Graham Little Research Articles

Modern Science: Proof Dualism As the Correct Science of People Derived From the Work of Graham Little

This paper is continuation of a tradition of human development that has existed almost for all human existence. Building better ideas that enable better management of circumstance. Ideas adopted more fit for the purpose of living. Conceptually it is the shift from ‘philosophy’ on a subject, to a tighter intellectual position usually referred as ‘science’. Natural philosophy, alchemy, and religious explanation of environmental events have all been discarded as empirical evidence, theory and research provided better explanation and thus adopted as better ideas to manage circumstance. Specifically, this paper provides an original intellectual base whereby humanity better understands itself and all outputs and characteristics of the system under study, namely a-person-in-their-environment. In finalizing this base (circa 2014) all historical writing on all aspects of humanity must be called into question, and this new paradigm applied as the ‘lens’ via which we enable greater understanding of ourselves, thus enabling improved decisions on how to manage ourselves both individually and socially such all people enjoy improved life experience. The dualist (mind and brain separate) science of humanity was first proposed by Descartes circa 1650. It has never been proved, and the world adopted monism (mind and brain the same) version of humanity not because it proved correct, but due none could prove it incorrect and prove dualism correct. Until now. From 1974, to today, Graham Little has identified and resolved every conceivable issue implicated in proving dualism correct and monism wrong. This paper provides an overview of the dualism science of people. It underlines the major changes that will occur when dualism is finally adopted ss the correct science of people, with major gains in personal well-being, changes in social and economic policy, depth of insight into social development including how to ensure improved wealth creation and wealth distribution, reduced suicides, reduced social tension and violence, better mental health, deepening social respect and understanding of the real nature of a diverse society and how to live effectively in such a society. This paper also outlines the plan for proving dualism to the highest intellectual quality standard making it an irresistible scientific proposition that must be adopted as the cornerstone of humanity’s intellectual position.

Lichen planopilaris: retrospective study on the characteristics and treatment of 291 patients

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is an immune-mediated cicatricial alopecia. The main clinical presentations of LPP include classic form, frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), and Graham–Little–Piccardi–Lassueur syndrome (GLPLS). We reviewed medical records of all 291 patients diagnosied with LPP from 2006 to 2017 in Department of Dermatology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. LPP was more common in women than men. Lichen planus (LP) was seen in 59 of patients (20.3%). Parietal lesions (69.75%), frontal (27.14%), occipital (23.71%), and temporal (21.64%) were frequently seen in LPP patients. However, trunk hair involvement (15.4% vs. 2.7%; p = .011) and eyebrow involvement (57.7% vs. 0%; p < .0001) were high in FFA patients. The response rates of cyclosporine (CSP) and methotrexate (MTX) were highest, 100% and 85%, respectively. Those treated with CSP achieved partial remission (PR) and complete remission (CR) faster than MTX-treated group. Moreover, MTX was more effective than MMF but not different in time to reach PR (p = .23) or CR (p = .56). However, CSP and MTX were less safe compared with MMF. 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, systemic retinoids (isotretinoin) or their combination were the most effective therapeutic options for FFA patients.

Graham Little–Piccardi–Lassueur syndrome in a patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome

International Journal of DermatologyVolume 55, Issue 4 p. e211-e212 Correspondence Graham Little–Piccardi–Lassueur syndrome in a patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome Jeff C. Donovan MD, PhD, FAAD, FRCPC, Jeff C. Donovan MD, PhD, FAAD, FRCPC jeffrey.donovan@utoronto.ca Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto Hair Loss Clinic, Toronto, ON, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author Jeff C. Donovan MD, PhD, FAAD, FRCPC, Jeff C. Donovan MD, PhD, FAAD, FRCPC jeffrey.donovan@utoronto.ca Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto Hair Loss Clinic, Toronto, ON, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 November 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.13100Citations: 4 Conflicts of interest: None. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume55, Issue4April 2016Pages e211-e212 RelatedInformation

