Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Secretion Research Articles

Molecular mechanisms underlying glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in human duodenal organoids.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone secreted by enteroendocrine K cells in the proximal small intestine. This study aimed to explore the function of human K cells at the molecular and cellular levels. CRISPR-Cas9 homology-directed repair was used to insert transgenes encoding a yellow fluorescent protein (Venus) or an Epac-based cAMP sensor (Epac-S-H187) in the GIP locus in human duodenal-derived organoids. Fluorescently labelled K cells were purified by FACS for RNA-seq and peptidomic analysis. GIP reporter organoids were employed for GIP secretion assays, live-cell imaging of Ca2+ using Fura-2 and cAMP using Epac-S-H187, and basic electrophysiological characterisation. The G protein-coupled receptor genes GPR142 and CASR were knocked out to evaluate roles in amino acid sensing. RNA-seq of human duodenal K cells revealed enrichment of several G protein-coupled receptors involved in nutrient sensing, including FFAR1, GPBAR1, GPR119, CASR and GPR142. Glucose induced action potential firing and cytosolic Ca2+ elevation and caused a 1.8-fold increase in GIP secretion, which was inhibited by the sodium glucose co-transporter 1/2 (SGLT1/2) blocker sotagliflozin. Activation of the long-chain fatty acid receptor free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) induced a 2.7-fold increase in GIP secretion, while tryptophan and phenylalanine stimulated secretion by 2.8- and 2.1-fold, respectively. While CASR knockout blunted intracellular Ca2+ responses, a CASR/GPR142 double knockout was needed to reduce GIP secretory responses to aromatic amino acids. The newly generated human organoid K cell model enables transcriptomic and functional characterisation of nutrient-sensing pathways involved in human GIP secretion. Both calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) and G protein-coupled receptor 142 (GPR142) contribute to protein-stimulated GIP secretion. This model will be further used to identify potential targets for modulation of native GIP secretion in diabetes and obesity.

Activation of Gs signaling in mouse enteroendocrine K-cells greatly improves obesity- and diabetes-related metabolic deficits.

Following a meal, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), the two major incretins promoting insulin release, are secreted from specialized enteroendocrine cells (L- and K-cells, respectively). Although GIP is the dominant incretin in humans, the detailed molecular mechanisms governing its release remain to be explored. GIP secretion is regulated by the activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed by K-cells. GPCRs couple to one or more specific classes of heterotrimeric G proteins. In the present study, we focused on the potential metabolic roles of K-cell Gs. First, we generated a mouse model that allowed us to selectively stimulate K-cell Gs signaling. Second, we generated a mouse strain harboring an inactivating mutation of Gnas, the gene encoding the alpha-subunit of Gs, selectively in K-cells. Metabolic phenotyping studies showed that acute or chronic stimulation of K-cell Gs signaling greatly improved impaired glucose homeostasis in obese mice and in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes, due to enhanced GIP secretion. In contrast, K-cell-specific Gnas knockout mice displayed markedly reduced plasma GIP levels. These data strongly suggest that strategies aimed at enhancing K-cell Gs signaling may prove useful for the treatment of diabetes and related metabolic diseases.

Secretion of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP may be affected by circadian rhythm in healthy males.

Glucagon is secreted from pancreatic alpha cells in response to low blood glucose and increases hepatic glucose production. Furthermore, glucagon enhances hepatic protein and lipid metabolism during a mixed meal. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are secreted from gut endocrine cells during meals and control glucose homeostasis by potentiating insulin secretion and inhibiting food intake. Both glucose homeostasis and food intake have been reported to be affected by circadian rhythms and vice versa. In this study, we investigated whether the secretion of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP was affected by circadian rhythms. A total of 24 healthy men with regular sleep schedules were examined for 24h at the hospital ward with 15h of wakefulness and 9h of sleep. Food intake was standardized, and blood samples were obtained every third hour. Plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP were measured, and data were analyzed by rhythmometric statistical methods. Available data on plasma glucose and plasma C-peptide were also included. Plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, C-peptide and glucose fluctuated with a diurnal 24-h rhythm, with the highest levels during the day and the lowest levels during the night: glucagon (p < 0.0001, peak time 18:26h), GLP-1 (p < 0.0001, peak time 17:28h), GIP (p < 0.0001, peak time 18:01h), C-peptide (p < 0.0001, peak time 17.59h), and glucose (p < 0.0001, peak time 23:26h). As expected, we found significant correlations between plasma concentrations of C-peptide and GLP-1 and GIP but did not find correlations between glucose concentrations and concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP. Our results demonstrate that under meal conditions that are similar to that of many free-living individuals, plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP were observed to be higher during daytime and evening than overnight. These findings underpin disturbed circadian rhythm as a potential risk factor for diabetes and obesity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06166368. Registered 12 December 2023.

