Analogs Of Growth Hormone-releasing Hormone Research Articles

PEGylation of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRF) analogues

Synthetically produced GRF 1–29 (Sermorelin) has an amino acid composition identical to the N-terminal 29 amino acids sequence of the natural hypothalamic GHRH 1–44 ( Figure 1). It maintains bioactivity in vitro and is almost equally effective in eliciting secretion of endogenous growth hormone in vivo. The main drawbacks associated with the pharmaceutical use of hGRF 1–29 relate to its short half-life in plasma, about 10–20 min in humans, which is caused mostly by renal ultrafiltration and enzymatic degradation at the N terminus. PEGylation has been considered as one valid approach to obtain more stable forms of the peptide, with a longer in vivo half-life and ultimately with increased pharmacodynamic response along the somatotropic axis (endogenous GH, IGF-1 levels). Different PEGylated GRF conjugates were obtained and their bioactivity was tested in vitro and in vivo by monitoring endogenous growth hormone (GH) serum levels after intravenous (i.v.) injection in rats, and intravenous and subcutaneous (s.c.) injection in pigs. It was found that GRF–PEG conjugates are able to bind and activate the human GRF receptor, although with different potency. The effect of PEG molecular weight, number of PEG chains bound and position of PEGylation site on GRF activity were investigated. Mono-PEGylated isomers with a PEG 5000 polymer chain linked to Lys 12 or Lys 21 residues, showed high biological activity in vitro, which is similar to that of hGRF 1–29,and a higher pharmacodynamic response as compared to unmodified GRF molecule.

Inhibition of PC-3 human prostate cancers by analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH) endowed with vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonistic activity.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) stimulates the proliferation and invasiveness of malignant prostatic cells. Receptors for VIP and the closely related growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH) show considerable homology and are found in prostatic and other carcinomas. Among various analogs of GH-RH synthesized, JV-1-52 is a non-selective VIP/GH-RH antagonist, whereas JV-1-53 is a VIP antagonist devoid of GH-RH antagonistic effect. In our study, nude mice bearing PC-3 human androgen-independent prostate carcinomas were treated with JV-1-52 or JV-1-53 (20 microg/day, s.c.) for 28 days. Both antagonists produced a similar reduction in tumor volume (62-67%, p < 0.01) and tumor weight (59-62%; p < 0.05) vs. controls and extended tumor doubling-time from 9.1 to about 16 days (p < 0.05). To investigate the mechanisms involved, in another study we compared the effects of JV-1-53 with those of somatostatin analog RC-160. VIP antagonist JV-1-53 reduced tumor weight by 67% (p < 0.01) and suppressed the expression of mRNA for c-fos and c-jun oncogenes by about 34% (p < 0.05), without affecting serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). In contrast, RC-160 (50 microg/day) reduced serum IGF-I by 19% (p < 0.05), but did not significantly decrease tumor weight. mRNA for VIP and high affinity receptors for VIP were detected on PC-3 tumors. Our results suggest that VIP/GH-RH antagonists can inhibit the growth of androgen-independent prostate cancer by abrogating the autocrine/paracrine mitogenic stimuli of VIP. The ability of GH-RH antagonists to block tumoral VIP receptors, in addition to GH-RH receptors, could be potentially beneficial for prostate cancer therapy.

Expression of a splice variant of the receptor for GHRH in 3T3 fibroblasts activates cell proliferation responses to GHRH analogs.

The stimulatory effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the antiproliferative action of GHRH antagonists have been demonstrated in various cancers, but the receptors that mediate these responses are not clearly identified. Recently, we reported that human cancer cell lines express splice variants (SVs) of the receptors for GHRH. SV1 exhibits the greatest similarity to the pituitary GHRH receptor and is most likely to be functional. To ascertain whether SV1 mediates mitogenic effects on nonpituitary tissues, we expressed SV1 in 3T3 mouse fibroblasts and studied the properties of the transfected cells. Radioligand binding assays with (125)I-labeled GHRH antagonist JV-1-42 detected high affinity (K(d) = 0.58 +/- 0.17 nM) binding sites for GHRH with a maximal binding capacity (B(max)) of 103 +/- 17.4 fmol/mg of membrane protein in 3T3 cells transfected with pcDNA3-SV1, whereas the control cells transfected with the empty vector did not show any GHRH binding. Cell proliferation studies showed that cells expressing SV1 are much more sensitive to GHRH analogs than the pcDNA3 controls. Thus, the expression of SV1 augments the stimulatory responses to GHRH(1-29)NH(2) or GHRH agonist JI-38 and inhibitory responses to GHRH antagonist JV-1-38 as compared with pcDNA3 controls. The stimulation of SV1-expressing cells by GHRH or JI-38 is followed by an increase in cAMP production, but no GH release occurs. Vasoactive intestinal peptide had no effect, and its antagonist JV-1-53 did not inhibit the proliferation of SV1-expressing cells stimulated by GHRH. Our results suggest that SV1 could mediate responses of nonpituitary cells and various tumors to GHRH and GHRH antagonists. The presence of SV1 in several human cancer cell lines provides a rationale for antitumor therapy based on the blockade of this receptor by specific GHRH antagonists.