The origin of consciousness and beyond

The origin of consciousness and beyond

Graham little's theory of political leadership

AbstractThis paper examines the theory of political leadership developed by the Australian academic and writer on psychoanalysis and politics, Graham Little – a theory that both provides a general framework for understanding political leadership and posits three types that can be used to develop interpretations of contemporary and historical leaders. Building upon the typologies developed by Wilfred Bion, Little worked from both a deep knowledge of psychoanalytic theory and practice and from empirical work to write his interpretations of individual leaders, such as Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, and two recent Australian prime ministers, Bob Hawke and Paul Keating. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

In Memory of Graham Little

In Memory of Graham Little

Liberation and Its Limits: The Moral and Political Thought of Freud. By Jeffrey B. Abramson (Boston: Beacon Press, 1986. xi, 160p. $14.95 cloth; $7.95 paper). - Political Ensembles: A Psychosocial Approach to Politics and Leadership. By Graham Little (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. viii, 223p. $29.95).

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Immunofluorescent findings and clinical overlap in two cases of follicular lichen planus

Two cases of follicular lichen planus are reported. Clinically, Case 1 fits the Graham Little- Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome (GLPLS), whereas Case 2 fits lichen planopilaris (LPP). The immunofluorescent findings and the clinical overlap of these two cases support the concept that GLPLS and LPP are variants of lichen planus.

A teacher's reflections on autonomy

Summary Is it part of a university teacher's job to promote the autonomy of his students? This question arose for the author as a result of a conversation with a colleague from the psychology department and was focused by his reading of Graham Little's Faces on the Campus. An older conception of the teacher's job is first explored, then confronted by claims that autonomy is an appropriate ideal. It is suggested that several tensions pervade discussion of autonomy as an educational goal, but that Little's notion provides a worthy ideal that can also be used as a guide to teaching practice.

The Concept of Power: A Critique and an Alternative*

Australian Journal of Politics & HistoryVolume 23, Issue 2 p. 252-267 The Concept of Power: A Critique and an Alternative* PETRO GEORGIOU, PETRO GEORGIOUSearch for more papers by this author PETRO GEORGIOU, PETRO GEORGIOUSearch for more papers by this author First published: August 1977 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1977.tb01243.xCitations: 2 † *I should like to thank David Kemp, Graham Little, Leon Peres, Colin Rubenstein and Josef Szwarc for their comments and criticism. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume23, Issue2August 1977Pages 252-267 RelatedInformation

The University Experience: An Australian Study. Graham Little

Previous articleNext article No AccessBook NotesThe University Experience: An Australian Study. Graham Little PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Comparative Education Review Volume 16, Number 2Jun., 1972University Reform Sponsored by the Comparative and International Education Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/445617 Copyright 1972 The Comparative and International Education SocietyPDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

The Waterhouse-Friederichsen syndrome

VOLCKER first described fulminating purpura with bilateral adrenal hmmorrhage in 189.4. BLAHER and BAILEY suggested in 1901, that it was blood poisoning. LITTLE in the same year could find no bacteriological evidence of infection in his series of cases. WATERHOUSE gave detailed description of the disease enti ty in 1911, under the title "Supra-renal apoplexy " and reported one case in a boy aged 8 months. He stated "The case related above appears to form one of a distinct group, examples of which have been described by VOLCKER, STILL, GARROD and DRYSDALE, BATTEN, ANDREWS, TALBOT, BLATTER and BAILY, GRAHAM LITTLE, LONGMEAD and DUDGEON, omitting the case of STILL, in which miliary tuberculosis also was found at the necropsy and that of BATTEN in which hzemorrhage occurred into one supra-renal capsule only in a boy aged 2.', years ; there remains, including that just described, 15 cases, all infants between the ages of 2 and 15 months, and all of whom died after an illness lasting in the majority less than 24 and in none more than 48 hours. In all but three a hmmorrhagic rash of greater or less extent was present. Vomiting occurred in 6, diarrhoea in 1, convulsions in 5, and symptoms suggestive of abdominal pain in 3. In several cases sign of bronchitis was present. The temperature in most between 100 ~ and 103~ Volcker's case 105 ~ , and in one of GRAHAM LITTLE reached 108 ~ before death. Apart from the lesions of the adrenals and the hmmorrhagic rash, the most constant post-mortem findings have been intense engorgement of the lungs. Cultures from various organs have in most cases proved negatiw~ but in one of TALBOT'S streptococcus was obtained by DRYSDADE from the supra-renal cal~sule after death. (Pp. 578)." In 1918, FRIEDERICHSEN reported 12 cases of his own and summarised the literature. In 1933, the clinical pathological entity was first designated as "The Waterhouse-Friederichsen Syndrome" (GLANZMAN). So far there had been 125 reported cases in the world literature.

