Guselkumab Group Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who had inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance to one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: study protocol for SOLSTICE, a phase 3B, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BackgroundTumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are frequently chosen as the first biologic for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Given that many patients with PsA are TNFi inadequate responders (TNF-IR; either inadequate efficacy or intolerance), treatments utilizing alternative mechanisms of action are needed. In phase 3 studies, the fully human interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit-inhibitor, guselkumab, was efficacious in patients with active PsA, including TNFi-IR. Efficacy was generally consistent between TNFi-naïve and TNFi-experienced cohorts; however, in the latter, higher response rates have been observed with the Q4W dosing regimen relative to the Q8W dosing regimen for some endpoints, suggesting the need to evaluate whether more frequent dosing may provide an incremental clinical benefit for TNFi-IR patients.MethodsThe phase 3b SOLSTICE study will assess guselkumab efficacy and safety in TNFi-IR PsA patients. Eligibility criteria include a PsA diagnosis for ≥ 6 months; active disease (≥ 3 swollen, ≥ 3 tender joints, C-reactive protein ≥ 0.3 mg/dL); and inadequate efficacy with, and/or intolerance to, one prior TNFi. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab Q4W or Q8W or placebo→guselkumab Q4W (at Week 24). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 24. Major secondary endpoints include ACR50, ACR70; an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of psoriasis score of 0/1 plus ≥ 2-grade reduction and ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (both among patients with ≥ 3% body surface area affected by psoriasis and baseline IGA ≥ 2); minimal/very low disease activity; and changes from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores. The target sample size (N = 450) is estimated to provide > 90% power in detecting differences between each guselkumab group and the placebo group for the primary endpoint assuming a 2-sided α = 0.05. Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel testing and analyses of covariance will be used to compare efficacy for binary and continuous endpoints, respectively.DiscussionFindings from the phase 3b SOLSTICE study, the design of which was informed by results from previously conducted phase 3 studies, is expected to provide important efficacy and safety information on guselkumab therapy in TNFi-IR patients with PsA.Trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04936308, on 23 June 2021.

Response Types and Factors Associated with Response Types to Biologic Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis from Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

This study aimed to understand treatment response dynamics, including factors associated with favorable response, among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who received guselkumab, adalimumab, or secukinumab. These post hoc analyses used data from the phaseIII clinical trials ECLIPSE and VOYAGE1, which were conducted between September 2021 and November 2022. On the basis of absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) scores, patients were divided into short-term response types (SRT1-6, based on week20-48 response) and long-term response types (LRT1-4, based on week52-252 response). Response types(RTs) were based on aPASI cutoffs deemed clinically relevant by the investigators; SRT1/LRT1 were the most favorable response types. Baseline characteristics were compared across RTs, and logistic regression analyses established factors associated with SRT1/LRT1. Overall, 1045, 662, and 272 patients were included in the ECLIPSE short-term, VOYAGE1 short-term, and VOYAGE1 long-term analyses, respectively. Mean age, body mass index (BMI), baseline aPASI score, and body surface area were lower in SRT1 than SRT6. In VOYAGE1, adalimumab treatment, high BMI, and current/former smoking status resulted in less favorable responses. In the VOYAGE1 long-term analysis, patients in LRT4had the highest baseline aPASI score, were older, and were more often obese compared with other LRT groups. Regression analyses showed that SRT1 (both treatments) in VOYAGE1 and ECLIPSE, and LRT1 (guselkumab group) in the VOYAGE1 long-term analysis, were associated with week16 aPASI response. In VOYAGE1, SRT1 was associated with psoriasis duration and smoking status. Early treatment response and baseline characteristics, including smoking, psoriasis duration, and obesity, may be associated with longer-term response to biologics. ECLIPSE: NCT03090100, VOYAGE1: NCT02207231.

Efficacy and safety of 48 weeks of guselkumab for patients with Crohn's disease: maintenance results from the phase 2, randomised, double-blind GALAXI-1 trial

