Glycemic Management In Patients Research Articles

The Influence of GLP1 on Body Weight and Glycemic Management in Patients with Diabetes—A Scientometric Investigation and Visualization Study

Diabetes medications can affect weight and cardiovascular health. Some medications can aid in weight management, while others may lead to weight gain. Patients must be monitored and receive appropriate care to manage weight and prevent cardiovascular complications. Despite advancements in diabetes treatments that can influence weight and cardiovascular outcomes, ongoing research is necessary in this intricate field. Long-term effects, individual variations, and combination therapies are still subjects of uncertainty and ongoing investigation. The major objective of the research is to evaluate the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on body weight in diabetic patients through a scientometric assessment. Methodology: Research data were gathered from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database by searching for the keywords “Body Weight”, dulaglutide, and semaglutide, identifying 60 relevant articles in the field. While there are advantages in managing diseases in which the cardiovascular system is implicated, there are also clinical considerations for personalized medicine and shared decision-making. The scientometric analysis of the articles revealed important insights into how dulaglutide and semaglutide impact weight management and their potential benefits for managing cardiovascular diseases in individuals with diabetes. Conclusions: Semaglutide shows superior outcomes compared to other commercially available GLP-1RAs, particularly in improving blood sugar control, lowering body weight, and addressing other cardio-metabolic risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs have the potential to provide cardiovascular protection by influencing various physiological factors such as blood pressure, pulse rate, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (RAC). The development and validation of the 4GI model provides a sophisticated tool for evaluating the complex interactions involved in diabetes treatments, offering insights into the mechanisms of action of various medications.

Glycemic Management in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of Glycemic Control and Drug Therapy.

Emerging evidence describes the high incidence and strong impact of hyperglycemia on the outcomes of critically ill patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Given resource limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians moved away from using continuous IV infusions of insulin to manage hyperglycemia. To evaluate glycemic control in critically ill patients receiving various medication regimens to manage their hyperglycemia. This retrospective cohort study involved 120 mechanically ventilated adult patients (> 18 years) with COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2020 and December 2021. The following data were collected for the first 14 days of the ICU admission: blood glucose values (up to 4 times daily), hypoglycemia events, and antihyperglycemic medication regimens. The use of IV insulin infusions maintained glucose measurements within the target range of 4 to 10 mmol/L more often than any other medication regimen, with 60% of measured values falling within the target range. The use of a sliding-scale insulin regimen maintained 52% of glucose measurements within the target range. Oral hypoglycemic agents performed relatively poorly, with only 12% to 29% of glucose measurements within range. The coadministration of corticosteroids led to worse glycemic control across all medication regimens. This study confirmed that ICUs should continue using the standard protocol of IV insulin infusion to achieve recommended blood glucose targets in critically ill patients with COVID-19, particularly those receiving corticosteroids.

7481 Beyond the Operation Room: A Retrospective Study on Diabetes and Post-Operative Hyperglycemia Outcomes

Abstract Disclosure: P. Aron: None. T. Zaihra Rizvi: None. M. Hodge: None. J. Upadhyay: None. Introduction: Optimal, evidence based intraoperative and postoperative glycemic management may reduce poor surgical outcomes. Research design: This is a retrospective study from a single center to estimate quality gaps in perioperative glycemic management in patients with diabetes undergoing major surgery requiring general anesthesia between Oct 2022 and Dec 2022. Study Cohort: Patients > 18 years old, who underwent major surgery (>3 hrs) under general anesthesia, had diabetes mellitus based on Hba1c > 6.5% within last 1 year or as listed diagnosisThis is an ongoing study. We have currently looked at 79 patients of which 61 were in the hyperglycemic group (glucose > 180 mg/dL) and 18 in normoglycemic group (glucose < 180mg/dL) post-operatively. Methods: Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and operative details between the hyperglycemic and normoglycemic groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis's rank sum test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher's exact tests using categorical variables. Results: Patients who were found to have hyperglycemia in the first 24 hours after surgery had a higher preop A1c of 7.4% vs 6.7% in the normoglycemia group (p-value = 0.047). They also had a higher BMI of 32 as compared to 30 respectively and a reduced GFR of 60 vs 73 in the normoglycemic group (P=0.069). 24 hours leading into surgery, the hyperglycemia group had a high average glucose of 196 mg/dL as compared to 135 mg/dL (p-value = 0.001). During the intraoperative period which lasted on average of 350 minutes (5.5 hours) there was an average glucose check of 3.2 times averaging 221 mg/dL for the hyperglycemia group compared to 2.2times averaging 174 mg/dL (P = 0.017). 62% of patients with intraoperative hyperglycemia DIDNOT receive IV insulin treatment in the hyperglycemic group. Steroid use was equal in both groups. 24 hours after surgery, patients in the hyperglycemia group had an average glucose reading of 252 mg/dL compared to 145 mg/dL in the normoglycemia group (P < 0.001).Endocrinology was not consulted in 87% of patients with hyperglycemia. Looking at our endpoints, readmission rate was 23% in the hyperglycemia group as opposed to 11% in normoglycemia. There were 4 patients who had a 90-day mortality from the hyperglycemia group compared to no patients in normoglycemia. 37% of patients had post-op complications in the hyperglycemia vs 22% in the euglycemia group (P 0.269). The hospital stay was the same for both groups averaging 8 days. Conclusions: Intraoperative hyperglycemia leads to poor outcomes. Formulating policy around insulin administration, frequency and monitoring of blood sugars during major surgeries and endocrine consultation in patients with Type 2 DM can achieve better glycemic management and postoperative outcomes. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led personal continuous glucose monitor workflow to improve glycemic management in an internal medicine clinic