WATERHOUSE-FRIDERICHSEN SYNDROME

The disease known as the Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome was described as an entity by Graham Little 1 in 1901. He reviewed the literature and published 4 cases of his own. Waterhouse 2 reported his case in 1911 and reviewed 15 others. He gave an accurate description of symptomatology and pathology. In 1918 Friderichsen, 3 in Germany, published his 2 cases and brought the literature up to date. There was little information as to the cause of the syndrome at this time. Maclagan and Cooke, 4 in 1916, were perhaps the first to label the meningococcus as the etiologic agent. Reports have been printed in the German literature concerning the entity by Baumann 5 and others. Aegerter 6 and Sacks 7 reviewed the literature in 1936 and 1937 respectively. Considerable publicity has been given to the syndrome during the last three to four years. Recent

NEVUS ANEMICUS (VOERNER)

The first case of was reported by H. Vorner in 1906, and the name nevus anemicus has found general recognition; it is doubtful whether nevus ischemicus s. hyphemicus, as suggested by F. Parkes Weber (1929), is more appropriate. This type of was at first thought to be extremely rare (Seeger offered a study of 1 case as a thesis for the M.D. degree in 1908), and it does not seem to have caught the attention of British and American dermatologists to a great extent. Sir E. G. Graham Little presented the first case in Britain in 1921, and it is not frequently mentioned in the American literature. But the disease deserves more study, and a review of the work done on the subject may offer some points of general interest. The is actually not extremely rare (in nineteen years I saw 7 cases)

PITYRIASIS ROSEA

I. INCIDENCE Nekam 1 observed pityriasis rosea in 4 per cent of 100,000 cases of cutaneous disease, while Stelwagon, 2 in 123,746 cases collected by the American Dermatological Association from 1878 to 1887, found the disease in only 0.057 per cent. MacLeod 3 found 3 cases of pityriasis rosea per thousand cases of cutaneous diseases in children under 14 years of age observed at the Victoria Hospital. Graham Little 4 saw 6.7 cases per thousand in a dermatologic clinic for adults and children and 4.7 per thousand in a children's clinic. Benedek 5 quoted statistics from thirteen authors. The frequency of pityriasis rosea in Leipzig was 0.52 per hundred and in Vienna, 1.67 per hundred cases of cutaneous diseases. The frequency index (cases per month) was 0.54 for New York city and 9.7 for Berlin. Bolam 3 found that pityriasis rosea comprised 0.3 per cent of all dermatoses; Crocker, 6

GRANULOMA ANNULARE

Although there is an abundance of literature on the cutaneous manifestations of granuloma annulare, little attention has been paid until recently to cases presenting lesions confined predominantly or exclusively to the subcutis (Jacobi¹). Involvement of the scalp in granuloma annulare is apparently a rare finding. Graham Little²noted only two such instances in a review of forty-nine cases, and the lesions were all of the cutaneous variety. The tendency of granuloma annulare to spare the scalp does not seem to be confined to the cutaneous lesions alone, but apparently applies to the subcutaneous manifestations as well. Jacobi stated that the subcutaneous form has been observed on the palm, the flexor surfaces of the fingers, the dorsum of the foot and the forearm, but said nothing of its occurrence on the scalp. In view of these facts, the following case is reported because of the unusual character and distribution

