Gq Protein Research Articles

Leucine and arginine enhance milk fat and milk protein synthesis via the CaSR/Gi/mTORC1 and CaSR/Gq/mTORC1 pathways.

Amino acids (AAs) not only constitute milk protein but also stimulate milk synthesis through the activation of mTORC1 signaling, but which amino acids that have the greatest impact on milk fat and protein synthesis is still very limited. In this study, we aimed to identify the most critical AAs involved in the regulation of milk synthesis and clarify how these AAs regulate milk synthesis through the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signaling pathway. In this study, a mouse mammary epithelial cell line (HC11) and porcine mammary epithelial cells (PMECs) were selected as study subjects. After treatment with different AAs, the amount of milk protein and milk fat synthesis were detected. Activation of mTORC1 and GPCRs signaling induced by AAs was also investigated. In this study, we demonstrate that essential amino acids (EAAs) are crucial to promote lactation by increasing the expression of genes and proteins related to milk synthesis, such as ACACA, FABP4, DGAT1, SREBP1, α-casein, β-casein, and WAP in HC11 cells and PMECs. In addition to activating mTORC1, EAAs uniquely regulate the expression of calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) among all amino-acid-responsive GPCRs, which indicates a potential link between CaSR and the mTORC1 pathway in mammary gland epithelial cells. Compared with other EAAs, leucine and arginine had the greatest capacity to trigger GPCRs (p-ERK) and mTORC1 (p-S6K1) signaling in HC11 cells. In addition, CaSR and its downstream G proteins Gi, Gq, and Gβγ are involved in the regulation of leucine- and arginine-induced milk synthesis and mTORC1 activation. Taken together, our data suggest that leucine and arginine can efficiently trigger milk synthesis through the CaSR/Gi/mTORC1 and CaSR/Gq/mTORC1 pathways. We found that the G-protein-coupled receptor CaSR is an important amino acid sensor in mammary epithelial cells. Leucine and arginine promote milk synthesis partially through the CaSR/Gi/mTORC1 and CaSR/Gq/mTORC1 signaling systems in mammary gland epithelial cells. Although this mechanism needs further verification, it is foreseeable that this mechanism may provide new insights into the regulation of milk synthesis.

Differential regulation of histamine H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation by Gq proteins and arrestins

Gq protein-coupled histamine H1 receptors play crucial roles in allergic and inflammatory reactions, in which the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) appears to mediate the production of inflammatory cytokines. ERK phosphorylation is regulated by G protein- and arrestin-mediated signal transduction pathways. Here, we aimed to explore how H1 receptor-mediated processes of ERK phosphorylation might be differentially regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. For this purpose, we evaluated the regulatory mechanism(s) of H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing Gq protein- and arrestin-biased mutants of human H1 receptors, S487TR and S487A, in which the Ser487 residue in the C-terminal was truncated and mutated to alanine, respectively. Immunoblotting analysis indicated that histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation was prompt and transient in cells expressing Gq protein-biased S487TR, whereas it was slow and sustained in cells expressing arrestin-biased S487A. Inhibitors of Gq proteins (YM-254890) and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X), and an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) suppressed histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation in cells expressing S487TR, but not those expressing S487A. Conversely, inhibitors of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), β-arrestin2 (β-arrestin2 siRNA), clathrin (hypertonic sucrose), Raf (LY3009120), and MEK (U0126) suppressed histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation in cells expressing S487A, but not those expressing S487TR. These results suggest that H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation might be differentially regulated by the Gq protein/Ca2+/PKC and GRK/arrestin/clathrin/Raf/MEK pathways to potentially determine the early and late phases of histamine-induced allergic and inflammatory responses, respectively.

Computational Analysis of Histamine Protonation Effects on H1R Binding.

Despite numerous studies investigating histamine and its receptors, the impact of histamine protonation states on binding to the histamine H1-receptor (H1R) has remained elusive. Therefore, we assessed the influence of different histamine tautomers (τ-tautomer, π-tautomer) and charge states (mono- vs. dicationic) on the interaction with the ternary histamine-H1R-Gq complex. In atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, the τ-tautomer formed stable interactions with the receptor, while the π-tautomer induced a rotation of the histamine ring by 180° and formed only weaker hydrogen bonding interactions. This suggests that the τ-tautomer is more relevant for stabilization of the active ternary histamine-H1R-Gq complex. In addition to the two monocationic tautomers, the binding of dicationic histamine was investigated, whose interaction with the H1R had been observed in a previous experimental study. Our simulations showed that the dication is less compatible with the ternary histamine-H1R-Gq complex and rather induces an inactive conformation in the absence of the Gq protein. Our data thus indicate that the charge state of histamine critically affects its interactions with the H1R. Ultimately these findings might have implications for the future development of new ligands that stabilize distinct H1R activation states.

