Graduating Chief Residents Research Articles

Perceptions of Graduating General Surgery Chief Residents: Are They Confident in Their Training?

Debate exists within the surgical education community about whether 5 years is sufficient time to train a general surgeon, whether graduating chief residents are confident in their skills, why residents choose to do fellowships, and the scope of general surgery practice today. In May 2013, a 16-question online survey was sent to every general surgery program director in the United States for dissemination to each graduating chief resident (CR). Of the 297 surveys returned, 76% of CRs trained at university programs, 81% trained at 5-year programs, and 28% were going directly into general surgery practice. The 77% of CRs who had done >950 cases were significantly more comfortable than those who had done less (p < 0.0001). Only a few CRs were uncomfortable performing a laparoscopic colectomy (7%) or a colonoscopy (6%), and 80% were comfortable being on call at a Level I trauma center. Compared with other procedures, CRs were most uncomfortable with open common bile duct explorations (27%), pancreaticoduodenectomies (38%), hepatic lobectomies (48%), and esophagectomies (60%) (p < 0.00001). Of those going into fellowships, 67% said they truly had an interest in that specialty and only 7% said it was because they were not confident in their surgical skills. Current graduates of general surgery residencies appear to be confident in their skills, including care of the trauma patient. Fellowships are being chosen primarily because of an interest in the subspecialty. General surgery residency no longer provides adequate training in esophageal or hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

The Fellowship Council: a decade of impact on surgical training

The objective of this project is to document the history of the Fellowship Council (FC) and report its current impact on surgical training. The need for advanced training in laparoscopic surgery resulted in the rapid development of fellowships for which there was no oversight. Fellowship program directors began meeting in the 1990s and formally created the FC in 2004 to provide that oversight. To obtain information with which to create a narrative of the history of the FC, the authors performed a detailed review of all available minutes from the meetings of the various iterations of the council and its committees between 2001 and 2012. Information about fellowships and meetings of the directors of fellowships prior to 2001 are based on information included in minutes of meetings after 2001. Minimally invasive surgery fellowship program directors in collaboration with surgical societies created the FC to bring order to the application process for residents and program directors. It has evolved into an organization with mature, reliable processes for application, matching, curriculum development, accreditation, and reporting. It now receives applications from more than 30% of graduating chief residents in general surgery. It has 223 accredited fellowship positions in the following disciplines: Minimally invasive surgery, bariatric/metabolic surgery, Flexible endoscopy, hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, colorectal surgery, and Thoracic surgery. The FC provides a reliable, fair process for matching residents with fellowship programs and has successfully expanded its oversight of such programs with mature processes for accreditation, curriculum development, and reporting.

Early Subspecialization and Perceived Competence in Surgical Training: Are Residents Ready?

In order to understand how current surgical residents feel about their training, a survey focused on perceptions regarding early entry into a subspecialty and the adequacy of training was sent to selected residency programs in general surgery (GS). A 36-item online anonymous survey was sent to the program directors of 55 GS programs. The national sample consisted of 1,515 PGY 1 to PGY 5 categorical residents. The response rate was 45%. Overall, 80% were planning on pursuing a fellowship. The majority (63%) believed that the Residency Review Committee for Surgery and the American Board of Surgery should consider the shift to early subspecialty training. Almost 70% of respondents preferred a 3-year basic track followed by a 3-year subspecialty track. In response to the survey item, "Do you think a 5-year GS residency fully prepares you to practice GS?", 38% of residents overall responded "no" or "unsure." This figure decreased with each increasing year of residency training, from PGY 1 (53.3%) to PGY 5 (23%). Finally, 71% of residents who answered "no" or "unsure" to the above question believe there should be a change to a track system. The choice of fellowship training for 80% of trainees partially reflects that 38% are not confident about their skills with 5 years of training in GS, including 23% of graduating chief residents. Training and certifying groups should update and strengthen the current curriculum for categorical residents in GS and continue their efforts to offer shortened independent or integrated residency training for those who will enter surgical specialties. Innovative solutions are needed to solve the logistic and financial problems involved.

