Greatwall Kinase Research Articles

Role for regulated phosphatase activity in generating mitotic oscillations in Xenopus cell-free extracts

Although current textbook explanations of cell-cycle control in eukaryotes emphasize the periodic activation of cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs), recent experimental observations suggest a significant role for the periodic activation and inactivation of a CDK-counteracting protein phosphatase 2A with a B55δ subunit (PP2A:B55δ), during mitotic cycles in frog-egg extracts and early embryos. In this paper, we extend an earlier mathematical model of embryonic cell cycles to include experimentally motivated roles for PP2A:B55δ and its regulation by Greatwall kinase. Our model is consistent with what is already known about the regulation of CDK and PP2A:B55δ in frog eggs, and it suggests a previously undescribed role for the Greatwall-PP2A:B55δ interaction in creating a toggle switch for activation of the anaphase-promoting complex as embryonic cells exit mitosis and return to interphase.

Greatwall Kinase Is Required for Meiotic Maturation in Porcine Oocytes1

Meiotic maturation in many species is initiated by the activation of maturation-promoting factor (MPF) with concomitant inactivation of counteracting phosphatases, most notably protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). Recently, Greatwall (GWL) has been identified as a cell cycle regulator that inhibits PP2A activity. In this study, we demonstrate that GWL is required for meiotic maturation in porcine oocytes. GWL expression increases from germinal vesicle (GV) to metaphase II (MII) stages of porcine oocytes and dramatically decreases with progression of the meiotic cell cycle. GWL is initially localized in the nucleus of GV oocytes and is associated with spindle fibers following GV breakdown. Depletion of GWL inhibited or delayed meiotic maturation secondary to defects in chromosome congression and spindle formation. Conversely, overexpression of GWL overcame meiotic arrest and initiated progression to MII stage. However, these oocytes had severe spindle defects. Furthermore, MII oocytes depleted of GWL progressed to pronuclear formation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that GWL is required not only for meiotic maturation but also for maintenance of MII arrest in porcine oocytes.

Robust mitotic entry is ensured by a latching switch

SummaryCell cycle events are driven by Cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and by their counter-acting phosphatases. Activation of the Cdk1:Cyclin B complex during mitotic entry is controlled by the Wee1/Myt1 inhibitory kinases and by Cdc25 activatory phosphatase, which are themselves regulated by Cdk1:Cyclin B within two positive circuits. Impairing these two feedbacks with chemical inhibitors induces a transient entry into M phase referred to as mitotic collapse. The pathology of mitotic collapse reveals that the positive circuits play a significant role in maintaining the M phase state. To better understand the function of these feedback loops during G2/M transition, we propose a simple model for mitotic entry in mammalian cells including spatial control over Greatwall kinase phosphorylation. After parameter calibration, the model is able to recapture the complex and non-intuitive molecular dynamics reported by Potapova et al. (Potapova et al., 2011). Moreover, it predicts the temporal patterns of other mitotic regulators which have not yet been experimentally tested and suggests a general design principle of cell cycle control: latching switches buffer the cellular stresses which accompany cell cycle processes to ensure that the transitions are smooth and robust.

Cell cycle regulation of Greatwall kinase nuclear localization facilitates mitotic progression

Cell division requires the coordination of critical protein kinases and phosphatases. Greatwall (Gwl) kinase activity inactivates PP2A-B55 at mitotic entry to promote the phosphorylation of cyclin B-Cdk1 substrates, but how Gwl is regulated is poorly understood. We found that the subcellular localization of Gwl changed dramatically during the cell cycle in Drosophila. Gwl translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in prophase. We identified two critical nuclear localization signals in the central, poorly characterized region of Gwl, which are required for its function. The Polo kinase associated with and phosphorylated Gwl in this region, promoting its binding to 14-3-3ε and its localization to the cytoplasm in prophase. Our results suggest that cyclin B-Cdk1 phosphorylation of Gwl is also required for its nuclear exclusion by a distinct mechanism. We show that the nucleo-cytoplasmic regulation of Gwl is essential for its functions in vivo and propose that the spatial regulation of Gwl at mitotic entry contributes to the mitotic switch.