P2Y receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1

P2Y receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on P2Y Receptors [3, 5, 189]) are activated by the endogenous ligands ATP, ADP, UTP, UDP, UDP-glucose and adenosine. The eight mammalian P2Y receptors are activated by distinct nucleotides: P2Y1, P2Y11, P2Y12 and P2Y13 are activated by adenosine-nucleotides; P2Y2, P2Y4 can be activated by both adenosine and uridine nucleotides, with some species-specific differences; P2Y6 is mainly activated by UDP; P2Y14 is preferentially activated by sugar-uracil nucleotides. The missing numbers in the receptor nomenclature refer either to non-mammalian orthologs or receptors having some sequence homology to P2Y receptors but for which there is no functional evidence of responsiveness to nucleotides [380]. Based on their G protein coupling P2Y receptors can be divided into two subfamilies: P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6 and P2Y11 receptors couple via Gq proteins to stimulate phospholipase C followed by increases in inositol phosphates and mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. P2Y11 receptors couple in addition to Gs proteins followed by increased adenylate cyclase activity. In contrast, P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14 receptors signal primarily through activation of Gi proteins and inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity or control of ion channel activity [380]. Clinically used drugs acting on these receptors include the dinucleoside polyphosphate diquafosol, agonist of the P2Y2 receptor subtype, approved in Japan and South Korea for the management of dry eye disease [238], and the P2Y12 receptor antagonists prasugrel, ticagrelor and cangrelor, all approved as antiplatelet drugs [52, 320].

Structural insights into angiotensin receptor signaling modulation by balanced and biased agonists.

The peptide hormone angiotensin II regulates blood pressure mainly through the type 1 angiotensin II receptor AT1 R and its downstream signaling proteins Gq and β-arrestin. AT1 R blockers, clinically used as antihypertensive drugs, inhibit both signaling pathways, whereas AT1 R β-arrestin-biased agonists have shown great potential for the treatment of acute heart failure. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the human AT1 R in complex with a balanced agonist, Sar1 -AngII, and Gq protein at 2.9 Å resolution. This structure, together with extensive functional assays and computational modeling, reveals the molecular mechanisms for AT1 R signaling modulation and suggests that a major hydrogen bond network (MHN) inside the receptor serves as a key regulator of AT1 R signal transduction from the ligand-binding pocket to both Gq and β-arrestin pathways. Specifically, we found that the MHN mutations N1113.35 A and N2947.45 A induce biased signaling to Gq and β-arrestin, respectively. These insights should facilitate AT1 R structure-based drug discovery for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Neurotensin receptor 1-biased ligand attenuates neurotensin-mediated excitation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens

Strong expression of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) in ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons and terminals makes it an attractive target to modulate DA neuron activity and normalize DA-related pathologies. Recent studies have identified a novel class of NTR1 ligand that shows promising effects in preclinical models of addiction. A lead molecule, SBI-0654553 (SBI-553), can act as a positive allosteric modulator of NTR1 β-arrestin recruitment while simultaneously antagonizing NTR1 Gq protein signaling. Using cell-attached recordings from mouse VTA DA neurons we discovered that, unlike neurotensin (NT), SBI-553 did not independently increase spontaneous firing. Instead, SBI-553 blocked the NT-mediated increase in firing. SBI-553 also antagonized the effects of NT on dopamine D2 auto-receptor signaling, potentially through its inhibitory effects on G-protein signaling. We also measured DA release directly, using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in the nucleus accumbens and observed antagonist effects of SBI-553 on an NT-induced increase in DA release. Further, in vivo administration of SBI-553 did not notably change basal or cocaine-evoked DA release measured in NAc using fiber photometry. Overall, these results indicate that SBI-553 blunts NT's effects on spontaneous DA neuron firing, D2 auto-receptor function, and DA release, without independently affecting these measures. In the presence of NT, SBI-553 has an inhibitory effect on mesolimbic DA activity, which could contribute to its efficacy in animal models of psychostimulant use.