The importance of dedicated dermoscopy training during residency: A survey of US dermatology chief residents

Studies have shown low satisfaction levels among dermatology residents with respect to dermoscopy training. Many desire additional instruction. We surveyed graduating chief residents to assess current education practices among US dermatology training programs with respect to the role of dermoscopy as an aid in the management of pigmented lesions. An online survey was sent to 139 chief residents of US dermatology training programs. A 59% response rate was achieved. Of responding chief residents, 94% use dermoscopy. Although 92% of chief residents received dermoscopy training, only 48% trained with a pigmented lesion specialist. Among those training without a specialist, less than half received classroom or bedside teaching compared with 77% of those who trained with a specialist. Of those who trained with a specialist, 77% were satisfied with their training compared with only 30% who trained without a specialist (P < .0001). Those who trained with a specialist were more likely to agree that dermoscopy can help differentiate melanoma from benign lesions (77% vs 47%; P = .0065). Response bias and limiting the survey to chief residents potentially limits our ability to generalize these results to all US dermatology trainees. Although many residents use dermoscopy as a diagnostic tool, the lack of dedicated dermoscopy training remains a potential barrier to increasing residents' diagnostic confidence in the management of pigmented lesions. Increasing the amount of dedicated instruction on this topic is one possible approach to enhance resident satisfaction, potentially increasing their competency in the management of atypical nevi.

USMLE step one, otolaryngology in-training examination scores, and the American Board of Otolaryngology examination performance

To determine if U. S. Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) Step One scores have a positive correlation with performance on the annual Otolaryngology Training Examination (OTE) and subsequent performance on the American Board of Otolaryngology (ABOto) examination. A retrospective cohort study of 70 residents completing Otolaryngology residencies from 2005-2009. 103 otolaryngology training programs were contacted and USMLE Step 1 scores, OTE scores, and performance on the ABOto examination were collected for the graduating chief residents from 2005-2009 from a limited number of residency programs. The associations between the examinations were evaluated using Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient and Pearson’s correlation. USMLE Step 1 scores and board performance were provided for 70 residents from 7 Otolaryngology residency programs. Positive correlations were found using Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation to be significant for USMLE Step 1 scores compared with scores on the OTE-2, OTE-3, OTE-4, OTE-5 (p

Value of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training in a fourth-year medical school advanced surgical skills elective

BackgroundFew data are available describing the benefits of initiating fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) training during medical school. We hypothesized that an intense 1-month surgical skills elective that included FLS task training for fourth-year medical students (MS4s) would result in performance levels indistinguishable from graduating chief residents (PGY5) who had received clinical skill training and access to self-guided FLS curriculum. MethodsFrom July 2007 through June 2011, 114 MS4s participated in a 1-month advanced surgical skills elective. The curriculum for the elective included cadaver dissections, patient management presentations, and surgical skill training (open surgical skills and basic laparoscopic skills modules performed on FLS trainers and virtual reality laparoscopic simulators). From June 2009 through June 2011, 21 PGY5s graduated who had never received formalized FLS skills training. These residents were tested on FLS by a certified proctor and the results recorded. The performance outcome measure was task completion time. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare the performance measures for each group. ResultsAll PGY5s achieved FLS certification on their first attempt and completed enough cases for graduation. The MS4 group showed significantly better performance than the PGY5 group in the peg transfer and circle cut (P < 0.05). No difference was seen in the knot tying tasks between the two groups (P > 0.05) ConclusionsIncorporating FLS training into a 1 month-long medical school surgery elective enabled MS4s to achieve FLS performance similar to, or better than, the performance achieved by PGY5 surgery residents. We support the integration of FLS skills task training as a standard part of the skills training curriculum for medical students.