BackgroundThe use of personal continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in patients with diabetes has increased substantially and is expected to continue to increase as CGMs become more affordable and insurance plans improve coverage. The utilization of CGMs has improved diabetes management and reduced hypoglycemic events. ObjectivesTo create pharmacist-led personal CGM workflow and evaluate its impact on glycemic management in patients with diabetes. Practice DescriptionThe study took place at an Internal Medicine Clinic. The practice providers include 2 medical doctors, 5 physician assistants, 2 nurse practitioners, and 1 clinical pharmacist. Practice InnovationTo create and implement a sustainable pharmacy led CGM workflow for enhanced CGM use within an internal medicine clinic. Evaluation MethodsThis was a prospective, investigator-initiated pilot study conducted at an Atrium Health Internal Medicine clinic over 28 weeks. In this pilot, 42 patients were qualifying candidates with diabetes and personal CGM use. In addition, 30 patients were followed until study completion and included into final analysis. ResultsThe average baseline A1c was reduced from 8.3% to 7.1% over a 3- to 6-month period. The pharmacist-led CGM workflow revealed a statistically significant reduction in A1c from baseline by an average of 1.2% (95% CI −0.6 to −1.8, P = 0.0006). On average, patients were enrolled for 19.9 weeks and had an average of 5 visits during this time. During the study duration, 100 medications changes were implemented under the existing clinical pharmacist practitioner agreement between the pharmacists and the provider. Overall, 58 Current Procedural Terminology 95251 codes were billed yielding $7052.00 in billed CGM services for the clinic. This project generated 40.6 provider relative value units. ConclusionThe utilization of a pharmacist-led personal CGM workflow can improve diabetes outcomes.

Differentiated approach to glycemic management in type 2 diabetic patients during inpatient treatment of acute myocardial infarction: glycemic control and long-term prognosis

BACKGROUND: The risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is 2 times higher than without DM. Previously an association between the time in the target range of glycemia during hospitalization of AMI in patients with T2DM (hTIR — «hospital time in range») and long-term prognosis was found. It is supposed that a differentiated approach to glycemic management will help to achieve a higher level of hTIR and will lead to an improved prognosis.AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of differentiated approach to glycemic management in patients with T2DM during inpatient treatment of AMI and impact on long-term prognosis.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients with T2DM who were hospitalized with AMI with ST-segment elevation and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. A total amount of patients was 161; 102 were in the main group, 59 in the control group. There was a differentiated approach to glycemia management based on phenotype determination in the main group. Insulin therapy was prescribed to patients with the 1st phenotype during the entire inpatient treatment. Patients with the second phenotype received insulin therapy followed by switching oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). Patients of the 3rd phenotype were prescribed only OAD. In the control group, therapy of T2DM was prescribed according to the standard hospital procedures based on current clinical recommendations.RESULTS: In the main group, 22 patients (22%) were in the 1st phenotype, 54 (53%) –in the 2nd, 26 (25%) –in the 3rd. The average glycemia during hospitalization in the main group was lower than in the control group: 9.4±1.7 mmol/l vs 10.3±2.3 mmol/l (p=0.006). The hTIR in the main group was 58 [53; 71]% vs 46 [33; 63]% in the control group (p<0.001). It was shown that when hTIR > 55% is reached, the risk of cardiovascular death within a year after hospitalization is reduced by 80%.CONCLUSION: The differentiated approach to glycemic management in patients with T2DM leads to an improvement in glycemic control during inpatient treatment of AMI and is accompanied by a tendency to a lower incidence of cardiovascular death within a year after hospitalization. Achieving hTIR > 55% is associated with a multifold reduction of the risk of cardiovascular death in a year. About 25% of patients with DM2 during inpatient treatment of AMI do not need the insulin therapy.