FOLLICULITIS DECALVANS AND LICHEN SPINULOSUS

Reports of cases presenting a curious combination of two known clinical entities, folliculitis decalvans and lichen spinulosus, are comparatively rare in the literature. In 1915, Graham Little 1 presented a case before the Royal Society of Medicine in which both these conditions existed. His patient was a woman, aged 55, who said that her hair had been falling out in patches over a period of ten years. Five months before presentation, the patient suffered a sudden inflammation, with itching of the scalp, in which the hair came out in handfuls. At the same time, there appeared on the axillae, groins and flexors of the elbows an itchy, follicular eruption made up of grouped patches. On the back and external surfaces of the arms, there was a diffuse spiny folliculitis. Dore 2 and Beatty 3 reported somewhat similar cases in the same year, although, as a result of histologic study,

News and Views

THE New Year's Honours List contains the names of the following men of science and others associated with scientific work: Baron: Sir Ernest Rutherford, chairman of the Advisory Council of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, and until recently president of the Royal Society. Baronets: Sir John Rose Bradford, president of the Royal College of Physicians; Sir Richard Gregory, editor of NATURE. K.C.B.: Dr. F. E. Smith, secretary to the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. K.C.M.G.: Hon. Sir Walter Hartwell James, Chancellor of the University of Western Australia; Dr. A. W. Hill, Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Knights: Prof. C. R. Beazley, professor of medieval and modern history in the University of Birmingham; Mr. W. W. Hornell, Viee-Chancellor of Hong Kong University; Dr. E. G. Graham Little, member of Senate of the University of London since 1906; Dr. R. W. Livingstone, Vice-Chancellor of the Queen's University, Belfast. C.B.: Mr. R. L. Hobson, Keeper of Ceramics and Ethnography, British Museum. C.I.E.: Lieut.—Col. H. W. Acton, director of the School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Calcutta. C.B.E.: Miss Caroline Haslett, director of the Electrical Association for Women and secretary of the Women's Engineering Society (Inc.); Miss Edith Helen Major, Mistress of Girton College, Cambridge; Miss Louisa Martindale, president of the Medical Women's Federation and vice-president of the Medical Women's International Association; Prof. Sidney Russ, professor of physics, Medical School, Middlesex Hospital, for work in connexion with radium; Mr. J. J. Shaw, secretary to the Seismological Investigations Committee of the British Association. O.B.E.: Dr. W. M. Aders, lately economic biologist, Zanzibar; Mr. R. S. Capon, Superintendent of Scientific Research, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Air Ministry; Mr. J. M. Carey, H.M. Divisional Inspector of Mines; Mr. J. S. Corbett, secretary of the Empire Forestry Association; Mr. A. de V. Wade, principal assistant in the Native Affairs Department, Kenya. M.B.E.: Dr. V. E. Wilkins, Assistant Principal, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.

Co-education

DR. GRAHAM LITTLE is well known as a champion of medical co-education, and we print his letter on the subject with pleasure. The article in NATURE was not intended to indicate any general objection to co-education, but we suggested that the question of medical co-education in London constitutes a special problem since a well-organised system of unisexual medical schools is already in existence. Conditions in 1915 during the War were quite exceptional, and the view then taken on the question of medical co-education cannot be regarded as binding the University. We retain our dislike of the ‘quota’ system, notwithstanding Dr. Graham Little's interesting evidence as to its origin and working.

FOLLICULITIS DECALVANS ET ATROPHICANS (LITTLE)

In 1915, Sir Graham Little¹presented before the Dermatological Section of the Royal Society of Medicine of London, a patient with a symptom-complex which had hitherto never been observed or recorded, so far as can be ascertained. He named this symptom-complex folliculitis decalvans et atrophicans. Since that time seven other cases have been recorded. The following is the report of a case presenting this same symptom-complex. <h3>REPORT OF CASE</h3><h3>History.—</h3> Mrs. T. K., aged 50, a Russian Jewess, a housewife, presented herself at the Vanderbilt Clinic on July 12, 1927, complaining of an eruption beneath and between the breasts and over the lower part of the back. This eruption had been present one year. She remarked also concerning a condition of seven months' duration which had caused loss of hair in spots on the scalp. The eruption on the body as well as the condition of the scalp was