Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Research Articles

Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Versus Standard Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Stoma Reversal Surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundPractices such as prolonged preoperative fasting, bowel preparation, delayed ambulation and resumption of orals result in morbidity in 15-20% of stoma reversal cases which can be improved by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. AimTo evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ERAS pathway in patients undergoing elective loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal surgery MethodsThis was an open-labeled, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal were randomized to standard or ERAS care. Patients with ASA class ≥3, needing laparotomy for stoma reversal, cardiac, renal and neurological illnesses were excluded. Components of ERAS protocol included pre-operative carbohydrate loading, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, goal directed fluid therapy, avoidance of long-acting opioid anesthetics or analgesics, avoidance of drains, urinary catheter or nasogastric tube, early mobilization and early enteral feeding. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) while the secondary outcomes were postoperative recovery and morbidity parameters. ResultsForty patients each were randomized to standard care and ERAS. Demographic and laboratory parameters between the two groups were comparable. ERAS group patients had significantly reduced LOS (5.3±0.3 vs 7 ± 2.6; mean difference: 1.73 ± 0.98; p=0.0008). Functional recovery was earlier in the ERAS group compared to the standard care group, such as early resolution of ileus (median-2 days; p<0.001), time to first stool (median-3 days; p=0.0002), time to the resumption of liquid diet (median-3 days; p<0.001) and solid diet (median-4 days; p<0.001). Surgical site infections (SSI) were significantly lesser in ERAS group (12.5% vs 32.5%; p=0.03) while postoperative nausea/vomiting (p=0.08), pulmonary complications (p=0.17) and urinary tract infections (p=0.56) were comparable in both groups. ConclusionERAS pathways are feasible, safe and significantly reduces LOS in patients undergoing elective loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal surgery.

SP5.6 A UK-wide audit on peri-operative practices during deceased donor kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective National Transplant ACcess to Theatre (NTACT) Audit

Abstract Background The outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplants are mainly affected by donor and recipient factors. There is little data on standard perioperative practices across the UK and whether variations in perioperative practices could affect the outcomes. This national audit aims to identify current perioperative practices. Methods We conducted a multicentre, prospective audit of adult deceased donor kidney-only transplants across 14 UK transplant centres between February and September 2022. Data was collected on pre-operative antibiotic use, clinician’s grade, fluid management, central/arterial line insertion, post-operative destination, crossmatch and advanced haemodynamic monitoring use. Data was recorded on RedCap and analysed using descriptive statistics. Results 476 kidney-only transplants were recorded (59 were excluded for incomplete/incorrect data), leaving 417 transplants. In 98.6% of transplants, patients received antibiotics pre-operatively. A wide range of antibiotics were given; the three most used were co-amoxiclav (n=135), ciprofloxacin (n=92) and amikacin (n=62). Most operations were led by a consultant surgeon (91.1% n=380). However, only 60.1% of cases were led by consultant anaesthetists. Central lines were used in 65.5% (273/417) of patients, 41.0% (171/417) used an arterial line, and 25.4% (106/417) had advanced haemodynamic monitoring. A total of 289 cases (69.3%) received goal-directed fluid therapy, of which 74.4% (215/289) used static parameters. Most common post-operative destinations were the transplant ward, 75.3% (n=314), ICU, 9.4% (n=39) and HDU, 10.1% (n=42). Conclusions We identified wide variations in certain perioperative practices. In the future, we would like to assess whether there is any relationship between the variations in practice and postoperative outcomes, such as graft function and mortality.

