Group BD Research Articles

Efficacy of local dexmedetomidine add-on for spermatic cord block anesthesia in patients undergoing intrascrotal surgeries: randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.

Study objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine (DEX) to bupivacaine on the quality of spermatic cord block anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.DesignThis is a randomized, double-blind study.SettingThis study was performed in an educational and research hospital.PatientsOne hundred twenty adult males were scheduled for intrascrotal surgeries.InterventionsPatients were divided into two groups: group B received 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% for spermatic cord block and intravenous 50 µg of DEX and group BD received 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% added to 50 µg of DEX (9.5 mL bupivacaine 0. 25% + 0.5 mL [50 µg] DEX) for spermatic cord block, and for masking purposes, the patients received isotonic saline intravenously.MeasurementsTime to first analgesic request, analgesic consumption, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in the first 24 hours postoperatively were assessed.Main resultsTime to first rescue analgesic was significantly delayed in group BD in comparison with group B, median (interquartile) range, 7 (6–12) hours versus 6 (5–7) hours, (p=0.000), the mean cumulative morphine consumption (mg) in the first postoperative 24 hours was significantly lower in group BD compared with group B, 8.13±4.45 versus 12.7±3.79, with a mean difference (95% CI) of −4.57 (−6.06 to −3.07) (p=0.000); also, there was a significant reduction of VAS pain score in group BD in comparison with group B at all measured time points, VAS 2 hours (1.28±0.9 vs 1.92±0.8), VAS 6 hours (2.62±1.5 vs 3.93±1.2), VAS 12 hours (2.40±1.1 vs 3.57±0.65), VAS 24 hours (1.90±0.68 vs 2.53±0.62) (p=0.000)ConclusionThe addition of 50 µg of DEX to bupivacaine 0.25% in spermatic cord block for intrascrotal surgeries resulted in delay of first analgesic supplementation, reduction of postoperative analgesic consumption as well as improvement of the success rate of the block.

Influence of different inner dressings in negative-pressure wound therapy on escharectomy wound of full-thickness burn rabbits

Objective: To explore the influence of different inner dressings in negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on escharectomy wound of full-thickness burn rabbits. Methods: Eighteen Japanese white rabbits were inflicted with full-thickness burn on unilateral back. They were divided into polymer dressing group (PD), biological dressing group (BD), and silver biological dressing group (SBD), according to the random number table, with 6 rabbits in each group. On 3 days post burn, the wounds were performed with escharectomy, and then wounds of rabbits in group PD were covered with polyurethane foam. Wounds of rabbits in group BD were covered with porcine acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and wounds of rabbits in group SBD were covered with silver porcine ADM. Then continuous NPWT was performed on rabbits of the three groups for 7 days. Immediately after surgery and on post surgery day (PSD) 7, general observation of wound was conducted and tissue around the wound was harvested for determination of dry to wet weight ratio. The content of bacteria was counted and the content of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 in wound was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Fibroblasts in wound were counted after Masson staining and number of microvessels was counted after CD31 antibody immunohistochemical staining. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, LSD-t test, paired samples t test, and Bonferroni correction. Results: (1) Immediately after surgery, there was no granulation tissue in basal wound of rabbits in the three groups, with rich blood supply and obvious edema. On PSD 7, much granulation tissue was found in basal wound of rabbits in the three groups, with no or mild edema and no obvious redness and swelling in wound edge. (2) There were no significant differences in dry to wet weight ratios of tissue around the wound among and within the three groups immediately after surgery and on PSD 7 (with F values respectively 0.70 and 0.09, t values from 0.17 to 0.52, P values above 0.05). (3) Immediately after surgery, the content of bacteria in wounds of rabbits in groups PD, BD, and SBD was respectively (603.0±146.0) ×10(4,) (573.0±63.0) ×10(4,) and (590.0±100.0)×10(4) colony-forming unit (CFU)/g, with no significant difference among them (F=0.13, P>0.05). On PSD 7, the content of bacteria in wounds of rabbits in groups PD, BD, and SBD were respectively (5.4±0.8) ×10(4,) (4.6±0.9) ×10(4,) and (3.5±0.9)×10(4) CFU/g. Among them, the content of bacteria in wounds of rabbits in group SBD was lower than that in groups PD and BD, respectively (with t values respectively 3.78 and 2.29, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The content of bacteria in wounds of rabbits in the three groups on PSD 7 was decreased compared with that immediately after surgery (with t values from 10.05 to 21.81, P values below 0.01). (4) There was no significant difference in content of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in wounds of rabbits in the three groups immediately after surgery and on PSD 7 (with F values from 0.10 to 1.89, P values above 0.05). The content of TNF-α in wounds of rabbits in the three groups on PSD 7 was significantly higher than that immediately after surgery (with t values from 2.93 to 5.01, P<0.05 or P<0.01). (5) There was no significant difference in amount of fibroblasts in wounds of rabbits in the three groups immediately after surgery and on PSD 7 (with F values respectively 0.01 and 0.81, P values above 0.05). The amount of fibroblasts in wounds of rabbits in the three groups on PSD 7 was larger than that immediately after surgery (with t values from 4.78 to 11.58, P values below 0.01). (6) There was no significant difference in number of microvessels in wounds of rabbits in the three groups immediately after surgery and on PSD 7 (with F values respectively 2.42 and 2.49, P values above 0.05). The number of microvessels in wounds of rabbits in the three groups on PSD 7 was larger than that immediately after surgery (with t values from 7.17 to 11.14, P values below 0.01). Conclusions: SBD is better at inhibiting the growth of bacteria. PD, BD, and SBD have almost the same effects on reducing tissue edema and inflammatory reaction, and on promoting the accumulation of collagen fibers and tissue vascularization.

Addition ofdexmedetomidinetobupivacainein supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Research is ongoing to determine the lowest dose of local anesthetics in brachial plexus block that provides adequate anesthesia and postoperative analgesia and reduces complications related to local anesthetics. Patients 18-65 years of age who underwent upper limb surgery and who received ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block at the Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between February 2014 and January 2015 were included in the study (n=50). Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks were performed on Group B cases by adding 30 ml 0.33% bupivacaine and on Group BD cases by adding 15 ml 0.33% bupivacaine and 1 µg / kg dexmedetomidine. Block success was evaluated by the onset and block duration of motor and sensory block and the duration of analgesia. The block success of Group B and Group BD was 92.6% and 89.3%, respectively (P = 1.000). Onset time of sensory block, degree of sensory block, duration of sensory block, onset time of motor block, degree of motor block and duration of motor block were similar in both groups in the intergroup comparison (P > 0.05). Duration of analgesia and the operative conditions of groups were similar (P > 0.05). In the implementation of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, block success, sensory and motor block and analgesia duration were similar for patients anaesthetized with 30 ml of bupivacaine in comparison with dexmedetomidine+bupivacaine (when the bupivacaine dose was reduced by 50% by the addition of the adjuvant).

PATTERN OF POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE RESORPTION UNDER MANDIBULAR IMPLANT HINGING OVERDENTURES: A 5 –YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Purpose: This 5-year retrospective study aimed to investigate and compare the effect of bar designs of two-implant-retained overdentures (2-IRO) on pattern of the residual ridge resorption (RRR) of the posterior mandibles using 3-D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Forty five edentulous patients treated with mandibular 2-IRO opposing maxillary complete denture were selected for the study. According to bar designs; the enrolled patients were divided into three groups: Group BC (n=19) patients treated with two-implant overdentures retained by a bar joint with a plastic retentive clip. Group BL (n=14) patients treated with two-implant overdentures retained by locator attachments on the top of milled bar. Group BD (n=12) patients treated with two-implant overdentures retained by a straight bar with a plastic retentive clip & distally cantilevered ball attachments. The pattern of posterior RRR was evaluated by using CBCT imaging after 5 years post-treatment. Results: The overall vertical means of RRR differences were highly significant between three bar groups (BC, BD, and BL) using One Way ANOVA test with LSD post hoc. For group BL, no significant differences were revealed in height and width (for both buccal and lingual sides) of alveolar bone when comparing molar and premolar areas. For group BD, the reduction in RRR recorded highly significant differences (p<0.001) in height and width (for lingual side only) with statistical significant increase at molar than premolar areas.Conclusion: Taking the limitation of this study into considerations; Mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption occurs irrespective of 2-IRO design. The impact of bar design on the rate of residual ridge resorption is a matter of controversy. Unless limited by the available restorative space; milled bar design with locator retainer could be considered the bar design of choice regarding the rate and pattern of RRR.

Comparative study of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with low dose dexmedetomidine in spinal anaesthesia

Background: Spinal anaesthesia remains one of the basic techniques in the arsenal of modern anaesthesiology despite the waxing and waning of its popularity over last 100 years since its introduction into clinical practice.It avoids biochemical and metabolic changes consequent to the stress of general anesthesia for surgery as well as provides near optimal conditions for surgery. In present study, we tried to study effectiveness of intrathecal 0.5% heavy bupivacaine alone with Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries.Methods: The present study was conducted in the department of anaesthesiology from December 2011 to September 2013.This study was a prospective, randomised controlled, single blind, study conducted in 100 patients of ASA grade I and II undergoing elective surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were divided randomly into two groups, containing 50 patients in each group. Dosages of drugs selected are divided as Group B: Patients received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15mg) and Group BD: Patients received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15mg) plus 10 µg Dexmedetomidine. Spinal block characteristics, Mean arterial pressure, Mean pulse rate, sedation and side effects were studied during intra-operative and postoperative period.Results: It was found from present study that in Dexmedetomidine group time to reach T10 sensory blockade and complete motor blockade was earlier and a higher level of sensory blockade compared to control group achieved. Duration of sensory, motor blockade and duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in the Dexmedetomidine group compared to the control group. Hemodynamic parameters were preserved both intra-operatively and postoperatively. However there were a small percentage of patients who developed hypotension and bradycardia which were easily managed without any untoward effect. Hence Dexmedetomidine is a better neuraxial adjuvant for providing early onset of sensory and motor blockade, prolonged sensory blockade and post operative analgesia and adequate sedation.Conclusions: Intrathecal low dose Dexmedetomidine in a dose of 10µg along with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine is an addition into anaesthesiologist's armamentarium for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries.

A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine in lower limb surgeries

Background: Epidural anesthesia is the most commonly used technique for inducing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries. Fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural local anesthetic has been used for a long time. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly selective α-2-adrenoceptor agonist with analgesic potency. Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine in lower limb surgeries. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Grade I or II who were undergoing lower limb surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group BD: received epidural study solution of 38 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of 100 μg dexmedetomidine + 1 ml of normal saline. Group BF: received epidural study solution of 38 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride + 2 ml of 100 μg fentanyl. Onset and maximum level of sensory blockade, time to attain maximum sensory level, time to complete motor blockade, time for two-segment regression, duration of analgesia and motor block, heart rate, and blood pressure were observed. Pain and sedation were assessed by numerical rating scale and Ramsay Sedation Scale, respectively. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: The onset of sensory blockade and time to attain maximum sensory level in Group BD were earlier than that of Group BF (P < 0.001). Duration of analgesia and motor blockade in Group BD were significantly more than that of Group BF (P < 0.001). Postoperative visual analog scale was reduced statistically significantly in Group BD (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine is a better alternative to fentanyl with higher analgesic property.

Burr hole craniostomy irrigation with and without drainage during surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A retrospective study of 87 cases.