Management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly: An experts' consensus statement.

Pasireotide is a somatostatin analogue for the treatment of acromegaly, a chronic condition caused by excess growth hormone. Despite the therapeutic benefits of pasireotide as a second-line treatment for inadequately controlled acromegaly, a major concern is its hyperglycemic side-effect. Here, we provide guidance on how to select appropriate patients with acromegaly for treatment with pasireotide. We summarize baseline characteristics of patients at high risk for pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia and recommend a monitoring strategy based on the risk profile. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels (SMBG), measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and regular HbA1c measurements are the foundation of our proposed monitoring approach. The pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia involves decreased secretion of the incretin hormones GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). Our expert recommendations address the specific pathophysiology of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia by recommending the incretin-based therapeutics dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in all appropriate patients as an alternative to first-line monotherapy with metformin. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of adequate control of acromegaly, excellent diabetes education, nutrition and lifestyle guidance and advise to consult expert diabetologists in case of uncertainty in the management of patients with hyperglycemia under pasireotide.

Duodenal enteroendocrine cells and GIP as treatment targets for obesity and type 2 diabetes

The duodenum is an important source of endocrine and paracrine signals controlling digestion and nutrient disposition, notably including the main incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Bariatric procedures that prevent nutrients from contact with the duodenal mucosa are particularly effective interventions to reduce body weight and improve glycaemic control in obesity and type 2 diabetes. These procedures take advantage of increased nutrient delivery to more distal regions of the intestine which enhances secretion of the other incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Preclinical experiments have shown that either an increase or a decrease in the secretion or action of GIP can decrease body weight and blood glucose in obesity and non-insulin dependent hyperglycaemia, but clinical studies involving administration of GIP have been inconclusive. However, a synthetic dual agonist peptide (tirzepatide) that exerts agonism at receptors for GIP and GLP-1 has produced marked weight-lowering and glucose-lowering effects in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes. This appears to result from chronic biased agonism in which the novel conformation of the peptide triggers enhanced signalling by the GLP-1 receptor through reduced internalisation while reducing signalling by the GIP receptor directly or via functional antagonism through increased internalisation and degradation.

SAT037 Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Knockout Mice Do Not Compensate For The Lack Of Incretin Action By Increasing Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Secretion

Abstract Disclosure: K.D. Galsgaard: None. H. Kissow: None. M.M. Smits: None. J.J. Juul: None. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), secreted from the intestinal L-cells and K-cells, respectively, both enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. This enhancement is referred to as the incretin effect. In the pancreatic islets of GIP receptor knockout mice, GLP-1 sensitivity may be increased. Conversely, deletion of the GLP-1 receptor has been shown to be compensated for by increased GIP secretion and action. This suggests a compensatory adaptation to loss of incretin signaling, via increased action/secretion of the remaining incretin hormone. To investigate this further, we subjected GLP-1 receptor knockout (Glp-1r-/-) mice and their wild-type littermates (Glp-1r+/+ mice) to an oral glucose tolerance test (2 g/kg body weight of glucose via oral gavage; OGTT) with subsequent measurement of plasma GIP concentrations. In separate experiments we measured pancreatic insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and total GLP-1 concentrations in Glp-1r-/- and Glp-1r+/+ mice, and total GLP-1 and GIP concentrations in the duodenum and distal ileum were also measured. During the OGTT, we found a similar GIP secretion (total area under the curve (tAUC0-30min)) in Glp-1r-/- and Glp-1r+/+ mice (15,432±2,148 vs. 13,683±1,316 pg/mL×min, P=0.5, n≥7). Blood glucose concentrations (tAUC0-30min) were increased in Glp-1r-/- mice during the OGTT (523.9±27.4 vs. 429.1±21.2 mmol/L×min, P=0.02, n≥6). Extractable pancreatic hormone concentrations were similar in Glp-1r+/+ and Glp-1r-/- mice; insulin (284.3±11.4 vs. 303.6±32.4 pmol/g tissue, P=0.6, n≥8); glucagon (203.6±24.3 vs. 270.8±36.9 pmol/g tissue, P=0.2, n≥8); somatostatin (299.9±94.97 vs. 321.4±78.79 pmol/g tissue, P=0.9, n≥9); and total GLP-1 (30.9±8.5 vs. 20.2±4.0 pmol/g tissue, P=0.2, n≤8). In the duodenum, extractable GIP (175.0±29.6 vs. 177.3±10.8 pmol/g tissue, P&amp;gt;0.9, n≥8) and GLP-1 (57.5±35.6 vs. 28.9±3.2 pmol/g tissue, P=0.4, n≥9). In the distal ileum, extractable GIP (2.2±0.5 vs. 2.1±0.4 pmol/g tissue, P=0.8, n≥9) and GLP-1 (266.6±57.1 vs. 236.0±43.1, P=0.7, n≥9) concentrations were also similar in Glp-1r+/+ and Glp-1r-/- mice. In conclusion, our results do not support the notion that Glp-1r-/- mice compensate for the lack of GLP-1 receptor signaling by increasing glucose stimulated GIP secretion or by increasing the intestinal GIP content. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Abstract P407: Increased Secretion Of Glucose Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Is Associated With Postprandial Hypotension In Patients With Parkinson Disease

