Group Of Phraseological Units Research Articles

Evaluative Component in the Meaning of Verbal Phraseological Units of English, Russian and Tatar Languages

Despite the fact that axiological interpretation of the linguistic and logical categories of evaluation, the problems of the value picture of the world and values, as well as the interpretation of appraisal, are rather widely represented in the works of modern Russian and foreign scientists, the problem of evaluation today has been more developed in the lexical system of the language than in phraseological corpus, that also explains our interest to the representation of the evaluation category in the units of secondary nomination.The main aim of this work is to study the evaluative component in the meaning of verbal phraseological units, describing human behavior in English, Russian and Tatar languages. Phraseological units denoting human behavior are one of the most active formation of the phraseological structure of any language. This group of phraseological units takes a significant place in phraseological system of Russian, English and Tatar languages as well, is characterized by semantic and structural diversity and expresses specific appraisal of the world and a person in it. The authors take an attempt to study evaluation as one of the macro components of the connotation of phraseological meaning of the researched units, suggest their own scale of emotive marks, separately consider the interaction of evaluation with expressiveness, emotiveness.

ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМЫ НА РЕЛИГИОЗНУЮ ТЕМАТИКУ В ЯКУТСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ

The purpose of this research is to identify and to sort phraseological units on religious themes in the Yakut language and to conduct their statistical analysis. In this article, for the first time in linguistics of the Yakut language, a classification of phraseological units according to religious themes is carried out. The statistical calculation of the number of phraseological units in each group is made as well. In total, 7 groups of phraseological units are revealed: 1) blessing “алгыс”; 2) trade cult; 3) cult of the deities “айыы”; 4) shamanism; 5) phraseological biblical expressions; 6) euphemism; 7) folklore. The number of collected phraseological units is calculated and the statistical result, on the basis of which a logical conclusion is drawn about the reasons for such a ratio of the number of phraseological units, is delivered. The total amount of 71 religious idioms is presented in the work.

Особенности вербализации семантики следствия во фразеологической картине мира русского языка

The article is devoted to the study of phraseological units with semantics of consequence. One of the segments of the concept of CAUSATION is considered, which covers causation, target, conditional and concessional relations. Linguistic and cultural analysis allows to reveal national and cultural peculiarities of verbalization of the mentioned semantics at the level of phraseology. It is shown that phraseological units, which contain the component of consequence in their structure, represent situations of emotional shocks, great physical and mental stress, have causal indicators ot kogo -, ot chego-libo ‘from someone, from something,’ are included in contexts, containing an indication of the cause. The analyzed material confirms the well-known thesis that idioms describing negative emotions prevail in quantitative terms over phraseological units representing positive emotions. The structure of the thematic group of phraseological units involving determination of such semantic groups as “Joy. Delight. Happiness,” “Fear. Horror,” “Anger. Rage,” “Despair,” “Anxiety. Excitement,” “Confusion. Shame,” “Sadness,” “Surprise. Astonishment,” “Suffering. Flour.” The main forms underlying the idioms in the studied groups are described. It is noted that in the structure of phraseological units components serdtse ‘heart,’ dusha ‘soul,’ golova ‘head,’ um ‘mind,’ pamyat’ ‘memory’ symbolizing the emotional and intellectual nature of a person are frequent.

Фразеологическая микросистема «черты характера человека по отношению к другим» в идеографическом аспекте (на материале украинского и английского языков)

Фразеологическая микросистема «черты характера человека по отношению к другим» в идеографическом аспекте (на материале украинского и английского языков)

Историко-культурная информативность французских фразеологических единиц с компонентом-дендронимом

Taisiya I. Skorobogatova, Olga Yu. Suraleva (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) Research of national specificity of phraseology in a national language by distinguishing thematic groups of phraseological units and the analysis of their component composition becomes increasingly important in linguistic studies. This article is devoted to the analysis of the French phraseological units, which include dendronyms. Authors narrow notion of “dendronym” and use it only to refer to the names of trees. In French phraseological corpus authors identified 18 dendronyms, which are core components of the floral phrasal units: amandier (almond tree), cedre (cedar), chene (oak), cocotier (coconut palm), cypres (cypress), figuier (fig tree), laurier (laurel tree), murier (mulberry), olivier (olive tree), orme (elm), osier (willow), palmier (palm), peuplier (poplar), platane (sycamore), poirier (pear), pommier (apple), prunier (plum), sapin (spruce, fir). The following list proves that the repertoire of dendronyms used to form French FU is not too wide. However, the authors confirmed the possibility to consider idioms-dendronym component as special items of historical and cultural memory. Key words: floral phraseology, phraseological unit, dendrons, historical/ cultural memory, the French language .

Идеографическая характеристика тематической группы фразеологических единиц «черты характера человека по отношению к труду» в украинском и английском языках

Идеографическая характеристика тематической группы фразеологических единиц «черты характера человека по отношению к труду» в украинском и английском языках

Фразеология как средство отражения нравственных ценностей русской национальной личности

The article deals with the peculiarities of linguistic personality; examines the ideographic groups of phraseological units, an integral semantics of which reflects the most important semantic dominants of the concept of Russian national personality; restores on the basis of phraseology of the moral sphere of human the positive type (portrait) of Russian national personality.

NATIONAL AND CULTURAL VARIETY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE

The article analyzes national and cultural peculiarities of English phraseological units. The author stresses that English phraseological units are an important source of socio-cultural information. The author notes that extralinguistic factors determine the national specificity of English phraseology. It should be emphasized that national peculiarities of the way of life, mode of life and cultural events are reflected in the phraseology of the English language. The author of the article notes that phraseological units reflecting the peculiarities of historical development of the country, its military affairs, nautical phraseological units and the phraseological units which came into the English language from the Bible make up the most numerous groups of phraseological units with national and cultural components of semantics. The use of Biblical phraseological units makes the speech more expressive and helps speakers to emphasize the most important points of their information. Phraseological units with a “colour” component in their semantics are also widely spread in the English language. The symbolic aspect of the “colour” phraseological units in the English language expresses the mentality of the nation. The author’s conclusions are supported by the examples from the English literature of the 19 th and 20 th centuries. The results of the research show, that peculiarities of using phraseological units in speech and frequency of their use in speech depend on the socio-historical factors and the level of the linguistic culture of speakers.

Hacia una definición de las unidades fraseológicas coloquiales

Abstract Phraseology is often examined within the context of colloquial language. Given the figurative nature of both of these areas, it is easy to view all phraseology as colloquial. But not all idioms or proverbs can be used in informal contexts. Some are only appropriate for neutral or even formal settings. In this article, the author proposes a series of criteria for identifying colloquial phraseological units (PUs) in Spanish and distinguishing them from standard units. She focuses on idioms, routine formulae and proverbs, given that colloquial collocations have been defined in a previous work (Travalia 2008). Different guidelines for determining register are proposed for each group of PUs, based on their defining characteristics. The author analyzes examples of each class of PUs, using the suggested criteria, in order to test their validity.