Many patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease do not respond to available therapies or lose response over time. The GALAXI-1 study previously found that three intravenous guselkumab dosages showed superior clinical and endoscopic outcomes over placebo at week 12 in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. We report the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous guselkumab maintenance regimens to week 48 in the GALAXI-1 study. We did a phase 2, randomised, multicentre, double-blind trial. Adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease were randomly allocated with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive one of five treatment groups, with regimens consisting of an intravenous induction phase transitioning to a subcutaneous maintenance phase starting at week 12 in a treat-through design: (1) guselkumab 200→100 mg group (200 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 100 mg subcutaneous every 8 weeks; (2) guselkumab 600→200 mg group (600 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 200 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks); (3) guselkumab 1200→200 mg group (1200 mg intravenous at weeks 0, 4, and 8, then 200 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks); (4) ustekinumab group (approximately 6 mg/kg intravenous at week 0, then 90 mg subcutaneous every 8 weeks); or (5) placebo group (placebo induction followed by either placebo maintenance [for those with CDAI clinical response at week 12] or crossover to ustekinumab [for those without CDAI clinical response at week 12]). Endpoints assessed at week 48 included CDAI remission (CDAI score <150), endoscopic response (≥50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD or SES-CD score ≤2), and endoscopic remission (SES-CD score ≤2) in the primary efficacy analysis population of all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug, excluding those discontinued during a temporary study pause. Safety analyses included all randomised patients who received at least one study drug dose. This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03466411) and is active but not recruiting. Among 700 patients screened, 309 (112 biologic-naive; 197 biologic-experienced) were included in the primary efficacy analysis population: 61 in the guselkumab 200→100 mg group, 63 in the guselkumab 600→200 mg group, 61 in the guselkumab 1200→200 mg group, 63 in the ustekinumab group, and 61 in the placebo group. 126 (41%) women and 183 (59%) men were included, with median age 36·0 years (IQR 28·0-49·0). At week 48, the numbers of patients with CDAI clinical remission were 39 (64%) in the guselkumab 200→100 mg group, 46 (73%) in the guselkumab 600→200 mg group, 35 (57%) in the guselkumab 1200→200 mg group, and 37 (59%) in the ustekinumab group. The corresponding numbers of patients with endoscopic response were 27 (44%), 29 (46%), 27 (44%), and 19 (30%), respectively, and endoscopic remission was seen in 11 (18%), 11 (17%), 20 (33%), and four (6%) patients, respectively. In the placebo group, 15 patients were in CDAI clinical response at week 12 and continued placebo; of these, nine (60%) were in clinical remission at week 48. 44 patients in the placebo group were not in CDAI clinical response at week 12 and crossed over to ustekinumab; of these, 26 (59%) were in clinical remission at week 48. Up to week 48, adverse events frequencies in the safety population (n=360) were 46 (66%) of 70 patients (464·9 events per 100 patient-years of follow-up) in the placebo group, 163 (74%) of 220 patients (353·1 per 100 patient-years) in the three guselkumab groups combined, and 60 (85%) of 71 patients (350·7 per 100 patient-years) in the ustekinumab group. Among patients treated with guselkumab or ustekinumab, the most frequently reported infections up to week 48 were nasopharyngitis (25 [11%] of 220 guselkumab recipients, 12 [11%] of 114 ustekinumab recipients) and upper respiratory infections (13 [6%] guselkumab recipients, eight [7%] ustekinumab recipients). After week 12, one patient who responded to placebo induction and two guselkumab-treated patients had serious infections. No active tuberculosis, opportunistic infections, or deaths occurred. Patients receiving guselkumab intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance treatment achieved high rates of clinical and endoscopic efficacy up to week 48. No new safety concerns were identified. Janssen Research & Development.

Time to Onset of a Minimal Clinically Important Difference in DLQI with Guselkumab Treatment in VOYAGE 1

Introduction Psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin. While skin clearance, as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), is a clinical goal, PsO patients also suffer from reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In the Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 trial, guselkumab (GUS) demonstrated improvements on patient reported outcomes compared with placebo (PBO) and adalimumab (ADA). Here we report an analysis of the estimated time to onset of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in HRQoL, as measured by the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and associated PASI response in GUS-treated patients from VOYAGE 1.&#x0D; Methods The VOYAGE 1 trial enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe PsO who were randomized to receive PBO, GUS, or ADA. The DLQI is a self-report measure for HRQoL ranging from 0 (no impact) to 30 (maximum impact) that assesses the effect of skin problems on 6 HRQoL domains. An accepted MCID in DLQI is 4, previously reported as the smallest difference in DLQI total score that patients’ rate as beneficial. DLQI score and PASI improvement (percent change from baseline) were analyzed at Weeks 0, 8, 16, and 24 for the subset of VOYAGE 1 patients with a baseline DLQI score &gt;4. Earliest time to onset of MCID in mean DLQI and corresponding mean PASI improvement were estimated using linear interpolation for the GUS group between Weeks 0 and 8.&#x0D; Results Among patients randomized to GUS, n=279 (85%) had DLQI &gt;4 at baseline. By first assessment at Week 8 (W8), we observed a reduction in the mean DLQI score from 15.6 (baseline) to 5.0 (W8) with median DLQI decreasing from 15.0 (baseline) to 3.0 (W8). The interpolated onset of MCID in DLQI occurred at 21.1 days (W3) following the initial GUS dose. In GUS-treated patients, the estimated mean PASI improvement corresponding to the onset of MCID in mean DLQI occurring at Week 3 was 29.2%.&#x0D; Conclusions These data indicate that the onset of clinically meaningful improvements in mean DLQI occur as early as after the first dose of GUS in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO.