Budding Yeast Greatwall and Endosulfines Control Activity and Spatial Regulation of PP2ACdc55 for Timely Mitotic Progression

Entry into mitosis is triggered by cyclinB/Cdk1, whose activity is abruptly raised by a positive feedback loop. The Greatwall kinase phosphorylates proteins of the endosulfine family and allows them to bind and inhibit the main Cdk1-counteracting PP2A-B55 phosphatase, thereby promoting mitotic entry. In contrast to most eukaryotic systems, Cdc14 is the main Cdk1-antagonizing phosphatase in budding yeast, while the PP2ACdc55 phosphatase promotes, instead of preventing, mitotic entry by participating to the positive feedback loop of Cdk1 activation. Here we show that budding yeast endosulfines (Igo1 and Igo2) bind to PP2ACdc55 in a cell cycle-regulated manner upon Greatwall (Rim15)-dependent phosphorylation. Phosphorylated Igo1 inhibits PP2ACdc55 activity in vitro and induces mitotic entry in Xenopus egg extracts, indicating that it bears a conserved PP2A-binding and -inhibitory activity. Surprisingly, deletion of IGO1 and IGO2 in yeast cells leads to a decrease in PP2A phosphatase activity, suggesting that endosulfines act also as positive regulators of PP2A in yeast. Consistently, RIM15 and IGO1/2 promote, like PP2ACdc55, timely entry into mitosis under temperature-stress, owing to the accumulation of Tyr-phosphorylated Cdk1. In addition, they contribute to the nuclear export of PP2ACdc55, which has recently been proposed to promote mitotic entry. Altogether, our data indicate that Igo proteins participate in the positive feedback loop for Cdk1 activation. We conclude that Greatwall, endosulfines, and PP2A are part of a regulatory module that has been conserved during evolution irrespective of PP2A function in the control of mitosis. However, this conserved module is adapted to account for differences in the regulation of mitotic entry in different organisms.

The phosphorylation of ARPP19 by Greatwall renders the autoamplification of MPF independent of PKA in Xenopus oocytes

Entry into mitosis or meiosis relies on the coordinated action of kinases and phosphatases that ultimately leads to the activation of Cyclin-B-Cdk1, also known as MPF for M-phase promoting factor. Vertebrate oocytes are blocked in prophase of the first meiotic division, an arrest that is tightly controlled by high PKA activity. Re-entry into meiosis depends on activation of Cdk1, which obeys a two-step mechanism: a catalytic amount of Cdk1 is generated in a PKA and protein-synthesis-dependent manner; then a regulatory network known as the MPF auto-amplification loop is initiated. This second step is independent of PKA and protein synthesis. However, none of the molecular components of the auto-amplification loop identified so far act independently of PKA. Therefore, the protein rendering this process independent of PKA in oocytes remains unknown. Using a physiologically intact cell system, the Xenopus oocyte, we show that the phosphorylation of ARPP19 at S67 by the Greatwall kinase promotes its binding to the PP2A-B55δ phosphatase, thus inhibiting its activity. This process is controlled by Cdk1 and has an essential role within the Cdk1 auto-amplification loop for entry into the first meiotic division. Moreover, once phosphorylated by Greatwall, ARPP19 escapes the negative regulation exerted by PKA. It also promotes activation of MPF independently of protein synthesis, provided that a small amount of Mos is present. Taken together, these findings reveal that PP2A-B55δ, Greatwall and ARPP19 are not only required for entry into meiotic divisions, but are also pivotal effectors within the Cdk1 auto-regulatory loop responsible for its independence with respect to the PKA-negative control.

