Crickets appear to be entrained to the circadian mechanism in which they are reared (Wiedenmann, 1988; Wiedenmann et al., 1988), and photoperiod influences a variety of cricket behaviors including egg laying (Olvido et al., 1998), induction of embryonic diapause (Shiga and Numata, 1996), egg hatching (Olvido et al., 1998; Itoh and Sumi, 2000), nymphal growth rate (Carriere et al., 1996), and adult wing from (Masaki and Shimizu, 1995). Photoperiod is also known to influence mate signaling in a variety of insect species including calling onset and duration in gypsy moths, Lymantria disar (Webster and Yin, 1997), and calling onset and temporal pattern in Australian common armyworms, Mythimna convecta (Del Socorro, 1997). In crickets, however, the evidence that photoperiod affects acoustic mate signaling is suggestive but not conclusive. Photoperiod influences time spent calling in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. In an experiment designed to test the effect of a strong electromagnetic field on the circadian singing activity, Shaw et al. (1995) found that control males (unexposed to the electromagnetic field) monitored in total darkness (0L:24D cycle) called significantly more often than males monitored in a more natural light cycle (12L:12D cycle). This research,
Read full abstract