Antagonists of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Somatostatin Analog RC-160 Inhibit the Growth of the OV-1063 Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cell Line Xenografted into Nude Mice

Antagonists of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Somatostatin Analog RC-160 Inhibit the Growth of the OV-1063 Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cell Line Xenografted into Nude Mice

Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin analog RC-160 inhibit the growth of the OV-1063 human epithelial ovarian cancer cell line xenografted into nude mice.

The effects of antagonists of GHRH and the somatostatin analog RC-160 on the growth of OV-1063 human epithelial ovarian cancer cells xenografted into nude mice were investigated. Treatment with 20 microg/day of the GHRH antagonist JV-1-36 or MZ-5-156 and 60 microg/day of the somatostatin analog RC-160 for 25 days decreased tumor volume by 70.9% (P < 0.01), 58.3% (P < 0.05), and 60.6% (P < 0.01), respectively, vs. the control value. The levels of GH in serum were decreased in all of the treated groups, but only RC-160 significantly reduced serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). The levels of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) for IGF-I and -II and for their receptors in OV-1063 tumors were investigated by multiplex RT-PCR. No expression of mRNA for IGF-I was detected, but treatment with JV-1-136 caused a 51.8% decrease (P < 0.05) in the level of mRNA for IGF-II in tumors. Exposure of OV-1063 cells cultured in vitro to GHRH, IGF-I, or IGF-II significantly (P < 0.05) stimulated cell growth, but 10(-5) mol/L JV-1-36 nearly completely inhibited (P < 0.001) OV-1063 cell proliferation. OV-1063 tumors expressed mRNA for GHRH receptors and showed the presence of binding sites for GHRH. Our results indicate that antagonistic analogs of GHRH and the somatostatin analog RC-160 inhibit the growth of epithelial ovarian cancers. The effects of RC-160 seem to be exerted more on the pituitary GH-hepatic IGF-I axis, whereas GHRH antagonists appear to reduce IGF-II production and interfere with the autocrine regulatory pathway. The antitumorigenic action of GHRH antagonists appears to be mediated by GHRH receptors found in OV-1063 tumors.

Direct action of growth hormone-releasing hormone agonist JI-38 on normal human fibroblasts: Evidence from studies on cell proliferation and c- myc proto-oncogene expression

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is secreted by the hypothalamus and stimulates the release of growth hormone from the pituitary. Recent studies also indicate that in addition to its neuroendocrine function, GHRH may play a direct role in the proliferation of cancer cells, acting as growth factor for various human tumors. In the present study we investigated the effects of JI-38, an agonistic analog of GHRH, on the rate of proliferation of normal human diploid dermal fibroblasts (NHF) cultured in vitro. The effects of JI-38 on the levels of mRNA for c- myc proto-oncogene were also tested. Exposure to 10 −7 M JI-38 stimulated the rate of proliferation of early passage NHF by about 100%. Exposure of NHF cells to 10 −8–5×10 −6 M JI-38 for 24 h resulted in about 0.5–3.5 fold increase in the levels of mRNA for c- myc proto-oncogene. The ability of JI-38 to stimulate the proliferation of NHF cells was abolished in cells cultured at late passage. Continuous exposure to 10 −7 M JI-38, over 6–7 passages (15–20 population doublings), progressively reduced the rate of proliferation of NHF compared with cells exposed to medium alone, indicating that GHRH agonist acted as a growth inhibitor. Our results suggest that at certain developmental stages, GHRH may act on various tissues, stimulating cell proliferation.