To evaluate the surgical treatment of a chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). We compared two surgical treatments of CSDH: burr-hole craniostomy irrigation with and without drainage. We retrospectively studied patients with chronic subdural haematomas admitted to our hospital. A total of 87 patients underwent surgery: 57 were treated via burr-hole irrigation with postoperative drainage (Group BD) and 30 were treated via irrigation without drainage (Group BI). Two instances of rebleeding developed in Group BD. The cerebral cortex did not expand in one case. One instance of rebleeding developed in Group BI but the cerebral cortex expanded in all cases. The average length of hospitalisation, number of postoperative complications, incidence of rebleeding, and extent of expansion of the cerebral cortex did not differ between the two groups (all P-values 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, most patients had recovered well. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) revealed no significant differences between the groups. No significant difference was found between the two surgical treatments in terms of the length of hospitalisation, rebleeding, or expansion of the cerebral cortex (which was complete in all but one patient). We believe that the key feature of CSDH surgery is thorough irrigation during the operation; whether to use postoperative drainage is not of great importance. We currently use burr-hole irrigation without postoperative drainage.

Evaluation of the effect of transdermal nitroglycerine patch on intrathecal dexmedetomidine as additive, on postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of transdermal nitroglycerin on intrathecal dexmedetomidine as additive, on postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy. Materials and Methods : Totally 140 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I or II, posted for abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia, were randomized to four groups using computer-generated random number list. Group B received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 ml normal saline and placebo patch, Group BN received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 ml NS and transdermal nitroglycerin (t-NTG), Group BD received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5 mcg (0.5 ml) dexmedetomidine and placebo patch and Group BDN received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5 μg (0.5 ml) dexmedetomidine and t-NTG patch. Outcomes measured include the total duration of analgesia, onset, and duration of sensory and motor block and any adverse effects. Results: The total duration of analgesia was longest in Group BDN (349.9 ± 40.6 min). It was significantly longer than Group BD (252.3 ± 34.0 min) and Group B and BN (130.5 ± 18.8, 138.3 ± 19.2 min). Time taken for two segment regression was comparable in Group B (79.9 ± 14.4 min) and Group BN (87.1 ± 22.6 min), but it was significantly longer in Group BD (122.5 ± 17.2 min) and Group BDN (136.4 ± 25.5 min). There was no significant difference in other variables between the groups. Conclusion: Transdermal nitroglycerine itself does not exhibit any analgesic potential of its own but, it enhances the analgesic potential of intrathecal dexmedetomidine.

Postoperative analgesia using bupivacaine wound infiltration with intravenous tramadol or dexamethasone following obstetric spinal anaesthesia.

Effective management of postcesarean section (CS) pain is important for the well-being of mother and child; even in limited-resource areas, there are drug options which can be explored to achieve this. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of a combination of bupivacaine wound infiltration with either intravenous (IV) dexamethasone or tramadol after CS. This study was a randomized, double-blind, comparative study in a tertiary hospital. Clearance obtained from the Institution's Ethics and Research Committee. One hundred and twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II pregnant women scheduled for CS under spinal anesthesia were recruited after giving consent. At the end of skin closure, all the patients received 20 ml of 0.1% plain bupivacaine for wound infiltration and IV dexamethasone 8 mg (Group BD) or tramadol 100 mg (Group BT). Outcome measures were time to first analgesic request, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, side effects, and patients' satisfaction. Time to first analgesic request was 3.2 ± 1.87 and 3.3 ± 2.01 h for BD and BT groups, respectively (P = 0.778). VAS scores for the first 2 h were lower in the bupivacaine/tramadol group compared to bupivacaine/dexamethasone group; the differences were statistically significant at 30 and 60 min (P = 0.027 and 0.008), respectively. Ninety percent versus 93% of the patients in BD and BT groups, respectively, expressed good to excellent satisfaction with pain relief. Combination of bupivacaine wound infiltration and IV tramadol provided better quality pain relief.

Evaluation of the role of dexmedetomidine in improvement of the analgesic profile of thoracic paravertebral block in thoracic surgeries: A randomised prospective clinical trial.