Postprandial hypotension (PPH) is highly prevalent in Parkinson Disease (PD) and is defined as a sudden and substantial decrease (&gt;20 mm Hg or &gt;10 mm hg) in blood pressure within two hours after ingesting a meal. This condition is associated with syncope and falls. Eating a meal induces significant blood sequestration in the splanchnic circulation through the release of gastrointestinal (GI) hormones. Patients with autonomic dysfunction cannot compensate for these hemodynamic changes, which results in PPH. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if increased secretion of GI hormones, including glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), a strong splanchnic vasodilator, contributes to PPH in those with PD. We enrolled 11 PD patients, seven with PPH (PPH+) (age 69±7.65 years old, 72% males, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale 29±18.9) and four without PPH (PPH-) (age 67±1.71 years, 75% males, UPDRS 20±15.30). PD PPH+ patients had evidence of autonomic impairment and orthostatic hypotension as defined by a change in systolic blood pressure, (-57±29.23 vs. -7±17.66 mm Hg in PPH). Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood GIP levels were measured before and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 min timepoints after 75 gr oral glucose in supine position. There was a time-dependent decrease in blood pressure with a nadir at 30 min (-17±14.30 mmHg vs. -5±17.26 in PPH-). In PD PPH+, peak GIP secretion also occurred at 30 min post-glucose ingestion (315.3±297.9 vs. 69.1±34.8 pmol/L in PPH-). PD PPH+ patients had a greater secretion of C-peptide (2141±1017.81 vs.1540.56±428.77 pmol/L in PPH-) and insulin (1477.78±1572.80 vs. 351.09±141.53 pmol/L in PPH-). These initial results show excessive GIP secretion in PD patients with PPH, suggesting that GIP may contribute to its pathophysiology.

Incretin hormone responses to carbohydrate and protein/fat are preserved in adults with sulfonylurea-treated KCNJ11 neonatal diabetes.

The incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), are thought to be the main drivers of insulin secretion in individuals with sulfonylurea (SU)-treated KCNJ11 permanent neonatal diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess for the first time the incretin hormone response to carbohydrate and protein/fat in adults with sulfonylurea-treated KCNJ11 permanent neonatal diabetes compared with that of controls without diabetes. Participants were given a breakfast high in carbohydrate and an isocaloric breakfast high in protein/fat on two different mornings. Incremental area under the curve and total area under the curve (0-240 minutes)for total GLP-1 and GIP were compared between groups, using non-parametric statistical methods. Post-meal GLP-1 and GIP secretion were similar in cases and controls, suggesting this process is adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel-independent. Future research will investigate whether treatments targeting the incretin pathway are effective in individuals with KCNJ11 permanent neonatal diabetes who do not have good glycemic control on sulfonylurea alone.

Glucose metabolism, gut-brain hormones, and acromegaly treatment: an explorative single centre descriptive analysis.