Physical exercise and glycemic management in patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy—a cross-sectional study

AimsExercise is an important practice for control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study aims to assess de association between exercise and glycemic management in people with T1D and to identify the main barriers to exercise in T1D.MethodsWe evaluated 95 people with T1D treated with insulin pump therapy. Participants answered a questionnaire about 1) exercise habits, 2) usual adjustments in insulin and food intake with exercise and 3) main barriers to exercise.Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was used to evaluate time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR) and time above range (TAR) during the last 60 days before the evaluation. CGM data during, before (2 h before) and after (24 h after) the last bout of exercise was also evaluated.ResultsThe mean age was 30.1 ± 12.1 years, and 51.6% were women. Participants that reported practicing exercise (55.8%) had a higher TIR (59.6 ± 16.3 vs. 48.7 ± 15.7, p = 0.012) and a lower TAR (32.6 ± 15.8 vs. 45.4 ± 17.7, p = 0.006). Comparing with the 60 days CGM data, the TBR was lower in the 2 h before exercise (− 1.8 ± 3.8, p = 0.0454) and TAR was lower during (− 16.9 ± 33.6, p = 0.0320) and in the 24 h after (− 8.7 ± 17.2, p = 0.032) the last bout of exercise. The absence of adjustments on insulin and food intake was associated with higher TBR after the exercise (13.44 ± 3.5, p < 0.05). Eating before the exercise and turning off the pump during the exercise were associated with lower TBR after exercise (food booster: − 7.56 ± 3.49, p < 0.05; turning off insulin pump − 8.87 ± 3.52, p < 0.05). The main barriers reported for exercise practicing were fear of hypoglycemia, lack of free time and work schedule.ConclusionExercise was associated with better glycemic management in people with T1D. Addressing common barriers may allow a higher adherence to exercise in T1D.

Strategies for Glycemic Management in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

Strategies for Glycemic Management in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

Nighttime hypoglycemia in Japanese children with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily injection insulin therapy.

Prevention of hypoglycemia is an important strategy for glycemic management in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Hypoglycemia is difficult to recognize at night while sleeping, particularly when using multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin therapy rather than sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy. Therefore, it is possible that patients with T1D are at higher risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia when insulin is administered using an MDI regimen. We investigated nocturnal hypoglycemia in 50 pediatric patients with T1D on MDI insulin therapy using data from an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) system. Hypoglycemia was observed on 446 of the 1,270 nights studied. Most of the hypoglycemic episodes were severe (blood glucose <54 mg/dL). On nights when hypoglycemia occurred, the blood glucose concentrations measured using finger-stick blood glucose monitoring (FSGM) before sleep and the next morning were lower than nights when hypoglycemia did not occur. However, few values were below the normal blood glucose range, suggesting that FSGM alone may be insufficient to detect nocturnal hypoglycemia. Approximately 7% of time was spent below the normal glucose range during the 10 hours from 21:00 to 7:00 the next morning. This result suggests that the patients on MDI insulin therapy could end up spending more time in hypoglycemia than is recommended by the American Diabetes Association (time below range <4.0% of time per day). Monitoring glucose levels overnight using an isCGM sensor may improve glycemic management via automatic detection of blood glucose peaks and troughs.