Five-year Maintenance of Clinical Response and Consistent Safety Profile for Guselkumab in Asian patients with Psoriasis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2.

Guselkumab is a human monoclonal antibody against IL-23 used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the Asian subpopulation of VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 through 5years. The proportions of guselkumab-treated Asian patients (VOYAGE 1 and 2) achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 and PASI 100, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1 and 0, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of 0/1 (week 100 through week 252) were assessed. Non-responders were patients who met the treatment failure rules. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using the as-observed methodology (no missing data imputation) for both studies and using non-responder imputation (for patients with any missing data) in VOYAGE 1. Safety outcomes were based on pooled data through week 252. Response rates through week 252 for 199 Asian patients in the guselkumab group in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 76.8% and 80.6% (PASI 90), 26.8% and 38.7% (PASI 100), 64.3% and 87.1% (IGA 0/1), and 26.8% and 45.2% (IGA 0). DLQI (0/1) at week 252 was achieved by 52.7% of patients in VOYAGE 1 and 61.3% in VOYAGE 2, while DLQI (0) at week 252 was achieved by 32.7% of patients in VOYAGE 1 and 40.3% in VOYAGE 2. The safety profile was similar to the global population and remained consistent through 5years. Asian patients were followed for a total of 814 patient-years (PY). Over 85% of the guselkumab-treated patients continued treatment through week 264. The rate of serious adverse events (AEs) at week 252 was 3.07/100 PY. Rates of AEs of interest were low: serious infections, 0.74/100 PY; nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), no patients; malignancies other than NMSC, 0.12/100 PY; and no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These analyses confirm a continuous response over 5years, indicating that guselkumab shows therapeutic longevity in Asian patients requiring long-term treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: VOYAGE 1 [NCT02207231] and VOYAGE 2 [NCT02207244].

IL-23 Inhibitors to treat psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AimTo review the available evidence on the efficacy and safety profiles of four Interleukin-23 inhibitors in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis. MethodsSeveral databases were searched till July 2022. A total of 11 RCTs with at least one treatment arm were included. All articles were in English. The primary outcomes were ACR20, HAQ-DI, PASI90, and TEAEs experienced by the patients. ResultsCompared to other groups, Guselkumab had the strongest association with ACR20 response (RR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.84-2.49, p < 0.00001), while a mean change in HAQ-DI (MD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.41- -0.13, p = 0.0001) and PASI90 (RR: 9.81; 95% CI: 3.18-30.22; p <0.01) were most strongly associated with Ustekinumab. TEAEs were significantly present in the Guselkumab group (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.59; p = 0.05). ConclusionAlthough our analysis suggests that IL-23 inhibitors are efficacious at treating psoriatic arthritis, further studies are required for long-term outcomes.

P473 Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates with guselkumab maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: Week 48 analyses from the phase 2 GALAXI 1 study

Abstract Background Corticosteroids are often used in Crohn’s disease (CD) to control inflammation. However, they are associated with adverse events; thus, achieving and maintaining remission without corticosteroids is a major treatment goal. GALAXI 1, a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study, evaluated efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), a selective interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active CD. Primary efficacy and safety data were presented previously. Here, we report corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates through Week (Wk) 48. Methods Pts with moderately to severely active CD were randomised in a treat-through design to GUS 200, 600, 1200mg; ustekinumab (UST) ~6mg/kg; or PBO intravenous (IV) induction followed by maintenance dosing (GUS 200mg IV--&amp;gt;GUS 100mg subcutaneous [SC] every 8 weeks [q8w], GUS 600mg IV--&amp;gt;GUS 200mg SC q4w, GUS 1200mg IV--&amp;gt;GUS 200mg SC q4w, UST ~6mg/kg IV--&amp;gt;UST 90mg SC q8w, PBO nonresponders--&amp;gt;UST ~6mg/kg IV--&amp;gt;UST 90mg SC q8w, PBO responders--&amp;gt;PBO SC q4w). Corticosteroid tapering was mandatory from Wk12 if medically feasible. Efficacy endpoints included corticosteroid-free CD Activity Index (CDAI) clinical remission (&amp;lt;150) and pt-reported outcome (PRO)-2 remission at Wk48 in the primary efficacy population. Pts randomised to PBO were not included in Wk48 efficacy analyses. GALAXI 1 was not powered to evaluate efficacy differences between treatment groups at Wk48; UST was a reference arm. Analyses were prespecified but not multiplicity controlled. Results At Wk48, 55.7-71.4% of pts in the GUS dose groups achieved corticosteroid-free CDAI clinical remission (Table 1). Similar rates were observed when the corticosteroid-free duration was ≥30 or ≥90 days before Wk48. Among pooled pts in CDAI clinical remission at Wk48 in the GUS groups, 115/120 (95.8%) were corticosteroid free. At Wk48, 49.2-68.3% of pts in the GUS dose groups achieved corticosteroid-free PRO-2 remission (Table 1). Among pooled pts in PRO-2 remission at Wk48 in the GUS groups, 105/110 (95.5%) were corticosteroid free. Outcomes in the reference UST group are shown in Table 1. Among pts in the GUS dose groups, 30.2-39.3% were using corticosteroids at Wk0 (median prednisone equivalent dose 20.0mg/d in each group); at Wk48, 60.0-78.9% of these pts met corticosteroid-free criteria (Table 2). Conclusion High rates of corticosteroid-free CDAI clinical and PRO-2 remission were achieved at Wk48 in the GUS dose groups. Among pts in clinical remission, most were corticosteroid free. Nearly all pts maintained corticosteroid-free CDAI clinical remission for ≥90 days. GUS IV induction followed by SC maintenance therapy also effectively reduced corticosteroid use at Wk48.

