Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Breast Research Articles

Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: analysis of the subgroup of patients from Japan in the phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial.

In CAPItello-291, capivasertib-fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo-fulvestrant in the overall and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered population with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer. Capivasertib-fulvestrant is approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with one or more tumor biomarker alterations (PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN). Here, we report outcomes in the CAPItello-291 subgroup of patients from Japan. Adults with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer whose disease had relapsed or progressed during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy, were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive capivasertib or placebo, plus fulvestrant. The dual primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS in the overall andPIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered population. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Of 708 patients randomized in CAPItello-291, 78 were from Japan (37 randomized to capivasertib-fulvestrant and 41 to placebo-fulvestrant). In the Japan subgroup, PFS numerically favored the capivasertib-fulvestrant arm (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.40-1.28), consistent with the analysis of PFS in the global population. Similarly, in the Japan subgroup of patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors, PFS favored the capivasertib-fulvestrant arm (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.29-1.39), consistent with the global population. The adverse event profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in the Japan subgroup was broadly similar to that in the global population; no new safety concerns were identified. Outcomes in the Japan subgroup were broadly similar to those of the global population, supporting the clinical benefit of capivasertib-fulvestrant in treating HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer that has progressed on, or after, an endocrine-based regimen.

Sacituzumab govitecan in HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer: the randomized phase 3 EVER-132-002 trial.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the global TROPiCS-02 study. TROPiCS-02 enrolled few Asian patients. Here we report results of SG in Asian patients with HR+HER2- mBC from the EVER-132-002 study. Patients were randomized to SG (n = 166) or chemotherapy (n = 165). The primary endpoint was met: PFS was improved with SG versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.87; P = 0.0028; median 4.3 versus 4.2 months). OS also improved with SG versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88; P = 0.0061; median 21.0 versus 15.3 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. SG demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile consistent with prior studies. SG represents a promising treatment option for Asian patients with HR+HER2- mBC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT04639986 ).

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of ribociclib in black patients with metastatic breast cancer the LEANORA study

Underrepresented populations’ participation in clinical trials remains limited, and the potential impact of genomic variants on drug metabolism remains elusive. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenomics (PGx) of ribociclib in self-identified Black women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2) advanced breast cancer. LEANORA (NCT04657679) was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study involving 14 Black women. PK and PGx were evaluated using tandem mass spectrometry and PharmacoScan™ microarray (including CYP3A5*3, *6, and *7). CYP3A5 phenotypes varied among participants: 7 poor metabolizers (PM), 6 intermediate metabolizers (IM), and one normal metabolizer (NM). The area under the curve did not significantly differ between PMs (39,230 h*ng/mL) and IM/NMs (43,546 h*ng/mL; p = 0.38). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also similar. We found no association between CYP3A5 genotype and ribociclib exposure. Continued efforts are needed to include diverse populations in clinical trials to ensure equitable treatment outcomes.

Statin use and risks of breast cancer recurrence and mortality.