Goal-directed fluid therapy compared to liberal fluid therapy in patients subjected to colorectal surgery

ABSTRACT Background The best technique to manage intraoperative fluids during colorectal surgery has never been universally agreed upon. Key organ function is hampered by excessive intraoperative fluid administration: It lengthens and raises the expense of hospitalization by increasing the risk of heart failure that goes along with it, causing gastrointestinal membrane edema, and impeding the recovery of gastrointestinal functions. Aim and objectives Thestudy’s objective was to evaluate the impacts of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) and liberal fluid therapy (LFT) using cardiometry in candidates with colorectal abnormalities. Subjects and methods 100 patients were allocated into two equal groups in a random pattern for this prospective, randomized, controlled trial at the Mansoura oncology center; GDFT group) 50 patients): by using stroke volume optimization and the LFT group (50 patients): by using the traditional technique of fluid administration. Results Crystalloid and total fluids were significantly lower among GDFTgroup compared to LFT group. Both lactate and creatinine levels were slightly higher among the GDFT group than the LFT group but without a statistically significant difference. Postoperative complications were comparable between the studied groups. Conclusions However, GDFT needs lower total volume of fluids given to the patients it may not enhance patients’ postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery compared to liberal fluid treatment. Moreover, both studied strategies did not affect organ perfusion, although serum lactate and serum creatinine were slightly higher with GDFT.

The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy combined with enhanced recovery after surgery program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled study

BackgroundTo investigate the effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.MethodsPatients, more than 60 years old, undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer were randomly divided into GDFT group and restrictive fluid therapy (RFT) group. ERAS program was implemented in all patients. In GDFT group, the intraoperative fluid management was guided by stroke volume variation (SVV), cardiac index (CI), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and maintained the SVV < 13%, CI > 2.5 L/min/m2, and MAP > 65 mmHg. In RFT group, fluid maintenance with 2 ml/kg/h of balanced crystalloid solution, norepinephrine was used to maintain MAP > 65 mmHg. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and pulmonary and cardiac complications was compared.ResultsTwo-hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (138 in each group). Compared to RFT group, the total intraoperative infusion volume, colloids infusion volume, and urine output were more; the dosage of norepinephrine was lower in GDFT group. Although there were no significant differences of postoperative AKI (GDFT vs RFT; 4.3% vs 8%; P = 0.317) and composite postoperative complications (GDFT vs RFT; 66 vs 70) between groups, but the postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group than that in RFT group (GDFT vs RFT; 91.9 ± 25.2 μmol/L vs 97.1 ± 17.6 μmol/L; P = 0.048).ConclusionsUnder ERAS program, there was no significant difference of AKI incidence between GDFT and RFT in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. But postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group.Trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04302467 on 26 February 2020.

Stroke Volume Variation Directed Versus Conventional Fluid Therapy for Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - A Randomized Pilot Study

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery may be associated with postoperative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Commonest intraoperative risk factors for postoperative AKI include hypotension and hypoperfusion. Intravenous fluids are administered during surgery to optimize intravascular status and thus prevent hypotension. Conventionally, intravenous fluids are administered during surgery using pre-calculated volumes based on maintenance needs. Alternatively, goal-directed fluid therapy using Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) can be used to decide the volume of intravenous fluids. We compared early postoperative AKI following intraoperative use of conventional (group C, n=15) versus SVV directed fluid therapy (group S, n = 17) in patients undergoing PCNL surgery. Methods: This double-blinded pilot study involved 32 adult patients, randomised to two groups according to type of intraoperative fluid therapy (group C or group S). Postoperative AKI was diagnosed as per KDIGO guidelines. Results: Incidence of early postoperative AKI was clinically higher for group S, though statistically similar, as compared to group C (47.1% versus 26.7%) (P = 0.234). Postoperative increase in eGFR, and 24-hour urine output were clinically greater for group S (P &gt; 0.05). Volume of intraoperative fluids infused was significantly lesser for group S (P = 0.000). The incidence of hypotension and requirement of vasopressor to maintain blood pressure was clinically lesser, though statistically similar for group S as compared to group C (P = 0.659). Conclusions: There appears to be a clinical trend of greater incidence of AKI with use of SVV guided therapy despite better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and greater improvement in postoperative urine output and eGFR in the first postoperative day. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Acute kidney injury, Fluid therapy, General anesthesia, Blood pressure

