Abstract Contrasting the conservative German welfare state with the liberal market economy of the United Kingdom, this paper examines how each welfare regime affects the first-birth decisions of men and women under the conditions of either high labour market integration (full-time work in a permanent position) or occupational uncertainty (part-time work or work with a fixed-term contract). The results, which are based on BHPS and GSOEP data, suggest for Germany that occupational uncertainty hampers transitions to parenthood, but are inconclusive for the UK. Among highly educated women in both Germany and the UK, however, a high degree of labour market integration is found to delay family formation. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.) 1. Introduction Family formation is a key turning point in the life course, and for many potential parents today, achieving the financial security necessary to start a family is a difficult and time-consuming process. Recent research has focused on how fertility decisions are shaped by the relationship between social policies, labour market conditions, and the changing gender contract (Oppenheimer 1994, Brewster and Rindfuss 2000, Crompton and Lyonette 2006, McDonald and Meyers 2009). This study extends this research by investigating how individual labour market integration (i.e., obtaining a permanent full-time job that is in line with one's vocational training, and/or acquiring the education or professional record that provides access to such a job) might expedite the realisation of fertility plans by providing the economic resources needed to start a family. The welfare state plays a key role in this process by determining general labour market risks and options. Against this backdrop, couples have to decide whether their family plans require one or both partners to have a stable position in the labour market to compensate for low levels of welfare state support to families (Hobcraftand Kiernan 1995). Furthermore, they must do so in the context of culturally and institutionally embedded gender roles, which in some societies lead to conflicts between the occupational and domestic duties assigned to women. To better understand the role of institutions that structure male and female employment patterns and thereby affect family formation, I compare fertility choices in Germany (East and West) and the United Kingdom. These two countries provide a meaningful basis for comparison because, while they share traditional expectations of female caregivers, the UK has a lower level of welfare state protection and a more deregulated labour market than Germany. Thus, relative to Germany, the institutional features of the UK system tend to encourage female labour market engagement. Although this means that British women face particularly high hurdles in adapting to the competing demands of market and family roles, the total fertility rate in the UK clearly exceeds that of Germany (Figure 1). Against this backdrop, I aim to examine the micro-level mechanisms that explain fertility choices in the context of labour market participation in East and West Germany and the UK. Distinguishing country- and gender-specific effects, my analysis focuses on two aspects of the relationship between labour market integration and fertility decisions: first, I address the question of how the timing of the first birth is affected by the duration of active labour market participation under the assumption of increasing labour market integration over time; and, second, I investigate whether differences in the first- birth risk depend on being firmly established in the labour market, or on being exposed to occupational uncertainties. In other words, I consider the extent to which the fertility decisions of individuals who are strongly integrated into the labour market (defined as having a stable full-time job and/or high income) differ from those of individuals who are poorly integrated (defined as having discontinuous and/or precarious employment patterns). …
Read full abstract