Preclinical evidence suggests improved breast cancer survival associated with statin use, but findings from observational studies are conflicting and remain inconclusive. The objective of this study was to assess the association between statin use after cancer diagnosis and cancer outcomes among breast cancer patients. In this retrospective cohort study, 38,858 women aged ≥66 years who were diagnosed with localized and regional stage breast cancer from 2008 through 2017 were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database. Statin use was ascertained from Medicare Part D pharmacy claims data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between post-diagnosis statin use and risks of breast cancer recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality. Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years for recurrence and 3.7 years for mortality, 1446 women experienced a recurrence, and 2215 died from breast cancer. The mean duration of post-diagnosis statin use was 2.2 years. Statin use post-diagnosis was not associated with recurrence risk (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91-1.21), but was associated with a reduced risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96). The reduction was more pronounced in women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88). These findings suggest that post-diagnosis statin use is associated with improved cancer-specific survival in women with breast cancer and should be confirmed in randomized trials of statin therapy in breast cancer patients.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the end of treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is an independent prognostic factor for ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical significance of peripheral blood biomarkers, including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), at the end of treatment (EOT) with CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib and palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. We included 67 patients treated with fulvestrant plus abemaciclib or palbociclib. Overall survival (OS) since the EOT with CDK/4/6 inhibitors was compared in relation to the levels of ALC and NLR. The cut-off values of ALC and NLR were set at 1000/μL and 3, respectively. Patients with a high ALC at EOT showed significantly longer OS than those with a low ALC (p = 0.0358). Moreover, patients with a low NLR at EOT showed significantly longer OS than those with a high NLR at EOT (p = 0.0044). Looking at the changes of ALC and NLR between baseline and the EOT, patients with a high ALC both at baseline and at the EOT showed significantly longer OS than others (p = 0.0201). Similarly, patients with a low NLR both at baseline and at the EOT showed significantly longer OS after EOT than others (p = 0.0136). Multivariable analysis revealed that the NLR at EOT (low vs. high) and changes in NLR (low at baseline to low at EOT vs. others) were significant and independent prognostic factors for OS after EOT (p = 0.0337, p = 0.0039, respectively). NLR at EOT with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a significant and independent prognostic marker for patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Major considerations on the relationship of triple negative breast cancer with microRNAs and nutrological triggers: a systematic review

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% of all cases. Its incidence is usually higher in young women (under 40 years of age). The classification as triple-negative occurs because, in this case, there are no estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, which are responsible for controlling tumor growth. Higher levels of physical activity and better diet quality are associated with lower mortality from breast cancer in observational studies. Furthermore, physical activity and optimal nutrition can improve the relative dose intensity of chemotherapy, as they can activate miRNAs that regulate several biological processes. Objective: This was to conduct a systematic review to establish the main considerations of the relationship between triple-negative breast cancer and microRNAs as biomarkers and regulators of gene expression in cancer cells, as well as to show some nutritional triggers of microRNA activation desirable for breast cancer control. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was conducted from April to June 2024 in the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE and AMSTAR-2 instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed appropriately. According to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: 112 articles were found, and 40 were evaluated in full and included in this article, 22 of which were included in the systematic review. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the global assessment resulted in 15 studies with a high risk of bias and 25 studies that did not reach GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with X2=81.5%>50%. It was concluded that an increasing number of studies have shown that non-coding RNA (ncRNA), including microRNA (miRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), play a significant role in tumorigenesis. Although a diet and exercise intervention did not affect relative dose intensity, the intervention was associated with a higher pCR in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and triple-negative breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. High expression levels of miR-27a/b, miR-210, and miR-454 were associated with shorter overall survival, whereas high expression levels of miR-454 and miR-374a/b were associated with disease-free survival. The miRNAs associated with triple-negative breast cancer may provide new avenues for early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore, specific miRNAs may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01.

The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2-directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.

Cost-effectiveness of early vs delayed use of abemaciclib combination therapy for patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer.

Abemaciclib was newly approved for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Clinical guidelines recommended abemaciclib as the first-line treatment for HR+/ HER2- EBC (early use) or HR+/ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (delayed use). To compare the cost-effectiveness of early vs delayed use of abemaciclib for treatment of HR+/HER2- high-risk EBC. Early use was defined as combined abemaciclib and endocrine therapy as first-line therapy for EBC, followed by treatment with fulvestrant for MBC. Delayed use was defined as endocrine therapy for EBC, followed by combined abemaciclib and fulvestrant therapy for MBC. A 5-state model was developed to estimate lifetime costs, life-years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of hypothetical patients with HR+/ HER2- EBC from a third-party US payer's perspective. Key clinical and safety data were derived from the monarchE and MONARCH 2 clinical trials. Costs, utilities, and disutility values of adverse events were obtained from the literature. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of early vs delayed abemaciclib use and compared it with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per LY or QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed to test the robustness of the base-case model. Base-case analysis showed early use yielded 21.08 LYs and 17.93 QALYs for $586,213 and delayed use yielded 11.14 LYs and 9.38 QALYs for $157,576. The ICER of early vs delayed use was $43,136/LY and $50,104/QALY, which was cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $100,000. The PSA result indicated that a 94.6% likelihood of early use (vs delayed use) was cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $100,000 per QALY. This study suggests that giving abemaciclib in the early stage rather than waiting until patients develop metastatic disease (current standard of care in MBC) is a cost-effective strategy.