The association between intraoperative fluid management and perioperative allogenic blood transfusion during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Bleeding and transfusion remain important concerns during surgical correction of scoliosis even when multiple conservative strategies, such as preoperative recombinant erythropoietin and/or antifibrinolytic agents, are used. The current work aimed to determine the impact of other potential risk factors, especially the volume of intraoperative fluid intake, on the perioperative risk of allogenic transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This prospective study included all cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis operated in a single center during 2 years (2018-2020). Predictors analyzed were as follows: body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, thoracoplasty, preoperative halo-gravity, volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration, use of esophageal Doppler (for goal-directed fluid therapy), and duration of surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Two hundred patients were included in the analysis. Multivariable analysis found: an increased volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration as a significant predictor of allogenic blood transfusion. Receiving operator characteristics analysis found the model exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.95). Optimizing stroke volume using esophageal Doppler was associated with a decrease in intraoperative crystalloid intake. These results indicate a statistical association between the increase in crystalloid intake and the risk of allogenic blood transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Controlled studies are needed to address the causative relation between intraoperative fluid intake and the risk of allogenic transfusion.

Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy based on both stroke volume variation and delta stroke volume on the incidence of composite postoperative complications among individuals undergoing meningioma resection.

Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy based on both stroke volume variation and delta stroke volume on the incidence of composite postoperative complications among individuals undergoing meningioma resection.

Effectiveness of goal-directed fluid therapy guided by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) in major gastrointestinal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

Background &amp; Objective: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness between goal-directed fluid therapy guided by Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output (esCCO) monitoring and liberal infusion therapy on the early perioperative and postoperative complications, as well as long-term complications in major gastrointestinal surgeries.&#x0D; Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Hanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from October 2020 to October 2021. There were 138 patients enrolled in the study and divided randomly into two groups: Group LIF (liberal infusion therapy) and Group GD (goal-directed fluid therapy using esCCO monitors). The logistic regression (univariate and multivariate) analysis models were performed to evaluate the relationship between the complication (yes or no) and potential predictors.&#x0D; Results: Mortality and length of hospital stay in the esCCO group were not different from those in the liberal infusion therapy group (P &gt; 0.05). Postoperative respiratory complications such as pneumonia and pulmonary edema were lower in the Group GD but not statistically significant compared with the Group LIF (5.7% vs 7.4% with P &gt; 0.05). There was a higher rate of acute kidney injury in the Group GD than in the Group LIF, but the difference was not statistically significant (5.7% vs 1.5% with P &gt; 0.05). Other complications such as bleeding, wound infection, and tissue edema in the Group GD was almost equivalent to those in the Group LIF and the difference was not statistically significant.&#x0D; Conclusion: Goal-directed fluid therapy according to esCCO guidelines reduced the amount of intraoperative fluids while maintaining hemodynamic stability during surgery, but has not shown a real effect in reducing postoperative complications. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed, in high-risk groups of patients requiring intravenous fluids according to esCCO guidelines to better evaluate the effectiveness of reducing postoperative complications.&#x0D; Abbreviations: esCCO - Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output; esSVI - Estimated Stroke Volume Index; PEEP -Positive End-Expiratory Pressure; MAC - Minimum Alveolar Concentration&#x0D; Key words: esCCO; Gastrointestinal Surgeries; Goal-directed Fluid Therapy; Infusion Therapy; Randomized Controlled Trial&#x0D; Citation: Hoang Vu P, Anh Duong ND, Viet Duc Tran VD, Tran TH, Luu VX, Truong QT, Nguyen HT, Ochiai R. Effectiveness of goal-directed fluid therapy guided by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) in major gastrointestinal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2023;27(3):371−378; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i3.2242&#x0D; Received: November 15, 2022; Reviewed: April 29, 2023; Accepted: April 29, 2023

Research priorities in perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring: A Delphi Consensus Survey from the Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR).