The effect of guselkumab on inhibiting radiographic progression in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: study protocol for APEX, a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundGuselkumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit, is approved to treat adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-2 trial of 739 bilogico-naïve patients with active PsA, guselkumab 100 mg resulted in less radiographic progression, assessed via change from baseline in PsA-modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, compared with placebo at week (W) 24 when given at W0, W4, and then every 4 weeks (Q4W) or Q8W. The least squares mean differences from placebo were -0.66 for guselkumab Q4W (p=0.011) and -0.43 for guselkumab Q8W (p=0.072). Reports suggest baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and joint erosions are strongly prognostic of poor outcomes, especially radiographic progression, in PsA patients. We designed a trial (APEX) to further assess the effect of guselkumab on radiographic progression in patients with active PsA and risk factors for radiographic progression.MethodsPatients are eligible for APEX if they have had PsA for ≥6 months and active disease (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints, CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL) despite prior therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, apremilast, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with ≥2 joints with erosions on baseline radiographs (hands and feet). The primary and major secondary endpoints are the proportion of patients achieving ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) response at W24 and change from baseline at W24 in PsA-modified vdH-S score, respectively. Sample sizes of 350/250/350 for guselkumab Q8W/guselkumab Q4W/placebo are expected to provide >99% power to detect significant differences in W24 ACR20 response rates for each guselkumab group vs placebo, as well as ≥90% (Q4W vs placebo) and ≥80% (Q8W vs placebo) power to detect a significant difference in PsA-modified vdH-S score change at W24. A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and analysis of covariance will compare treatment efficacy for the primary and major secondary endpoints, respectively.DiscussionDISCOVER-2 findings informed the design of APEX, a Phase 3b study intended to further evaluate the impact of guselkumab in patients with active PsA and known risk factors for radiographic progression.Trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04882098. Registered on 11 May 2021.

33150 Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Pooled analyses across clinical studies

Introduction: Studies of guselkumab in plaque psoriasis have established a favorable safety profile for the drug. To evaluate the cumulative safety experience in psoriasis, we pooled safety data from phase 2/3 studies of guselkumab (CNTO1959PSO2001, CNTO1959PSO3001/3002, CNTO1959PSO3003, CNTO1959PSO3004, CNTO1959PSO3006, and CNTO1959PSO3009). Methods: Safety data were summarized for the placebo-controlled (wk 0-16 in CNTO1959PSO2001, CNTO1959PSO3001/3002, and CNTO1959PSO3006) and end-of-reporting (wk 0-40 for CNTO1959PSO3006; wk16-44 for CNTO1959PSO3003; wk0-52 for CNTO1959PSO2001 and CNTO1959PSO3004; wk0-56 for CNTO1959PSO3009; and through wk264 for CNTO1959PSO3001/3002) periods. Pooled data were adjusted by exposure per 100 patient-years of follow-up [100PY]). Results: During the placebo-controlled period, 544 patients received placebo (165 PY) and 1220 received guselkumab (378 PY). Adverse event (AE) rates were similar for placebo (341.12/100PY) and guselkumab (345.63/100PY); corresponding serious AE (SAE) rates were 6.66/100PY and 6.34/100PY. Infection rates were 83.61/100PY (placebo) and 95.92/100PY (guselkumab). Serious infections (SIs) occurred at rates of 1.21/100PY and 1.06/100PY in the placebo and guselkumab groups, respectively. The rate was 0.26/100PY for both NMSC and malignancies other than NMSC in the guselkumab group (none in the placebo group). Through the end-of-reporting period (n = 2891 patients; 8662 PY), rates remained low for guselkumab-treated patients: 169.02/100PY (AE), 5.26/100PY (SAE), 65.92/100PY (infections), and 0.88/100PY (SIs). Other AEs of interest rates were 0.43/100PY (malignancies), 0.35/100PY (NMSC), and 0.33/100PY (MACE). In guselkumab-treated patients, there were no reported active tuberculosis or opportunistic infections; no serum sickness-like/anaphylactic reactions related to guselkumab were reported. Conclusions: Pooled analyses confirm the established safety profile of guselkumab for patients treated for up to 5 years.