Active acromegaly is associated with impaired glucose metabolism, which improves upon treatment. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSA) and Pegvisomant (PEG), and irradiation. The objective of the study was to describe the differential effect of various treatment regimens on the secretion of glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in patients with acromegaly. 23 surgically treated, non-diabetic patients with acromegaly and 12 healthy controls underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and subsequently isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion on a separate day. Baseline hormone concentrations, time-to-peak and area under the curve (AUC) on the OGTT-day and incretin effect were compared according to treatment regimens. The patients treated with SSA (N = 15) had impaired GIP-response (AUC, P = 0.001), and numerical impairment of all other hormone responses (P > 0.3). Patients co-treated with PEG (SSA + PEG, N = 4) had increased secretion of insulin and glucagon compared to patients only treated with SSA (SSA ÷ PEG, N = 11) (insulinAUC mean ± SEM, SSA + PEG 49 ± 8.3nmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 25 ± 3.4, P = 0.007; glucagonAUC, SSA + PEG 823 ± 194pmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 332 ± 69, P = 0.009). GIP secretion remained significantly impaired, whereas GLP-1 secretion was numerically increased with PEG (SSA + PEG 3088 ± 366pmol/l*min vs SSA ÷ PEG 2401 ± 239, P = 0.3). No difference was found in patients treated with/without radiotherapy nor substituted or not with hydrocortisone. SSA impaired the insulin, glucagon, and incretin hormone secretions. Co-treatment with PEG seemed to counteract the somatostatinergic inhibition of the glucagon and insulin response to OGTT. We speculate that PEG may exert its action through GH-receptors on pancreatic δ-cells. Clinical trial registration NCT02005978.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in humans: Characteristics and regulation.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are important incretin hormones. They are released from the gut after meal ingestion and potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Their release after meal ingestion and oral glucose are well established and have been characterized previously. During recent years, knowledge of other regulatory aspects that potentially may affect GIP and GLP-1 secretion after meal ingestion have also begun to emerge. Here, the results of human studies on these novel aspects of meal- and nutrient-stimulated incretin hormone secretion are reviewed. The human literature was revisited by identifying articles in PubMed using key words GIP, GLP-1, secretion, meal, and nutrients. The results show that all macronutrients individually stimulate GIP and GLP-1 secretion. However, there was no synergistic action when given in combination. A pre-load 30 min before a meal augments the GIP and GLP-1 response. GIP and GLP-1 secretion have a diurnal variation with a higher response to an identical meal in the morning than in the afternoon. There is no difference in GIP and GLP-1 secretion whether a meal is ingested slowly or rapidly. GIP and GLP-1 secretion after dinner are the same whether or not breakfast and lunch have been ingested. The temperature of the food may be of importance for the incretin hormone response. These novel findings have increased our knowledge on the regulation of the complexity of the incretin system and are also important knowledge when designing future studies.

Saponins from Camellia sinensis Seeds Stimulate GIP Secretion in Mice and STC-1 Cells via SGLT1 and TGR5.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is one of the important incretins and possesses lots of physiological activities such as stimulating insulin secretion and maintaining glucose homeostasis. The pentacyclic triterpenoid saponins are the major active ingredients in tea (Camellia sinensis) seeds. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tea seed saponins on the GIP secretion and related mechanisms. Our data showed that the total tea seed saponins (TSS, 65 mg/kg BW) and theasaponin E1 (TSE1, 2–4 µM) could increase the GIP mRNA and protein levels in mice and STC-1 cells. Phlorizin, the inhibitor of Sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1), reversed the TSE1-induced increase in Ca2+ and GIP mRNA level. In addition, TSE1 upregulated the protein expression of Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), and TGR5 siRNA significantly decreased GIP expression in TSE1-treated STC-1 cells. Network pharmacology analysis revealed that six proteins and five signaling pathways were associated with SGLT1, TGR5 and GIP regulated by TSE1. Taken together, tea seed saponins could stimulate GIP expression via SGLT1 and TGR5, and were promising natural active ingredients for improving metabolism and related diseases.

Effects of calcium salts of palm oil inclusion and ad libitum feeding regimen on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentration of feedlot steers.

Sixty Angus × SimAngus-crossbred steers (body weight [BW] 279 ± 16 kg) were used to evaluate the effect of calcium salts of palm oil inclusion (CPO) and the amount of feed offered (AFO) on plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) concentration and its association with energy metabolism and marbling score (MS) in feedlot steers. Steers were blocked by BW and gain to feed (G:F) and randomly assigned to individual feedlot pens. Treatments (2 × 2 factorial) consisted of ad libitum-fed steers without (ANF) or with (AWF) the inclusion of CPO or restricted-fed steers (85% of the ad libitum intake of ANF) without (RNF) or with the inclusion of CPO (RWF). After weaning, steers were adapted to individual pens and fed a corn silage-based diet for 30 d and subsequently placed in a ground corn (GC)-based diet. Diets were given ad libitum or at 85% of the ANF intake and with or without CPO. After 59 d on the finishing diet, all steers had ad libitum access to the finishing diet until harvest. Measurements of CO2 emission and O2 consumption to estimate respiratory quotient (RQ) were taken (n = 9/treatment). Correlations between plasma GIP and insulin concentrations and RQ were analyzed. A linear regression was performed to evaluate the association of plasma GIP and MS. All data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. During the first 103 d of the trial, there were AFO × CPO interactions (P ≤ 0.01) for BW, dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and net energy for maintenance (NEm) intake. Ad libitum-fed steers without CPO presented the greatest DMI among dietary treatments and had greater BW and ADG compared with steers in the RWF and RNF treatments. After all steers had ad libitum access to dietary treatments, steers that were previously restricted showed a 30% and 19% increase (P ≤ 0.01) in ADG and G:F, respectively. There was a three-way interaction time × CPO × AFO (P = 0.04) for plasma GIP concentration. There was no correlation (P = 0.96) of GIP with RQ, whereas insulin demonstrated marginal significance for a positive (P = 0.07) and negative (P = 0.08) correlation with plasma GIP and RQ, respectively. There was no association (P = 0.30) between GIP and MS. These data indicate that GIP secretion results from an interaction between CPO and energy intake depending on the time relative to feed intake that GIP might indirectly regulate energy metabolism through insulin secretion, and that GIP does not appear to be associated with MS.

Phloretin suppresses carbohydrate-induced GLP-1 secretion via inhibiting short chain fatty acid release from gut microbiome

We previously found that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion by co-administration of maltose plus an α-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol (maltose/miglitol) was suppressed by a GLUT2 inhibitor phloretin in mice. In addition, maltose/miglitol inhibited glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion through a mechanism involving short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced by microbiome. However, it remains unknown whether phloretin suppresses GLP-1 secretion by modulating SCFAs. In this study, we examined the effect of phloretin on SCFA release from microbiome in vitro and in vivo. In Escherichia coli, acetate release into the medium was suppressed by phloretin, when cultured with maltose/miglitol. In mice, phloretin inhibited maltose/miglitol-induced SCFA increase in the portal vein. In addition, alpha methyl-d-glucose (αMDG), a poor substrate for GLUT2, significantly increased GLP-1 secretion when co-administered with phloridzin in mice, suggesting that GLUT2 is not essential for glucose/phloridzin-induced GLP-1 secretion. αMDG increased portal SCFA levels, thereby increasing GLP-1 secretion and suppressing GIP secretion in mice, suggesting that αMDG is metabolizable not for mammals, but for microbiota. In conclusion, phloretin is suggested to suppress maltose/miglitol-induced GLP-1 secretion via inhibiting SCFAs produced by microbiome.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion after oral macronutrient ingestion: The human literature revisited and a systematic study in model experiments in mice.

Aims/IntroductionThe incretin hormone glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is secreted after meal ingestion. This study explored the relative influence of classes of macronutrients on GIP secretion.Materials and MethodsThe human literature was revisited by identifying articles from PubMed using key words GIP, macronutrients, carbohydrates, fat, protein, healthy subjects. In model experiments in anesthetized mice, glucose (25–125 mg), protein (15–120 mg), fat emulsion (6–100 mg) or saline was given orally with determination of GIP levels.ResultsThe literature survey identified 15 studies in which glucose, protein or fat was administered to healthy subjects. All three classes of macronutrients stimulated GIP secretion with a 30–45 min peak after glucose and protein, and a more prolonged release after fat. Limitations in study designs preclude firm conclusions on the relative potency of the macronutrients. In mice, glucose was more potent to stimulate GIP secretion than fat and protein, with no significant difference between protein and fat. By co‐administration of the macronutrients at moderate caloric combinations, a synergistic stimulation of GIP secretion was observed. In contrast, when raising the glucose challenge together with protein and fat, no synergy, but an additive effect, was evident.ConclusionsGlucose, protein and fat all stimulate GIP secretion in humans and mice. In mice, glucose is more potent than fat and protein, and there is also a synergy between the macronutrients on GIP secretion at moderate caloric doses. Further studies are warranted in humans to explore the relative potency of macronutrients.

