This report is a product of the International Arctic Seas Assessment Project (IASAP), instituted in 1993 by the IAEA and endorsed by the Consulting Parties of the London Convention. IASAP was set up following the 1992 revelations of radioactive waste dumping in the Kara and Barents Seas by the Former Soviet Union. These were later detailed in Yablokov's famous `White Book'. IASAP was constituted as a Coordinated Research Programme, with additional contacts and consultancies, coordinated with the Norwegian-Russian Expert Group investigating contamination in northern areas. Its objectives were to assess the risks to human health and, at the request of the LD's Contracting Parties, to consider possible remedial actions and their justification. The present report contains only some of the results of the study. An earlier IASAP report provided predictions of release rates from dumped marine reactors (IAEA TECDOC-938, 1997) and two further TECDOCS are in preparation on: `Anthropogenic radionuclides in the Arctic Seas' and `Modelling of the radiological impact ... '. The report opens with a 7-page Executive Summary, providing a condensed and reassuring assessment of the current and future radiological situation and the feasibilty, cost and justification for remediation. It concludes that leakage from dumped wastes has been small, with negligible doses when compared with those from natural sources. Future doses to `typical' local human population groups are predicted to be low. Doses to marine organisms are predicted to be orders of magnitude below levels at which detrimental effects at a population level would be expected. Remediation is not justified on radiological grounds although controls on beach occupancy and the utilisation of marine resources will have to be maintained. The remainder of the report provides more detail on the methodology, assumptions and databases which were used to support the conclusions. It is divided into 8 main chapters with the following content: (1) Introduction; (2) Radiological protection and decision making; (3) The Arctic environment; (4) The radioactive source term; (5) Environmental modelling for radiological impact assessment; (6) Possible remedial action; (7) Analysis of the need for remdial action; (8) Conclusions and recommendations. The bibliography contains 120 references (up to 1997) and there is a list of contributors to the drafting and review. Each chapter is further subdivided to three levels of hierarchy, allowing the reader to navigate quite effectively. Overall the text is easy to follow and there are useful illustrations provided of data sets and technical information. For example, the food web and potential food sources for humans in the Kara Sea are well presented graphically. However, those interested in a more critical examination of some of the data, or some of the modelling assumptions made, will have to consult the primary sources cited in the text. A minor irritation was the presentation of much of the geographic information, such as distributions of radionuclides in seawater, on a rectangular grid, where some form of polar projection would have been more appropriate. The report provides an excellent summary of an important international collaborative project. It is presented in a style which should encourage a wide readership, amongst students, scientists, NGOs and decision makers. It demonstrates, in a logical sequence, how a complex radiological assessment is undertaken, taking into account the environmental setting, the nature of the waste, potential pathways of human exposure and how conclusions and recommendations are arrived at.