256 Max Weber Studies later chapters show, the Verein did not enjoy unalloyed success, but this account of reform politics is pulled together through discussion of social insurance, the issue of East Elbian estates, and the emergent framework of 'industrial relations'. Max Weber was, of course, heavily involved in the second of these, and the degree to which this account relies upon Schmoller' s perspective is evident in the manner that the back ground to the debates of the early 1890s to agricultural protection and the Junker estates relies firstly upon Schmoller's own writings, and secondly Brentano's argu ments about tariffs and protection. This underscores the manner in which Grimmer Solem's account of social reform in the late-nineteenth century is written consistently from the standpoint of Schmoller and Brentano, irrespective of their centrality to the issues concerned. His dismissive comments about Weber's own presentation to the Verein on the rural labour question (p. 232) point this up strongly, and sit oddly with his generous reading of Schmoller as a modern liberal. Grimmer-Solem clearly has a tolerance for the writings of Schmoller that goes far beyond my own, or of anyone else in my experience. Schmoller's writings are heavily cited both from archival and published sources, as noted above in many cases using Schmoller' s own comments to introduce issues not otherwise closely associated with his work. Given the amount of effort that goes into archival research it can only be regretted that Schmoller's biography is not given greater centrality. Large swathes of Schmoller's work do not fit into the framework provided by the book, such as, for example, his contributions to the Acta Borussica project and his extensive writings on agrarian and administrative history. When, for example, Schmoller was commis sioned to lead the former project, his terms of reference limited him strictly to the period after 1713. When the first volume was published it failed to reach this date. For anyone familiar at first hand with Schmoller's historical method, this will seem all too familiar. But today Schmoller is an enigma, an academic powerhouse whose energy seems so busy, yet curiously undynamic. Keith Tribe The King's School, Worcester Joachim Radkau, Max Weber: Die Leidenschaft des Denkens (Hanser: Munich, 2005), pp. 1000. ISBN 3-446-20675-2. €45.00. Science as passion: Intimate insight and a voyeuristic attitude When Max Weber died in 1920, Karl Jaspers felt as if the German world had lost its heart. This was an emotion particularly felt amongst the younger members around Max Weber's circle, although he was actually in fact a master without pupils. After release from teaching duties, he spent most of his further lifetime as a private scholar. His worldwide fame started decades after his death. Nonetheless, he became an authority of modern social science, and the international Weber industry is growing more and more. Some twenty years ago, Lawrence Scaff predicted that whoever is successful with his own Weber interpretation may determine the further progress of the social sciences. If this is right, one can certainly say that 'Weber is power'. This is also the conclusion of historian Joachim Radkau, who examines the life and work of Max Weber in this voluminous biography. To anticipate the follow ing remarks: this book is the first biography of Weber since 1926 that really may be called a biography. All the other previous attempts were merely extracts of Marianne© Max Weber Studies 2008. Book Reviews 257 Weber's Lebensbild of Max Weber, a hagiographie widow's portrait, first published in 1926. Radkau's book offers new insights even for those who are familiar with Weber's life and work. He quotes sources from private archive material that has not been accessible up to now, especially Marianne's diaries as well as unpublished letters, including correspondence between Max and Marianne, his mother, and his two lovers. All these sources provide a deeper and more accurate understanding of Weber's life, particularly his affective life. But at the same time, these sources lead the biographer to a voyeuristic attitude that is occasionally embarrassing and detri mental to his performance. Previously, Joachim Radkau distinguished himself...
Read full abstract