Research in fluid therapy and perioperative hemodynamic monitoring is difficult and expensive. The objectives of this study were to summarize these topics and to prioritize these topics in order of research importance. Electronic structured Delphi questionnaire over three rounds among 30 experts in fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring identified through the Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. 77 topics were identified and ranked in order of prioritization. Topics were categorized into themes of crystalloids, colloids, hemodynamic monitoring and others. 31 topics were ranked as essential research priority. To determine whether intraoperative hemodynamic optimization algorithms based on the invasive or noninvasive Hypotension Prediction Index versus other management strategies could decrease the incidence of postoperative complications. As well as whether the use of renal stress biomarkers together with a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol could reduce hospital stay and the incidence of acute kidney injury in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, reached the highest consensus. The Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care will use these results to carry out the research.

Intraoperative pleth variability index-based fluid management therapy and gastrointestinal surgical outcomes in elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIntraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been reported to reduce postoperative complications of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The clinical benefits of pleth variability index (PVI)-directed fluid management for gastrointestinal (GI) surgical patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVI-directed GDFT on GI surgical outcomes in elderly patients.MethodsThis randomised controlled trial was conducted in two university teaching hospitals from November 2017 to December 2020. In total, 220 older adults undergoing GI surgery were randomised to the GDFT or conventional fluid therapy (CFT) group (n = 110 each). The primary outcome was a composite of complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary complications, time to first flatus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative length of stay.ResultsThe total volumes of fluid administered were less in the GDFT group than in the CFT group (2.075 L versus [vs.] 2.5 L, P = 0.008). In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference in overall complications between the CFT group (41.3%) and GDFT group (43.0%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.935; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.541–1.615; P = 0.809). The proportion of cardiopulmonary complications was higher in the CFT group than in the GDFT group (19.2% vs. 8.4%; OR = 2.593, 95% CI, 1.120–5.999; P = 0.022). No other differences were identified between the two groups.ConclusionsAmong elderly patients undergoing GI surgery, intraoperative GDFT based on the simple and non-invasive PVI did not reduce the occurrence of composite postoperative complications but was associated with a lower cardiopulmonary complication rate than usual fluid management.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-17012220) on 1 August 2017.

Prioridades de investigación en términos de fluidoterapia perioperatoria y monitorización hemodinámica: encuesta de consenso Delphi del Subcomité de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización hemodinámica de la Sección de Hemostasia, Medicina Transfusional y Fluidoterapia (SHTF) de la Sociedad española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR)

BackgroundResearch on perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring is difficult and expensive. The objectives of the present study were to summarize and prioritize these issues, in order of research importance. research importance. MethodsStructured electronic Delphi questionnaire over three rounds among 30 experts in fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring identified through the Subcommittee on Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. Results77 issues were identified, which were ranked in order of prioritization. The were categorized into crystalloid, colloid, hemodynamic monitoring and others. and others. Thirty-one issues were categorized as of essential research priority, to determine whether intraoperative hemodynamic optimization algorithms based on the index of invasive or noninvasive hypotension prediction index versus other management strategies could reduce the incidence of postoperative reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, as well as whether the use of biomarkers of renal stress in conjunction biomarkers of renal stress in conjunction with a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol could reduce hospital stay and the hospital stay and the incidence of acute renal failure in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, and whether the non-cardiac surgery, achieving the highest consensus. ConclusionsThe Subcommittee on Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring of the Section of Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation will use these results for further research.

Predicting fluid responsiveness using esophagus Doppler monitoring and pulse oximetry derived pleth variability index; retrospective analysis of a hemodynamic study.