Training Satisfaction Versus Dissatisfaction Among Chief Residents in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery—A Pilot Survey

To survey chief residents in accredited oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) training programs to assess their satisfaction with their surgical training and analyze their career plans after residency. A 19-question anonymous survey was electronically mailed to 212 individuals identified as graduating chief residents in accredited OMS training programs. Ninety-four individuals (44%) completed the survey. Of these 85 were men (90.4%) and 9 were women (9.6%). Average age was 32 years. Forty-seven respondents (50%) completed the 4-year traditional OMS programs, 37 respondents (39.4%) completed the 6-year MD integrated programs, 9 respondents (9.6%) completed the 4-year MD option programs, and 1 listed "other" as a program type. Fifty-two individuals (55.3%) planned a full-time private practice career, 5 (5.3%) planned a full-time academic career, 3 (3.2%) planned a military career, 27 (28.7%) planned a combined private practice and academic career, and 7 (7.4%) planned to complete a fellowship after residency. Seventy-nine of all respondents (84%) were satisfied with their OMS training program, whereas 15 (16%) were not. Most participants of this survey were satisfied with their training program and OMS as a career. However, it is important to note that less than half (44%) of chief residents who received this survey completed it. This short survey is a pilot survey; a more involved evaluation of OMS resident satisfaction is planned, further assessing satisfaction and burnout during residency.

Operative experience during residency training in obstetrics and gynecology: is there a trend towards fewer surgical cases?

Operative experience during residency training in obstetrics and gynecology: is there a trend towards fewer surgical cases?

The Impact of Robotics on Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer and Resident Education in Rochester, New York

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been performed in Rochester, NY, since 2003. Currently, 10 area urologists perform RARP, and robotic training has become an important component of the residency. We present data describing the timeline for adoption, both in clinical practice and in the residency program. We reviewed the operating logs for all surgeons who were performing prostatectomies in all hospitals in Rochester, NY, from 2003 to 2007. We examined the influence RARP had on other treatments, including brachytherapy and cryotherapy. Surgical logs of graduating chief residents were also reviewed. Eleven surgeons in Rochester regularly perform radical prostatectomy (10 perform primarily RARP, one performs only open prostatectomy). Three of the city's four hospitals have robotic systems. In 2003-2004, there were 30 open prostatectomies performed monthly and fewer than 10 performed robotically. By 2006, the trend was reversed, with 50 robot-assisted prostatectomies performed each month and fewer than 10 open prostatectomies (P<0.05). The rate of brachytherapy fluctuated, increasing in centers without a robot. The number of open prostatectomies in centers without a robot dropped significantly to fewer than 10 cases per year. There was also a significant decrease in the number of open prostatectomies performed by chief residents. Since the introduction of surgical robotics, significant changes have been seen. The volume of radical prostatectomies performed by surgeons at institutions with robotics has increased; the volume at robot-free institutions has become nominal. There is a trend toward increased radiation therapy at robot-free institutions. While radical prostatectomies logged by graduating chief residents have increased, open prostatectomy experience is now minimal.

Decreasing Electrosurgical Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Surgical Volume During Graduate Medical Education Training is Associated With Increased Surgical Adverse Events

In the United States the numbers of electrosurgical transurethral prostate resection procedures have been decreasing. Since electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate is a difficult procedure to master, we hypothesized that recent residents are lacking in training for this procedure. We used summary case log information provided by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to determine if the number of electrosurgical transurethral prostate resection procedures performed by graduating chief residents has decreased and if there has been an increase in surgical adverse events. In addition, we investigated whether the increased number of laser procedures impacted the rate of adverse events. Summary operative data from graduating chief resident case logs were provided by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for academic years 2001 to 2007. The numbers of electrosurgical transurethral prostate resection procedures, laser procedures and procedures for adverse events were recorded for each year. The number of electrosurgical transurethral prostate resection procedures performed by graduating chief residents has steadily decreased from 58 in 2001 to 43 in 2007. Conversely the number of laser procedures started increasing in 2004. The rate of procedures for adverse events as a percentage of electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate procedures increased during the study period (from 3% in 2001 to 6% in 2007), and as a percentage of electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate and laser procedures the rate increased until 2005 and subsequently started decreasing. The rate of surgical adverse events, as measured by the need for subsequent procedures, has increased during the last 7 years. However, when laser procedures are accounted for, it appears that adverse events have recently started trending down as an increasing number of laser procedures started being performed.