Evaluation of glycemic control and related factors among outpatients with type 2 diabetes at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe goals of glycemic management for patients with diabetes are to prevent or delay complications and optimize quality of life. However, in clinical practice, the recommended glycemic control target is difficult to achieve. Therefore, it is important to identify factors that influence the outcomes of glycemia to improve the quality of diabetic management.The study aimed to evaluate the level and factors associated with glycemic control among type 2 diabetic outpatients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.MethodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among systematically selected 325 patients with type 2 diabetes who attended diabetic clinics at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Pretested, structured, and interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect sociodemographic and diabetes-related information from March 1 to May 30, 2021. HbA1c was used to assess glycemic control according to the HbA1c target of < 7% (‘good’ control) as recommended by the American Diabetes Association for non-pregnant adults. The HbA1c level in the range of 7–8% was defined as ‘inadequate’ control and ‘poor’ at levels > 8%. Data entry and analysis were performed using SPSS v26. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of glycemic control.ResultsThe median level of HbA1c of the participants was 8.4% (IQR 6.8–10.1). And approximately three-quarters (73.8%) of the patients had inadequate and poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%). Older age (AOR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.28–6.01), DM duration of > 10 years (AOR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.22–6.54), insulin therapy (AOR: 3.07, 95% CI: 2.10–6.12), poor diet compliance (AOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.28–3.52) and failure to set goals for glycemic control (AOR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.17–5.97) were factors associated with inadequate and poor glycemic control.ConclusionsThe study revealed that a significant number of diabetic patients had inadequate and poor glycemic control levels. And this was associated with older age, longer duration of DM, insulin therapy, poor diet compliance, and failure to set control goals. This requires a focus on the associated factors identified and tailored management mechanisms to maintain good glycemic control.

Insulin for hyperglycemia prevention and management during postgastrectomy nutrition support in gastric cancer: Reduced complications in a retrospective cohort study in China.

To evaluate the effectiveness of insulin addition to the total nutrition admixture (TNA) for glycemic control among patients with gastric cancer (GC) receiving supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) after gastrectomy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 208 noncritical ill patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC from 2017 to 2019 at a tertiary teaching hospital in Lanzhou, China. All the included patients received individualized SPN and enteral nutrition treatment after gastrectomy. The patients were randomly divided into insulin and noninsulin groups based on the TNA composition. Blood glucose (BG) measurements, glycemic fluctuation, and hypoglycemia incidence during SPN were compared between the two groups. The postoperative comprehensive complications index (CI) and infections were compared according to insulin regimen and postoperative glycemic status. The mean BG was significantly lower and fluctuated less in the insulin group than in the noninsulin group (p<0.05). One unit of insulin per 6 g of parenteral nutrition glucose addition to TNA did not increase hypoglycemia incidence (p>0.05). Comparing CI and the infection rate, no significance was observed between the insulin and noninsulin groups, but a higher postoperative CI was observed in patients with hyperglycemia than in euglycemic patients (p<0.05). Appropriate insulin addition to TNA has an overall positive effect on glycemic management in patients with noncritical GC who received SPN after gastrectomy. Postoperative glycemic status was associated with the incidence of relevant complications. Further research is needed for conclusive recommendations.

Clinical characteristics and managing type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities in people with COVID-19 infection. Inadequate glycemic control is related to high inflammation, hypercoagulability, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19 might need modifications to their diabetes therapy. The study was aimed at evaluating the association of clinical presentation and glycemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes and COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 patients with type 2 DM and COVID-19, distributed into three groups: group 1 oral agents — 32 patients, group 2 oral agents and basal insulin — 15 patients, group 3 intensive insulin treatment — 13 patients. We measured laboratory parameters, evaluated clinical presentation, and followed glycemic treatment during hospitalization. Results: Patients on oral antidiabetic drugs had better glycemic control before hospitalization, shorter duration of DM, and normal weight according to BMI compared with the other two groups. The most common symptoms of COVID -19 were: fever, cough, and fatigue. For better glycemic control we added basal insulin in 15 patients in group 1 (50%) and 9 patients need intensive insulin treatment in group 2 (60%). We discounted metformin in two patients in group 1 and three patients in group 2. A total of 7 patients died (11.6 %) during hospitalization, including 3 deaths in group 2 (5%), and 4 deaths in group 3 (6.6%). Conclusions: Poorer glycemic control before COVID -19 is associated with higher inflammation parameters, worse outcomes, and required modification of their treatment during hospitalization.

Reply to Berk et al. Comment on "Moriconi et al. Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet as a Safe and Valuable Tool for Long-Term Glycemic Management in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients 2021, 13, 758".

We thank the authors of the comment [...].

Comment on Moriconi et al. Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet as a Safe and Valuable Tool for Long-Term Glycemic Management in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients 2021, 13, 758.

With interest, we have read the article of Moriconi et al. [...].

Quality gaps in screening and monitoring for postoperative hyperglycemia in a Canadian hospital: a retrospective cohort study

IntroductionEvidence-based preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative glycemic management may reduce poor surgical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that quality gaps in perioperative glycemic management may be common.Research design and methodsThis retrospective cohort...

Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet as a Safe and Valuable Tool for Long-Term Glycemic Management in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Obesity-related type 2 diabetes represents one of the most difficult challenges for the healthcare system. This retrospective study aims to determine the efficacy, safety and durability of a very-low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD), compared to a standard low-calorie diet (LCD) on weight-loss, glycemic management, eating behavior and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity. Thirty patients with obesity and T2DM, aged between 35 and 75 years, who met the inclusion criteria and accepted to adhere to a VLCKD or a LCD nutritional program, were consecutively selected from our electronic database. Fifteen patients followed a structured VLCKD protocol, fifteen followed a classical LCD. At the beginning of the nutritional protocol, all patients were asked to stop any antidiabetic medications, with the exception of metformin. Data were collected at baseline and after 3 (T1) and 12 (T2) months. At T1 and T2, BMI was significantly reduced in the VLCKD group (p < 0.001), whereas it remained substantially unchanged in the LCD group. HbA1c was significantly reduced in the VLCKD group (p = 0.002), whereas a slight, although not significant, decrease was observed in the LCD group. Quality of life and eating behavior scores were improved in the VLCKD group, whereas no significant changes were reported in the LCD group, both at T1 and T2. At the end of the study, in the VLCKD group 26.6% of patients had stopped all antidiabetic medications, and 73.3% were taking only metformin, whereas 46.6% of LCD patients had to increase antidiabetic medications. The study confirms a valuable therapeutic effect of VLCKD in the long-term management of obesity and T2DM and its potential contribution to remission of the disease.

Diabetes mellitus in dialysis and renal transplantation.

Diabetes mellitus is the commonest cause of end-stage kidney failure worldwide and is a proven and significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Renal impairment has a significant impact on the physiology of glucose homeostasis as it reduces tissue sensitivity to insulin and reduces insulin clearance. Renal replacement therapy itself affects glucose control: peritoneal dialysis may induce hyperglycaemia due to glucose-rich dialysate and haemodialysis often causes hypoglycaemia due to the relatively low concentration of glucose in the dialysate. Autonomic neuropathy which is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes increases the risk for asymptomatic hypoglycaemia. Pharmacological options for improving glycaemic control are limited due to alterations to drug metabolism. Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes are also common in the post-kidney-transplant setting and increase the risk of graft failure and mortality. This review seeks to summarise the literature and tackle the intricacies of glycaemic management in patients with CKD who are either on maintenance haemodialysis or have received a kidney transplant. It outlines changes to glycaemic targets, monitoring of glycaemic control, the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents, the management of severe hyperglycaemia in dialysis and kidney transplantation patients.

Sulfonylureas may be useful for glycemic management in patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis.

This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of sulfonylurea (SU) use in patients with T2DM and compensated liver cirrhosis. From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2012, we selected the data of 3781 propensity-score-matched SU users and nonusers from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. The mean follow-up time for this study was 5.74 years. Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich standard error estimates were used to compare the risks of main outcomes between SU users and nonusers. The incidence of mortality during follow-up was 3.24 and 4.09 per 100 person-years for SU users and nonusers, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, and decompensated cirrhosis in SU users relative to SU nonusers were 0.79 (0.71-0.88), 0.69 (0.61-0.80), and 0.82 (0.66-1.03), respectively. The SU-associated lower risks of death and cardiovascular events seemed to have a dose-response trend. This population-based cohort study demonstrated that SU use was associated with lower risks of death and major cardiovascular events compared with SU non-use in patients with T2DM and compensated liver cirrhosis. SUs may be useful for glycemic management for patients with liver cirrhosis.

1512-P: Severe Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia among U.S. Adults with Diabetes and ESRD on Dialysis, 2010-2015

