Platelets contain α-granules that are reservoirs of critical growth factors (GFs) regulating cellular proliferation, migration, differentiation and angiogenesis. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can be effective in treating hair loss disorders as reported from several clinical trials, however the response within a study and between studies has been inconsistent. It is possible that this is related to quantitative and qualitative differences in platelet-derived GFs in PRP. It is currently unclear whether these differences result from inherent patient-to-patient variability or from the devices used to prepare PRP or both. To test these variables, we first compared platelet expression and release of prominent GFs (TGFβ1, PDGF-A, PDGF-BB, VEGF, FGF2 and EGF) between patient volunteers undergoing PRP therapy for hair loss. PRP was prepared using an FDA-cleared device which utilizes a density-based separation technique on a patented separator gel. Platelet GF expression and their levels in PRP were highly variable between patients (n=34) and failed the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, suggesting an inherent patient-to-patient variability. The variability was more pronounced for VEGF and EGF while it was least for TGFβ1. We then compared GF levels in PRP to those prepared using another FDA-cleared device (n=7) which utilizes a dual spin protocol wherein the first soft spin removes the red blood cells while the second spin concentrates the platelets. A final PRP volume of 7-10 ml was produced in both devices although the original volume of blood used and platelet enrichment in PRP was different between them. Significant individual differences in GF levels were also detected when PRP prepared from both devices was compared. Thus, our study suggests that quantitative and qualitative differences in GFs are not only inherent between patients but may also be driven by the devices used to prepare PRP. This may affect the clinical data reported in the literature contributing to inconsistent clinical responses.