Historically and under cooler climate conditions, steep slope vineyards yielded best quality wines and highest reputation, due to their distinctive microclimate, especially during ripening period. Nevertheless, steep slope vineyard sites primarily suffer from reduced competitiveness leading to abandonment, thus a loss of valuable vineyard sites. The aim of this work was to investigate differences in microclimatic conditions between different steep slope vineyard management systems and row orientations. Records of inner canopy microclimatic parameters were taken over two consecutive vegetation periods including seven vineyard pairs. A Bayesian mixed effect model was used to properly account for the complexity of the conducted experiment. Additionally, irradiation and canopy surface temperature data was compared. Grapevines planted downslope (control) exhibited a more even light distribution on canopy sides. Contrarily, at terraced vineyard sites canopy sides showed big differences regarding light interception, also affecting diurnal canopy surface temperature. Differences in N-S/E-W row orientation comparison were more pronounced compared to vineyard pairs aligned NE-SW/NW-SE. Night temperatures were slightly higher in terraced vineyards, while daily mean and maximum temperature and temperature amplitude were higher in vineyard rows planted in line of the greatest slope. While a treatment effect was not always clearly visible, an impact of row orientation on temperature microclimate was observed. Differences between treatments may become more pronounced under projected climate change conditions with consequences on physiological processes, thus grapevine performance influencing berry composition.
Read full abstract