The Present and Future Use of Physician Extenders in General Surgery Training Programs: One Response to the 80-Hour Work Week

The aim of this study was to assess the use of physician extenders (PEs) in general surgery residency programs. We surveyed the program directors in surgery for the number of chief residents, PEs on general surgery services, PE duties, whether PEs were hired in response to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour restrictions, plans to hire additional PEs, and program type. Data were analyzed using the Student's t-test; p values are two-tailed and considered significant if <0.05. There were 163 programs (65%) that responded, (87 university, 70 nonuniversity, and 6 military programs), with a total of 689 graduating chief residents per year. One hundred sixty programs use 840 PEs (median, 3.5 PEs per program; mean, 5.3 PEs per program, 2 PEs per chief resident). One hundred twenty-seven programs (79%) use at least 1 PE (range 1 to 50 PEs); 93 programs (57%) hired 513 (61%) PEs in response to work-hour restrictions. Before 2003, the mean number of PEs per program was 2.0; after 2003, there were 5.3 per program (p=0.0001). Most common uses of PEs included taking histories and physicals (84%), seeing consults (58%), first-assisting (52%), and seeing patients in the emergency department (47%). Forty-seven of 162 (29%) programs plan to hire more PEs in the next 3 years, 76 programs (47%) would like to, but are unsure of funding; 23 programs (14%) are not planning to increase the total, and 16 programs (10%) are unsure. With available funding, 431 additional PEs may be hired in the next 3 years, for a total of 1,271 PEs in 163 programs, or an average of 7.8 PEs per program and 1.8 PEs per chief resident. PEs have been hired in large numbers to assist on general surgery teaching services, with most hired in response to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour restrictions, and most of their duties are intended to aid resident education. Almost 80% of programs currently use PEs; 76% would like to hire more. Currently 1.2 PEs are used per graduating chief resident; this could increase to 1.8 PEs per chief resident in the next 3 years.

Surgical Resident Research Productivity Over 16 Years

General surgery training has changed over the past decade due to the 80-hour work week and increasing demands on the surgery faculty to generate clinical revenue with ever decreasing reimbursements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgery resident productivity over the years and the surgery resident's contribution to clinical and basic research literature. A PubMed literature search of all graduating chief residents (n = 95) over a 16-y period from a single university-based general surgery program were evaluated. Number and types of publications (clinical paper versus basic science paper) were analyzed for each resident. A cohort of residents graduating from the years 1990 to 1996 (n = 42) were deemed the early group and a cohort of residents graduating from the years 1999 to 2005 (n = 41) were deemed the late group. Residents graduating in 1997 and 1998 were deemed the washout group. From 1990 to 2005, there were 95 graduates with 204 published articles. Resident research time ranged from 0 to 2 y, with most residents spending 1 y of research time. In the early group, residents averaged 2.0 +/- 0.4 papers versus the late group where each resident published 2.6 +/- 0.5 papers (P = NS). In the early group, 24.4% of the papers were basic science in nature as opposed to the late group where 27.7% of the papers were with a basic science topic (P = NS, chi(2) analysis). Resident research productivity at a single university-based program with an elective research time does not appear to be deteriorating over time. A majority of research performed by residents is clinically oriented; however. basic science research does not appear to be decreasing. Careful scrutiny to resident research productivity is needed to ensure productive future academic surgeons.

The Residency Experience in Pediatric Otolaryngology

To assess the residency experience in pediatric otolaryngology, determine the impact of pediatric fellowship programs on residency training, and evaluate the need for fellowship training in pediatric otolaryngology. An anonymous, web-based survey of chief residents in otolaryngology. Respondents described their experience in pediatric otolaryngology using a 5-point Likert scale and reported their comfort levels (yes/no) with various medical and surgical issues in pediatric otolaryngology. The survey was successfully completed by 70 respondents, representing a response rate of 26%. The majority of the respondents reported positive experiences with regard to the following aspects of pediatric otolaryngology training: didactics (81%), clinical research opportunities (78%), positive faculty role models (87%), career mentorship (74%), independent medical (84%) and surgical (81%) decision-making, and overall comprehensive residency experience (87%). Basic science research opportunities (50%) were reported as less available than clinical research opportunities (78%) (P = .002). Compared with other surveyed issues, a lower comfort level was reported for management of craniofacial anomalies (P < .001), excision of large lymphatic malformations (P < .001), cochlear implantation (P < .001), laryngotracheal reconstruction (P < .001), and surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency (P < .001). No statistically significant difference was noted in responses based on the presence of a fellowship program at the institution. The residency experience in pediatric otolaryngology is perceived as comprehensive by graduating chief residents participating in this survey. The presence of a fellowship program does not appear to negatively impact the residency experience. Based on the reported comfort levels, the management of complex issues in pediatric otolaryngology may require additional training.

