SESSION TITLE: Asthma: From Blood Biomarkers to Biologics and Disease Burden SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/21/2019 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM PURPOSE: We previously reported shifts in blood eosinophil count (BEC) group with repeated BEC measurements for individual patients with asthma (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;121[Suppl 5]:S39‒40). In this analysis, we evaluated the kinetics of BEC group shifts and the influence of oral corticosteroids (OCS) on these shifts. METHODS: We evaluated adult patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma from the placebo cohort of the pooled Phase III SIROCCO (Lancet 2016;388:2115‒27; 48 weeks) and CALIMA (Lancet 2016;388:2128‒41; 56 weeks) studies. Patients were divided by baseline BEC into <150 cells/μL, ≥150–<300 cells/μL, and ≥300 cells/μL groups. Timing of initial shift from baseline BEC group to a different BEC group was determined at Weeks 4, 8, 24, and 40 and at end of treatment. Baseline characteristics were described based on the presence or absence of a shift in BEC group. RESULTS: A total of 739 patients were evaluated. Of those, 260 (35%) did not shift BEC group from baseline, 474 (65%) shifted to a different BEC group during the study, and five patients did not have post-baseline values. The percentage of patients who moved to a different group from baseline was greatest for the ≥150–<300 cells/μL group (88%, 149/170), followed by the <150 cells/μL group (70%, 99/141) and the ≥300 cells/μL group (53%, 226/428). Of patients who shifted groups during the study (n=474), 47% (n=225), 69% (n=329), and 86% (n=410) did so by Week 4, 8, and 24, respectively. Patients with baseline BEC <150 cells/μL shifted the fastest (to ≥150 cells/μL), with 59% (58/99) shifting at Week 4, compared with 55% (82/149) shifting from ≥150–<300 cells/μL to either <150 or ≥300 cells/μL, 38% (85/226) shifting from ≥300 cells/μL to <300 cells/μL. Baseline characteristics that differed for patients who shifted BEC groups vs. those who did not included BEC (median cells/μL [range]: 320 [0–2,690] vs. 520 [0–4,494]), OCS use (17% [n=78] vs. 11% [n=29]), nasal polyposis (15% [n=72] vs. 28% [n=72]), and past polypectomy (10% [n=47] vs. 19% [n=50]). A greater percentage of patients who used OCS shifted BEC groups vs. those who did not use OCS, with 91% (21/23) vs. 87% (128/147) for the ≥150–<300 cells/μL group, 84% (16/19) vs. 68% (83/122) for the <150 cells/μL group, and 61% (41/67) vs. 51% (185/361) for the ≥300 cells/μL group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the ≥150–<300 cells/μL group at baseline had the greatest tendency to shift to another BEC group. Patients with OCS use also have a greater tendency to shift to a different BEC group regardless of BEC baseline values. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A single BEC measurement may be insufficient to inform whether a patient has a clinical diagnosis of eosinophilic asthma. DISCLOSURES: Employee relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: >$100000 Added 03/12/2019 by William Cook, source=Web Response, value=Salary Employee relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: >$100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Ian Hirsch, source=Web Response, value=Salary No relevant relationships by James Kreindler, source=Web Response Consultant relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Ad Boards relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Fees Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Fees Ad Boards relationship with Sanofi Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Fees Ad Boards relationship with GSK Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Fees Grants for Clinical Trials relationship with Sanofi Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support Grants for Clinical Trials relationship with GSK Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support Grants for Clinical Trials relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: >$100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support Advisory Committee Member relationship with SANOFI Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/15/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with Astra Zeneca Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/15/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with GSK Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/15/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Consultant relationship with TEVA Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/15/2019 by Njira Lugogo, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Employee relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP Please note: >$100000 Added 03/13/2019 by Ubaldo Martin, source=Web Response, value=Salary Shareholder relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: >$100000 Added 03/12/2019 by Frank Trudo, source=Web Response, value=Salary