P2Y11/IL-1 receptor crosstalk controls macrophage inflammation: a novel target for anti-inflammatory strategies?

Although first cloning of the human ATP receptor P2Y11 was successful 25years ago, the exact downstream signaling pathways of P2Y11 receptor, which can couple to Gq and Gs proteins, have remained unclear. Especially the lack of rodent models as well as the limited availability of antibodies and pharmacological tools have hampered examination of P2Y11 expression and function. Many meaningful observations related to P2Y11 have been made in primary immune cells, indicating that P2Y11 receptors are important regulators of inflammation and cell migration, also by controlling mitochondrial activity. Our recent studies have shown that P2Y11 is upregulated during macrophage development and activates signaling through IL-1 receptor, which is well known for its ability to direct inflammatory and migratory processes. This review summarizes the results of the first transcriptomic and secretomic analyses of both, ectopic and native P2Y11 receptors, and discusses how P2Y11 crosstalk with the IL-1 receptor may govern anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic processes in human M2 macrophages.

Abstract 4961: Novel biased PAR2 inhibitors with best-in-class properties reduce resistance to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy in oncology models

Abstract A large-scale meta-analysis has recently identified Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) gene expression to be significantly associated with resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in cancer patients and preclinical models. PAR2 and its ligands (proteases) are indeed upregulated in different cancer types and are expressed by various cells in the tumor microenvironment. In cancer cells, the PAR2 receptor controls cell migration, proliferation, survival, and expression of inflammatory cytokines. In immune cells, it influences the infiltration and phenotype of macrophages and T cells. Therefore, PAR2 represents a promising therapeutic target in oncology and immuno-oncology. A novel series of potent and selective PAR2 inhibitors has been developed at Domain Therapeutics. In vitro experiments demonstrated unique properties of our PAR2 small molecule antagonists when compared to those of competitors. The antagonists inhibit pathogenic signaling pathways (i.e. Gz, G13, Gq, G14 and G15 protein activation as well as intracellular calcium) but not βarrestin2 recruitment, potentially reducing the risks of drug resistance. Furthermore, they maintain high potency and insurmountability in conditions that mimic the tumor microenvironment (high concentration of proteases and acidic pH). Finally, their pharmacokinetic properties are compatible with a once-a-day oral administration and demonstrate no signs of in vivo toxicity except at high doses (>500 mg/kg). Proof-of-concept experiments showed that PAR2 antagonists prevented PAR2-mediated resistance to Gefitinib in vitro and increased the potency of anti-PD1 therapy in vivo in pre-clinical syngeneic mouse models. Immunohistochemistry analyses from cancer patient biopsies confirmed that high expression levels of PAR2 in cancer and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment significantly associates with the patient overall survival. In conclusion, new potent and selective negative allosteric modulators of PAR2 have been developed, they demonstrate strong potency by alleviating the resistance to both chemo- and immunotherapy in cancer models. These findings confirm the high value of PAR2 as a therapeutic target and demonstrates the relevance of small molecule inhibitors targeting this receptor to treat cancer. Citation Format: Thibaut Brugat, Francesco Bergami, Baptiste Rugeri, Aurélie Janvier, Edith Steinberg, Luc Baron, Mandy Recolet, Xavier Wirth, Meriem Semache, Antoine Mousson, Camille Dietsch, Quentin Ruet, Orphée Blanchard, Célia Jacoberger-Foissac, Isabelle Cousineau, Maleck Kadiri, Anne-Laure Blayo, Christel Franchet, Stanislas Mayer, John Stagg, Nathalie Lenne, Stephan Schann. Novel biased PAR2 inhibitors with best-in-class properties reduce resistance to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy in oncology models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4961.

Structure-affinity and structure-residence time relationships of macrocyclic Gαq protein inhibitors

The macrocyclic depsipeptides YM-254890 (YM) and FR900359 (FR) are potent inhibitors of Gαq/11 proteins. They are important pharmacological tools and have potential as therapeutic drugs. The hydrogenated, tritium-labeled YM and FR derivatives display largely different residence times despite similar structures. In the present study we established a competition-association binding assay to determine the dissociation kinetics of unlabeled Gq protein inhibitors. Structure-affinity and structure-residence time relationships were analyzed. Small structural modifications had a large impact on residence time. YM and FR exhibited 4- to 10-fold higher residence times than their hydrogenated derivatives. While FR showed pseudo-irreversible binding, YM displayed much faster dissociation from its target. The isopropyl anchor present in FR and some derivatives was essential for slow dissociation. These data provide a basis for future drug design toward modulating residence times of macrocyclic Gq protein inhibitors, which has been recognized as a crucial determinant for therapeutic outcome.

Two-step structural changes in M3 muscarinic receptor activation rely on the coupled Gq protein cycle

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate diverse intracellular signaling pathways through the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. However, the effects of the sequential activation–deactivation cycle of G protein on the conformational changes of GPCRs remains unknown. By developing a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) tool for human M3 muscarinic receptor (hM3R), we find that a single-receptor FRET probe can display the consecutive structural conversion of a receptor by G protein cycle. Our results reveal that the G protein activation evokes a two-step change in the hM3R structure, including the fast step mediated by Gq protein binding and the subsequent slower step mediated by the physical separation of the Gαq and Gβγ subunits. We also find that the separated Gαq-GTP forms a stable complex with the ligand-activated hM3R and phospholipase Cβ. In sum, the present study uncovers the real-time conformational dynamics of innate hM3R during the downstream Gq protein cycle.

Two-step structural changes in M3 muscarinic receptor activation rely on the coupled G protein cycle.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate diverse intracellular signaling pathways through the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. However, the effects of the reversible activation-deactivation cycle of G protein on the conformational changes of GPCRs remains unknown. By developing a new Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) tool for human M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, we found that a single-receptor FRET probe can display the consecutive structural conversion of a receptor by G protein cycle. Our results revealed that the G protein activation evokes a two-step change in the hM3R structure, including the fast step mediated by Gq protein binding and the subsequent slower step mediated by the physical separation of the Gαq and Gβγ subunits. We also found that the separated Gαq-GTP forms a stable complex with the ligand-activated hM3R and phospholipase Cβ. In sum, the present study uncovered the real-time conformational dynamics of innate hM3R during the downstream Gq protein cycle.

In silico analysis of biased signaling in the serotonin 2A receptor.

The 5-HT2A receptor (5HT2AR) is a widely expressed and highly studied subtype of the serotonin receptor family. Many FDA-approved antidepressants and antipsychotics elicit their pharmacological effects through antagonism of 5HT2AR, a class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). However, these drugs suffer from undesired hallucinogenic effects similar to those produced by classic psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin. The binding of an agonist to 5HT2AR can induce conformational changes in the receptor and activate intracellular signaling through the G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated pathways. Interestingly, like other GPCRs, the 5HT2A receptor has been shown to exhibit biased signaling in which ligands can preferentially activate one pathway over another. A recent structural and pharmacological study demonstrated that β-arrestin biased agonists, such as IHCH-7086, can exhibit antidepressant properties without hallucinogenic effects. Notably, the IHCH-7086-bound receptor revealed altered conformational changes in a set of phenylalanine residues in the orthosteric sites. However, the subsequent signal transduction mechanism and how other residues in the signaling network are altered remain poorly understood. In this study, using molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the conformational dynamics of the receptor bound to an antagonist, lumateperone (PDB ID: 7WC8), and IHCH-7086 (PDB ID: 7WC9) in the presence or absence of Gq protein. Our results show that the β-arrestin-biased partial agonist produces significant changes at the intracellular receptor-Gq protein interface residue interactions that are unfavorable for the binding. Also, there is a significant difference in the interactions of IHCH-7086 at the orthosteric binding site. Lastly, our network analysis shows differences in communications between residues among the studied receptor-ligand complexes. The knowledge obtained from this study will be used to develop structure-based pharmacophore models to identify high-affinity biased agonists for the 5HT2A receptor as potential therapeutics to treat 5HT2A receptor-related CNS diseases.