Emetic Response to T-2 Toxin Correspond to Secretion of Glucagon-like Peptide-17-36 Amide and Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide.

The T-2 toxin, a major secondary metabolite of Fusarium Gramineae, is considered a great risk to humans and animals due to its toxicity, such as inducing emesis. The mechanism of emesis is a complex signal involving an imbalance of hormones and neurotransmitters, as well as activity of visceral afferent neurons. The T-2 toxin has been proven to induce emesis and possess the capacity to elevate expressions of intestinal hormones glucagon-like peptide-17–36 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), both of which are important emetic factors. In addition, the activation of calcium-sensitive receptor (CaSR) and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are engaged in intestinal hormone release. However, it is unknown whether hormones GLP-1 and GIP mediate T-2 toxin-induced emetic response through activating CaSR and TRP channels. To further assess the mechanism of T-2 toxin-induced emesis, we studied the hypothesis that T-2 toxin-caused emetic response and intestinal hormones GLP-1 and GIP released in mink are associated with activating calcium transduction. Following oral gavage and intraperitoneal injection T-2 toxin, emetic responses were observed in a dose-dependent manner, which notably corresponded to the secretion of GLP-1 and GIP, and were suppressed by pretreatment with respective antagonist Exending9–39 and Pro3GIP. Additional research found that NPS-2143 (NPS) and ruthenium red (RR), respective antagonists of CaSR and TRP channels, dramatically inhibited both T-2 toxin-induced emesis response and the expression of plasma GLP-1 and GIP. According to these data, we observed that T-2 toxin-induced emetic response corresponds to secretion of GLP-1 and GIP via calcium transduction.

Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide-A Postprandial Hormone with Unharnessed Metabolic Potential.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is released from the upper small intestine in response to food intake and contributes to the postprandial control of nutrient disposition, including of sugars and fats. Long neglected as a potential therapeutic target, the GIPR axis has received increasing interest recently, with the emerging data demonstrating the metabolically favorable outcomes of adding GIPR agonism to GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes and obesity. This review examines the physiology of the GIP axis, from the mechanisms underlying GIP secretion from the intestine to its action on target tissues and therapeutic development.

Roles of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in diet-induced obesity.

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are incretins that play an important role in glucose metabolism, by increasing glucose‐induced insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells and help regulate bodyweight. Although they show a similar action on glucose‐induced insulin secretion, two incretins are distinct in various aspects. GIP is secreted from enteroendocrine K cell mainly expressed in the upper small intestine, and GLP‐1 is secreted from enteroendocrine L cells mainly expressed in the lower small intestine and colon by the stimulation of various nutrients. The mechanism of GIP secretion induced by nutrients, especially carbohydrates, is different from that of GLP‐1 secretion. GIP promotes fat deposition in adipose tissue, and contributes to fat‐induced obesity. In contrast, GLP‐1 participates in reducing bodyweight by suppressing food consumption and/or slowing gastric emptying. There is substantial evidence that GIP and GLP‐1 might differently contribute to bodyweight control. Although meal contents influence both glycemic and weight control, we do not fully understand whether incretin actions differ depending on the contents of the meal and what kind of signaling is involved in its context. We focus on the molecular mechanism of GIP secretion induced by nutrients, as well as the roles of GIP in weight changes caused by various diets.

The dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide: a novel cardiometabolic therapeutic prospect

Incretin hormones are peptides released in the intestine in response to the presence of nutrients in its lumen. The main incretins are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon secretion at pancreatic α cells and has also extrapancreatic influences as slowing of gastric emptying which increases the feeling of satiety. GIP is the main incretin hormone in healthy people, causative of most the incretin effects, but the insulin response after GIP secretion in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is strongly reduced. Therefore, in the past GIP has been considered an unappealing therapeutic target for T2DM. This conception has been changing during recent years, since it has been reported that resistance to GIP can be reversed and its effectiveness restored by improving glycemic control. This fact paved the way for the development of a GIP receptor agonist-based therapy for T2DM, looking also for the possibility of finding a combined GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist. In this framework, the novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide seems to be not just a new antidiabetic medication. Administered as a subcutaneous weekly injection, it is a manifold single pharmacological agent that has the ability to significantly lower glucose levels, as well as improve insulin sensitivity, reduce weight and amend dyslipidemia favorably modifying the lipid profile. Tirzepatide and additional dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists that could eventually be developed in the future seem to be a promising furthest advance for the management of several cardiometabolic settings. Obviously, it is too early to be overly hopeful since it is still necessary to determine the long-term effects of these compounds and properly verify the potential cardiovascular benefits. Anyway, we are currently facing a novel and very appealing therapeutic option.

