The political developments that eventually resulted in the founding of the Turkish nation-state marked drastic changes in the status and strength of the Greek Orthodox patriarchate of Constantinople as an institution and of the patriarch(s) as its head. Following heated debates at the peace negotiations between the Turkish and the Allied delegations at Lausanne, at which the partriarchate's removal from its historical seat at Phanar in Istanbul was insistently advocated by the Turkish representatives, the patriarchate was finally given the right to retain its position on the condition of renouncing “all political and non-ecclesiastic attributes.”1 The rationale of the Turkish delegation's demand for the partiarchate's removal from Istanbul emanated from their perception of the patriarchate as a “fifth-column” that had acted to the detriment of the Turkish national interests in the past. According to this perception, which resurged from time to time in the following decades, the patriarchate and the Ottoman Empire's Greek Orthodox community had been engaged in disloyal activities against the state and had become an instrument of foreign intervention in the Ottoman-Turkish domestic affairs. Specifically, it was considered the “agent of Greek imperialism in Turkey.”2 Consequently, it was not surprising that the leadership of the new Turkish nation-state made absolutely sure that the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), the founding treaty of the Turkish nation-state, eliminated all the privileges that the patriarchate had enjoyed, especially those related to civil jurisdiction and secular functions. Thereafter, the patriarchate became a purely religious organization authorized only for religious and moral affairs of its adherents—the Turkish citizens of the Greek Orthodox religion—whose numbers decreased dramatically following the exchange of populations between Greece and Turkey,3 and the status of the patriarch(s) was restricted to spiritual affairs.4 Still, the patriarchate continued to be suspicious in the eyes of the Turkish statesmen, and accordingly, all its activities were put under surveillance.