Background and Aims:Thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) is one of the effective methods for management of post-operative pain in thoracic surgeries. The aim of the study was to evaluate effectiveness of addition of dexmedetomidine to paravertebral block with bupivacaine in improving the postoperative pain relief and pulmonary functions in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.Methods:A prospective randomized double-blinded study was performed on forty patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. A paravertebral catheter was secured under ultrasound guidance preoperatively for all patients. Group B (n = 20) received a bolus dose of 0.25% bupivacaine at 0.3 mL/kg followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine 0.1 mL/kg/h. Group (BD) received a bolus dose of 0.25% bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg at 0.3 mL/kg followed by continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg/h + 0.125% bupivacaine 0.1 mL/kg/h. Anaesthesia technique was standardized for all patients. Postoperatively, all patients were assessed during first 24 hours for intraoperative fentanyl and post-operative morphine requirements, Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) scores at rest and during cough, and postoperative pulmonary functions.Results:Post-operative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours and intraoperative fentanyl requirement were significantly less in group BD (2.95 ± 1.986 mg, 80.75 ± 31.551μg respectively) compared to group B (9.85 ± 3.468 mg, 186 ± 39.683 μg respectively). Group BD showed less VAS scores during cough and better postoperative pulmonary functions (P < 0.05).Conclusion:Addition of dexmedetomidine to paravertebral bupivacaine in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries provides more effective analgesia with improvement in post-operative pulmonary functions.

Dexmedetomidine decreases the required amount of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in pediatrics patients: a randomized study

BackgroundThe effect of dexmedetomidine on the potency of bupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pediatric patients has not been investigated. Study objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine to decrease the concentration of bupivacaine needed for analgesia for ultrasound-guided TAP block in a pediatric patient undergoing hernia repair or hydrocelectomy. DesignThis is a randomized, double-blind, up-down, dose-finding study. SettingOperating room. PatientsSixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged 1-4 years scheduled for elective unilateral herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy. InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups: group B (0.125% bupivacaine, 1mL/kg) TAP block or group BD (0.125% bupivacaine plus 2μg/kg dexmedetomidine, 1mL/kg) TAP block. MeasurementsThe response of each child was observed for 60 seconds after skin incision and evaluated as ‘unsuccessful’ when skin incision caused a change in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean blood pressure) 20% more than the preincision values. If the response was determined to be unsuccessful, the concentration of bupivacaine administrated to the next patient was increased by 0.02%. If it was successful, the concentration of bupivacaine administrated to the next patient was decreased by 0.02%. ResultsThe minimum local anesthetic concentration of bupivacaine was 0.0839% (0.0137) in the B group and 0.0550% (0.0169) in the BD group. The difference was statistically significant (t=7.165, P=.0001). The total postoperative analgesic dosage of morphine was significantly higher in the B group (0.17±0.04 mg/kg) than the BD group (0.11±0.02 mg/kg, P=.001). ConclusionsThe addition of 2μg/kg of dexmedetomidine reduced the minimum local anesthetic concentration of bupivacaine used for a TAP block and improved postoperative analgesia in children undergoing surgery for inguinal hernia repair or hydrocelectomy.

Efficiency of bupivacaine and association with dexmedetomidine in transversus abdominis plane block ultrasound guided in postoperative pain of abdominal surgery

Background and objectivesWe aimed to evaluate the effect of bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine added to bupivacaine used in tranversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on postoperative pain and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. MethodsPatients submitted to lower abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. After anesthesia induction, ultrasound guided TAP block was performed. TAP block was obtained with 21mL 0.9% saline in Group C (n=31), 20mL 0.5% bupivacaine+1mL saline in Group B (n=31), and 20mL 0.5% bupivacaine+1mL dexmedetomidine (100μg) in Group BD (n=31). ResultsVisual analog scale scores were lower in Group BD compared to Group C, at all time points (p<0.05); it was lower in group BD than in group B at 10–24h. In Group B, it was lower than Group C at 2–8h (p<0.05). Total morphine consumption was lower in Group BD compared to other groups and lower in group B than in the controls (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in Group BD than in other groups and was higher in both study groups than in the controls (p<0.001). Nausea-vomiting scores, antiemetic requirement, or additional analgesic administration were not significant among groups (p>0.05). ConclusionsThe addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on TAP block decreased postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption; it also increased patient satisfaction in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dexmedetomidine did not have any effect on nausea and vomiting score and antiemetic requirement.