Structure and function of the growth-hormone-releasing hormone receptor

Growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulates growth hormone (GH) secretion and GH synthesis and is also thought to cause somatotroph proliferation. Specific high-affinity binding sites for GHRH have been demonstrated on pituitary membranes using iodinated GHRH analogs. The complementary DNA encoding for the human GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) was recently cloned. The open reading frame was shown to extend 1269 bp and thus to encode a protein of 423 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 47 kDa. Expression is restricted to specific tissues. Analysis of the genomic structure revealed that the human GHRH-R gene spans 15 kb and consists of 13 exons. The 5'-flanking region of the human GHRH-R gene was recently characterized. Transcriptional regulation of the GHRH-R is discussed in this review. Mechanisms of signal transduction for control of GH transcription and secretion are presented. Furthermore, the role of the GHRH-R in proliferation and differentiation of the somatotrophic pituitary cell as well as in disease is examined.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone: an autocrine growth factor for small cell lung carcinoma.

Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) inhibit the growth of various cancers in vivo. This effect is thought to be exerted through suppression of the pituitary growth hormone-hepatic insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis and direct inhibition of autocrine/paracrine production of IGF-I and -II in tumors. However, other evidence points to a direct effect of GHRH antagonists on tumor growth that may not implicate IGFs, although an involvement of GHRH in the proliferation of cancer cells has not yet been established. In the present study we investigated whether GHRH can function as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). H-69 and H-510A SCLC lines cultured in vitro express mRNA for GHRH, which apparently is translated into peptide GHRH and then secreted by the cells, as shown by the detection of GHRH-like immunoreactivity in conditioned media from the cells cultured in vitro. In addition, the levels of GHRH-like immunoreactivity in serum from nude mice bearing H-69 xenografts were higher than in tumor-free mice. GHRH(1-29)NH(2) stimulated the proliferation of H-69 and H-510A SCLCs in vitro, and GHRH antagonist JV-1-36 inhibited it. JV-1-36 administered s.c. into nude mice bearing xenografts of H-69 SCLC reduced significantly (P < 0.05) tumor volume and weight, after 31 days of therapy, as compared with controls. Collectively, our results suggest that GHRH can function as an autocrine growth factor in SCLCs. Treatment with antagonistic analogs of GHRH may offer a new approach to the treatment of SCLC and other cancers.

Antagonistic analogs of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) inhibit cyclic AMP production of human cancer cell lines in vitro☆

Antagonistic analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) inhibit growth of various human cancers both in vivo and in vitro. GHRH, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide stimulate cyclic AMP (cAMP) release from various human cancer cell lines in vitro. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the effects of antagonistic analogs of GHRH on the GHRH- and VIP-induced cAMP release from cultured human cancer cells in a superfusion system. Various human cancer cell lines were exposed to human GHRH(1-29)NH 2 (2–20 nM) or VIP (0.1–5 nM) repeatedly for 12 min or continuously for 96 min. GHRH antagonist MZ-5-156 at 100 to 200 nM concentration inhibited the GHRH- or VIP-induced cAMP release from mammary (MDA-MB-468), prostatic (PC-3), and pancreatic (SW-1990 and CAPAN-2) cancer cells. These results show that antagonistic analogs of GHRH suppress the stimulatory effects of GHRH and VIP on the cAMP production of various cancer cells. Because cAMP is a potent second messenger controlling many intracellular functions, including the stimulation of cell growth, an inhibition of autocrine/paracrine action of GHRH by the GHRH antagonists may provide the basis for the development of new methods for cancer treatment.

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the GH secretagogue (GHS), L692,585, differentially modulate rat pituitary GHS receptor and GHRH receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels.