Platelet P2Y1 receptor exhibits constitutive G protein signaling and β-arrestin 2 recruitment

BackgroundPurinergic P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors (P2Y1-R and P2Y12-R) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) activated by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to mediate platelet activation, thereby playing a pivotal role in hemostasis and thrombosis. While P2Y12-R is the major target of antiplatelet drugs, no P2Y1-R antagonist has yet been developed for clinical use. However, accumulating data suggest that P2Y1-R inhibition would ensure efficient platelet inhibition with minimal effects on bleeding. In this context, an accurate characterization of P2Y1-R antagonists constitutes an important preliminary step.ResultsHere, we investigated the pharmacology of P2Y1-R signaling through Gq and β-arrestin pathways in HEK293T cells and in mouse and human platelets using highly sensitive resonance energy transfer-based technologies (BRET/HTRF). We demonstrated that at basal state, in the absence of agonist ligand, P2Y1-R activates Gq protein signaling in HEK293T cells and in mouse and human platelets, indicating that P2Y1-R is constitutively active in physiological conditions. We showed that P2Y1-R also promotes constitutive recruitment of β-arrestin 2 in HEK293T cells. Moreover, the P2Y1-R antagonists MRS2179, MRS2279 and MRS2500 abolished the receptor dependent-constitutive activation, thus behaving as inverse agonists.ConclusionsThis study sheds new light on P2Y1-R pharmacology, highlighting for the first time the existence of a constitutively active P2Y1-R population in human platelets. Given the recent interest of P2Y12-R constitutive activity in patients with diabetes, this study suggests that modification of constitutive P2Y1-R signaling might be involved in pathological conditions, including bleeding syndrome or high susceptibility to thrombotic risk. Thus, targeting platelet P2Y1-R constitutive activation might be a promising and powerful strategy for future antiplatelet therapy.

Phenylephrine-Induced Contraction in Guinea Pig Thoracic Aorta Is Triggered by Stimulation of α1L-Adrenoceptors Functionally Coupled with Store-Operated Ca2+ Channels and Voltage-Dependent Ca2+ Channels.

We examined whether the α1L-adrenoceptor (AR), which shows low affinity (pA2 < 9) for prazosin (an α1-AR antagonist) and high affinity (pA2 ≈ 10) for tamsulosin/silodosin (α1A-AR antagonists), is involved in phenylephrine-induced contractions in the guinea pig (GP) thoracic aorta (TA). Intracellular signaling induced by α1L-AR activation was also examined by focusing on Ca2+ influx pathways. Tension changes of endothelium-denuded TAs were isometrically recorded and mRNA encoding α-ARs/Ca2+ channels and their related molecules were measured using RT-quantitative PCR. Phenylephrine-induced contractions were competitively inhibited by prazosin/tamsulosin, and their pA2 value were calculated to be 8.53/9.74, respectively. These contractions were also inhibited by silodosin concentration-dependently. However, the inhibition was not competitive fashion with the apparent pA2 value being 9.48. In contrast, phenylephrine-induced contractions were not substantially suppressed by L-765314 (an α1B-AR antagonist), BMY 7378 (an α1D-AR antagonist), yohimbine, and idazoxan (α2-AR antagonists). Phenylephrine-induced contractions were markedly inhibited by YM-254890 (a Gq protein inhibitor) or removal of extracellular Ca2+, and partially inhibited by verapamil (a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel (VDCC) inhibitor). The residual contractions in the presence of verapamil were slightly inhibited by LOE 908 (a receptor-operated Ca2+ channel (ROCC) inhibitor) and strongly inhibited by SKF-96365 (a store-operated Ca2+ channel (SOCC) and ROCC inhibitor). Among the mRNA encoding α-ARs/SOCC-related molecules, α1A-AR (Adra1a)/Orai3, Orai1, and Stim2 were abundant in this tissue. In conclusion, phenylephrine-induced contractions in the GP TA can be triggered by stimulation of Gq protein-coupled α1L-AR, followed by activation of SOCCs and VDCCs.

Structures of human gastrin-releasing peptide receptors bound to antagonist and agonist for cancer and itch therapy

Gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), a member of the bombesin (BBN) G protein-coupled receptors, is aberrantly overexpressed in several malignant tumors, including those of the breast, prostate, pancreas, lung, and central nervous system. Additionally, it also mediates non-histaminergic itch and pathological itch conditions in mice. Thus, GRPR could be an attractive target for cancer and itch therapy. Here, we report the inactive state crystal structure of human GRPR in complex with the non-peptide antagonist PD176252, as well as two active state cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of GRPR bound to the endogenous peptide agonist gastrin-releasing peptide and the synthetic BBN analog [D-Phe6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14] Bn (6-14), in complex with Gq heterotrimers. These structures revealed the molecular mechanisms for the ligand binding, receptor activation, and Gq proteins signaling of GRPR, which are expected to accelerate the structure-based design of GRPR antagonists and agonists for the treatments of cancer and pruritus.

