Ethnographers have constructed contradicting assertions, and indeed assumptions,about the nature of learning, how it is best accomplished, andhow students internalise this learning in order to form both individualisedand collective identities. Are the rites of passage, so often described in analysesof postgraduate socialisation – the oral examinations, the viva voce, thedepartmental seminar, or graduation ceremony – the only routes availablefor understanding how anthropological culture is inculcated into students?Is the role of the supervisor as mentor pivotal in the successful completionof a Ph.D? Or is this more of a master/apprentice relationship? Does thisproc ess maintain its relevance in a globalised field and with instant virtualaccess to experts from other institutions anywhere in the world? Such issueshave been of interest to both students and faculty within the anthropologydiscipline, in particular, and the social sciences more generally.