The Effect of Guselkumab on General Health State in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Through Week 52 of the Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled DISCOVER-2 Trial.

In DISCOVER-2, guselkumab, an interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor, was efficacious in biologic-naïve psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. We report the effect of guselkumab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index and Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) through Week 52. Adults with active PsA were randomized to guselkumab 100mg every 4weeks (Q4W) or Weeks 0, 4, then every 8weeks (Q8W), or placebo (crossover to guselkumab Q4W at Week 24). Least squares (LS) mean changes in EQ-5D-5L Index (0-1, US-based value set) and EQ-VAS (0-100) from baseline through Week 52 were assessed. Proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences (MIDs) were assessed through Week 52. Associations between patient clinical features and EQ-5D-5L Index and EQ-VAS scores were examined cross-sectionally with pooled data through Week 24. The analysis included 738 patients (Q4W n = 245; Q8W n = 248; placebo n = 245). At Week 24, LS mean changes from baseline in the Q4W, Q8W, and placebo groups were 0.12, 0.12, and 0.05, respectively, for EQ-5D-5L Index, and 18.2, 18.4, and 6.8, respectively, for EQ-VAS. At Week 52, improvement was maintained in the guselkumab groups and increased in the placebo crossover group. EQ-5D-5L Index MID was achieved by 56.0% in each guselkumab group at Week 24 and 66.2% in Q4W, 68.5% in Q8W, and 66.1% in placebo crossover group at Week 52. Higher C-reactive protein level, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, fatigue, and pain were correlated with worse EQ-5D-5L Index and EQ-VAS, based on pooled data through Week 24. Higher tender joint count was correlated with worse EQ-5D-5L, while higher swollen joint count was correlated with worse EQ-VAS. Guselkumab improved HRQoL through 52weeks in patients with active PsA. Impairment in HRQoL was correlated with increased inflammation, fatigue, pain, and measures of skin and joint symptom severity. GOV: NCT03158285.

Guselkumab for the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease: Induction Results From the Phase 2 GALAXI-1 Study

Guselkumab, a selective p19 interleukin-23 antagonist, is approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or biologic therapy. GALAXI-1, a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, 600 mg, or 1200 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8; intravenous ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg at week 0 and 90 mg subcutaneously at week 8; or placebo. Change from baseline in Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (primary end point), clinical remission, clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, endoscopic response (major secondary end points), and safety in guselkumab-treated patients vs placebo were evaluated through week 12. Ustekinumab was a reference arm. Of 309 patients evaluated, approximately 50% had disease refractory to prior biologic therapy. At week 12, significantly greater reductions in Crohn's Disease Activity Index from baseline (least squares means: 200 mg: -160.4, 600 mg: -138.9, and 1200 mg: -144.9 vs placebo: -36.2; all, P < .05) and significantly greater proportions of patients achieved clinical remission in each guselkumab group vs placebo (Crohn's Disease Activity Index <150; 57.4%, 55.6%, and 45.9% vs 16.4%; all, P < .05). Greater proportions of patients receiving guselkumab achieved clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, and endoscopic response at week 12 vs placebo. Efficacy of ustekinumab vs placebo was also demonstrated. Safety event rates were generally similar across treatment groups. At week 12, all 3 dose regimens of guselkumab induced greater clinical and endoscopic improvements vs placebo, with a favorable safety profile. gov, Number: NCT03466411.

OP23 The efficacy and safety of guselkumab induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 2b QUASAR Study results through week 12

Abstract Background The QUASAR Induction Study 1 (NCT04033445) is a phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 p19 subunit antagonist, as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who had an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional (ie, thiopurines or corticosteroids) or advanced therapy (ie, tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib). Methods Patients included in these analyses had moderately to severely active UC (defined as a modified Mayo score of 5 to 9, inclusive) with a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 and a Mayo endoscopy subscore ≥ 2 obtained during central review of video endoscopy at baseline. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive IV GUS 200 mg, 400 mg, or placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 12, and major secondary endpoints included clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization at Week 12. Type 1 error was controlled at the 0.05 significance level for the primary endpoint; no other endpoints were controlled for multiplicity. Safety was assessed through Week 12. Results Three hundred thirteen patients were randomized in the primary analysis population (mean age, 41.6 yrs; male 59.1%, mean UC duration, 7.55 yrs; mean Mayo score, 9.2; endoscopy subscore of 3 indicating severe disease, 70%; baseline oral corticosteroid use, 39.6%). Approximately 50% had a prior inadequate response or intolerance to advanced therapy for UC. The baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar among treatment groups (Table 1). At Week 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with GUS 200 mg and 400 mg achieved clinical response compared with placebo (61.4% and 60.7% vs 27.6%, respectively, both p&amp;lt;0.001). A greater proportion of GUS-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients achieved the major secondary endpoints at Week 12 (Figure 1). The proportions of patients reporting adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to discontinuation in the GUS groups were not greater compared with placebo (Table 2). No serious infections were reported for GUS. No cases of malignancy or death were reported. Conclusion In patients with moderately to severely active UC, GUS induction treatment demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo treatment. Overall, safety results through Week 12 were consistent with the known safety profile of GUS in approved indications. The efficacy and safety of GUS 200 mg and 400 mg were comparable.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab and adalimumab for pustulotic arthro-osteitis and their impact on peripheral blood immunophenotypes