Yeast Endosulfines Control Entry into Quiescence and Chronological Life Span by Inhibiting Protein Phosphatase 2A

The TORC1 and PKA protein kinases are central elements of signaling networks that regulate eukaryotic cell proliferation in response to growth factors and/or nutrients. In yeast, attenuation of signaling by these kinases following nitrogen and/or carbon limitation activates the protein kinase Rim15, which orchestrates the initiation of a reversible cellular quiescence program to ensure normal chronological life span. The molecular elements linking Rim15 to distal readouts including the expression of Msn2/4- and Gis1-dependent genes involve the endosulfines Igo1/2. Here, we show that Rim15, analogous to the greatwall kinase in Xenopus, phosphorylates endosulfines to directly inhibit the Cdc55-protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A(Cdc55)). Inhibition of PP2A(Cdc55) preserves Gis1 in a phosphorylated state and consequently promotes its recruitment to and activation of transcription from promoters of specific nutrient-regulated genes. These results close a gap in our perception of and delineate a role for PP2A(Cdc55) in TORC1-/PKA-mediated regulation of quiescence and chronological life span.

Bypassing the Greatwall–Endosulfine Pathway: Plasticity of a Pivotal Cell-Cycle Regulatory Module in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans

In vertebrates, mitotic and meiotic M phase is facilitated by the kinase Greatwall (Gwl), which phosphorylates a conserved sequence in the effector Endosulfine (Endos). Phosphorylated Endos inactivates the phosphatase PP2A/B55 to stabilize M-phase-specific phosphorylations added to many proteins by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). We show here that this module functions essentially identically in Drosophila melanogaster and is necessary for proper mitotic and meiotic cell division in a wide variety of tissues. Despite the importance and evolutionary conservation of this pathway between insects and vertebrates, it can be bypassed in at least two situations. First, heterozygosity for loss-of-function mutations of twins, which encodes the Drosophila B55 protein, suppresses the effects of endos or gwl mutations. Several types of cell division occur normally in twins heterozygotes in the complete absence of Endos or the near absence of Gwl. Second, this module is nonessential in the nematode Caenorhaditis elegans. The worm genome does not contain an obvious ortholog of gwl, although it encodes a single Endos protein with a surprisingly well-conserved Gwl target site. Deletion of this site from worm Endos has no obvious effects on cell divisions involved in viability or reproduction under normal laboratory conditions. In contrast to these situations, removal of one copy of twins does not completely bypass the requirement for endos or gwl for Drosophila female fertility, although reducing twins dosage reverses the meiotic maturation defects of hypomorphic gwl mutants. These results have interesting implications for the function and evolution of the mechanisms modulating removal of CDK-directed phosphorylations.

The Greatwall kinase: a new pathway in the control of the cell cycle

New data have recently established that protein phosphorylation during mitosis is the result of a controlled balance between kinase and phosphatase activities and that, as for mitotic kinases, phosphatases are also regulated during cell division. This regulation is at least in part induced by the activation of the Greatwall (Gwl) kinase at mitotic entry. Activated Gwl phosphorylates its substrates cAMP-regulated phospho protein 19 (Arpp19) and α-endosulfine (ENSA), promoting their binding to and the inhibition of PP2A. Interestingly, besides the role of the Gwl-Arpp19/ENSA in the control of mitotic division, new data in yeast support the involvement of this pathway in mRNA stabilization during G(0) program initiation, although in this case the phosphatase PP2A appears not to be implicated. Finally, Gwl activity has been shown to be required for DNA checkpoint recovery. These new findings support the view that Gwl, Arpp19 and ENSA could function as the core of a new signalization pathway that, by targeting different final substrates, could participate in a variety of physiological functions.

Determinants for Activation of the Atypical AGC Kinase Greatwall during M Phase Entry

The atypical AGC kinase Greatwall (Gwl) mediates a pathway that prevents the precocious removal of phosphorylations added to target proteins by M phase-promoting factor (MPF); Gwl is thus essential for M phase entry and maintenance. Gwl itself is activated by M phase-specific phosphorylations that are investigated here. Many phosphorylations are nonessential, being located within a long nonconserved region, any part of which can be deleted without effect. Using mass spectrometry and mutagenesis, we have identified 3 phosphorylation sites (phosphosites) critical to Gwl activation (pT193, pT206, and pS883 in Xenopus laevis) located in evolutionarily conserved domains that differentiate Gwl from related kinases. We propose a model in which the initiating event for Gwl activation is phosphorylation by MPF of the proline-directed sites T193 and T206 in the presumptive activation loop. After this priming step, Gwl can intramolecularly phosphorylate its C-terminal tail at pS883; this site probably plays a role similar to that of the tail/Z motif of other AGC kinases. These events largely (but not completely) explain the full activation of Gwl at M phase.

