Recognition in December 1951 of full Libyan independence brought into being a new state that is imposing in extent of territory, but only slenderly endowed with natural resources, and hence supporting a population of less than one and a half million. As a geographically isolated area lying well to the south of the main currents of activity in the Mediterranean, Libya is overshadowed in many ways by the more powerful units of Egypt and French North Africa. Unlike some of the Levant states, intrinsic poverty in resources and inhabitants is not compensated for by a favourable location, which might act as the facade of a larger and more productive hinterland. Libya is un? likely to become a route-centre of the first importance; no oil pipelines cross its territories, and its strategic potentialities, though not unimportant, are less prominent than those of Egypt, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey. The fact that the new state of Libya has adopted a federal instead of a unified system of government?there are three autonomous territories, Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and the Fezzan?can from some points of view be considered a reflection of geographical conditions. The country consists of a discontinuous mosaic of better watered and settled territory, embedded as it were in wide expanses of arid or semi-arid land. A more productive zone lies along the Mediterranean coast, but this is by no means continuous, being broken by expanses where semi-desert and steppe land reach the sea. Many regional names are taken from local settlements, like Cirene, Barce and Tripoli, and this fact, with the piecemeal Italian conquest during the present century,x is a further indication of the scattered nature of the main centres of occupation. Libya cannot be said to have marked unity, except that imposed by the presence of the desert, which gives to the wetter marginal areas an interconnection in much the same way as a closed sea can be said to unite the lands on its borders. The concept of Libya as a kind of Aegean or Mediter? ranean, with scattered settlements following a way of life fundamentally similar in basic pattern but with regional differences, is not without usefulness, and in a few respects the political evolution of the modern state shows a certain parallel with that of the Greek or Phoenician city-states. Structurally, the whole of Libya forms part of the great African table, with Archaean basement rocks underlying much of the region. Upon this ancient series, and disposed in generally horizontal layers with only slight disturbance, occur sediments of Cretaceous to mid-Tertiary age exposed roughly in succession of age, with Cretaceous sandstones prominent in the south, and Eocene limestone in the north. A few districts, notably in the north, show indications of tectonic disturbance; extensive faulting, with lava
Read full abstract