A combination of geochemical and geophysical methods is proposed to overcome difficulties in distinguishing key boron-bearing minerals from those with which they usually occur. Borate deposits are divided according to occurrence: hypogene (ludwigite-ascharite), developed with magnesium and/or calcitic skarns, and sedimentary (cotoite), found with gold-copper contact-metamorphic deposits. Neutron-logging and neutron-gamma methods are given for distinguishing ludwigite from accompanying magnetite, black serpentine or ilvaite and ascharite from talc, brucite or calcite. In sedimentary deposits, where boron and chlorine, frequently appear together, readings for α-particles and γ-quanta are compared. Methods of compensating for ground-water anomalies in geophysical logging are given, as well as the latest field and laboratory shortcuts, which enable testing of 200 to 300 samples per day.—A. Eustus.