The ability of synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) to elicit a maximal release of GH in vivo is dependent on an intact GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) signaling system. The role of GHRH in GHS-induced GH release has been attributed primarily to the ability of GHS to release GHRH from hypothalamic neurons. However, GHS also releases GH directly at the pituitary level. Several lines of evidence suggest that GHRH is necessary to maintain pituitary responsiveness to GHS by stimulating GHS receptor (GHS-R) synthesis. To test this hypothesis, male rats (250-290 g) were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (which does not alter pulsatile GH secretion) and infused i.v. with a GHRH analog ([des-NH2Tyr1,D-Ala15]hGRF-(1-29)-NH2; 10 microg/h) or saline for 4 h. Serum was analyzed for GH, pituitaries were collected, and GHS-R and GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were determined by RT-PCR. GHRH infusion resulted in a 10-fold increase in circulating GH concentrations that were accompanied by an increase in GHS-R mRNA levels to 200% of those in saline-treated controls (P < 0.01). In contrast, GHRH reduced GHRH-R mRNA levels slightly, but not significantly (P < 0.07). The stimulatory effect of GHRH on GHS-R mRNA levels was independent of somatostatin tone, as pretreatment with somatostatin antiserum did not alter the effectiveness of GHRH infusion. In contrast, blockade of somatostatin actions up-regulated GHRH-R mRNA levels under basal conditions and unmasked the inhibitory effects GHRH on its own receptor mRNA. These observations suggest GHRH-R mRNA is tonically suppressed by somatostatin. The stimulatory effect of GHRH on GHS-R mRNA levels was independent of circulating GH, as GHRH infusion in spontaneous dwarf rats, which do not have immunodetectable GH, increased GHS-R mRNA levels to 150% of those in saline-treated controls (P < 0.05). To determine whether this effect occurred by a direct action on the pituitary, primary cell cultures from normal rat pituitaries were incubated with GHRH (0.01-10 nM) or forskolin (10 microM) for 4 h. These GH secretagogues did not alter GHS-R mRNA levels in vitro. However, GHRH and forskolin reduced GHRH-R mRNA levels by 40% (P < 0.05). To determine whether the synthesis of the GHS-R, like that of the GHRH-R, is negatively mediated by its own ligand, anesthetized rats were infused with the nonpeptidyl secretagogue, L-692,585 (100 microg/h) for 4 h. Neither circulating GH (at 4 h) nor GHRH-R mRNA levels were significantly altered by L-692,585, whereas GHS-R mRNA levels were reduced by 50% (P < 0.05). Taken together, these results indicate that GHRH-induced up-regulation of pituitary GHS-R synthesis in vivo is indirect and independent of both somatostatin and GH. They also demonstrate that GHS-R synthesis, like that of GHRH-R, can be rapidly down-regulated by its own ligand.

Inhibition of growth, production of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II), and expression of IGF-II mRNA of human cancer cell lines by antagonistic analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone in vitro.

Antagonistic analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) suppress growth of various tumors in vivo. This effect is exerted in part through inhibition of the GHRH-GH-insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I axis. Nevertheless, because autocrine/paracrine control of proliferation by IGF-II also is a major factor in many tumors, the interference with this growth-stimulating pathway would offer another approach to tumor control. We thus investigated whether GHRH antagonists MZ-4-71 and MZ-5-156 also act on the tumor cells directly by blocking the production of IGF-II. An increase in the IGF-II concentration in the media during culture was found in 13 of 26 human cancer cell lines tested. Reverse transcription-PCR studies on 8 of these cell lines showed that they also expressed IGF-II mRNA. Antagonists of GHRH significantly inhibited the rate of proliferation of mammary (MDA-MB-468 and ZR-75-1), prostatic (PC-3 and DU-145), and pancreatic (MiaPaCa-2, SW-1990, and Capan-2) cancer cell lines as shown by colorimetric and [3H]thymidine incorporation tests and reduced the expression of IGF-II mRNA in the cells and the concentration of IGF-II secreted into the culture medium. Growth and IGF-II production of lung (H-23 and H-69) and ovarian (OV-1063) cancer cells that express mRNA for IGF-II and excrete large quantities of IGF-II also was marginally suppressed by the antagonists. These findings suggest that antagonistic analogs of GHRH can inhibit growth of certain tumors not only by inhibiting the GHRH-GH-IGF-I axis, but also by reducing the IGF-II production and by interfering with the autocrine regulatory pathway.

New analogs of human growth hormone-releasing hormone (1-29) with high and prolonged antagonistic activity.