Glycemic management in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is challenging. There is limited evidence about the incidence of severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in this population. Here, we examine rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (ascertained using validated ICD-9/10 codes) in a national cohort of adults with diabetes and incident ESRD, included in the United States Renal Data System, between 2010-2015. We then examine risk factors for these events using logistic regression. Among 678,376 patients with ESRD, 59.5% (n=403,490) had diabetes (63.6±13.0 years, 56.4% male, 26.8% Black, and 18.0% Hispanic). Rates of severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were 126.2 and 35.5 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Strongest risk factors for hypoglycemia were insulin therapy (OR 4.5 [95% CI, 4.4-4.6] vs. no medications) and non-insulin diabetes medications (OR 3.7 [3.6-3.8]); Black race (OR 1.3 [1.3-1.4] vs. Caucasian); older age: 65-74 years (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.3] and ≥75 years OR 1.1 [1.1-1.1] vs. 18-44 years); and history of amputation (OR 1.4 [1.4-1.5]) or retinopathy (OR 1.2 [1.2-1.3]). Strongest risk factors for hyperglycemia were insulin (OR 7.7 [7.4-8.2]) and non-insulin diabetes medication use (OR 2.8 [2.6-3.1]) and retinopathy (OR 1.5 [1.4-1.5]). Older age was protective for hyperglycemia (OR 0.1 [0.1-0.1] for age ≥75 and 0.2 [0.2-0.2] for age 65-74 vs. 18-44 years). Patients on peritoneal dialysis had a lower risk (OR 0.8 [0.8-0.9]) of hypoglycemia, but no difference in odds of hyperglycemia, compared to patients on hemodialysis. Hypoglycemia requiring ED/hospital care was 3.6-fold more prevalent than severe hyperglycemia, greatly exceeding rates previously reported for older adults and those with non-end stage chronic kidney disease. There is a critical need for proactive interventions to reduce hypoglycemia and related ED/hospital use in this high-risk population. Disclosure R.J. Galindo: Advisory Panel; Self; Lilly Diabetes. Consultant; Self; Valeritas, Inc. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. Other Relationship; Self; UpToDate. M.K. Ali: Research Support; Self; Merck &amp; Co., Inc. N. Shah: None. S. Funni: None. G.E. Umpierrez: None. R.G. McCoy: None. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK111024)

Glycemic Monitoring and Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with diabetes are profoundly altered by advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Risk of hypoglycemia is increased by failure of kidney gluconeogenesis, impaired insulin clearance by the kidney, defective insulin degradation due to uremia, increased erythrocyte glucose uptake during hemodialysis, impaired counterregulatory hormone responses (cortisol, growth hormone), nutritional deprivation, and variability of exposure to oral antihyperglycemic agents and exogenous insulin. Patients with end-stage kidney disease frequently experience wide glycemic excursions, with common occurrences of both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Assessment of glycemia by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is hampered by a variety of CKD-associated conditions that can bias the measure either to the low or high range. Alternative glycemic biomarkers, such as glycated albumin or fructosamine, are not fully validated. Therefore, HbA1c remains the preferred glycemic biomarker despite its limitations. Based on observational data for associations with mortality and risks of hypoglycemia with intensive glycemic control regimens in advanced CKD, an HbA1c range of 7% to 8% appears to be the most favorable. Emerging data on the use of continuous glucose monitoring in this population suggest promise for more precise monitoring and treatment adjustments to permit fine-tuning of glycemic management in patients with diabetes and advanced CKD.

Efficacy, safety and cardiovascular outcomes of once-daily oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: The PIONEER programme.

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) are recommended for glycaemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Oral semaglutide, the first oral GLP‐1RA, has recently been approved for clinical use, based on the results of the randomized, Phase 3a Peptide InnOvatioN for Early diabEtes tReatment (PIONEER) clinical trials. The PIONEER programme tested oral semaglutide in patients with T2D of duration ranging from 3.5 to 15 years, from monotherapy through to insulin add‐on, in global populations and two trials dedicated to Japanese patients. Outcomes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] and body weight reduction, plus other relevant efficacy and safety endpoints) were tested against both placebo and active standard‐of‐care medications. A separate trial evaluated the cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide in patients with T2D at high cardiovascular risk. Over periods of treatment up to 78 weeks, oral semaglutide 7 and 14 mg once daily reduced HbA1c and body weight across the spectrum of T2D, and improved other diabetes‐related endpoints, such as fasting plasma glucose. Oral semaglutide provided significantly better efficacy than placebo and commonly used glucose‐lowering medications from the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (sitagliptin) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) classes, as well as the subcutaneous GLP‐1RAs liraglutide and dulaglutide. Oral semaglutide was well tolerated in line with the known safety profile of GLP‐1RAs, with transient gastrointestinal events being the most common side effects reported. Cardiovascular safety was demonstrated for oral semaglutide in patients with cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. The results of the PIONEER programme suggest that oral semaglutide is efficacious and well tolerated for glycaemic control of T2D. The availability of oral semaglutide may help to broaden treatment choice and facilitate adoption of earlier GLP‐1RA treatment in the paradigm of T2D management.