374P Real-world (Rw) outcomes in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with chemotherapy (CT) in France and Germany

374P Real-world (Rw) outcomes in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with chemotherapy (CT) in France and Germany

Palbociclib: Randomized Studies and Real-world Evidence as the Basis for Therapeutic Planning in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Endocrine-based combination therapy with an inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6 inhibitors) is currently the first-line therapy of choice for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The efficacy and safety of the treatment with palbociclib, the first CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for this indication, have been confirmed in large randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with strictly defined patient cohorts. Since then, many relevant questions about CDK4/6 inhibition with palbociclib for mBC have been investigated in RCTs and real-world studies. Based on this evidence, palbociclib is widely used in clinical practice since many years because of its efficacy and good tolerability. The aim of this review is to summarize findings from RCTs and RWE considering clinically relevant aspects such as safety, tolerability, quality of life and efficacy with a focus on specific questions and patient characteristics. A critical discussion and review of the overall evidence for endocrine-based therapy with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can contribute to support therapy decisions in daily clinical practice.

Determining Clinicopathologic Factors That Influence Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer in Argentina After CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated. This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting. Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 v 8.7 months, P = .00045). In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.

The different sequences of CDK4/6 inhibitor and mTOR inhibitor in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study

BackgroundCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) are effective for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of different sequences of CDK4/6i and EVE are largely unknown. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different sequences in China. Methods146 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received both CDK4/6i and EVE in salvage setting were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results56 patients received CDK4/6i prior to EVE (Group A), 90 patients received CDK4/6i subsequent to EVE (Group B). The median PFS of CDK4/6i and EVE in Group A vs Group B were 8.4m and 2.5m vs 4.6m and 6.1m respectively. The total PFS of first-line and second-line endocrine therapy were not different between Group A and Group B [13.1m vs 17.7m (P=0.330, HR=0.738, 95%CI: 0.399-1.365)]. The 5y OS of patients in Group A or Group B were 62.0% vs 57.4%, P=0.569. ConclusionsWe found that no matter CDK4/6i or EVE was used first, the survival were not significantly different between Group A and Group B. Both can be clinical options.

359P Overall survival of palbociclib (PAL) + endocrine therapy (ET) in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the 1st line (1L) or 2nd line (2L) setting: A multicenter observational study

359P Overall survival of palbociclib (PAL) + endocrine therapy (ET) in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the 1st line (1L) or 2nd line (2L) setting: A multicenter observational study

Major pathologic response and long-term clinical benefit in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundThe majority of HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients can also achieve long-term survival despite not attaining pCR, indicating limited prognostic value of pCR in this population. This study aimed to identify novel pathologic end points for predicting long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MethodsWe analyzed HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients with stage II-III tumors who underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from three hospitals. Major pathologic response (MPR), defined as the presence of Miller-Payne grades 3–5 and positive lymph node ratio of ≤10 %, was used as a pathological evaluation indicator. We assessed the association between MPR and event-free survival (EFS) and performed Multivariable Cox regression to identify independent factors associated with EFS. ResultsFrom January 2010 to December 2020, 386 patients were included in the final analysis. 28 patients (7.3 %) achieved pCR and 118 patients (30.6 %) achieved MPR. The median duration of follow-up was 54.4 months,5-year EFS was 87 % in the MPR group vs. 68 % in the non-MPR group. Multivariate analysis showed that low PR expression, high clinical stage, lower Miller–Payne grades and Positive lymph node ratio were independent poor prognostic factors for EFS (all P values < 0.05). The prognostic effect of MPR remained in multivariable models (hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.76; P = 0.008), In non-pCR patients, those who achieved MPR exhibited a similar EFS compared with pCR patients (HR, 2.25; 95 % CI, 0.51–9.84; P = 0.28). ConclusionMPR may be a novel pathologic end point in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, holding greater applicability in the prognosis evaluation than pCR.