Structures of the arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin receptor signaling complexes.

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) are neurohypophysial hormones which share a high sequence and structure homology. These are two cyclic C-terminally amidated nonapeptides with different residues at position 3 and 8. In mammals, AVP and OT exert their multiple biological functions through a specific G protein-coupled receptor family: four receptors are identified, the V1a, V1b, V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R) and the OT receptor (OTR). The chemical structure of AVP and OT was elucidated in the early 1950s. Thanks to X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, it took however 70 additional years to determine the three-dimensional structures of the OTR and the V2R in complex with their natural agonist ligands and with different signaling partners, G proteins and β-arrestins. Today, the comparison of the different AVP/OT receptor structures gives structural insights into their orthosteric ligand binding pocket, their molecular mechanisms of activation, and their interfaces with canonical Gs, Gq and β-arrestin proteins. It also paves the way to future rational drug design and therapeutic compound development. Indeed, agonist, antagonist, biased agonist, or pharmacological chaperone analogues of AVP and OT are promising candidates to regulate different physiological functions and treat several pathologies.

Bidirectional regulation by "star forces": Ionotropic astrocyte's optical stimulation suppresses synaptic plasticity, metabotropic one strikes back.

The role of astrocytes in modulating synaptic plasticity is an important question that until recently was not addressed due to limitations of previously existing technology. In the present study, we took an advantage of optogenetics to specifically activate astrocytes in hippocampal slices in order to study effects on synaptic function. Using the AAV-based delivery strategy, we expressed the ionotropic channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) or the metabotropic Gq-coupled Opto-a1AR opsins specifically in hippocampal astrocytes to compare different modalities of astrocyte activation. In electrophysiological experiments, we observed a depression of basal field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in the CA1 hippocampal layer following light stimulation of astrocytic ChR2. The ChR2-mediated depression increased under simultaneous light and electrical theta-burst stimulation (TBS). Application of the type 2 purinergic receptor antagonist suramin prevented depression of basal synaptic transmission, and switched the ChR2-dependent depression into potentiation. The GABAB receptor antagonist, phaclofen, did not prevent the depression of basal fEPSPs, but switched the ChR2-dependent depression into potentiation comparable to the values for TBS in control slices. In contrast, light stimulation of Opto-a1AR expressed in astrocytes led to an increase in basal fEPSPs, as well as a potentiation of synaptic responses to TBS significantly. A specific blocker of the Gq protein downstream target, the phospholipase C, U73122, completely prevented the effects of Opto-a1AR stimulation on basal fEPSPs or Opto + TBS responses. To understand molecular basis for the observed effects, we performed an analysis of gene expression in these slices using quantitative PCR approach. We observed a significant upregulation of "immediate-early" gene expression in hippocampal slices after light activation of Opto-a1AR-expressing astrocytes alone (cRel, Arc, Fos, JunB, and Egr1) or paired with TBS (cRel, Fos, and Egr1). Activation of ChR2-expressing hippocampal astrocytes was insufficient to affect expression of these genes in our experimental conditions. Thus, we concluded that optostimulation of astrocytes with ChR2 and Opto-a1AR optogenetic tools enables bidirectional modulation of synaptic plasticity and gene expression in hippocampus.

Signaling network model of cardiomyocyte morphological changes in familial cardiomyopathy

