Vulvar Cancer (GROINSS) trials and other sentinel trials from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Here we will also review the literature on the management of recurrent vulvar cancer, highlighting current treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. The following is a report of the journal club presentation.

Relationship between Knowledge Level and Attitude with Ovarian Cancer Early Detection Behavior at Ibnu Sina Hospital Makassar

Ovarian cancer is a malignant tumor originating from the ovary with various histological types that can affect all ages, in the early stages of the disease does not show specific clinical symptoms. The Indonesian Society of Gynecologic Oncology recorded 354 cases of ovarian cancer and is the second most common gynecologic cancer. The high mortality rate is due to asymptomatic tumor growth, delayed onset of symptoms, and lack of proper screening so that ovarian cancer is only diagnosed at an advanced stage. Ovarian cancer cases that are recognized and found at an early stage and receive rapid and appropriate treatment and treatment will provide a better life expectancy. Currently, radiologic examinations for ovarian cancer detection include: Ultrasound, CT scan, PET scan, and MRI. This study aims to determine the relationship between the level of knowledge and attitudes with the behavior of early detection of ovarian cancer at Ibnu Sina Hospital Makassar. Research using quantitative descriptive design with cross-sectional design. Of the 60 respondents obtained results based on the category of knowledge level in patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who have good knowledge as many as 19 respondents (100%), enough as many as 10 (41.7%), less (5.9%) good category attitudes as many as 18 (40.9%), enough 12 (80.0%), less 0 respondents (0.0%). And for the level of knowledge in patients who are not diagnosed with ovarian cancer who have good knowledge 0 respondents (0.0%), enough 14 (58.3%), less knowledge as many as 16 (94.1%), good category attitudes 26 (59.1%), sufficient category attitudes 3 (20.0%), less category attitudes 1 (100.0%). There is a relationship between the level of knowledge and attitude towards ovarian cancer early detection behavior.

Recent Developments in Endometrial Cancer Research Presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting 2023: Interviews with Two Key Opinion Leaders

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries, and often presents at an early stage. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is the standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer; however, there is new evidence that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has synergistic effects in the treatment of this disease. For this article, EMJ conducted an interview in August 2023 with two key opinion leaders: Jubilee Brown and Wendel Naumann from Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, both of whom have a wealth of experience and expertise in the management of endometrial cancer. The experts gave valuable insights into recent developments in endometrial cancer research as presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancers 2023, held on 25th–28th March 2023 in Tampa, Florida, USA, and online. Topics discussed included the unprecedented progression-free survival (PFS) data from two Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, RUBY with dostarlimab, and NRG GY018 with pembrolizumab, which created a buzz at SGO 2023. Clinically meaningful benefit of dostarlimab or pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus standard-of-care chemotherapy was seen regardless of mismatch repair status in RUBY and NRG-GY018, respectively. Brown and Naumann considered the implications of these results on first-line treatment and recurrent settings, and outlined the management of immune-related adverse events related to immunotherapy-based treatment regimens. The experts also explored key earlier stage studies presented at SGO, and the potential for personalised medicine in endometrial cancer. Finally, Brown and Naumann described what the future of the management of patients with endometrial cancer might look like, which clinical trials are needed, and which advancements in research they would like to see.

Nonsurgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer due to obesity: a survey of the practice patterns of current Society of Gynecologic Oncology members

ObjectiveNonsurgical management for endometrial cancer in patients with class 3 obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) is a challenging scenario given lack of consensus on patient selection and treatment options. Our objective was to evaluate trends in practice patterns and physician opinions in the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) on nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer and complex atypical hyperplasia due to obesity. MethodsAn online survey was sent to all gynecologic oncologist members of the SGO with questions centered on decision-making for nonsurgical approaches for patients with class 3 obesity patients. Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess the associations between offering nonsurgical management and geographic region, practice type, and time in practice. Results255 (19.8 %) members from 6 geographic regions responded, of which 183 (71.8 %) offered primary nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer to patients with class 3 obesity and 72 (28.2 %) do not. The choice to offer initial nonsurgical management did not vary based on geographic region, time in practice or practice type. When asked to select BMI cutoff, the majority (65.2 %) started to offer nonsurgical management was BMI 60–64 kg/m2. Progesterone intrauterine device was the preferred treatment (68.3 %, 125/183). Of those who offered nonsurgical management, 97.3 % (178/183) recommended resampling in 3–6 months. ConclusionPrimary nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer in patients with class 3 obesity is offered by most gynecologic oncologists in SGO. However, almost one-third of gynecologic oncologists indicated they do not offer nonsurgical management for endometrial cancer for obesity alone. Additional data are needed to determine the safety of both approaches in these complex patients.

Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference

ABSTRACT Ovarian cancer has the 17th highest incidence among all cancers in the United States; however, it is the deadliest gynecologic cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to create educational materials for clinicians on the early diagnosis and prevention of gynecologic cancers. This article is an evidence summary based on ACOG's extensive literature review on the early diagnosis and prevention of ovarian cancer. An expert panel was recruited from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review and summarize evidence from articles published between January 2000 and October 2021. Topics used to frame the literature review included the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, risk factors, prevention and risk reduction, screening strategies and early detection, health disparities, diagnosis and care coordination by primary care providers, and special considerations. The Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference occurred in February 2022 where the expert panel and stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations discussed their findings and drafted summaries to develop educational materials. Review of the epidemiology revealed that in 2022 there were 19,880 new cases of ovarian cancer, 12,810 women died of ovarian cancer, 5-year survival is 49.7% and correlates strongly with stage at diagnosis, and fewer than 10% of women with stage 1 disease will have recurrence. Risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, inactivity, nulliparity, early menarche, late menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy, genetic mutations such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, and endometriosis. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces incidence of ovarian cancer by 80% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.39) and is recommended by ACOG for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Contraception, physical activity, and lactation may help reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. The most common methods studied for screening include transvaginal ultrasonography, bimanual palpation, and measuring tumor marker CA-125. The Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm uses CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound to estimate the risk of ovarian cancer based on age and change in CA-125; however, it is still being studied, and no established screening method exists for asymptomatic women. Several organizations including ACOG support identifying women at high risk and subsequent genetic counseling. Symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific and include abdominal distention and pain, and while workup should include ultrasonography and CA-125 measurement, no high-quality studies have compared imaging, biomarkers, risk algorithms, or multimodal risk assessment tools for the primary evaluation of patients with high-risk symptoms. Regarding disparities, Black women consistently had worse outcomes compared with their White counterparts, and little evidence regarding other racial and ethnic groups or gender minorities was identified. Finally, care coordination is critical, and ACOG recommends a low bar for referral to a gynecologic oncologist for patients with suspicion of ovarian cancer, which has been shown to increase survival and offer other advantages. This evidence review identifies many research gaps and opportunities for ovarian cancer and provides a high-level educational summary of current best practices in the risk stratification, diagnosis, and prevention of ovarian cancer.

Operative efficiency and cost differences between hysterectomy with surgical involvement by Ob/Gyn chief residents and gynecologic oncology fellows (2321)

Operative efficiency and cost differences between hysterectomy with surgical involvement by Ob/Gyn chief residents and gynecologic oncology fellows (2321)

Innovation in gynecologic oncology fellowship training: Rethinking the research year (1207)

Innovation in gynecologic oncology fellowship training: Rethinking the research year (1207)

Resident perceptions prior to the introduction of a gynecologic oncology fellowship (2313)

Resident perceptions prior to the introduction of a gynecologic oncology fellowship (2313)

Gynecologic oncology fellowship letter of recommendations differ by gender and race (055)

Gynecologic oncology fellowship letter of recommendations differ by gender and race (055)

Gynecologic oncology fellowship recruitment in the virtual era: an evaluation of program websites and survey of applicant preferences (2312)

Gynecologic oncology fellowship recruitment in the virtual era: an evaluation of program websites and survey of applicant preferences (2312)

Letters of recommendation for gynecologic oncology fellowship differ by gender and race

IntroductionLetters of recommendation (LOR) play a significant role in applicant selection for gynecologic oncology (GO) fellowship. LORs can be agentic, associated with competence, independence and strength, or communal, associated with being accommodating, cooperative and empathetic. Agentic LORs have been shown to reflect favorably on applicants, making them more likely to be selected for interview. The primary goal of this study was to determine linguistic differences in LORs for applicants applying to GO fellowship based on applicant gender and race. MethodsAll applications to a single academic institution from the years 2018–2020 were analyzed. LORs were extracted from all applicants who self-reported their gender and race/ethnicity. Analysis was performed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) in terms of agentic and communal language. All analysis was done using SAS version 9.4. ResultsFrom 2018 to 2020, there were 239 GO fellowship applications to a single academic institution. There were 186 (78.1%) applicants who identified as female and 52 (21.8%) who identified as male. Female applicants were more likely to have more research (p = 0.047) and volunteer activities (p = 0.02) than male applicants. There were no differences between female and male applicants in terms of age, geographic location of residency, USMLE scores, AOA status, number of publications or attending a Doximitiy-rated top 20 residency program. There were 139 (60.7%) applicants who identified as White, 46 (20.1%) as Asian, 16 (7.0%) as Black, 19 (8.3%) as Latinx and 9 (3.9%) as other. On multivariable analysis, LORs written for male applicants had higher agentic scores compared to females (p < 0.05), and LORs of female applicants received higher communal scores (p < 0.05). LORs for applicants who identified as Black or Latinx were found to have lower agentic scores compared to individuals who identified as White(p < 0.05 for both). ConclusionThere were demonstrated linguistic differences in LOR for GO fellowship based on applicant gender and race/ethnicity. LORs written for white, male applicants were more likely to have higher agentic scores compared to minority, female applicants. LORs written for female applicants were more likely to have higher communal scores. As LORs have been shown to be instrumental in GO fellowship interview selection and linguistic differences exist based on applicant gender and race/ethnicity, this study highlights the need for a more objective GO fellowship application process. DisclosuresPortion of this paper was presented at the Society for Gynecologic Oncology as part of a focus plenary.

Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer care: a survey report on global patterns of care, current practices, and barriers

ObjectiveAlthough global disparities in survival rates for patients with ovarian cancer have been described, variation in care has not been assessed globally. This study aimed to evaluate global ovarian cancer...