ObjectivesWe compared the treatment effectiveness between guselkumab and adalimumab in patients with pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO). In addition, we performed peripheral blood immunophenotyping to elucidate the immunological background and analyzed the impact of therapeutic drugs to verify the validity of immunological phenotypes as therapeutic targets.MethodsPatients were treated with guselkumab 100 mg (guselkumab group; n = 12) and adalimumab 40 mg (adalimumab group; n = 13). Arthritis disease activity, skin lesion activity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The retention rate and adverse events were evaluated. Comprehensive phenotyping of peripheral immune cells was performed in both groups, and phenotypes were compared before and after treatment.ResultsAt 6 months, both groups showed significant improvement in arthritis disease activity and PROs. In the guselkumab group, skin symptoms significantly improved. The 6-month continuation rates were 91.7% (11/12) and 69.2% (9/13) in the guselkumab and adalimumab groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 2/12 and 5/13 patients in the guselkumab (16.7%) and adalimumab (38.5%) groups, respectively. Peripheral blood immunophenotyping showed that the proportion of activated T helper (Th) 1 cells was significantly lower in patients with PAO than in healthy controls and that the proportion of activated Th17 cells was significantly higher in patients with PAO, which significantly decreased after treatment with guselkumab.ConclusionAlthough guselkumab and adalimumab have comparable efficacy for PAO, their impact on immunophenotypes varies.

Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study.

IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are inadequate responders to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results through one year of a phase IIIb, randomised, controlled study (COSMOS)

ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23p19-subunit antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with prior inadequate response (IR) to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).MethodsAdults with active PsA...

Consistent safety profile with up to 5 years of continuous treatment with guselkumab: Pooled analyses from the phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Guselkumab effectively treats moderate-to-severe psoriasis. To evaluate the cumulative safety experience of guselkumab using pooled data from the VOYAGE 1 and 2 studies through 5years. Patients were randomized to guselkumab, placebo with crossover to guselkumab at week 16, or adalimumab. The studies were identical through week 24. VOYAGE 1 evaluated continuous guselkumab treatment (adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab at week 52), while VOYAGE 2 assessed randomized withdrawal/retreatment (weeks 28-76). Open-label guselkumab treatment was administered starting at week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 76 in VOYAGE 2 and continued through week 252. Pooled safety data were adjusted by exposure and analyzed in the guselkumab groups, including placebo-crossover-to-guselkumab (n=1221) and adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab (n=500), through week 264. Patients were followed for a total of 7166 patient-years (PY). Overall, 1349 of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients (78.4%) continued treatment through week 252. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 149/100 PY and 5.01/100 PY, respectively. Rates of adverse events of interest were low: serious infections (0.85/100 PY), nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.34/100 PY), malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.45/100 PY), and major adverse cardiovascular events (0.29/100 PY). Year-to-year variability was evident, but no increasing trend was observed. No direct treatment comparisons were possible after week 52. The safety profile remained consistent and favorable during 5years of continuous guselkumab treatment of psoriasis.

Efficacy of guselkumab on axial involvement in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and sacroiliitis: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies.

