REX NETTLEFORD often reminded us that, generationally speaking, most West Indians are still close to the canepiece. As someone with biological links to the enslavers, enslaved and indentured labourers who met on the canepiece, I regard this central image from Caribbean history as an appropriate vantage point from which to view philosophy, the discipline to which I have devoted a significant part of my career. Of course, the philosophical beliefs of those who actually experienced the canepiece, or are still experiencing it, are largely unwritten and thus unknown. So the canepiece of my title is mainly an imaginary conceptual space, and will function mostly in the manner of a literary device.It is appropriate, therefore, to begin within some poetic images of the Caribbean canepiece. In his history of the literature of the Anglophone Caribbean, Edward Baugh1 shows the romantic view of the canepiece held by poets of the white master class. John Singleton describes this major source of British wealth as an wondrous plant.2 Robert Dunbar described it thus: Thy tall blades, whispering in the sun-bright air, / With fancy's visions seem to fill the scene: / And hither Ceres and her nymphs repair, / And bind their tresses with your chaplets green.3 Toil in the canepiece was done, as James Grainger puts it, by Afric's sable progeny.4When descendants of the labourers on the canepiece began producing their own poetry, a different picture emerged. persona of David Dabydeen's The Canecutter's Song, in addressing a white woman, says, Bu daylight separate me and yu, an dis mud on me haan / Dis sweat from me face, dis rag on me back.5 She does not know, he says, what it is like to have a cutlass slice her leg, or a snake twist around her foot. persona of Edward Brathwaite's Cane contemplates arson: Goin' to burn burn now in dis willin wind till we hurt, till we hate, like it finish.6 In his Long Service Award, Edward Baugh describes a woman who, after fifty years traversing the cane, back bent, beaten by sun and rain, is given a cheap clock by the white foreign boss as a retirement gift.7 Mervyn Morris, in For Consciousness,8 suggests that the plantation model persists in contemporary arrangements. I shall consider some possible perspectives on philosophy from the point of view of the Tainos, the enslaved Africans, the indentured Indians and Chinese, as well as those of us who are descended from them.A sketch towards a Taino philosophyThe Tainos were the first known inhabitants of the northern Caribbean, and the first victims of the canepiece. It is said that within thirty or so years after the arrival of the Spaniards, their entire Jamaican population was decimated as a result of enslavement, exploitation, wanton cruelty and the diseases brought by the invaders. Most of what we know about them comes from the written records of the Europeans and the archaeological records which they left behind.Philosophy is a very literary subject, and it may be foolhardy to attempt a sketch of their philosophy, since they left no written records. But research has been done on some of the beliefs underlying their lifestyle, and I shall draw from some of these sources.9Taino ontology included a supreme being called YaYa, who resembled the Great Spirit of the native American tradition. YaYa governed the cosmos with the assistance of lesser gods and spirits, who were responsible for various domains. This spirit who ruled all other spirits was represented in icons or sacred images called zemis, which served as intermediaries between man and YaYa. Since YaYa was prayed to and accessed through zemis, Senior has called their religion Zemeism.10 It is unclear whether they regarded YaYa as transcendent, and thus beyond experience, or as immanent and thus pervading the universe. But it is clear that they regarded YaYa as a being who was manifested in natural phenomena like cassava and the sea, on which they depended for food. …
Read full abstract