Summary Excised leaves and berries of the grapevine were fed 14 C-glucose and 14 C-glyoxylate and the radioactivity as well as the labelling pattern of the isolated tartrate determined. In both organs these substances proved to be about equally good tartaric acid precursors. When using glyoxylate-2- 14 C as a traces, the label is localized exclusively in the inner C-atoms of tartrate. Application of glucose-l- 14 C and glucose-6-14C to leaves yields tartrate labelled predominantly in the C1/C4 and the C2/C3 positions, respectively, whereas the inverse situation occurs in the fruits. Furthermore, the question of ascorbic acid being an extremely effective tartaric acid precursor in grapevine — as reported in the literature — was investigated. The differing distribution of radioactivity within the tartrate molecule after application of the above tracers reveals the existence of two, at least partly distinct, pathways for tartrate genesis in grapevine. The respective labelling patterns suggest that, in the leaf, glucose is transformed via gluconate to pretaric acid (1,2-dihydroxyethyl hydrogen L (+) tartrate), which undergoes cleavage between carbons 4 and 5, whereby tartaric acid and glycolalde-hyde are formed — an overall reaction sequence recently described to account for tartrate synthesis in Gluconobacter suboxydans . In the grape plant, two molecules of the glycoalde-hyde thus formed are condensed, yielding another tartaric acid molecule (cf. scheme). In the berry, on the other hand, the glucose is oxidized to glucuronic acid, and this compound transformed to pretaric acid with gulonic-, 5-keto-, enol- and 4-keto-gulonic acids as intermediates, in a way analogous to that in the leaf. Saito and Kasai (1969) reported that more than 70 % of the radioactivity of the aqueous HCl extract of young grape berries was localized in tartaric acid after administration of ascorbic acid-l- 14 C. A critical study of their working-up procedure shows, however, that the use of solutions permitting complete extraction of tartrate results in a rapid non-enzymatic conversion of ascorbate to tartrate. Therefore, at least the high incorporation rate of this compound — undoubtedly extreme for higher plants — must be considered an artefact.
Read full abstract