QS56. Surgical Resident Research Productivity Over 16 Years

Purpose: General surgery training has changed over the past decade due to an increasing emphasis on the 80-hour work week and increasing demands on the surgery faculty to generate clinical revenue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgery resident productivity over the years and the surgery resident’s contribution to clinical and basic research literature. Method: A PubMed literature search of all graduating chief residents (n = 95) over a 16 year period from a single university based general surgery program were evaluated. Number and types of publications (clinical paper versus basic science paper) were analyzed for each resident. A cohort of residents graduating from the years 1990-1996 (N=42) were deemed the early group and a cohort of residents graduating from the years 1999-2005 (N=41) were deemed the late group. Residents graduating in the class years, 1997 and 1998 were deemed the washout group. Results: From 1990-2005, there were 95 graduates with 203 published articles. Resident research time ranged from 0 to 2 years, with most residents spending one year of research time. In the early group, residents averaged 2.0 ± 0.4 papers as opposed to the late group where each resident published 2.6 ± 0.5 papers (P=NS). In the early group 32.8% of the papers were basic science in nature as opposed to the late group where 27.7% of the papers were with a basic science topic (P=NS, Chi-squared analysis). See Table. Conclusions: Resident research productivity at a single university based program with an elective 1-2 year research time does not appear to be deteriorating over time. A majority of research performed by residents is clinically oriented, however basic science research does not appear to be decreasing. Careful scrutiny to resident research productivity is needed to ensure productive academic surgeons in the future. TABLEResident Productivity N Total papers Clinical papers Basic Science papers Papers per resident Clinical papers per resident Basic science papers per resident Early: 1990-1996 42 85 64 21 2.00.4 2.1 0.9 Late: 1999-2005 41 108 78 30 2.60.5 1.9 0.7 P-Value - - - - NS NS NS Open table in a new tab

Emerging Trends in the Performance of Parathyroid Surgery

The management of hyperparathyroidism has evolved rapidly in the past decade with the introduction of intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing, radioguided surgery, and endoscopic surgery. Not surprisingly, there is a corresponding movement toward specialization of surgeons providing increasingly sophisticated treatments for head and neck endocrine disorders. We sought to identify trends in the disciplines performing parathyroid surgery. Nonrandomized, controlled comparison of surgical caseloads and publication volumes. Two metrics designed to reflect the proportion of parathyroidectomies being performed by otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons (OHNS) and general surgeons (GS) were chosen: the operative case logs of graduates from American training programs in OHNS and GS from 1996 through 2005 and the number of scientific papers published relating to parathyroid surgery during two timeframes (1991-1995 and 2001-2005). There was a gradual increase in the mean number of parathyroid surgeries performed by GS residents from 6.0 in 1996 to a peak of 9.2 in 2004; this volume has begun to decline (to 8.5 in 2005). During the same timeframe, the mean number of parathyroidectomies performed by OHNS residents rose sharply and steadily from 1.8 in 1996 to 10.9 in 2005. The number of American GS parathyroid publications from 1991 to 1995 was 41, compared with 108 in the period 2001 to 2005. During the same timeframe, the number of American OHNS parathyroid papers increased from 1 to 27. The relative proportion of parathyroid publications authored by American otolaryngologists rose from 2.4% to 20.0% (P = .006). Increasingly, otolaryngologists are the primary surgeons in parathyroid operations as indicated by two surrogate metrics. Graduating chief residents in otolaryngology now perform more parathyroid procedures than chief residents in general surgery, and a growing proportion of parathyroid publications are being authored by otolaryngologists.