Real-world experience of abemaciclib for adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer.

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, was approved to reduce risk of recurrence in high-risk, HR+, HER2-, early breast cancer based on the monarchE trial. The most common adverse events reported in monarchE were diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Real-world tolerability data and incidence of adverse events with abemaciclib in the adjuvant setting versus the metastatic setting is lacking. This is a retrospective analysis of HR+, HER2- breast cancer patients on abemaciclib from March 2018 to September 2021 at Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chicago, Illinois. Incidence, grade of adverse events, dose reductions, and discontinuations were evaluated in patients taking abemaciclib in the adjuvant setting and the metastatic setting. Of the 30 patients included in this analysis, 100% experienced an adverse event of any grade. During treatment, 12.5% treated in the adjuvant setting and 35.7% in the metastatic setting experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of abemaciclib occurred in 18.8% of patients in the adjuvant setting and 57.1% in the metastatic setting. This data suggests abemaciclib is better tolerated in high-risk, HR+, HER2-, node-positive, early breast cancer treated in the adjuvant setting compared to the metastatic setting. Management of adverse events is crucial to help patients stay on therapy to improve clinical outcomes. Real-world tolerability of abemaciclib in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings is of importance.

A phase 3 study (PATHWAY) of palbociclib plus tamoxifen in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy is approved for treating patients with hormone-receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer; however, data on palbociclib combined with tamoxifen are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib–tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. This double-blind phase 3 study included 184 women who were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib–tamoxifen or placebo–tamoxifen. Pre/perimenopausal women also received goserelin. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Median PFS was 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–32.4) with palbociclib–tamoxifen and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4–14.6) with placebo–tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85; P = 0.002). Palbociclib–tamoxifen improved PFS in patients who were treated with first-line or second-line endocrine therapy and pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients. Though OS data are still immature (median not reached in both groups), an overall risk reduction of 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44–1.21) with palbociclib–tamoxifen was observed at the time of PFS analysis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with palbociclib–tamoxifen was neutropenia (89.0% [none were febrile] versus 1.1% with placebo–tamoxifen). There were no deaths owing to adverse events in either group. Among patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer, palbociclib–tamoxifen resulted in significantly longer PFS than tamoxifen alone. Early OS data showed a trend favoring palbociclib–tamoxifen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03423199. Study registration date: February 06, 2018.

Current and Novel Treatment Options in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains an incurable disease, and most patients will experience disease progression during their treatment course. Although endocrine therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative mBC, significant progress has been and continues to be made in the treatment of this BC subtype. The discovery of molecular markers, mutations in key cellular pathways, and genomic signatures have led to the development of novel and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates, oral selective estrogen receptor downregulators, and inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. This has resulted in significant improvements in the survival and quality of life of patients. With the increasing number of treatment options for patients, appropriate drug sequencing remains a challenge. Treatment discussions should involve patient-physician shared decision making, with consideration of genomic data, previous lines of therapy, side effect profiles, and clinical trial enrollment.

Rationale for the Initiation, Outcomes, and Characteristics of Chemotherapy Following CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study.