Based on our previous results, in conjunction with various structural considerations, 19 new analogs of the GHRH antagonist [PhAc-Tyr1,D-Arg2,Phe(pCl)6,Abu15,Nle27,Agm29]++ +hGHRH(1-29) (MZ-5-156) were synthesized by the solid-phase method. These compounds were designed to develop further analogs of this class with increased receptor-binding affinity. All analogs had Abu15 and Nle27 modifications and were acylated with phenylacetic acid at the N-terminus. Most of the analogs had D-Arg2 and Phe(pCl)6 substituents and Agm29 or Arg29-NH2 at the C-terminus. Additional single substitutions consisted of the incorporation of D- or L-Tic1, D-Tic2, Tic6 or Phe(pNO2)6 and Arg29-NH2. The Arg29-NH2 analog of MZ-5-156 (KT-48) was further modified by single substitutions using Pal1; D-Tpi2; D- or L-Phe4; Phe(pX)6 X = F, Cl, I; Tyr7; Aib8; Tyr(Me)10 or Phe(pCl)10. Four peptides had multiple substitutions. All the analogs were evaluated for their ability to inhibit GH release induced by hGHRH(1-29)NH2 in vitro and some were also tested in vivo. Peptides [PhAc-Tyr1,D-Arg2,Phe(pI)6,Abu15,Nle27]hGHRH(1-2 9)NH2 (KT-30), [PhAc-Tyr1,D-Arg2,Phe(pCl)6,Aib8,Abu15,Nle27] hGHRH(1-29)NH2 (KT-50) and [PhAc-Tyr1,D-Arg2,Phe(pCl)6,Tyr(Me)10,Abu15,Nle27]h GHRH(1-29)NH2 (KT-40) with Phe(pI)6, Aib8 or Tyr(Me)10 modifications, respectively, showed high and prolonged inhibitory effect in superfused rat pituitary system. Analog KT-50 also exhibited a strong and long-term inhibitory activity in vivo in rats. Most of the new analogs showed high binding affinities to rat pituitary GHRH receptors.

Treatment of radiation-induced growth hormone deficiency with growth hormone-releasing hormone.

In children with hypothalamic causes for GH deficiency there are theoretical reasons why a GHRH analogue might be better than conventional GH therapy in promoting growth. We have aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1-29)-NH2 given as a twice daily subcutaneous injection in the treatment of growth failure in children with radiation-induced GH deficiency. A multicentre study comparing growth before and after 1 year of treatment with GHRH (1-29)-NH2, 15 micrograms/kg twice daily, by subcutaneous injection in children with radiation-induced GH deficiency. On completion of the study year all children were treated with GH (0.5 U/kg/week) and growth parameters were documented over the next year. Nine children (six boys) with radiation-induced GH deficiency following cranial (n = 4) or craniospinal (n = 5) irradiation for a brain tumour distant from the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (n = 8) or prophylaxis against central nervous system leukaemia (n = 1) were studied. All were prepubertal when the study commenced, which was at least 2 years from radiotherapy. Anthropometry and pubertal staging were carried out at 3-monthly intervals and bone age estimations at 6-monthly intervals (TW2 method). Pretreatment standing height velocities were compared with values during the year of GHRH treatment and then after the first year of GH therapy. In those that had received craniospinal irradiation, a change in leg-length Standard deviation score (SDS) was noted before and after GHRH therapy. Changes in skin-fold thickness and bone age during the GHRH study year were documented. Adverse events and 3-monthly measurements of clinical chemistry, haematology, lipid profile and thyroid function were recorded. There was a significant increase in height velocity from 3.3 (SD 1.1) cm/year before treatment, to 6.0 (SDS 1.5) cm/year after 1 year of GHRH treatment (P = 0.004). GHRH maintained or improved the leg length SDS in children who had received craniospinal irradiation. Bone age increased by a mean of 1.1 years/chronological year during treatment with GHRH. Subsequent height velocity during 1 year of GH therapy was 7.5 (SD 1.5)cm/year. No adverse changes in biochemical or hormonal analyses were noted or adverse events that could be attributed to GHRH therapy. One child went into puberty during the GHRH study year and three were pubertal during the first year of GH therapy. In cranially irradiated children, GHRH was effective in increasing growth velocity but this was less than that seen in response to GH therapy, although it matched that in children with isolated idiopathic GH deficiency treated with the same dose and schedule of GHRH administration.

Effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRF) analogs, bovine and rat GRF on growth hormone secretion in cattle in vivo.

