Although three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been used to measure mitral valve areas (MVA) in mitral stanosis from both transescphageal (TEE) and transthoracic (TTE) approaches, the accuracy of these techniques has not been compared. Accordingly, we compared the accuracy of mitral valve area measurements obtained with a 3D volumetric free-hand (FH) TEE approach to those acquired with a 3D TEE approach using invasive Gorlin mitral valve area as the gold standard. Methods: 19 patients (49±18 yrs) with mitral stenosis were studied with TEE and free-hand TEE prior to valvuIoplasfy. During TEE, 2D images were acquired every 3 ° over 180 ° (SONOS 5500). Freehand images were obtained in 80 planes gated to respiration and heart rate using magnetic tracking, and processed on Omniview (TomTec). Direct 3D mitral valve area measurements reconstructed from TEE and free-hand TEE were compared to invasive Gorlin mitral valve area. Results: Both 3D techniques, free*hand TEE and TEE, were in good agreement with invasive data (Bland-AItmann and correlation, figure). Conclusions. Mitral valve orifice area measurements obtained with free-hand TEE scanning are as accurate as those obtained with 3D TEE, with the advantages of being noninvasive and suitable for serial measurements.