Likert scale, and satisfaction based on ranking of education quality from poor to excellent. The intervention group received 32 weekly e-mails. Results. The study group included 82 interns with a pretest response rate of 100% and posttest response rate of 70%. The intervention group showed greater improvement in knowledge (18% increase compared to 8% in the control group, p 1⁄4 0.005) than the control group. Preparedness in symptom management skills (ie, converting between opiates, differentiating types of pain, treating nausea, and vomiting) improved in the intervention group more than the control group (p 1⁄4 0.04, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). Preparedness in discussing end-of-life decisions with patients increased for residents who participated in a palliative care elective versus those who did not (p 1⁄4 0.04). There were no differences in preparedness in communication skills or satisfaction between control and intervention. Conclusion. E-mailed FFAC are an educational technique that increases intern knowledge and self-reported preparedness in symptom management skills but not preparedness in communication skills or satisfaction with palliative care education. Implications for research, policy, or practice. Weekly e-mailed FFAC are a timeand cost-effective educational method that may be easily integrated into existing residency curricula.