Effects of bovine and human growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRF) analogs (bGRF(1-29)-NH2: bGRF-29, [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29, [D-Ala2]-hGRF(1-29)-NH2: [D-Ala2]-hGRF-29), bovine GRF (bGRF(1-44)-NH2: bGRF-44), as well as rat GRF (rGRF) on GH release were studied in female calves. Intravenous (i.v.) bolus injections of 0.25 microg/kg BW of bGRF-29, [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29, and [D-Ala2]-hGRF-29 stimulated GH release. Plasma GH levels began to rise 10 min after the injection of each peptide, and significant increases in GH concentrations were obtained at 60, 180 and 150 min after the injection of bGRF-29, [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29 and [D-Ala2]-hGRF-29, respectively. The concentrations of GH 80 min after the injection of [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29 were significantly higher than those after the injection of [D-Ala2]-hGRF-29 (except at 80 and 90 min) or bGRF-29. The i.v. bolus injections of 0.25 microg/kg BW of bGRF-44 and rGRF stimulated GH release, and the GH-releasing potency of rGRF was approximately equal to that of bGRF-44. The plasma GH responses to the repeated i.v. injection of bGRF-29 or [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29 at 2-h intervals were examined. bGRF-29 acutely increased plasma GH levels after each injection, and the high GH levels decreased to the basal values within 2 h. In contrast, high GH levels induced by [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29 were gradually decreased but not lowered to basal values throughout the experiment. These results show that [D-Ala2, Ala15]-bGRF-29 has longer-lasting and greater GH-releasing activity than the other GRF analogs in female calves, and the GH-releasing potency of rat GRF is approximately equal to that of bovine GRF in cattle in vivo.

Biodegradable microspheres as a delivery system for rismorelin porcine, a porcine-growth-hormone-releasing-hormone

Biodegradable controlled release microspheres containing rismorelin porcine, a potent analog of growth-hormone-releasing-hormone (GHRH), and poly( D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) were prepared by a modified solvent evaporation technique. Release rates of rismorelin porcine were characterized in vitro by use of a cell perifusion system and evaluated in vivo in pigs. Rismorelin porcine is 4-methylhippuroyl (1) porcine GHRH (2-76)-OH, which is a potent analog of a natural porcine GHRH. Due to the high water solubility of rismorelin porcine, a modified solvent evaporation procedure was used to prepare poly( D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. The aqueous phase was modified by the inclusion of phosphate salts to prevent rismorelin porcine solubilization during microsphere formation. Rismorelin porcine loading levels evaluated were 5% w/w, 10% w/w, and 25% w/w. Rismorelin porcine loading level determined rate and total amount of peptide released from microspheres in vitro and in vivo. The biological efficacy of the rismorelin porcine microspheres was determined in finishing swine by urinary urea nitrogen (UUN) depression as well as by serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Depression of both UUN and BUN was noted upon subcutaneous administration of rismorelin porcine microspheres. The nature of the injection vehicle used to suspend the microspheres for injection influenced in vivo release of rismorelin porcine. Physical site of injection of microspheres did not influence release profile in swine. In vivo release of rismorelin porcine from microspheres ceased after nine to twelve days in all studies.

Effect of chronic administration of a new potent agonist of GH-RH(1–29)NH 2 on linear growth and GH responsiveness in rats

The effects of a repeated or continuous administration of a potent agonistic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH), [Dat 1, Thr 8, Orn 12,21, Abu 15, Nle 27, Asp 28, Agm 29] hGH-RH(1–29) (JI-36), on the linear growth and the GH responses to bolus injections of GH-RH(1–29)NH 2 were investigated in male rats about 7 weeks old. Body weight and tail length were monitored. Basal serum GH and IGF-I concentrations and GH responses to GH-RH(1–29)NH 2 were measured by RIA. Chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 by continuous release from osmotic minipumps at the rate of 0.2 μg/h or twice daily injections of 0.5 and 5 7gmg/rat for 4 weeks significantly speeded up the growth of rats as measured by the tail length. The acceleration of growth was similar in the 3 groups and was associated with stimulation of IGF-I secretion. The GH response to bolus injection of GH-RH(1–29)NH 2 was preserved in all groups and no attentuation of the response occurred in rats treated for 4 weeks with agonist JI-36 as compared with the control group. Our results indicate that chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 significantly increases the growth rate without affecting somatotroph responsiveness in rats. It is therefore likely that this class of GH-RH agonists may be useful clinically.