Abstract PR297

Background & Objectives: General anaesthesia (GA) is the standard technique used for breast surgery but is associated with considerable postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been suggested as an ideal alternative to GA for breast surgeries. Benefits include reduction in intraoperative analgesic and anaesthetic requirement, postoperative pain relief and reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting. We aimed to assess the efficacy of morphine or dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in PVB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Materials & Methods: Forty five women aged 18-60 years with unilateral carcinoma breast belonging to either ASA-1 or 2 undergoing modified radical mastectomy with or without axillary clearance were randomly assigned into group BM and BD where they received PVB with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with morphine 3 mg or dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, respectively. A standardised GA was induced after confirming the onset of PVB. Patient characteristics, intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and propofol were noted. Postoperatively, numerical rating scores for pain at rest and movement, nausea and vomiting, sedation scores, consumption of morphine, time of administration of first rescue analgesic and the duration of analgesia were recorded. Results: Patient demographics, duration of surgery and anaesthesia, intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and ephedrine were comparable between the two groups. Propofol consumption in group BD was significantly lower [654.35 (217.08) mg vs 822.73 (305.43) mg, p=0.0381]. Numerical rating score for pain at rest and upon movement was significantly lower in group BM at 2, 6, 12 and 18 h postoperatively. The number of patients requiring intravenous morphine during the first 2 h postoperatively was significantly lower (p=0.0061) in group BM. Duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group BM [1172.1 (194.4) min] than group BD [501.7 (159.7) min] (p=0.0001). The overall incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was low and comparable between the two groups. Sedation scores were comparable at all time intervals. Conclusion: Morphine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in PVB for modified radical mastectomy was more efficacious than dexmedetomidine in providing prolonged postoperative analgesia both at rest and on movement, and also in reducing postoperative analgesic requirement.

COMPARISON OF FENTANYL AND DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A RANDOMIZED-DOUBLE BLIND PROSPECTIVE STUDY

ABSTRACTObjectives: Supraclavicular block of brachial plexus provides complete and reliable anesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Using adjuvant to localanesthetics, blocks can be prolonged to long durations. Peripheral nerve blocks thus help in avoiding the hazards of general anesthesia. We comparedthe sensory blockade, motor blockade, and duration of analgesia with the addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for supraclavicularbrachial plexus block.Methods: A total of 50 American Society of Anesthesiologist’s Physical Status I and II patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries undersupraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into two equal groups in a randomized double-blinded fashion. Group BF received 30 mlbupivacaine with fentanyl 50 µg and Group BD received 30 ml bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 50 µg. The characteristics for anesthesia andanalgesia were assessed in both groups.Results: Duration of sensory and motor block was 363.4±38.36 minutes and 357±36.77 minutes, respectively, in Group BF while it was452.96±77.12 minutes and 441.52±48.46 minutes in Group BD. There was a statistically significant difference in onset of sensory and motorblock between the two groups. The duration of analgesia (time to requirement of rescue analgesia) in Group BD was longer than in Group BF(471.44±65.88 minutes vs. 366.48±38.02 minutes) with (p&lt;0.0001). There were minimum hemodynamic disturbances and side effects in any groupexcept for Grade 3 sedation score which was more in Group BD.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine, when added to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block, enhanced the duration of sensory and motorblock and also the duration of analgesia, more than when fentanyl was added to bupivacaine.Keywords: Fentanyl, Dexmedetomidine, Bupivacaine, Supraclavicular brachial block.

Treatment of Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Operations: Comparing the Efficiency of Bupivacaine, Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl for Caudal Block.