Familial cardiomyopathy is a precursor of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Over the past several decades, researchers have discovered numerous gene mutations primarily in sarcomeric and cytoskeletal proteins causing two different disease phenotypes: hypertrophic (HCM) and dilated (DCM) cardiomyopathies. However, molecular mechanisms linking genotype to phenotype remain unclear. Here, we employ a systems approach by integrating experimental findings from preclinical studies (e.g., murine data) into a cohesive signaling network to scrutinize genotype to phenotype mechanisms. We developed an HCM/DCM signaling network model utilizing a logic-based differential equations approach and evaluated model performance in predicting experimental data from four contexts (HCM, DCM, pressure overload, and volume overload). The model has an overall prediction accuracy of 83.8%, with higher accuracy in the HCM context (90%) than DCM (75%). Global sensitivity analysis identifies key signaling reactions, with calcium-mediated myofilament force development and calcium-calmodulin kinase signaling ranking the highest. A structural revision analysis indicates potential missing interactions that primarily control calcium regulatory proteins, increasing model prediction accuracy. Combination pharmacotherapy analysis suggests that downregulation of signaling components such as calcium, titin and its associated proteins, growth factor receptors, ERK1/2, and PI3K-AKT could inhibit myocyte growth in HCM. In experiments with patient-specific iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (MLP-W4R;MYH7-R723C iPSC-CMs), combined inhibition of ERK1/2 and PI3K-AKT rescued the HCM phenotype, as predicted by the model. In DCM, PI3K-AKT-NFAT downregulation combined with upregulation of Ras/ERK1/2 or titin or Gq protein could ameliorate cardiomyocyte morphology. The model results suggest that HCM mutations that increase active force through elevated calcium sensitivity could increase ERK activity and decrease eccentricity through parallel growth factors, Gq-mediated, and titin pathways. Moreover, the model simulated the influence of existing medications on cardiac growth in HCM and DCM contexts. This HCM/DCM signaling model demonstrates utility in investigating genotype to phenotype mechanisms in familial cardiomyopathy.

Biased agonists differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles in Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

The structural features that contribute to the efficacy of biased agonists targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) towards G proteins or β-arrestin (β-arr) signaling pathways is nebulous, although such knowledge is critical in designing biased ligands. The dynamics of the agonist-GPCR complex is one of the critical factors in determining agonist bias. Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is an ideal model system to study the molecular basis of bias since it has multiple β-arr2 and Gq protein biased agonists as well as experimentally solved three dimensional structures. Using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations for the Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) bound to ten different agonists, we infer that the agonist bound receptor samples conformations with different relative weights, from both the inactive and active state ensembles of the receptor. This concept is perhaps extensible to other class A GPCRs. Such a weighted mixed ensemble recapitulates the inter-residue distance distributions measured for different agonists bound AT1R using DEER experiments. The ratio of the calculated relative strength of the allosteric communication to β-arr2 vs Gq coupling sites scale similarly to the experimentally measured bias factors. Analysis of the inter-residue distance distributions of the activation microswitches involved in class A GPCR activation suggests that β-arr2 biased agonists turn on different combination of microswitches with different relative strengths of activation. We put forth a model that activation microswitches behave like rheostats that tune the relative efficacy of the biased agonists toward the two signaling pathways. Finally, based on our data we propose that the agonist specific residue contacts in the binding site elicit a combinatorial response in the microswitches that in turn differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles resulting in differences in coupling to Gq and β-arrestin.

Hyperresponsiveness to Extracellular Acidification-Mediated Contraction in Isolated Bronchial Smooth Muscles of Murine Experimental Asthma

Extracellular acidification is a major component of tissue inflammation, including airway inflammation. The extracellular proton-sensing mechanisms are inherent in various cells including airway structural cells, although their physiological and pathophysiological roles in bronchial smooth muscles (BSMs) are not fully understood. In the present study, to explore the functional role of extracellular acidification on the BSM contraction, the isolated mouse BSMs were exposed to acidic pH under contractile stimulation. The RT-PCR analyses revealed that the proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptors were expressed both in mouse BSMs and cultured human BSM cells. In the mouse BSMs, change in the extracellular pH from 8.0 to 6.8 caused an augmentation of contraction induced by acetylcholine. Interestingly, the acidic pH-induced BSM hyper-contraction was further augmented in the mice that were sensitized and repeatedly challenged with ovalbumin antigen. In this animal model of asthma, upregulations of G protein-coupled receptor 68 (GPR68) and GPR65, that were believed to be coupled with Gq and Gs proteins respectively, were observed, indicating that the acidic pH could cause hyper-contraction probably via an activation of GPR68. However, psychosine, a putative antagonist for GPR68, failed to block the acidic pH-induced responses. These findings suggest that extracellular acidification contributes to the airway hyperresponsiveness, a characteristic feature of bronchial asthma. Further studies are required to identify the receptor(s) responsible for sensing extracellular protons in BSM cells.