The left retroperitoneal (LRP) approach to the aorta is a well-established technique for aortic exposure. The right retroperitoneal (RRP) approach to the aorta has been performed less often, and the outcomes remain unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of RRP aortic procedures and to determine whether it is a viable strategy to preserve the LRP space for future procedures. We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained computerized database with a query for all retroperitoneal aortic procedures. The patients' medical records were reviewed and data collected. The demographics, indications, intraoperative details, and outcomes were tabulated. We found 6076 retroperitoneal approaches for aortic procedures that had been performed between 1984 and 2020. Of these, 225 had used the RRP approach. Of the 225 patients, 153 were men (68%), and the median age was 65.2 years (range, 26-88). The comorbidities included hypercholesterolemia (n = 98; 15.6%), hypertension (n = 38; 16.9%), coronary artery disease (n = 25; 11.1%), current tobacco use (n = 98; 43.6%), diabetes (n = 32; 14.2%), and renal failure (n = 5; 2.2%). The indications for intervention included aneurysm (n = 112; 49.8%), occlusive disease (n = 100; 44.4%), and other (n = 13; 5.8%). The intraoperative blood loss was 967.1 mL (range, 50-8000 mL). Perioperative complications occurred in 43 patients (19.1%), with a total of 50 complications. These included cardiac events (n = 5), cerebrovascular events (n = 3), multiorgan failure (n = 8), renal failure (n = 4), pulmonary events (n = 3), bleeding (n = 7), colon ischemia (n = 6), hematoma (n = 1), infection (n = 2), limb loss (n = 3), and graft occlusion or stenosis (n = 5). Four patients died perioperatively (1.8%). Of the 225 patients treated with a RRP approach, 31 required 66 subsequent procedures. These procedures included 29 cases of extra-anatomic bypass, 19 cases of thrombectomy or embolectomy, 10 cases of bypass revision, 5 cases of infected graft excision, and 3 cases of aneurysm revision. Of the 225 patients in the RRP group, 8 had eventually undergone a LRP approach for aortic reconstruction and had also required 26 subsequent procedures. Of the RRP group, 14 had undergone a prior LRP approach and had required 12 subsequent procedures. The RRP approach to the aorta is a useful technique in the setting of prior surgery, anatomic abnormality, or infection that complicates the use of other approaches. The outcomes were similar to those with other more standard approaches. The RRP aortic approach has the added benefit of preserving the left retroperitoneum for future inflow procedures.