Reviewed by: Charles Dickens and the Properties of Fiction: The Lodger World by Ushashi Dasgupta Dominic Rainsford (bio) Ushashi Dasgupta. Charles Dickens and the Properties of Fiction: The Lodger World. Oxford UP, 2020. Pp. xvi + 307. $80.00, £60.00. ISBN 978-0-19-885911-6 (hb). All readers of Dickens will have been struck by the attention given to domestic architecture and interiors in his work. Structures such as the Peggottys' boat-house, Bleak House, and Satis House attain a character-like status within a more general system of interchangeability, where bricks and mortar can peculiarly resemble flesh and blood. Furthermore, we can't ignore the socio-political and plot-related significances of many kinds of temporary housing: it is clearly of crucial importance in which grade of accommodation, in which part of town, under the malign or benevolent eye of what kind of owner or manager, Oliver, or the Nicklebys, or Nell (and so on, through the canon) come to lay their heads. We see all of this, but we may still not be sure precisely what it means to be housed up "two pair of stairs," in a "second floor front," or in an attic, let alone about the status of specific neighborhoods. Meanwhile, we may feel that there may be significant connections to be made between the fictional world of freeholds, lodgings, and tenancies, and the long and very complex story of Dickens's own homes. But we may not know quite where to start. Ushashi Dasgupta's very good book will reinvigorate and deepen our thinking about all of the above, and a great deal more – especially in relation to the fine historical detail of leased or rented housing in Dickens's England. At the same time, it connects this factual enrichment with a vital dimension of twenty-first-century literary-critical thinking, often marked as the "spatial turn," and with a more general move to resuscitate theory by thoroughly connecting matters of aesthetics, form, genre, and artistic self-expression with ethics, politics, commerce, the materiality of real lives in real bodies, and books as consequential objects in time and space. Picking up on the exuberant mood of early Dickens, Dasgupta's first chapter, "Building a Career: From Sketches to Dombey" concerns itself with "laughter and lodgings" (41). We look at the comic potential of miscellaneous people – not least, the young, romantic, and unattached – thrown together in shared housing, as well as at the all-too-easily mocked figure of the landlady (such as Mrs. Bardell or Miss La Creevy). Dasgupta refines our understanding of the situations in which Dickens places these characters by explaining tenancy and lodging law, and London demographics. But she also sets them in a highly convincing literary context: not so much the novel as the popular theatre, and more specifically the farce. This entails dusting off the works of farceurs such as John Poole and John Maddison Morton: authors who may be unknown to most 21st-century Dickensians, but who were deeply significant to Dickens's own cultural experience, [End Page 200] and to his evolution as a writer. "Without exception, lodging-house farces are peopled with two-dimensional caricatures, types, and tropes. … they ultimately speak to flatness and exaggeration in human behaviour" (48). In other words, this could be where Dickens picked up bad habits. However, "Dickens … does not simply flatten his lodging-house characters for laughs; instead, he uses practices common to farce to make some poignant suggestions about urban behaviour. Loneliness creates idiosyncrasy, and so does the desperate competition for attention in noisy, overcrowded quarters" (65). The lightness of the farce tradition is not condemned here; after all, Dickens retains a degree of frivolity (thank goodness) till the end, but we can see how he detected the serious undertones: the important things that the farce tradition almost inadvertently says about society. In the case of the landlady, for example, Dickens embarks on a pattern of reflection on gendered identities and spaces that will run through to his late work (and to Dasgupta's final chapter). There are metafictional hints, moreover, that even early Dickens senses that authors are landladies of a sort, accommodating characters as often precarious...
Read full abstract