Meiosis and oogenesis

Molecular Biology of the CellVol. 23, No. 6 ASCB Annual Meeting HighlightsFree AccessMeiosis and oogenesisMarie-Hélène VerlhacMarie-Hélène VerlhacSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:13 Oct 2017https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e11-12-0982AboutSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail A minisymposium at the 2011 meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology presented recent advances in the field of meiosis and oogenesis (Figure 1).FIGURE 1: Scheme of meiosis in mouse oocytes. Homologous chromosome pairing, synapsis, and recombination take place in prophase I. Oocyte: light gray; maternal and paternal chromosomes: blue and violet; nucleus: dark gray; nuclear envelope breakdown: dotted line; spindle: green.How does the follicle coordinate meiosis progression?The ovarian follicle is an integrated system in which follicular cells regulate oocyte progression into meiosis. Oocytes are large cells that divide asymmetrically to preserve stores for future embryonic development. To do this, they must coordinate asymmetric spindle positioning with cell cycle progression and chromosome segregation. In mammals, the luteinizing hormone signaling induces a drop in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels in the granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte. As discussed by Laurinda Jaffe, this drop in cGMP is due to a decrease in guanylyl cyclase-B activity in these cells. As a consequence, the phosphodiesterase PDE3A activity is no longer inhibited in oocytes, leading to a drop in cAMP levels and thus triggering a drop in protein kinase A activity and subsequent activation of cyclin B/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), a prerequisite for meiotic resumption. Takeo Kishimoto presented evidence that robust meiotic resumption in starfish oocytes not only requires cyclin B/CDK1 activation but also depends on Greatwall kinase activity.How does F-actin control chromosome positioning?Starfish oocytes gather their condensing chromosomes, dispersed in an 80-μm-wide nucleus, using an F-actin fishnet, which contracts isotropically (as described by Péter Lénárt). At nuclear envelope breakdown, this mesh is anchored to the animal pole at which the centrosomes reside, which provides directionality to the general motion of chromosomes. Furthermore, chromosomes at the border of the meshwork induce larger patches of F-actin in a RanGTP-dependent manner, reminiscent of the effect of chromatin on the cortex in mouse oocytes. This actin mesh delivers chromosomes that are beyond the reach of microtubules to the centrosomes for spindle assembly and asymmetric division. Similarly, Marie-Emilie Terret presented evidence that the coordination between two F-actin meshworks in mouse oocytes allows positioning of the first meiotic spindle to the cortex at the end of meiosis I. Indeed, an Arp2/3-dependent thickening of the cortex occurs in meiosis I; this is essential for first meiotic spindle migration. These cortical filaments create a border between cytoplasmic and cortical F-actin. Therefore, in both starfish and mouse, a contractile F-actin meshwork delivers chromosomes to the cortex. In starfish, it is anchored on remnants of the nuclear envelope, such that its contractions do not deform the plasma membrane. In mouse oocytes, it is anchored to the cortex, and cortical thickening thus acts as a barrier protecting the plasma membrane from intracellular F-actin contractions.Is there loading of cohesin after S-phase during the arrest in prophase I?Female gamete formation, which in mammals starts in the embryo and ends during adulthood, necessitates adaptations specific to a process extending over a prolonged period. Recent studies in mouse have suggested that sister chromatid cohesion is lost in aging females and that there is no turnover of cohesins during the growth phase, potentially explaining the increased error rate of chromosome segregation in human oocytes. Both Sharon Bickel and Aaron Severson provided compelling evidence that cohesins can be reloaded after the last round of DNA replication in prophase I of meiosis. Severson showed that in nematodes, cohesin complexes that associate with two new kleisin subunits (COH-3 and COH-4) load onto chromosomes after premeiotic DNA replication is complete and are triggered to establish sister chromatid cohesion by the Spo11-induced DNA double-strand breaks that initiate crossover recombination. Sharon Bickel showed that the acetyltransferase Drosophila homologue of Eco1 (Deco), which is necessary for cohesion establishment during S-phase, is also required during meiotic prophase for maintenance of chiasmata. Loss of Deco after meiotic S phase results in loss of chiasma maintenance and increased levels of nondisjunction. Bickel's work suggests that two pathways could promote increased incidence of errors in aging females: progressive loss of cohesion and loss of cohesion reloading during prophase I.FOOTNOTESDOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-12-0982FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 23, No. 6 March 15, 2012965-1140 Metrics Downloads & Citations Downloads: 180 History Information© 2012 Verlhac. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).PDF download