Fluid therapy during major surgery can be managed by providing repeated bolus infusions until stroke volume no longer increases by ≥ 10%. However, the final bolus in an optimization round increases stroke volume by < 10% and is not necessary. We studied how different cut-off values for the hemodynamic indications given by esophagus Doppler monitoring, as well as augmentation by pulse oximetry, are associated with a higher or smaller chance that stroke volume increases by ≥ 10% (fluid responsiveness) before fluid is infused. An esophagus Doppler and a pulse oximeter that displayed the pleth variability index were used to monitor the effects of a bolus infusion in 108 patients undergoing goal-directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery. The analyzed data set comprised 266 bolus infusions. The overall incidence of fluid responsiveness was 44%, but this varied greatly depending on pre-infusion hemodynamics. The likelihood of being fluid-responsive was 30%-38% in the presence of stroke volume > 80 mL, corrected flow time > 360 ms, or pleth variability index < 10%. The likelihood was 21% if stroke volume had decreased by <8% since the previous optimization, which decreased to 0% if combined with stroke volume > 100 mL. By contrast, the likelihood of fluid responsiveness increased to 50%-55% when stroke volume ≤ 50 mL, corrected flow time ≤ 360 ms, or pleth variability index ≥ 10. A decrease in stroke volume by > 8% since the previous optimization was followed by a 58% likelihood of fluid responsiveness that, in combination with any of the other hemodynamic variables, increased to 66%-76%. Single or combined hemodynamic variables provided by esophagus Doppler monitoring and pulse oximetry derived pleth variability index could help clinicians avoid unnecessary fluid bolus infusions.

Prueba de volumen en el quirófano: subestudio planificado del estudio observacional Fluid Day

BackgroundIntraoperative fluid administration is a ubiquitous intervention in surgical patients. But inadequate fluid administration may lead to poor postoperative outcomes. Fluid challenges (FCs), in or outside the so-called goal-directed fluid therapy, allows testing the cardiovascular system and the need for further fluid administration. Our primary aim was to evaluate how anesthesiologists conduct FCs in the operating room in terms of type, volume, variables used to trigger a FC and to compare the proportion of patients receiving further fluid administration based on the response to the FC. MethodsThis was a planned substudy of an observational study conducted in 131 centers in Spain in patients undergoing surgery. ResultsA total of 396 patients were enrolled and analyzed in the study. The median [interquartile range] amount of fluid given during a FC was 250mL (200-400). The main indication for FC was a decrease in systolic arterial pressure in 246 cases (62.2%). The second was a decrease in mean arterial pressure (54.4%). Cardiac output was used in 30 patients (7.58%), while stroke volume variation in 29 of 385 cases (7.32%). The response to the initial FC did not have an impact when prescribing further fluid administration. ConclusionsThe current indication and evaluation of FC in surgical patients is highly variable. Prediction of fluid responsiveness is not routinely used, and inappropriate variables are frequently evaluated for assessing the hemodynamic response to FC, which may result in deleterious effects.

Expert Consensus on the Use of Human Serum Albumin in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Expert Consensus on the Use of Human Serum Albumin in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Goal-directed fluid therapy using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and balanced crystalloid solutions during hip revision arthroplasty: a quality implementation project

BackgroundTo implement a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocol using crystalloids in hip revision arthroplasty surgery within a quality management project at a tertiary hospital using a monocentric, prospective observational study.MethodsAdult patients scheduled for elective hip revision arthroplasty surgery were screened for inclusion in this prospective study. Intraoperatively stroke volume (SV) was optimized within a previously published protocol using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and balanced crystalloids. Quality of perioperative GDFT was assessed by protocol adherence, SV increase as well as the rate of perioperative complications. Findings were then compared to two different historical groups of a former trial: one receiving GDFT with colloids (prospective colloid group) and one standard fluid therapy (retrospective control group) throughout surgery. Statistical analysis constitutes exploratory data analyses and results are expressed as median with 25th and 75th percentiles, absolute and relative frequencies, and complication rates are further given with 95% confidence intervals for proportions using the normal approximation without continuity correction.ResultsSixty-six patients underwent GDFT using balanced crystalloids and were compared to 130 patients with GDFT using balanced colloids and 130 controls without GDFT fluid resuscitation. There was a comparable increase in SV (crystalloids: 65 (54–74 ml; colloids: 67.5 (60–75.25 ml) and total volume infused (crystalloids: 2575 (2000–4210) ml; colloids: 2435 (1760–3480) ml; and controls: 2210 (1658–3000) ml). Overall perioperative complications rates were similar (42.4% (95%CI 30.3–55.2%) for crystalloids and 49.2% (95%CI 40.4–58.1%) for colloids and lower compared to controls: 66.9% (95%CI 58.1–74.9)). Interestingly, a reduced number of hemorrhagic complications was observed within crystalloids: 30% (95%CI 19.6–42.9); colloids: 43% (95%CI 34.4–52.0); and controls: 62% (95%CI 52.6–69.9). There were no differences in the rate of admission to the post-anesthesia care unit or intensive care unit as well as the length of stay.ConclusionsPerioperative fluid management using a GDFT protocol with crystalloids in hip revision arthroplasty surgery was successfully implemented in daily clinical routine. Perioperative complications rates were reduced compared to a previous management without GDFT and comparable when using colloids.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01753050.

A Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Pleth Variability Index (PVI) for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Intraoperatively in Patients Undergoing Intracranial (Supratentorial ICSOLs) Surgeries.

Fluid management in the perioperative period is a grey zone in clinical practice of late. Looking back on previous practices, static parameters were the only options. Now, dynamic parameters indicating fluid responsiveness have become a significant part of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT). However, the efficacy of this approach has yet to be established in neurosurgery cases where patients are already on lot of diuretics, thus making fluid management more challenging. The present study aims to determine the efficacy of the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) with pulse pressure variation (PPV) in guiding GDFT in patients undergoing neurosurgery for supra-tentorial intracranial space occupying lesions (ICSOLs), in the form of a randomised controlled trial. After randomisation, the patients were categorised into either PVI or PPV groups. Both received a baseline 2 ml/kg/h Lactated Ringer's (RL) infusion. Additional fluid boluses consisted of 250 ml of colloid infused over a 10 min period if PVI was > 15% or PPV was > 13% for at least five minutes. The primary outcome was to determine the serum lactate difference between preoperative and postoperative values, which could fairly predict fluid deficit leading to inadequate perfusion. A total of 74 patients were analysed. Both PVI- and PPV-guided GDFT strategies showed no significant difference in the postoperative lactate values, with a P-value of 0.18. Similarly, the mean total fluid administered, mean blood loss, length of CCU stay, and emetic and hypotension episodes also showed no significant differences among the groups with P-values of 0.41, 0.78, 0.25, 0.30, and 0.67, respectively. For patients undergoing neurosurgery (supratentorial ICSOLs), PVI seems to guide GDFT comparably to PPV regarding tissue perfusion and postoperative complications. However, both the parameters had low sensitivity and specificity, with an area of curve of 0.577 for PPV and 0.423 for PVI, as far as GDFT was concerned.

Effect of Goal-directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Combined Lingual and Cervical Radical Surgery

Background: The intraoperative rehydration technique known as the effect of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT), which is guided by the dynamic monitoring of volume responsiveness, has received a lot of attention recently. According to a meta-analysis by Bene, GDFT can maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability, which lowers the incidence of postoperative complications and reduces stay at the intensive care unit. Objectives: This study aimed to determine how GDFT affected elderly patients who underwent combined lingual and cervical radical surgery after an operation for postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Methods: This interventional study was conducted between December 2021 and December 2022 in a medical center affiliated with Fujian Medical University on people undergoing radical neck and tongue surgery for tongue cancer. The samples (n=36) were selected using an availability sampling method and randomly divided into conventional fluid therapy (the Non-GDFT, n=18) and GDFT (n=18) groups. The Non-GDFT group was hydrated normally during anesthesia. A continuous infusion of 8 mL/(kg/h) of compounded sodium chloride was administered to the GDFT group to maintain basal hydration volume during the operation. Before and following surgery, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale scores were completed, arterial blood lactate values and bilateral cerebral oxygen saturation levels were measured at various times following the stabilization of anesthesia, and the levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and S100 protein in venous blood were calculated. Results: The Non-GDFT group had a higher incidence of POCD than the GDFT group, the GDFT group had significantly lower levels of IL-6 and S100 than the Non-GDFT group, the GDFT group had significantly lower levels of serum lactate than the Non-GDFT group. The GDFT group experienced significantly lower rates of intraoperative hypotensive and intraoperative low rSO2 events than the Non-GDFT group, and this difference was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Assuring the balance of cerebral oxygen supply and demand, lowering the production of inflammatory mediators, and successfully reducing the incidence of POCD are all possible benefits of GDFT.