Do U.S. Medical Licensure Examination Step 1 Scores Correlate with Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology In-Training Examination Scores and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology Written Examination Performance?

The purpose of this study was to assess the possible association between scores of >200 on U.S. Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) step 1 and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training examinations and the pass rate on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written examination. The USMLE step 1 and postgraduate year 1 to 4 CREOG in-training examination scores for the graduating chief residents in eight accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs were obtained. Performance on USMLE step 1 was correlated with ABOG examination performance and CREOG in-training examination scores. The correlations between USMLE step 1 and CREOG in-training examination scores and ABOG examination performance were analyzed by using the Spearman correlation coefficient. USMLE step 1 scores were significantly correlated with CREOG in-training examination scores (p < 0.000). None of the residents who scored >200 on USMLE step 1 and a mean of >200 on the CREOG in-training examinations failed the ABOG written examination. Program directors have used USMLE step 1 to identify trainees who are likely to perform well on the CREOG in-training examination. The CREOG in-training examination has been used to identify residents who are likely to pass the ABOG written examination. The results of this study document the strength of these associations.

Thyroid Surgery: Changing Patterns of Practice

The practice of thyroidectomy has evolved over the past 10 years with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, laryngeal nerve monitoring, and outpatient surgery. We sought to investigate corresponding trends in the disciplines performing thyroid surgery. The authors conducted a nonrandomized, case-controlled comparison of surgical volumes and systematic analysis of publication volumes. Two surrogates for the proportion of thyroidectomies being performed by otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons (OHNS) and general surgeons (GS) were chosen: 1) the operative case logs of graduates from American training programs in OHNS and GS from 1995 through 2004 were compared; and 2) the number of scientific articles published relating to thyroid surgery were systematically queried for two timeframes (1990-1994 and 2000-2004). There was a gradual increase in the mean number of thyroidectomies performed by GS residents from 13.2 in 1995 to 18.2 in 2004. During the same timeframe, the mean number of thyroidectomies performed by OHNS residents more than doubled from 15.0 to 33.5. The number of American GS thyroid publications from 1990 to 1994 was 79, compared with 98 in the period 2000 to 2004, representing a 24% increase. During the same timeframe, the number of American OHNS articles increased from 14 to 49 (a 250% increase). The relative proportion of thyroid publications authored by American otolaryngologists more than doubled from 15.1% to 33.3% (P = .0017). A clear trend is emerging in the pattern of thyroid surgery in that a growing proportion of publications are being authored by otolaryngologists compared with general surgeons, and the average number of procedures performed by graduating chief residents is now 84% higher in otolaryngology compared with general surgery.

Broad-based general surgery training is a model of continued utility for the future.

Our program has emphasized broad-based training that potentially allows residents to pursue a variety of career paths, with or without additional surgical training. Diverse experiences have emphasized a variety of rotations, including a university hospital with a large trauma service, several tertiary private institutions, and suburban and rural experiences with private practitioners. Our faculty includes surgeons with both broad-based and narrowly focused practices. In light of duty-hour restrictions and proposed changes in surgical training, we assessed the results of this model over an extended period. The case volume from the Residency Review Committee (RRC) operative logs, ABSITE scores, ABS performance, fellowship training, and subsequent career choices were examined for all graduating chief residents in general surgery from our program over the past 17 years. The impact of specialty faculty was assessed and data from 5 index (aortic, major esophagogastric, liver, pancreatic, and pelvic resections) cases were also abstracted from the logs. A survey was then sent to all 208 of the 212 surgeons who had completed the program since 1971. Of the 115 residents who completed training in the last 17 years, 60 pursued fellowship training and 55 went directly into general surgical practice in 20 states. Fifteen of the 29 residents who had an elective laboratory experience were among the 23 who remained in academic careers. The operative experience has been excellent (1090 +/- 42 total major; 240 +/- 21 surgeon chief). Experience did not vary, even though the number of graduating chiefs ranged from 5 to 8 per year, and there have been no deficiencies in RRC index cases. The addition of specialty faculty (n = 5) at various intervals promptly increased the volume of complex cases in pelvic, liver, pancreas, and vascular surgery. Since all residents promptly passed the ABS examinations, it was not possible to discern factors associated with Board performances other than broad-based training. The survey demonstrated that most continued to practice broad-based general surgery and believed that such training was highly relevant to their current practice. The provision of broad-based training with generalists and specialty faculty has allowed for excellent breadth and depth in case volume. While many residents pursued fellowships, those who did not have indeed achieved successful careers. Most continue to practice general surgery, indicating the value of complete training in this field. It will be important to monitor these outcomes as changes in residency training occur.