The overlooked greatwall: a new perspective on mitotic control

The role of the dual specificity protein phosphatase, Cdc25, in activating the cyclin-dependent kinase-cyclin B complex (Cdk1-CycB) by overcoming the inhibitory Wee1 kinase is a long-established principle for mitotic entry. Recently, however, evidence has emerged of a regulatory network that facilitates Cdk1-CycB activity by inhibiting the form of protein phosphatase 2A having a B55 regulatory subunit (PP2A-B55). Here, I review the genetic and biochemical evidence for Greatwall kinase and its substrate Endosulphine as the key components of this previously obscure regulatory network. Not only is the inhibition of PP2A-B55 by phospho-endosulphine required to prevent dephosphorylation of Cdk1-CycB substrates until mitotic exit, but it is also required to promote Cdc25 activity and inhibit Wee1 at mitotic entry. I discuss how these alternating states of preferential PP2A-B55 or Cdk1-CycB activity can have an impact upon the regulation of Polo kinase and its ability to bind different partner proteins as mitosis progresses.

CDK-Dependent Potentiation of MPS1 Kinase Activity Is Essential to the Mitotic Checkpoint

Accurate chromosome segregation relies upon a mitotic checkpoint that monitors kinetochore attachment toward opposite spindle poles before enabling chromosome disjunction [1]. The MPS1/TTK protein kinase is a core component of the mitotic checkpoint that lies upstream of MAD2 and BubR1 both at the kinetochore and in the cytoplasm [2, 3]. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying the regulation of MPS1 kinase, we undertook the identification of Xenopus MPS1 phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry. We mapped several phosphorylation sites onto MPS1 and we show that phosphorylation of S283 in the noncatalytic region of MPS1 is required for full kinase activity. This phosphorylation potentiates MPS1 catalytic efficiency without impairing its affinity for the substrates. By using Xenopus egg extracts depleted of endogenous MPS1 and reconstituted with single point mutants, we show that phosphorylation of S283 is essential to activate the mitotic checkpoint. This phosphorylation does not regulate the localization of MPS1 to the kinetochore but is required for the recruitment of MAD1/MAD2, demonstrating its role at the kinetochore. Constitutive phosphorylation of S283 lowers the number of kinetochores required to hold the checkpoint, which suggests that CDK-dependent phosphorylation of MPS1 is essential to sustain the mitotic checkpoint when few kinetochores remain unattached.

Greatwall kinase and cyclin B-Cdk1 are both critical constituents of M-phase-promoting factor

Maturation/M-phase-promoting factor is the universal inducer of M-phase in eukaryotic cells. It is currently accepted that M-phase-promoting factor is identical to the kinase cyclin B–Cdk1. Here we show that cyclin B–Cdk1 and M-phase-promoting factor are not in fact synonymous. Instead, M-phase-promoting factor contains at least two essential components: cyclin B–Cdk1 and another kinase, Greatwall kinase. In the absence of Greatwall kinase, the M-phase-promoting factor is undetectable in oocyte cytoplasm even though cyclin B–Cdk1 is fully active, whereas M-phase-promoting factor activity is restored when Greatwall kinase is added back. Although the excess amount of cyclin B–Cdk1 alone, but not Greatwall kinase alone, can induce nuclear envelope breakdown, spindle assembly is abortive. Addition of Greatwall kinase greatly reduces the amount of cyclin B–Cdk1 required for nuclear envelope breakdown, resulting in formation of the spindle with aligned chromosomes. M-phase-promoting factor is thus a system consisting of one kinase (cyclin B–Cdk1) that directs mitotic entry and a second kinase (Greatwall kinase) that suppresses the protein phosphatase 2A-B55 which opposes cyclin B–Cdk1.

