ObjectiveTo synthesize the tumor associated analogs of MUC1 for use in structural and functional studies between sialyl‐Tn (sTn) antigen with macrophage galactose‐specific lectin (MGL).AbstractMucin 1 (MUC1) is a heavily glycosylated transmembrane protein, altered in both expression and glycosylation pattern in human carcinomas of the epithelium. The presence of incomplete or truncated glycan structures, often capped by sialic acid, commonly known as tumor‐associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs), on the cell surface is a well‐known cancer biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that TACAs expression is associated with tumor escape from immune defenses through interaction with endogenous carbohydrate binding proteins (lectins). These interactions often lead to creation of a protumor microenvironment, favoring tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and immune evasion. Macrophage galactose binding lectin (MGL) is a C‐type lectin receptor found on antigen‐presenting cells (APCs) which facilitates the uptake of carbohydrate antigens for antigen presentation, modulating the immune response homeostasis, autoimmunity, and cancer. Considering the crucial role of tumor‐associated forms of MUC1 with MGL in tumor immunology, a thorough understanding of this interaction is essential for it to be exploited for cancer vaccine strategies. The specific aim of this research is to synthesize structurally well‐defined chemical probes, mono and multiple glycosylated MUC1 glycopeptide models carrying the Tn or sTn, that allow for the control of the complexity of the chemical space of the multivalent ligands. For this purpose, a concise scheme was developed for the large synthesis of the sTn antigen building block. Thiophenyl glycoside donors, in the presence TfOH/NIS or TMSOTf/NIS as promoter system, were used for the galactosylation and sialylation steps of the amino acid building block synthesis, respectively. We explored the effect of activator, temperature, solvent, and excess equivalent of sialic acid thioglycoside donor on sialylation reaction. The most favorable reaction conditions improved the desired α‐stereoselectivity, decreased the competing 2,3‐elimination reaction on the sialyl donor during activation, leading to overall increase in the reaction yield. This building block was used in the stepwise solid‐phase peptide synthesis of MUC1 glycopeptide models. The secondary structure of synthesized peptides was determined by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy.