Glucose-free Dialysate Research Articles

Glycosylation and Characterization of Human Transferrin in an End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern affecting approximately one billion individuals worldwide. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD), the most severe form of CKD, is often accompanied by anemia. Peritoneal dialysis (PD), a common treatment for ESKD, utilizes the peritoneum for solute transfer but is associated with complications including protein loss, including transferrin (Tf) a key protein involved in iron transport. This study investigated Tf characteristics in ESKD patients compared to healthy individuals using lectin microarray, spectroscopic techniques and immunocytochemical analysis to assess Tf interaction with transferrin receptors (TfRs). ESKD patients exhibited altered Tf glycosylation patterns, evidenced by significant changes in lectin reactivity compared to healthy controls. However, structural analyses revealed no significant differences in the Tf secondary or tertiary structures between the two groups. A functional analysis demonstrated comparable Tf-TfR interaction in both PD and healthy samples. Despite significant alterations in Tf glycosylation, structural integrity and Tf-TfR interaction remained preserved in PD patients. These findings suggest that while glycosylation changes may influence iron metabolism, they do not impair Tf function. The study highlights the importance of a glucose-free dialysis solutions in managing anemia exacerbation in PD patients with poorly controlled anemia, potentially offering a targeted therapeutic approach to improve patient outcomes.

Targeting Predialysis Glucose up to 180 mg/dl Reduces Glycemic Variability in End Stage Diabetic Nephropathy.

Glycemic variability plays a major role in the development as well as the progression of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. We compared the mean plasma glucose and glycemic variability (GV) parameters on and off hemodialysis (HD) in patients with End-Stage Diabetic Nephropathy (ESDN) and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Cross-sectional study. We included 23 ESDN and 6 ESRD patients who underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (iPro2) for 6 days and a glucose-free dialysate for 4 hours thrice weekly. EasyGV software was used to calculate the variability parameters {mean glucose, Time in range (TIR), Time above and below range (TAR/TBR), CV (Coefficient of Variation) and MAGE}. The quantitative data variables were expressed by using mean and SD. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the two groups. P value <0.05 was considered significant. In the ESDN group, TIR was significantly lower whereas TAR and TBR were significantly higher on HD day. MAGE (101.88 ± 40.5 v/s 89.46 ± 30.0, P < 0.007) and CV (29.41% v/s 21.67%) were higher on HD day. Subjects with pre-HD glucose values ≥180 mg/dl (Group B, n = 24) had a rapid drop with a delayed higher rise in glucose values than those with pre-HD glucose values <180 mg/dl (Group A, n = 27). Ten patients had 13 episodes of hypoglycemia. The CGM parameters were not different in the ESRD group. Targeting a pre- HD glucose value <180 mg/dl could be a good strategy to prevent larger fluctuation during and post HD.

The effects of glucose-free and glucose-containing dialysate during dialysis in MHD patients: a prospective cross-over study.

To investigate the effects of glucose-free and glucose-containing dialysates during dialysis in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients by the prospective cross-over study, and detect glucose control methods in MHD patients. A total of 66 MHD 18-75 years old patients in our hospital from Nov. 2019 to Mar. 2020 were recruited. All patients underwent HD with 4 hours per time, three times per week. Glucose-free dialysate (glucose-free group) and then 5.55 mmol/L glucose-containing dialysate (glucose-5.55 group) were used alternately in dialysis. The demographics and parameters of pre- and post-dialysis were recorded. A total of 60 patients were analyzed, and 28 patients among them had type 2 diabetes. Serum glucose pre and post dialysis were 8.64 ± 4.18 mmol/L versus 5.74 ± 1.82 mmol/L (p < 0.01) in glucose-free dialysate, and 9.31 ± 4.89 mmol/L versus 7.80 ± 2.59 mmol/L (p < 0.01) in glucose-5.55 dialysate. The post-dialysis blood glucose of glucose-free group was lower than glucose-5.55 group (5.74 ± 1.82 vs 7.80 ± 2.59, p < 0.01). About 18 (30.00%) patients in glucose-free group and 1 patient (1.67%) in glucose-5.55 group whose blood glucose was lower than 4.44 mmol/L (p < 0.01). About 29 patients (48.33%) in glucose-free group and 17 patients (28.33%; p = 0.02) in glucose-5.55 group have hunger feeling. Serum sodium level in the glucose-free group was higher than that in Glucose-5.55 group (137.92 ± 1.64 vs 136.70 ± 1.64, p < 0.01). Post-dialysis blood glucose had no significant differences between patients not using diabetes-related medication (13 patients) and patients using diabetes-related medication (15 patients) in glucose-free group (7.13 ± 1.78 mmol/L vs 6.08 ± 2.84 mmol/L, p = 0.23) and glucose-5.55 group (9.22 ± 2.59 mmol/L vs 9.35 ± 2.88 mmol/L, p = 0.90). Glucose-free and glucose-5.55 dialysate both decrease the blood glucose post-dialysis. Dialysates containing 5.55 mmol/L glucose can reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia and lower serum sodium, but have no effect on blood pressure during dialysis. Stopping insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs once before dialysis may not affect the control of blood glucose.

Hemodialysis-Related Glycemic Disarray Proven by Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Glycemic Markers and Hypoglycemia.

There is a high risk of asymptomatic hypoglycemia associated with hemodialysis (HD) using glucose-free dialysate; therefore, the inclusion of glucose in the dialysate is believed to prevent intradialytic hypoglycemia. However, the exact glycemic fluctuation profiles and frequency of asymptomatic hypoglycemia using dialysates containing >100 mg/dL glucose have not been determined. We evaluated the glycemic profiles of 98 patients, 68 of whom were men, with type 2 diabetes undergoing HD (HbA1c 6.4 ± 1.2%; glycated albumin 20.8 ± 6.8%) with a dialysate containing 100, 125, or 150 mg/dL glucose using continuous glucose monitoring. Sensor glucose level (SGL) showed a sustained decrease during HD, irrespective of the dialysate glucose concentration, and reached a nadir that was lower than the dialysate glucose concentration in 49 participants (50%). Twenty-one participants (21%) presented with HD-related hypoglycemia, defined by an SGL <70 mg/dL during HD and/or between the end of HD and their next meal. All these hypoglycemic episodes were asymptomatic. Measures of glycemic variability calculated using the SGL data (SD, coefficient of variation, and range of SGL) were higher and time below range (<70 mg/dL) was lower in participants who experienced HD-related hypoglycemia than in those who did not, whereas time in range between 70 and 180 mg/dL, time above range (>180 mg/dL), HbA1c, and glycated albumin of the two groups were similar. Despite the use of dialysate containing 100-150 mg/dL glucose, patients with diabetes undergoing HD experienced HD-related hypoglycemia unawareness frequently. SGL may fall well below the dialysate glucose concentration toward the end of HD.

POS-550 INCIDENCE OF HYPOGLYCEMIA IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS CAUSED BY FAILURE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN TWO HEMODIALYSIS CENTERS- A CASE

Patient Safety is considered a serious public health problem. Very often patients suffer damage that could have been prevented or mitigated during their care. Family members and health professionals are also victims of this complex process. Communication is one of the 6 international safety goals in patient care and considered a very important one. The lack of integrated and effective communication processes between the various teams of professionals and health services are factors that contribute to the failure in care. Our objective was to report the experience regarding the incidence of hypoglycemia in hemodialysis patients due to communication failure. A descriptive method of analysis the experience of hypoglycemia events recorded in a hemodialysis service of a private clinical-surgical hospital, located in southern Brazil, occurred in October 2020. The Nephrology and Dialysis Center started its activities on September 21, 2020, replacing another 35 years of experience terciary clinic. For almost two years, the processes and protocols paying attention to patient safety were mapped. The acquisition of hemodialysis inputs needed to be similar to the older clinic, because the target audience was composed of the same clients (n = 93), with a mean age of 72.4 years, 45 (50.5%) patients with diabetes mellitus. The information requested was: dialysator priming and the composition of hydroelectrolytic concentrates. The verbally reported information regarding the hydroelectrolytic concentrate, was that there were a higher consumption of glucose-free solution. This information served as the basis to purchase the supplies for the patients. During the first month of operation, an important incidence of hypoglycemia was observed in hemodialysis patients. During the reported period, 1,104 hemodialysis sessions were performed and 217 (19.7%) hypoglycaemia (HGT <80mg/dL). The episodes were managed with administration of intravenous hypertonic glucose, according to the institutional protocol. No patient presented worsening of the condition or needed hospitalization. The identification of the root cause allowed the elaboration of an action plan and acquisition of a greater amount of hydroelectrolytic concentrate with glucose. With the use of glucose solution, partial data showed the occurrence of 49 episodes of hypoglycemia in the first half of the following month, a reduction of 65% compared to October. Failures in institutional communication processes is also pointed out as a source of risk of adverse events. Another critical communication process for the risk of adverse events is between the pharmacy, nursing and medical staff. Situations of failures of writing and interpretation of medical prescription, as well as the dispensing and preparation of medications are moments. prior to administration of medications that can induce the error of the nursing team. The case reported illustrates the impact on the entire drug chain due to misinformation about the hydroelectrolytic solution, which led to the failure of the administration, pharmacy, doctors and nurses that are part of the new service. Events could have been avoided, as diabetic patients with chronic renal disease may present with episodes of hypoglycemia, usually asymptomatic, during hemodialysis sessions when using glucose-free dialysate.

Glycemic Fluctuation and the Risk of Hypoglycemia Unawareness Associated with Hemodialysis in Type 2 Diabetic Renal Failure

Despite the high-risk of asymptomatic hypoglycemia associated with hemodialysis (HD) using glucose-free dialysate, presence of dialysate glucose is believed to prevent intradialytic hypoglycemia. However, exact glycemic fluctuation profiles and frequency of asymptomatic hypoglycemia during HD remain unappreciated. Using continuous glucose monitoring, we evaluated glycemic excursions in 63 type 2 diabetic HD patients (44 male, HbA1c 6.4±1.2%) treated with a dialysate containing either 100, 125 or 150 mg/dL glucose. Average sensor glucose level (SGL) at start of HD after 7.2±5.0 U bolus insulin and breakfast was 187.9±56.2 mg/dL. SGL showed gradual and sustained decrease during HD irrespective of the dialysate glucose levels (Figure). SGL nadir reached below the dialysate glucose levels in 23 of 37 patients treated with dialysate containing 100 mg/dL glucose, in 14 of 17 patients with 125 mg/dL and in all 9 patients with 150 mg/dL. Fourteen of all 63 patients (22%) presented with HD-related hypoglycemia as defined by SGL &amp;lt;63 mg/dL during HD or immediately after HD up until the next meal. All hypoglycemic episodes revealed asymptomatic. In conclusion, type 2 diabetic HD patients present a high-risk of HD-related hypoglycemia unawareness despite the use of dialysate containing 100-150 mg/dL glucose. SGL may fall well below the dialysate glucose level toward the end of HD. Disclosure A. Hayashi: None. A. Momozono: None. S. Kawai: None. T. Masaki: None. S. Yoshino: None. A. Ogawa: None. K. Takano: None. M. Shichiri: None.

Overcoming glucose delivery by on-line hemodiafiltration: a feasible chimera for diabetics on dialysis.

The increasing number of patients with diabetes undergoing renal replacement therapy has raised interest in the issue of glucose delivery with the substitution fluid-over 20g per session. The ideal situation would be to have a glucose-containing bath to avoid glycemic disarrays and a glucose-free substitution fluid. But this seems a chimera because the substitution fluid is nothing else than an ultrapure dialysis bath. In this technical note, we present a cheap solution to realize the desired mix, using a commercially available glucose-free dialysate and adding glucose in the inlet dialysate compartment of the dialyzer by means of a common pump and a unique handmade T-tube. Our in vitro experiments showed glucose levels in the dialysate (mean ± SD, mg/dl): 99.7 ± 4.6at baseline, 100.7 ± 7.3at mid-session and 100.7 ± 2.1at the end of dialysis, whereas measurements in the substitution fluid always gave a "low" output (p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in single 1- and 4-h in vivo experiments carried out in a non-diabetic overweight hemodialysis patient. Our simple, yet unequivocal, results lay the foundation for assembling a hemodialysis machine equipped with an infusion pump to modify the on-line substitution fluid without affecting the dialysate. This would overcome the ethical issue of delivering glucose intravenously in certain groups of patients.

Skin- and Plasmaautofluorescence in hemodialysis with glucose-free or glucose-containing dialysate

BackgroundHaemodialysis (HD) patients suffer from an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Skin autofluorescence (SAF) is a strong marker for CVD. SAF indirectly measures tissue advanced glycation end products (AGE) being cumulative metabolites of oxidative stress and cytokine-driven inflammatory reactions. The dialysates often contain glucose.MethodsAutofluorescence of skin and plasma (PAF) were measured in patients on HD during standard treatment (ST) with a glucose-containing dialysate (n = 24). After that the patients were switched to a glucose-free dialysate (GFD) for a 2-week period. New measurements were performed on PAF and SAF after 1 week (M1) and 2 weeks (M2) using GFD. Nonparametric paired statistical analyses were performed between each two periods.ResultsSAF after HD increased non-significantly by 1.2% while when a GFD was used during HD at M1, a decrease of SAF by 5.2% (p = 0.002) was found. One week later (M2) the reduction of 1.6% after the HD was not significant (p = 0.33). PAF was significantly reduced during all HD sessions. Free and protein-bound PAF decreased similarly whether glucose containing or GFD was used. The HD resulted in a reduction of the total PAF of approximately 15%, the free compound of 20% and the protein bound of 10%. The protein bound part of PAF corresponded to approximately 56% of the total reduction. The protein bound concentrations after each HD showed the lowest value after 2 weeks using glucose-free dialysate (p < 0.05). The change in SAF could not be related to a change in PAF.ConclusionsWhen changing to a GFD, SAF was reduced by HD indicating that such measure may hamper the accumulation and progression of deposits of AGEs to protein in tissue, and thereby also the development of CVD. Glucose-free dialysate needs further attention. Protein binding seems firm but not irreversible.Trial registrationISRCTN registry: ISRCTN13837553. Registered 16/11/2016 (retrospectively registered).

Health policies on dialysis modality selection: a nationwide population cohort study

ObjectivesIn Taiwan, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis are fully accessible to patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the usage of PD is considered low in Taiwan. Since 2005, 4 major...

Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and glycaemic disarrays.

In patients with diabetes receiving chronic haemodialysis, both very high and low glucose levels are associated with poor outcomes, including mortality. Conditions that are associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia in these patients include decreased gluconeogenesis in the remnant kidneys, deranged metabolic pathways, inadequate nutrition, decreased insulin clearance, glucose loss to the dialysate and diffusion of glucose into erythrocytes during haemodialysis. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia is common during treatments with glucose-free dialysate, which engenders a catabolic status similar to fasting; this state can also occur with 5.55 mmol/l glucose-containing dialysate. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia occurs more frequently in patients with diabetes than in those without. Insulin therapy and oral hypoglycaemic agents should, therefore, be used with caution in patients on dialysis. Several hours after completion of haemodialysis treatment a paradoxical rebound hyperglycaemia may occur via a similar mechanism as the Somogyi effect, together with insulin resistance. Appropriate glycaemic control tailored for patients on haemodialysis is needed to avoid haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and other glycaemic disarrays. In this Review we summarize the pathophysiology and current management of glycaemic disarrays in patients on haemodialysis.

Risk of hypoglycemia during hemodialysis in diabetic patients is related to lower pre-dialysis glycemia.

To compare the occurrence of hypoglycemia during hemodialysis in chronic kidney disease diabetic patients who present different levels of pre-dialysis glycemia both when using dialysis solutions with and without glucose. Twenty type 2 diabetic patients in maintenance hemodialysis were submitted to three dialysis sessions (at a 7-day interval each) with dialysis solutions without glucose, with glucose at 55 mg/dL, and at 90 mg/dL subsequently. Blood glucose levels were measured immediately pre-dialysis and at 4 moments during the session, and values under 70 mg/dL were considered as hypoglycemia. Average pre-dialysis glycemia was lower in those who presented intra-dialytic hypoglycemia than in those who did not, both in glucose-free (140.4 ± 50.7 vs. 277.7 ± 91.0 mg/dL; p = 0.005; 95%CI: 46.4 to 228.1) and in glucose 55 mg/dL (89.5 ± 10.6 vs. 229.7 ± 105.0 mg/dL; p < 0.05; 95%CI: 9.8 to 270.5). In patients with pre-dialysis glycemia under 140 mg/dL, average intradialytic glycemia was significantly lower than pre-dialysis glycemia only when using glucose-free dialysate (p < 0.0001; 95%CI: 29.9 to 56.0 - t-test). Hypoglycemia during dialysis was observed only when using glucose-free or glucose-poor dialysis solutions. The use of glucose-free or glucose-poor dialysis solution presents a high risk of intradialytic hypoglycemia in diabetic renal patients, especially in those with presumed better glycemic control.

Analysis of the metabolic properties of maintenance hemodialysis patients with glucose-added dialysis based on high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

The purpose of this study was to compare the metabolic properties of maintenance hemodialysis patients treated with glucose-containing and glucose-free dialysate using metabonomics. Pre- and post-dialysis serum samples from group G (−) using glucose-free dialysate, and group G (+) using glucose-added dialysate (glucose levels were 5.5 mmol/L) were analyzed and tested with high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Orthogonal signal correction–partial least squares discriminate analysis revealed a significant difference in the post-dialysis metabolic properties between samples from the G (−) and G (+) groups, and concentrations of leucine and dihydroxyprostaglandin F2α were higher in the G (+) group than in the G (−) group. However, markers of reactive lipid mobilization and amino acid release, such as bile acids, aspartate, and valine, were lower in the G (+) group than in the G (−) group. There were no significant differences in excitatory neurotransmitters aspartate and phosphorylated anandamide. Use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry metabonomics indicated that using glucose-added dialysate was superior to glucose-free dialysate in the protection of the central nervous system of maintenance hemodialysis patients, but had potential risks in stimulating oxidative stress.

Clearance, Distribution Volume, and Dialyzer Mass Area Transport Coefficient of Glucose in Whole Blood

The extracorporeal transport of glucose was studied to determine the dialyzer mass transfer coefficient K(0)A for glucose in whole blood under conditions of glucose delivery and glucose removal. Glucose was removed from blood or delivered to blood using glucose-free dialysate or dialysate with a glucose concentration of 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/L). FX8 dialyzers (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) were studied at constant dialysate flow Q(d) (500 ml/min) and variable blood flows Q(b) (200, 300, and 400 ml/min) under countercurrent flow conditions in a series of laboratory bench studies. Glucose clearance K(d) and glucose distribution volume flow rate Q(e) were determined from glucose mass balance. In 32 studies done with bovine blood at different hematocrit levels glucose was calculated to distribute in plasma water and to be excluded from red cell water when passing the FX8 dialyzer. The dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient K(0)A for glucose computed from Q(e), Q(d), and K(d) was 301.6 ± 45.2 ml/min and not different between modes of glucose delivery or glucose removal but lower than expected from the diffusivity of glucose estimated for aqueous solutions.

Recomendaciones para el soporte nutricional y metabólico especializado del paciente crítico. Actualización. Consenso SEMICYUC-SENPE: Insuficiencia renal aguda

Nutritional support in acute renal failure must take into account the patient's catabolism and the treatment of the renal failure. Hypermetabolic failure is common in these patients, requiring continuous renal replacement therapy or daily hemodialysis.In patients with normal catabolism (urea nitrogen below 10g/day) and preserved diuresis, conservative treatment can be attempted. In these patients, relatively hypoproteic nutritional support is essential, using proteins with high biological value and limiting fluid and electrolyte intake according to the patient's individual requirements. Micronutrient intake should be adjusted, the only buffering agent used being bicarbonate.Limitations on fluid, electrolyte and nitrogen intake no longer apply when extrarenal clearance techniques are used but intake of these substances should be modified according to the type of clearance. Depending on their hemofiltration flow, continuous renal replacement systems require high daily nitrogen intake, which can sometimes reach 2.5g protein/kg. The amount of volume replacement can induce energy overload and therefore the use of glucose-free replacement fluids and glucose-free dialysis or a glucose concentration of 1g/L, with bicarbonate as a buffer, is recommended.Monitoring of electrolyte levels (especially those of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium) and of micronutrients is essential and administration of these substances should be individually-tailored.

Guidelines for specialized nutritional and metabolic support in the critically-ill patient: update. Consensus SEMICYUC-SENPE: acute renal failure.

Nutritional support in acute renal failure must take into account the patient's catabolism and the treatment of the renal failure. Hypermetabolic failure is common in these patients, requiring continuous renal replacement therapy or daily hemodialysis. In patients with normal catabolism (urea nitrogen below 10 g/day) and preserved diuresis, conservative treatment can be attempted. In these patients, relatively hypoproteic nutritional support is essential, using proteins with high biological value and limiting fluid and electrolyte intake according to the patient's individual requirements. Micronutrient intake should be adjusted, the only buffering agent used being bicarbonate. Limitations on fluid, electrolyte and nitrogen intake no longer apply when extrarenal clearance techniques are used but intake of these substances should be modified according to the type of clearance. Depending on their hemofiltration flow, continuous renal replacement systems require high daily nitrogen intake, which can sometimes reach 2.5 g protein/kg. The amount of volume replacement can induce energy overload and therefore the use of glucose-free replacement fluids and glucose-free dialysis or a glucose concentration of 1 g/L, with bicarbonate as a buffer, is recommended. Monitoring of electrolyte levels (especially those of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium) and of micronutrients is essential and administration of these substances should be individually-tailored.

Plasma Insulin is Removed by Hemodialysis: Evaluation of the Relation Between Plasma Insulin and Glucose by Using a Dialysate With or Without Glucose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the alteration in plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and glucose concentrations due to hemodialysis (HD) treatment by using a dialysate with or without glucose in HD patients. We divided the patients into three groups: non-diabetic patients (n-DM group), well-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) <7.0% [w-DM group]), and poorly-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7.0% [p-DM group]). Using a dialysate with a glucose concentration of 100 mg/dL (glu(+)-dialysate) and a glucose-free dialysate (glu(-)-dialysate), we studied the daily profiles of plasma glucose in the three groups. We measured the levels of plasma glucose and IRI at three time points (predialysis and 2 h and 4 h after the initiation of dialysis) at pre(A) and postdialyzer (V) sites in HD patients. There was a significant increase in the daily profiles of the plasma glucose level from the time before dinner until bedtime in both the w-DM and p-DM groups, when comparing the values on an HD day with those on a non-HD day. In the p-DM group, the use of the glu(-)-dialysate resulted in a significant hyperglycemia in the evening hours when compared with the use of the glu(+)-dialysate. In the DM group, the use of the glu(+)-dialysate resulted in a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD. However, in the n-DM group, there was no difference in the plasma glucose levels during HD. On the other hand, the use of a glucose-free dialysate led to a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD in all groups. The plasma IRI levels decreased significantly between the A and V sites at each point in all groups irrespective of the glucose concentration of the dialysate. The present study confirmed that the concentration of not only glucose but also IRI had decreased during the passage of the plasma through the dialyzer. In HD patients with diabetes, the glucose content of the hemodialysis solution plays an important role in preventing acute hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia on HD days.

Effects of Glucose-Free Dialysis Solutions on Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells

Background: Glucose-free dialysis solutions may be more biocompatible owing to the physiological pH and the lack of glucose degradation products, and the effects can be reflected by the changes in some markers of peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMC). Method: Peritoneal effluents were collected in 17 CAPD patients after one daily exchange of glucose-containing dialysate to Nutrineal (1.1% amino acid-based PDF), and human PMC were cultured from peritoneal effluent and treated with various peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions. Results: The level of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in peritoneal effluent increased significantly after using Nutrineal® for 3 months (p = 0.045), whereas that of procollagen I peptide (PICP) remained unaltered. Production of CA125 by human PMC showed a time-responsive increase after stimulation with Nutrineal and Extraneal (icodextran-based PDF). An increased expression of CA125 was observed in cultured human PMC treated with various PD solutions, and the increase induced by Nutrineal was lower than that induced by 4.25% Dianeal® and Extraneal®. A lower increase was also observed for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The levels of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), however, were not altered. Conclusion: Nutrineal is more biocompatible to the peritoneal membrane than the conventional PD solutions tested herein, reflected by both the in vivo and in vitro response of CA125.

Glucose-added dialysis fluid prevents asymptomatic hypoglycaemia in regular haemodialysis

Hypoglycaemia (HG) has been demonstrated during chronic haemodialysis (HD). These events may become more frequent with the current use of glucose-free bicarbonate dialysis solution, the standard formula in most dialysis facilities in the last decade. On the other hand, HG-related symptoms are unusual among patients during or just after dialysis sessions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of HG in diabetic (DM) and non-diabetic (NDM) end-stage renal failure patients during HD using dialytic solution without and with glucose. Forty-two chronic renal failure patients-21 DM and 21 NDM-randomly selected among the 97 in our dialysis unit were submitted to an HD session with glucose-free bicarbonate solution (phase 1). Serum glucose was measured at 30, 60, 150 and 240 min. In eight patients (four DM and four NDM) glucose was also measured in fluid leaving the dialyser at 30, 60 and 150 min. After a week, all procedures were repeated in the same patients, this time with a 90 mg/dl glucose-added bicarbonate solution (phase 2). We compared the glucose levels and the number of symptomatic and asymptomatic HG events in each group in phases 1 and 2, using bivariate analysis methods with confidence limit of 0.95%. Data were expressed as mean+/-SD. No patient presented any clinical evidence of HG. For all patients, the mean plasma glucose level (mg/dl) was significantly higher in phase 2 than in phase 1 (138.2+/-96.3 vs 120.7+/-75.9; P=0.0392). This occurred in DM (171.1+/-104.5 vs 132.5+/-71.0; P=0.0067), but not in NDM (101.3+/-19.4 vs 95.2+/-21.2; P=0.06). With glucose-free HD solution, 10 patients (five DM, five NDM) presented 18 measures of glycaemia under 70 mg/dl, and with glucose-added solution, only one (DM) presented two measures under 70 mg/dl-P=0.0045 (number of patients); P=0.0003 (number of HG measures). Among DM patients, values for HG measures in phase 1 (49.1+/-16.2 mg/dl) were significantly lower than in phase 2 (65.0+/-1.4 mg/dl)-P=0.0139. For all patients, glucose was lost in HD fluid leaving the dialyser at lower values in phase 2 (5.2+/-2.9 g/h) than in phase 1 (16.7+/-10.9 g/h)-P<0.0001. Asymptomatic HG was frequent during HD when glucose-free dialysis solution was used. Glucose was lost in dialytic fluid leaving the dialyser in significantly lower amounts when using glucose-added solution than glucose-free solution. Glucose-added dialysis solution at 90 mg/dl significantly reduced the number and severity of HG episodes and although it caused higher mean glycaemia in DM patients during HD, its use seems advisable in all patients.

Hemodialysis: Techniques and Prescription

Hemodialysis: Techniques and Prescription

Effect of dialyzer reprocessing on glucose homeostasis

This study was designed to investigate the possible effect of dialyzer re‐use on glucose hemostasis. Twenty patients with end stage renal failure (including ten non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM]) on thrice weekly hemodialysis (using glucose free dialysate), were studied by serial assessment of blood glucose, C‐peptide, interleukin 1‐B (IL‐IB), Ca, Na and K at zero, 1 and 4 hours (end of dialysis) during hemodialysis on new, and then on re‐used (first) cuprophane dialyzers. Our results showed significant rise of C‐peptide, IL‐1B with drop of blood glucose in first hour sample (and was symptomatic in some diabetics) in both groups when using new dialyzers but these changes were less marked and totally asymptomatic when using reprocessed dialyzers. In addition there was a significant positive correlation between IL‐1B level and C‐peptide at 1 and 4 hour samples and negative correlation between IL‐1B and blood glucose at 1 and 4 hour samples. Conclusion: Through the effect of IL‐1B on insulin release curophane dialyzers can affect glucose homeostasis especially in diabetics and hypoglycemia might be part of the first use syndrome. It may be recommended that measurement of glucose effect of dialysis membrane on glucose homeostasis might be an important parameter of membrane bioincompatibility.