Suppression of Scant Identifies Endos as a Substrate of Greatwall Kinase and a Negative Regulator of Protein Phosphatase 2A in Mitosis

Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) plays a major role in dephosphorylating the targets of the major mitotic kinase Cdk1 at mitotic exit, yet how it is regulated in mitotic progression is poorly understood. Here we show that mutations in either the catalytic or regulatory twins/B55 subunit of PP2A act as enhancers of gwlScant, a gain-of-function allele of the Greatwall kinase gene that leads to embryonic lethality in Drosophila when the maternal dosage of the mitotic kinase Polo is reduced. We also show that heterozygous mutant endos alleles suppress heterozygous gwlScant; many more embryos survive. Furthermore, heterozygous PP2A mutations make females heterozygous for the strong mutation polo11 partially sterile, even in the absence of gwlScant. Heterozygosity for an endos mutation suppresses this PP2A/polo11 sterility. Homozygous mutation or knockdown of endos leads to phenotypes suggestive of defects in maintaining the mitotic state. In accord with the genetic interactions shown by the gwlScant dominant mutant, the mitotic defects of Endos knockdown in cultured cells can be suppressed by knockdown of either the catalytic or the Twins/B55 regulatory subunits of PP2A but not by the other three regulatory B subunits of Drosophila PP2A. Greatwall phosphorylates Endos at a single site, Ser68, and this is essential for Endos function. Together these interactions suggest that Greatwall and Endos act to promote the inactivation of PP2A-Twins/B55 in Drosophila. We discuss the involvement of Polo kinase in such a regulatory loop.

Regulation of Greatwall kinase during Xenopus oocyte maturation

Greatwall kinase has been identified as a key element in M phase initiation and maintenance in Drosophila, Xenopus oocytes/eggs, and mammalian cells. In M phase, Greatwall phosphorylates endosulfine and related proteins that bind to and inhibit protein phosphatase 2A/B55, the principal phosphatase for Cdk-phosphorylated substrates. We show that Greatwall binds active PP2A/B55 in G2 phase oocytes but dissociates from it when progesterone-treated oocytes reach M phase. This dissociation does not require Greatwall kinase activity or phosphorylation at T748 in the presumptive T loop of the kinase. A mutant K71M Greatwall, also known as Scant in Drosophila, induces M phase in the absence of progesterone when expressed in oocytes, despite its reduced stability and elevated degradation by the proteasome. M phase induction by Scant Greatwall requires protein synthesis but is not associated with altered binding or release of PP2A/B55 as compared to wild-type Greatwall. However, in vitro studies with Greatwall proteins purified from interphase cells indicate that Scant, but not wild-type Greatwall, has low but detectable activity against endosulfine. These results demonstrate progesterone-dependent regulation of the PP2A/B55-Greatwall interaction during oocyte maturation and suggest that the cognate Scant Greatwall mutation has sufficient constitutive kinase activity to promote M phase in Xenopus oocytes.

Beyond the Greatwall

The protein kinase Greatwall controls cell division by phosphorylating and activating inhibitors of protein phosphatase 2A.

The Substrate of Greatwall Kinase, Arpp19, Controls Mitosis by Inhibiting Protein Phosphatase 2A

Initiation and maintenance of mitosis require the activation of protein kinase cyclin B-Cdc2 and the inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which, respectively, phosphorylate and dephosphorylate mitotic substrates. The protein kinase Greatwall (Gwl) is required to maintain mitosis through PP2A inhibition. We describe how Gwl activation results in PP2A inhibition. We identified cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein 19 (Arpp19) and α-Endosulfine as two substrates of Gwl that, when phosphorylated by this kinase, associate with and inhibit PP2A, thus promoting mitotic entry. Conversely, in the absence of Gwl activity, Arpp19 and α-Endosulfine are dephosphorylated and lose their capacity to bind and inhibit PP2A. Although both proteins can inhibit PP2A, endogenous Arpp19, but not α-Endosulfine, is responsible for PP2A inhibition at mitotic entry in Xenopus egg extracts.

