Once infected with Trichinella spiralis, rats become refractory to the establishment of a secondary or challenge inoculum. Resistance to reinfection is expressed locally in the small intestine and is directed against infective (L,) stage larvae (stage designated according to Despommier, 1983. In Trichinella and Trichinosis, W. G. Campbell (ed.). Plenum Press, New York, p. 80). Striking features of this host response are the rapidity with which it is expressed and its efficacy. As early as 15 min after L1 larvae enter the small intestine, there is a dramatic reduction in the number of parasites successfully establishing in as compared with rats (Russell and Castro, 1979, J. Inf. Dis. 139: 304-312). Larvae that are prevented from establishing suffer no irreversible, detrimental effect and are expelled from the small intestine in a viable state (Hessel et al., 1982, J. Parasit. 68: 202-207). The rapid rejection reaction and a phenomenon termed rapid expulsion have been carefully defined in the rat (Russell and Castro, 1979, J. Inf. Dis. 139: 304-312; Bell and McGregor, 1979, Exp. Parasitol. 48: 42-50; Bell et al., 1982, Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 69: 73-80) and apparently represent a similar expression of resistance viewed at different time intervals, i.e., 15 min versus 4 to 24 hr, respectively, after a challenge inoculation. These phenomena appear to be characteristic of the species of Rattus norvegicus regardless of the strain (McCoy, 1940, Am. J. Hyg. 32: 105-116; Castro et al., 1976, J. Nutr. 106: 1484-1491; Love et al., 1976, Immunology 30: 7-15). In contrast, rapid expulsion in the mouse appears to be host strain specific (Wakelin and Lloyd, 1976, Parasitology, 72: 173182). During experimentation in our laboratory, inquiring into the physiological mechanism underlying the rapid rejection response, the guinea pig was considered as a host animal. Since no information is available on the capacity of this species to express rapid rejection, this report entails a description of experiments performed to clarify this point. Outbred, male, Hartley strain guinea pigs (Dutchland, Denver, PA) weighing 275-400 g at the time of primary infection, served as hosts. T. spiralis larvae used for inoculation of guinea pigs were obtained from the same species. The strain of T. spiralis was one maintained for more than 10 years in our laboratory by serial passage through mice. Larvae were recovered from skeletal muscle by established methods (Castro and Fairbairn, 1969, J. Parasit. 55: 51-58). Guinea pigs were immunized by inoculation with 2 x 103 larvae administered orally in saline. Counterparts from the same initial lots of animals, inoculated only with saline, served as nonimmunized controls. Challenge infection was with larvae administered orally or intraduodenally to guinea pigs 6 wk after the immunizing inoculation (Table I). Specific inoculation procedures are described below. Worms were recovered from the small intestine of challenged hosts by direct microscopic examination of mucosal scrapings cleared with NaOH. Three different experimental designs were employed in studies with guinea pigs. In the first experiment resistance to establishment of secondarily inoculated larvae was assessed by comparing intestinal worm burdens in immune and nonimmune animals 24 hr postchallenge with 5 x 103 larvae. Results presented in Table I revealed the presence of significantly fewer worms in the mucosa of previously infected hosts as compared with controls. The number of intestinal worms in immune guinea pigs was only 7.9% of that in nonimmune counterparts. Analogous studies in rats (Russell and Castro, 1979, J. Inf. Dis. 139: 304-312) produced an immune host: nonimmune host worm recovery mean ratio of approximately 19%.
Read full abstract