Current Commonly Used Dynamic Parameters and Monitoring Systems for Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: A Review.

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is usually recommended in patients undergoing major surgery and is essential in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. This fluid regimen is usually guided by dynamic hemodynamic parameters and aims to optimize patients' cardiac output to maximize oxygen delivery to their vital organs. While many studies have shown that GDFT benefits patients perioperatively and can decrease postoperative complications, there is no consensus on which dynamic hemodynamic parameters to guide GDFT with. Furthermore, there are many commercialized hemodynamic monitoring systems to measure these dynamic hemodynamic parameters, and each has its pros and cons. This review will discuss and review the commonly used GDFT dynamic hemodynamic parameters and hemodynamic monitoring systems.

The integration of rapid qualitative research in clinical trials: reflections from the ward-based goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in acute pancreatitis feasibility trial

BackgroundThere has been an increase in the integration of qualitative studies in randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this article is to reflect on our experience of carrying out a rapid qualitative study during a feasibility trial of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients with acute pancreatitis, including our sharing of emerging findings and the use of these findings by the trial team.MethodsThe study was designed as a rapid feedback evaluation and combined interviews with staff and patients who took part in the trial.FindingsThe rapid qualitative study pointed to common problems in trial recruitment among multiple sites, where lack of engagement of clinical teams across sites might impact negatively on patient recruitment. The article describes how the use of rapid feedback loops can be used as the trial is ongoing to inform changes in implementation. It also covers the potential challenges of working rapidly and collaborative with the trial team.ConclusionsRapid feedback evaluations can be used to generate findings across all stages of trial design and delivery. Additional research is required to explore the implementation of this research design in other settings and trial designs.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCurrent practice guidelines for optimal infusion rates during early intravenous hydration in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) remain inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare treatment outcomes between aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration in severe and non-severe AP.MethodsThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on November 23, 2022, and hand-searched the reference lists of included RCTs, relevant review articles and clinical guidelines. We included RCTs that compared clinical outcomes from aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration in AP. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for participants with severe AP and non-severe AP. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and several secondary outcomes included fluid-related complications, clinical improvement and APACHE II scores within 48 h.ResultsWe included a total of 9 RCTs with 953 participants. The meta-analysis indicated that, compared to non-aggressive intravenous hydration, aggressive intravenous hydration significantly increased mortality risk in severe AP (pooled RR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.37, 4.40), while the result in non-severe AP was inconclusive (pooled RR: 2.26, 95% CI: 0.54, 9.44). However, aggressive intravenous hydration significantly increased fluid-related complication risk in both severe (pooled RR: 2.22, 95% CI 1.36, 3.63) and non-severe AP (pooled RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.53, 6.93). The meta-analysis indicated worse APACHE II scores (pooled mean difference: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.79, 4.84) in severe AP, and no increased likelihood of clinical improvement (pooled RR:1.20, 95% CI: 0.63, 2.29) in non-severe AP. Sensitivity analyses including only RCTs with goal-directed fluid therapy after initial fluid resuscitation therapy yielded consistent results.ConclusionsAggressive intravenous hydration increased the mortality risk in severe AP, and fluid-related complication risk in both severe and non-severe AP. More conservative intravenous fluid resuscitation protocols for AP are suggested.Graphical