The standard therapy for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer includes the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy. The optimal post-CDK4/6i treatment sequence is unclear. This cohort study evaluated the initiation, characteristics, and outcomes of chemotherapy following CDK4/6i-based treatment. Among the 227 patients who began CDK4/6i therapy, 114 completed it. Seventy-nine female patients received further treatment, including 55 receiving chemotherapy. The average age was 60.1 years. Post-CDK4/6i chemotherapy was typically (69.1%) first-line due to an impending visceral crisis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.0 months (range 0.5-18.9), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 8.3 months (0.5-26.1). The median OS from the end of CDK4/6i treatment was 12.4 months (1.5-26.8). In univariate analysis, neither mPFS nor mOS was associated with age, tumor grade, receptor status, Ki67 status, time from diagnosis to CDK4/6i cessation, therapy line, or CDK4/6i type. Dose reduction occurred in 12 patients (21.8%), and chemotherapy was ceased due to adverse events in 8 patients (14.6%). Chemotherapy showed limited benefit regardless of the regimen. The role of chemotherapy may evolve with broader CDK4/6i use in adjuvant treatment.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics of Ribociclib in Black Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: The LEANORA study.

Underrepresented populations' participation in clinical trials remains limited, and the potential impact of genomic variants on drug metabolism remains elusive. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenomics (PGx) of ribociclib in self-identified Black women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2) advanced breast cancer. LEANORA (NCT04657679) was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study involving 14 Black women. PK and PGx were evaluated using tandem mass spectrometry and PharmacoScan™ microarray (including CYP3A5*3, *6, and *7). CYP3A5 phenotypes varied among participants: 7 poor metabolizers (PM), 6 intermediate metabolizers (IM), and one normal metabolizer (NM). The area-under-the-curve did not significantly differ between PMs (39,230 hr*ng/mL) and IM/NMs (43,546 hr*ng/mL; p = 0.38). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also similar. We found no association between CYP3A5 genotype and ribociclib exposure. Continued efforts are needed to include diverse populations in clinical trials to ensure equitable treatment outcomes.

OPERA-01: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of palazestrant (OP-1250) vs standard-of-care for patients with ER+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer after endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors.

TPS22 Background: In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), endocrine therapy (ET) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in the first-line setting. However, patients develop resistance, most commonly due to acquired mutations in ESR1. Efficacy of available ET post CDK4/6i treatment is limited. Therefore, a significant unmet need exists for patients with ET-CDKi-resistant ER+, HER2– MBC to improve outcomes and delay time to chemotherapy. Palazestrant is an oral small molecule complete ER antagonist (CERAN) and selective ER degrader (SERD) that binds ER and completely blocks ER-driven transcriptional activity, irrespective of ESR1 mutation status. In a phase 1/2 monotherapy study in heavily pretreated patients with ER+, HER2– advanced or MBC (NCT04505826), palazestrant showed a tolerable safety profile, favorable pharmacokinetics and encouraging antitumor efficacy in patients with and without ESR1 mutation at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 120 mg once a day (qd) (Lin et al. ESMO 2023 MO382). Methods: OPERA-01 (NCT06016738) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of palazestrant as a single agent to SOC ET (fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) in patietns with ER+, HER2– MBC that relapsed or progressed on 1-2 prior lines of ET, including a CDK4/6i. Eligible patients are adults who have a confirmed diagnosis of evaluable ER+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced or MBC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Prior treatments must include 1-2 prior lines of ET, last ET duration for ≥6 months; must have received CDK4/6i with ET and have disease progression during or within 28 days of completion of each line of prior treatment for MBC. No prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting is permitted. In the dose selection part of the study, 120 patients are randomized to 90 mg qd or 120 mg qd palazestrant or SOC monotherapy. The dose selection will be conducted when 80 patients in both palazestrant arms have had an opportunity to be on treatment for 16 weeks. Overall, 510 patients, including patients from the dose selection part, will be randomized to palazestrant or SOC ET. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival will be assessed by blinded independent central review in patients with and without ESR1 mutations in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, antitumor activity (objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and duration of response), safety, patient-reported outcomes, and PK in patients with and without ESR1 mutations. The study started recruitment in November 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT06016738 .