BackgroundCaudal analgesia is a common method for postoperative pain management in pediatric patients. Additive agents such as opioids and α2 agonists have been used to enhance the analgesic effects of local anesthetics for caudal block.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the additive effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on bupivacaine-induced caudal analgesia in pediatric patients who had undergone elective inguinal hernia repair.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial included children aged 1 - 5 years who were divided into three groups: the bupivacaine group (Group B) received 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml/kg), the bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine group (Group BD) received 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) plus 2 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, and the bupivacaine-fentanyl group (Group BF) received 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) plus 2 µg/kg fentanyl. The hemodynamic variables (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation) were measured perioperatively. Pain, sedation and motor block scores and adverse events (nausea and vomiting, pruritis, hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention and respiratory depression) were documented at 30 and 60 minutes, and the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th and 24th hours after the operation. The other recordings include the duration of surgery and analgesic requirement.ResultsA total of 61 patients were analyzed. The lowest pain scores were found in the BD group at all time points (P < 0.001). The sedation scores were higher in the BD group than in the other two groups at all time points (P < 0.001). No motor block was observed after the operation. Only three patients required analgesic administration 2 to 6 hours after the operation in group B. No side effects were observed in any of the groups, and there was no significant difference in the duration of surgery among the three groups.ConclusionsThe results show that the analgesic and sedative effects were better when dexmedetomidine was added to bupivacaine than when fentanyl was added or bupivacaine alone was administered in the pediatric population studied here that underwent elective inguinal hernia repair.

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Background: Alpha-2 agonists are added to local anesthetic agents to extend the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Objective: We evaluated the effect of combining dexmedetomidine with levobupivacine with respect to duration of motor and sensory block and duration of analgesia. Material and Methods: Sixty patients of ASA grade I or II aged between 18-60 years, posted for elective upper limb surgeries were enrolled for a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were divided into two groups, the control group B and the study group BD. In group B (n = 30), 30 ml of 0.325% levobupivacaine + normal saline; and in group BD (n = 30), 30 ml of 0.325% levobupivacaine + 1μ/kg dexmedetomidine were given for ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Duration of motor and sensory block and time to first rescue analgesia were recorded.. Results: Demographic profile and surgical characteristics were similar in both groups. The onset times for sensory and motor blocks were significantly shorter in BD group (p < 0.05), while the duration of sensory and motor blocks and duration of analgesia (DOA) was significantly longer in BD group. Heart rate level and SBP and DBP levels in group BD were significantly lower 15-20 min after block (p < 0.05). Bradycardia was observed in two patients in the group BD. No other adverse effects were observed in either of the groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine added as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block significantly shortens the onset time and prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blocks and duration of analgesia.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Promotes Spinal Bupivacaine Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical CONSORT Study.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been reported to have synergistic action with local anesthetics. This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was designed to observe the efficacy of intravenous DEX without loading dose on spinal blockade duration, postoperative sedation, patient-controlled analgesia and its morphine-sparing effect in lower limb surgeries.Seventy-five patients, scheduled for lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia, were randomly allocated into 2 groups: group BS (received 15 mg of 0.5% of bupivacaine for subarachnoid anesthesia and continuous intravenous infusion of saline in Ringer solution) and BD group (received 15 mg of 0.5% of bupivacaine for subarachnoid anesthesia and continuous intravenous infusion of DEX in Ringer solution at a rate of 0.25 μg/kg/h). Intravenous infusion started 15 minutes before spinal anesthesia.The onset time of sensory and motor blockade was shorten, the duration of sensory and motor blockade was significantly prolonged in BD patients when compared to BS patients. The Ramsay sedation score measured immediately after surgery was greater in BD group than BS group. BD patients also shown increased time to the first request of postoperative morphine and decreased total morphine consumption as compared with BS patients.Collectively, intravenous administration of DEX without loading dose promoted the efficacy of spinal bupivacaine anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery.

Evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, bupivacaine with butorphanol and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for lower segment caesarean section: a randomized control trial

Background: Following caesarean operation, a painless early ambulation is necessary to mother for caring of the neonate. Aim of the study is to compare more effective analgesic by intrathecal bupivacaine or combination with butorphanol or dexmedetomidine. Methods: Ninety parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=30). Group B: received bupivacaine (0.5%) 2 ml + 0.5 ml of normal saline (NS); group BB, bupivacaine (0.5%) 2 ml + 25 mcg butorphanol in 0.5 ml NS and group BD, bupivacaine (0.5%) 2ml + 2.5 mcg of dexmedetomidine in 0.5 ml NS . Visual numerical rating scale (VNRS), heart rate, blood pressure, sensory and motor block levels, fetal outcome by Apgar score and umbilical cord blood pH, any side effects were noted. Results: The onset time of modified Bromage 3 motor block was statistically significant among the groups (P=0.023) but not significant between Groups BB and BD (P=0.479). The regression time to reach modified Bromage 0 in group BD was significantly longer (P=<0.0001) than either of the groups B or BB but not significant between the later two groups (P=0.479). Time for 2-segment regression, sensory regression time to S1 dermatome and time for first rescue analgesia were significantly longer (P<0.001) in group BD but not significant between the groups B and BB. Sedation was significantly more in group BD (17/30 pts; P<0.001). Conclusions: Addition of dexmedetomidine to spinal bupivacaine block in caesarean section increase the duration of analgesia and motor block with minimal side effect and no adverse effects on the babies.

Effects of perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine in a femoral-sciatic nerve block

Background and Aim:Perineural administration of dexmedetomidine, a α2-adrenoceptor agonist, prolongs the duration of analgesia. We hypothesized that adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine would prolong postoperative analgesia after below knee surgery.Materials and Methods:After ethical approval, 60 patients scheduled for below knee surgery under combined femoral-sciatic nerve block were randomly allocated into two groups to have their block performed using bupivacaine 0.5% alone (group B) or bupivacaine 0.5% combined with 100 μg bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine (group BD). Motor and sensory block onset times; durations of blockades and analgesia were recorded.Results:Sensory and motor block onset times were shorter by 20% in group BD than in group B (P < 0.01). Sensory and motor blockade durations were longer in group BD (+45% and +40%, respectively) than in group B (P < 0.01). Duration of analgesia was longer in group BD by 75% than in group B (P < 0.01). Systolic, diastolic arterial blood pressure levels, and heart rate were significantly less in group BD, six patients in group BD, and no patients in group B developed bradycardia (P < 0.05).Conclusion:The addition of dexmedetomidine 100 μg to bupivacaine 0.5% during ultrasound-guided combined femoral and sciatic block for below knee surgery was associated with a prolonged duration of analgesia. However, this may be associated with significant bradycardia requiring treatment.

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Background: Many drugs have been used as adjuvants to local anesthetic agents to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks and decrease the time of onset. In this study we assessed the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in terms of onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative sedation, postoperative analgesia, sedation and Complications /side effects if any. Methods: 60 patients of age 18-70 yrs were divided into two equal groups for upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group BD was given 39 millilitres (ml) of 0.5% Bupivacaine+1 microgram/kg dexmedetomidine; Group BS was given 39 ml of bupivacine+1 ml of saline. The following brachial plexus nerve block parameters were assessed hemodynamic parameters, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, Ramsay sedation score, verbal rating score, duration of analgesia, duration for rescue analgesia and number of analgesia given. Results: The onset of sensory blockade was 2.54 minutes less in Group (BD) when compared to Group (BS). The onset of Motor Blockade is 3.26 minutes less in Group (BD) when compared to Group (BS). The duration of sensory blockade is 195.65 minutes more in Group (BD) then Group (BS). The duration of Motor Blockade is 190.33 minutes more in Group (BD) when compared to Group (BS). The duration of Analgesia is 207.83 minutes more in Group (BD) when compared to Group (BS). Ramsay sedation score in Gp (BD)continued to show slightly higher sedation scores at all times including postoperative period in comparison to Gp (BS) (P<0.01). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is good adjuvant to local anesthestic agents, as its addition to bupivacaine was associated with prolonged sensory and motor blockade, mild sedation and prolonged analgesia. Satisfactory hemodynamic stability without observed immediate post-operative side effects are other significant qualities related to it.