Guselkumab was efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis in the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in post-hoc analyses of patients with psoriatic arthritis with imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis consistent with axial involvement. In DISCOVER-1, 381 patients with active psoriatic arthritis (defined as ≥3 swollen joints, ≥3 tender joints, and C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥0·3 mg/dL) and in DISCOVER-2, 739 patients with active psoriatic arthritis (defined as ≥5 swollen joints, ≥5 tender joints, and CRP ≥0·6 mg/dL) were randomly allocated to receive guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks, guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks), or placebo. These pooled, post-hoc analyses included patients with axial disease documented by previous imaging or pelvic radiography at screening consistent with sacroiliitis (confirmed by investigator). Efficacy assessments included least squares mean changes, with 95% CIs, in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score, modified BASDAI (mBASDAI; excluding peripheral joint pain), spinal pain, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and proportions of patients achieving at least a 50% improvement in BASDAI score (BASDAI50) and achieving ASDAS responses of inactive disease (score <1·3), major improvement (change of ≥2·0), and clinically important improvement (change of ≥1·1). Of the 1120 patients in the two DISCOVER studies, 312 (28%) were included in this analysis, of whom 118 were in the placebo group, 103 were in the guselkumab every 4 weeks group, and 91 were in the guselkumab every 8 weeks group. 191 (61%) were male, and 121 (39%) were female, and the mean age was 45·1 (SD 11·2). HLA-B27 status was assessed in 190 patients; 57 (30%) were HLA-B27-positive and 133 (70%) were HLA-B27-negative. At week 24, least squares mean changes from baseline in BASDAI were -2·7 (95% CI -3·2 to -2·2) in both guselkumab groups versus -1·3 (-1·8 to -0·9) in the placebo group; similar results were observed for mBASDAI and spinal pain. Least squares mean changes in ASDAS scores at week 24 were -1·4 (95% CI -1·7 to -1·2) in both guselkumab groups and -0·7 (-0·9 to -0·5) for placebo. At week 24, 36 (38%) patients in the guselkumab every 4 weeks group and 34 (40%) of those in the guselkumab every 8 weeks group achieved BASDAI50 versus 21 (19%) of placebo patients; greater proportions of guselkumab-treated patients achieved ASDAS responses versus placebo. Across outcomes, separation from placebo was observed at week 8. Improvements with guselkumab were seen at week 24 independent of HLA-B27 status. These improvements were maintained at week 52 in the guselkumab groups. Patients with active psoriatic arthritis and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis who were treated with guselkumab every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks had greater mean improvements in BASDAI and ASDAS (as early as week 8) than did placebo-treated participants, with sustained improvements at week 52. Janssen Research & Development LLC.

S857 Patient-Reported Outcomes of Response and Remission Following Guselkumab Induction Treatment as Measured by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire: Results Through Week 12 of the Phase 2 GALAXI 1 Study

Introduction: GALAXI 1 is a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23 antagonist, for the treatment of patients (pts) with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) who had inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapies (corticosteroid, immunosuppressant) and/or biologics (TNF antagonist, vedolizumab). Patient-reported outcomes from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) through Week (Wk) 12 following GUS induction are reported here for the interim analysis population. Methods: Pts with moderate to severe CD (CDAI score 220-450) were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to GUS 200, 600, or 1200mg IV at Wks 0, 4, 8; ustekinumab (UST) ∼6mg/kg IV at Wk 0 and 90mg SC at Wk 8; or placebo (PBO) IV. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire with 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms, emotional function, systemic symptoms, and social function. IBDQ scores range from 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. IBDQ scores were evaluated at Wk 8 and Wk 12 for change from baseline, IBDQ response (defined as ≥16-point improvement from baseline), and IBDQ remission (defined as IBDQ score ≥170) for the GUS combined and PBO treatment groups. UST was a reference arm. Results: Two hundred fifty pts were evaluated; approximately 50% failed previous biologic therapy. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across treatment groups. However, some differences were observed between the groups, the most notable of which included a slightly lower disease duration in the GUS 1200mg IV group (6.2 yrs) compared with the GUS 200mg IV group (11.7 yrs), and a lower mean baseline IBDQ total score in the PBO group (117.3) compared with the GUS combined and UST groups. IBDQ scores change from baseline at Wk 8 and Wk 12 are presented in Table 1. Mean change from baseline in total IBDQ and each of the 4 IBDQ domains was greater among pts in the combined GUS group compared with the PBO group. The proportion of pts who achieved IBDQ response at Wk 8 and Wk 12 was higher in the combined GUS treatment group compared with PBO (Figure 1). A similar trend was seen for IBDQ remission. Conclusion: In pts with moderately to severely active CD, pts treated with GUS (combined) induction therapy reported greater improvement in IBDQ scores compared with PBO as early as Wk 8. A higher proportion of pts treated with GUS compared with PBO achieved IBDQ response and remission at Wks 8 and 12, and this treatment benefit (as delta) increased from Wk 8 to Wk 12.Table 1.: Change from baseline in IBDQ total and domain scores, at Week 8 and Week 12.Figure 1.: IBDQ Response and IBDQ Remission at Week 8 and Week 12.

Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2.

Psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy. Physician- and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated through week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. In total, 1829 patients were randomized at baseline to receive guselkumab 100mg every 8weeks, placebo or adalimumab. Patients receiving placebo crossed over to guselkumab at week 16. Patients receiving adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 in VOYAGE 1, and randomized withdrawal and retreatment occurred at weeks 28-76 in VOYAGE 2; all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. Efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) endpoints were analysed through week 252. Safety was monitored through week 264. The proportions of patients in the guselkumab group who achieved clinical responses at week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 84·1% and 82·0% [≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)]; 82·4% and 85·0% [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1]; 52·7% and 53·0% (100% improvement in PASI) and 54·7% and 55·5% (IGA 0). HRQoL endpoints were achieved as follows: 72·7% and 71·1% of patients (Dermatology Life Quality Index 0 or 1: no effect on patient's life); 42·4% and 42·0% [Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptom score = 0] and 33·0% and 31·0% (PSSD sign score = 0). As measured in VOYAGE 2 only, approximately 45% of patients achieved ≥ 5-point reduction in Short Form-36 physical and mental component scores, and 80% reported no anxiety or depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores < 8). Similar findings were reported for adalimumab crossovers. These effects were maintained from week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 100 in VOYAGE 2. No new safety signals were identified. Guselkumab maintains high levels of clinical response and improvement in patient-reported outcomes through 5years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OP0230 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GUSELKUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS WHO DEMONSTRATED INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITION: WEEK 24 RESULTS OF A PHASE 3B, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY

Background:Guselkumab (GUS), a selective monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-23p19 subunit, has demonstrated efficacy in 2 pivotal Ph3 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) studies (DISCOVER-1,1 DISCOVER-22).Objectives:Evaluate GUS efficacy and safety in PsA patients (pts) with inadequate response (IR) to tumor-necrosis-factor inhibition (TNFi) through Week24 (W24) of the Ph3b COSMOS study.Methods:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial, 285 pts with active PsA (≥3 swollen &amp; ≥3 tender joints) who demonstrated lack of benefit or intolerance to 1-2 TNFi were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous GUS 100mg (n=189) or PBO (n=96) at W0, W4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) through W44 (with PBO crossover to GUS at W24). At W16, pts who met early escape (EE) criteria (&lt;5% improvement in both tender &amp; swollen joint counts) also could switch from PBO to GUS. The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR20 response at W24 among randomized, treated pts. Pts missing ACR20 data at W24 or who met treatment failure criteria (including meeting EE criteria at W16) were considered nonresponders (NRs). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess consistency of primary treatment effect based on demographics, disease characteristics, and medication use at baseline. Prespecified sensitivity analyses included ‘Per-Protocol’ (PP) (excluded pts with major protocol deviations) and ‘EE-Correction’ (included pts incorrectly routed to EE) analyses. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized by treatment received.Results:Baseline characteristics were similar across GUS and PBO pts, though a higher proportion of females and more severe joint symptoms were seen in the GUS group. At W24, 44.4% of GUS vs 19.8% of PBO pts achieved ACR20 (p&lt;0.001) (Figure). GUS was superior to PBO for all major secondary endpoints. Efficacy was consistent across subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including in pts who discontinued prior TNFi use due to inadequate efficacy (84% GUS vs 81% PBO) and safety (16% GUS vs 19% PBO) (Table). 20 pts (12 GUS, 8 PBO) were incorrectly routed to EE. Results of PP (48.8% vs 23.8%) and EE-correction (48.1% vs 19.8%) sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis (Figure). AEs were similar between GUS- and PBO-treated pts (Table).Table 1.Baseline characteristics of, and adverse events reported by, randomized and treated COSMOS ptsGUS 100 mg Q8W (N=189)PBO (N=96) Age, y4949 Sex, Female54%46% Duration of PsA, y8.38.7 Body mass index, kg/m22931a Swollen (0-66) / tender (0-68) joint count10 / 219 / 18 Pt pain / Pt global arthritis / Physician global disease, 0-10 cm VAS6.5 / 6.5 / 6.96.0 / 6.2 / 6.4 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 0-31.3b1.2 C-reactive protein, mg/dL1.2b1.2 Methotrexate use at baseline56%53% Psoriatic body surface area, %17.913.4 Number of prior TNFi: 1 / 288% / 12%89% / 11% Reason for prior TNFi discontinuation: Efficacy / Safety84% / 16%* 81% / 19%*Pts with ≥1 AE / SAE37% / 3%48% / 3%Pts with ≥1 infection / serious infection18% / 0%20% / 0%Pts with ≥1 AE leading to study agent discontinuation2%2%Pts with ≥1 malignancy0.4%0Pts with ≥1 injection-site reaction2%1%Data shown are mean or %. aN=95; bN=188. *Missing for 1 pt. SAE – serious adverse events; VAS – visual analog scaleConclusion:In this Ph3b, placebo-controlled study of PsA pts with IR to 1-2 TNFi, GUS 100 mg Q8W elicited a significantly higher ACR20 response rate vs. PBO at W24; results of prespecified sensitivity and subgroup analyses were consistent. GUS safety in TNF-IR PsA pts through W24 is consistent with the favorable GUS safety profile in psoriasis and biologic-naïve PsA pts.3