A rural, community-based program can train surgical residents in advanced laparoscopy.

Advanced laparoscopy requires mastery of complex surgical skills. A steep learning curve, lack of an adequate number of cases, and a shortage of experienced staff are reasons cited as barriers to the acquisition of these skills by surgical residents. We hypothesize that advanced laparoscopy can be taught during residency without additional fellowship training. ast surgical residents who completed training at our rural, community-based, 140-bed hospital from 1992 to 2000 were contacted by mailed surveys and a followup telephone interview. Advanced laparoscopy was defined as cases other than cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and diagnostic laparoscopy. Five attending surgeons routinely perform advanced laparoscopy. The response rate to the survey was 93.3% with 15 of 18 graduates currently practicing general surgery and 100% of the surgeons performing advanced laparoscopy. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, splenectomy, colectomy, Nissen fundoplication, and adrenalectomy were performed by 12 (85.7%), 10 (71.4%), 11 (78.6%), 13 (92.9%), and 9 (64.3%) surgeons, respectively. Eight (57.1%) surgeons reported confidence to perform advanced laparoscopy immediately after residency. All graduating chief residents from the last 3 years expressed this confidence. On average each of two chief residents from the past 3 academic years graduated with 99 basic and 50 advanced laparoscopic cases. A rural, community-based program can train residents to perform advanced laparoscopy. Increasing the volume of advanced cases handled by resident correlates with increasing confidence in graduates.

The Leapfrog Initiative: a potential threat to surgical education

Purpose The Leapfrog Initiative was established in January 2000 by the Business Roundtable (BRT) in response to the Institute of Medicine report on quality and safety of medical care. The BRT is composed of chief executive officers of U.S. corporations representing more than 28 million employees. Leapfrog has proposed 3 hospital safety measures—computerized physician order entry, intensive care unit physician staffing standards and evidence-based hospital referral, which states that hospitals must meet certain volume/year criteria. Three of these criteria are pertinent to general surgery. They are abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair greater than or equal to 30/year, carotid endarterectomy (CE) greater than or equal to 100/year, and esophageal cancer surgery (ECS) greater than or equal to 7/year. Hospitals failing to meet these requirements would not be eligible to treat patients employed by BRT corporations. Methods Data were obtained from the Residency Review Committee (RRC) for Surgery Resident Statistics Summary for 1999 to 2001. Comparisons were made between the numbers of the Leapfrog index cases required and the actual number of cases performed by each graduating chief resident. Data from the Connecticut Hospital Association (CHA) for fiscal year 2000 were also analyzed. Outcomes for procedures at The Stamford Hospital were reviewed. Results Data obtained from the RRC reveal that the mode numbers for each of the 3 evidence-based standards for each graduating chief resident in 2000 and 2001 are 5 and 3 for AAA, 15 and 17 for CE, and 0 in both years for ECS. Extrapolation using the mode for each procedure reveals that hospitals with 5 or 6 graduating chief residents may be ineligible to treat patients for AAA and CE. Hospitals with less than or equal to 5 chief residents would be excluded from performing CE. Very few institutions are performing adequate numbers of ECS. Only 4 of 31 CT hospitals would be allowed to perform AAA, and only 3 of 31 could perform CE. Only 1 Connecticut hospital performed more than 7 ECS cases in FY 2000. It is apparent that Leapfrog standards will have serious economic impact on many hospitals, as well as displacing patients to other cities for care. Conclusions Surgical chairs and program directors should be aware of the Leapfrog standards and assess their own programs and institutions for compliance. Performance improvement and outcomes data for all evidence-based standards should be reviewed.