The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP-1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: A pathophysiological update.

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have their main physiological role in augmenting insulin secretion after their nutrient-induced secretion from the gut. A functioning entero-insular (gut-endocrine pancreas) axis is essential for the maintenance of a normal glucose tolerance. This is exemplified by the incretin effect (greater insulin secretory response to oral as compared to "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose administration due to the secretion and action of incretin hormones). GIP and GLP-1 have additive effects on insulin secretion. Local production of GIP and/or GLP-1 in islet α-cells (instead of enteroendocrine K and L cells) has been observed, and its significance is still unclear. GLP-1 suppresses, and GIP increases glucagon secretion, both in a glucose-dependent manner. GIP plays a greater physiological role as an incretin. In type 2-diabetic patients, the incretin effect is reduced despite more or less normal secretion of GIP and GLP-1. While insulinotropic effects of GLP-1 are only slightly impaired in type 2 diabetes, GIP has lost much of its acute insulinotropic activity in type 2 diabetes, for largely unknown reasons. Besides their role in glucose homoeostasis, the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 have additional biological functions: GLP-1 at pharmacological concentrations reduces appetite, food intake, and-in the long run-body weight, and a similar role is evolving for GIP, at least in animal studies. Human studies, however, do not confirm these findings. GIP, but not GLP-1 increases triglyceride storage in white adipose tissue not only through stimulating insulin secretion, but also by interacting with regional blood vessels and GIP receptors. GIP, and to a lesser degree GLP-1, play a role in bone remodelling. GLP-1, but not GIP slows gastric emptying, which reduces post-meal glycaemic increments. For both GIP and GLP-1, beneficial effects on cardiovascular complications and neurodegenerative central nervous system (CNS) disorders have been observed, pointing to therapeutic potential over and above improving diabetes complications. The recent finding that GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonists like tirzepatide have superior efficacy compared to selective GLP-1 receptor agonists with respect to glycaemic control as well as body weight has renewed interest in GIP, which previously was thought to be without any therapeutic potential. One focus of this research is into the long-term interaction of GIP and GLP-1 receptor signalling. A GLP-1 receptor antagonist (exendin [9-39]) and, more recently, a GIP receptor agonist (GIP [3-30] NH2 ) and, hopefully, longer-acting GIP receptor agonists for human use will be helpful tools to shed light on the open questions. A detailed knowledge of incretin physiology and pathophysiology will be a prerequisite for designing more effective incretin-based diabetes drugs.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on secretions of insulin and glucagon and gastric emptying in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A prospective, observational study.

Aims/IntroductionDifferences in the glucose‐lowering mechanisms of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) have been noted. Clarifying these differences could facilitate the choice of optimal drugs for individuals with type 2 diabetes and requires investigation in a clinical setting.Materials and MethodsA single‐arm, prospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate the effects of various GLP‐1RAs on postprandial glucose excursion, secretions of insulin and glucagon as well as on the gastric emptying rate. Participants were subjected to meal tolerance tests before and 2 weeks and 12 weeks after GLP‐1RA initiation. Effects on postprandial secretions of glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and apolipoprotein B48 were also investigated.ResultsEighteen subjects with type 2 diabetes received one of three GLP‐1RAs, i.e., lixisenatide, n = 7; liraglutide, n = 6; or dulaglutide, n = 5. While 12‐week administration of all of the GLP‐1RAs significantly reduced HbA1c, only lixisenatide and liraglutide, but not dulaglutide, significantly reduced body weight. Postprandial glucose elevation was improved by all of the GLP‐1RAs. Postprandial insulin levels were suppressed by lixisenatide, while insulin levels were enhanced by liraglutide. Postprandial glucagon levels were suppressed by lixisenatide. The gastric emptying rate was significantly delayed by lixisenatide, while liraglutide and dulaglutide had limited effects on gastric emptying. GIP secretion was suppressed by lixisenatide and liraglutide. Apolipoprotein B48 secretion was suppressed by all of the GLP‐1RAs.ConclusionsAll of the GLP‐1RAs were found to improve HbA1c in a 12‐week prospective observational study in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, differences in the mechanisms of the glucose‐lowering effects and body weight reduction were observed.