Mastl Kinase Gene Disruption Causes Embryonic Lethality.

AbstractAbstract 1567Microtubule-associated serine/threonine like kinase (MASTL kinase) was originally identified by genetic linkage as the probable mutant gene responsible for the platelet phenotype in a family with autosomal-dominant thrombocytopenia. MASTL kinase is the mammalian ortholog of Drosophila Greatwall kinase, which is required for cell cycle regulation. Affected members of the thrombocytopenic family carried a mutant MASTL kinase allele with a single nucleotide change that converted a glutamic acid codon to one specifying aspartic acid at amino acid 167 of the protein; no unaffected members of the family carried the mutant allele. Affected family members had a 60% reduction in the numbers of circulating platelets and megakaryocytes that were less mature and less polyploid than normal megakaryocytes. We have sought to determine how MASTL kinase affects platelet production and circulation by generating a strain of mice deficient in MASTL kinase. For this, we obtained embryonic stem (ES) cells containing a gene trap mutation within the murine Mastl gene from the Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Center of the National Center for Research Resources (MMRRC, University of California, San Diego). The mutation was generated by an insertional disruption, and the resulting mutant allele carries a beta–galactosidase/neomycin fusion expression cassette within the fourth intron of the Mastl kinase gene. Chimeric animals were bred and their offspring were genotyped by Southern blotting, confirming germ-line transmission. F1 heterozygote offspring were produced and appear developmentally normal and healthy, with platelet counts indistinguishable from those of their wild-type littermates. We have yet to observe a single weaned animal that is homozygous for the mutant allele in the F1 mice, indicating that MASTL kinase deficiency results in embryonic lethality. We observed decidual swellings at 13.5 days post coitus (dpc), which contained no traces of either embryos or yolk sac membranes. While this has made it impossible to genotype these malformed embryos, it does indicate that the embryos are viable to 3.5–5.5 dpc and are able to implant within the uterine horn. This unexpected phenotype demonstrates a significant and previously unknown role for Mastl kinase in embryonic development. We hypothesize that Mastl kinase may be involved in regulating cell differentiation during embryogenesis. In terms of role of MASTL kinase in familial thrombocytopenia, the mutant animals have allowed us to conclude that the thrombocytopenic syndrome is very unlikely to be the result of haploinsufficiency of MASTL kinase because heterozygous animals have normal platelet counts. Because of the dominant nature of the syndrome, this suggests that the mechanism involves either gain-of-function of the mutant allele or a dominant-negative inhibition of MASTL function specific to the megakaryocyte, two possibilities we are examining. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A novel role for Greatwall kinase in recovery from DNA damage

Activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for genomic integrity and tumor suppression. The occurrence of DNA damage quickly evokes the DDR through ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction, which promotes DNA repair and activates the checkpoint to halt cell cycle progression (Halazonetis et al., 2008; Motoyama and Naka, 2004; Zhou and Elledge, 2000). The "turn off" process of the DDR upon satisfaction of DNA repair, also known as "checkpoint recovery", involves deactivation of DDR elements, but the mechanism is poorly understood. Greatwall kinase (Gwl) has been identified as a key element in the G2/M transition (Archambault et al., 2007; Jackson, 2006; Zhao et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2006) and helps maintain M phase through inhibition of PP2A/B55δ (Burgess et al., 2010; Castilho et al., 2009; Goldberg, 2010; Lorca et al., 2010; Vigneron et al., 2009), the principal phosphatase for Cdk-phosphorylated substrates. Here we show that Gwl also promotes recovery from DNA damage and is itself directly inhibited by the DNA damage response (DDR). In Xenopus egg extracts, immunodepletion of Gwl increased the DDR to damaged DNA, whereas addition of wild type, but not kinase dead Gwl, inhibited the DDR. The removal of damaged DNA from egg extracts leads to recovery from checkpoint arrest and entry into mitosis, a process impaired by Gwl depletion and enhanced by Gwl over-expression. Moreover, activation of Cdk1 after the removal of damaged DNA is regulated by Gwl. Collectively, these results defines Gwl as a new regulator of the DDR, which plays an important role in recovery from DNA