Purification of the Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone Receptor with a C-Terminal, Biotinylated Affinity Ligand

The receptor for growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) has been purified from bovine pituitary tissue and HEK293 cells transfected with human or porcine receptor using a retrievable biotinylated GHRH analog. Custom synthesized [His1, Nle27, Biotin-Lys41]-human GHRH-(1–41)-NH2(GHRHb) bound to pituitary membranes with affinity comparable to human GHRH. GHRHbwhich has the biotinyl group on the C-terminus of the peptide allowed simultaneous binding to both the receptor and streptavidin agarose. This analog was used directly in the purification of the receptor from pituitary tissue or was modified by incorporation of the photoaffinity group ANBNOS (GHRHλb), radioiodinated and used to demonstrate purification of the GHRH receptor from transfected HEK293 cell membranes. Membranes were prepared and prebound with the respective ligand followed by CHAPS-solubilization and application of the solubilized complex to a strepavidin agarose column. Analysis of eluates from the pituitary tissue purification by silver stained SDS PAGE or of autoradiographs of gels from HEK293 eluates revealed specific bands of 52 and 55 kDa, respectively. The higher size of the latter band is expected for the ligand-crosslinked receptor. Both bands displayed similar mobility shifts of 10 kDa upon treatment with N-glycosidase, a method previously used to characterize this receptor (1). A 45 kDa band corresponding to the size of the GSαsubunit was also detected in eluates of the silver stained gels, suggesting that the GHRH receptor was retrieved as a heterotrimeric complex. Fold purification and yield for this procedure were estimated to be greater than 50,000 and 2.6–9%, respectively.

Investigation of the chemical stability of a new growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) analogue by HPLC.

The stability of a new active growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue (D-Ala2,Nle27,(gamma-amino-butyric acid)30-GHRH(1-30)-NH2) was investigated during storage at different temperatures in aqueous solution. Samples stored for various periods of time were analysed by HPLC. It is concluded that in aqueous solution D-Ala2, Nle27,(gamma-amino-butyric acid)30-growth hormone-releasing hormone (1-30)-NH2 is stable: at least for 36 days at 4 degrees C; for 28 days at 25 degrees C; and for 10 days at 37 degrees C.

Effect of Salts on the Structure of a Potent Analog of Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone As Determined by Optical Spectroscopy

Optical spectroscopic methods (circular dichroism, analytical ultracentrifugation, and static light scattering) were employed to study the solution behavior of an N‐terminal‐acylated 76‐residue analog of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH). The GHRH analog had a 30% helical configuration in aqueous acidic solution, unlike other GHRH analogs that had a random coil configuration in aqueous solutions, and self‐associated. High concentrations (7 M) of urea were required to obtain monomeric peptide, but such urea concentrations unfolded the peptide. Therefore, the folding and self‐association were related events. The self‐association and helix content were increased by the addition of various cations (e.g., Na+, Ca2+). In 7M urea, when these cations were added, the peptide started to refold toward its aqueous conformation in a pH dependent manner; at low pH (2.5–3.5) the peptide folded to approximately 50% of the native configuration. At neutral pH (>6) only small changes were seen when salts were added. When CaCl2was added to a solution containing 7M urea at pH 2.5, the self‐association of the peptide increased with the concentration of CaCl2. Therefore, the salt dependent self‐association observed in aqueous solvents was present in 7M urea. Residues 45–76 in this GHRH analog, which are not present outside the hypothalamus, are probably needed to interact with a folding chaperonein vivo and provide stability for successful membrane transport and maintenance of biological activity.

Peptide Design Using a Genetically Patterned Binary Code: Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone as a Model

This paper reviews a method for the design of peptides and proteins of predefined structure and function and provides an example. Specifically, an analog of rat growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (residues 1-23) was synthesized by solid-phase methods based on a reversed sequence of the mRNA for GHRH (1-23). The new peptide, designated GHRH 3′-5′, had a hydropathic profile similar to that of native GHRH 5′-3′ (GHRH) but had only 17% primary sequence homology. GHRH 3′-5′ specifically bound to the GHRH receptor on rat pituitary cells and to polyclonal anti-GHRH antibody in ELISA and RIA procedures. Additionally, GHRH 3′-5′ blocked the in vitro stimulation of GH RNA synthesis and in vitro and in vivo GH release mediated by GHRH. These data show that 3′-5′ GHRH with little sequence homology to native rat GHRH is an antagonist and further supports the importance of the linear pattern of hydropathy to the gross secondary and/or tertiary structure and rudimentary function of peptides and proteins. The impact of these findings on the interaction of complementary peptides is discussed.