Abstract Background Systemic steroid use, and IBD itself, both have negative effect on bone mineral density. Budesonide is a synthetic steroid with high topical glucocorticoid activity and low systemic bioavailability. When compared to systemic steroids, the frequency of side effects of budesonide appears to be quite low, however, there is no documented report about the long term budesonide use on BMD in IBD patients. We also do not know other potential side effects of long term budesonide use. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long term budesonide use on BMD and its’ other potential side effects, in IBD patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the files of the patients who had been using budesonide for ≥24 months and had DEXA measurements during the follow-up period (Budesonide group). Patients in the budesonide group were matched 1:1 with patients without a history of budesonide use, in relation to pre or post registry number of each index case under budesonide. Matching between groups has been done, in terms of gender, age, type of IBD, history of resection, concomitant medications, and comorbidities. For the exact matching, move on for the next or further next available patient, pre or post of each index case, was taken as a choice. (Control group). At the initiation and completion of budesonide treatment, DEXA scans were taken, and biochemical parameters and bone fractures were recorded. We also recorded other causes of secondary osteoporosis in patients (such as comorbidities, medications, alcohol, and cigarette use), as well as cumulative steroid doses and durations in those using conventional corticosteroids. Results A total of 104 patients were included in the study, with 52 in the budesonide group and 52 in the control group. The mean duration of budesonide use was 46.13 ± 15.4 months (range: 25-94 months), and the mean cumulative budesonide usage dose was found to be 34.9 ± 11.8 g (range: 14-64.8 g) in the budesonide group. Table 1a presents the comparison of the two groups. None of the patients in the budesonide group showed deterioration in BMD during the follow-up (Table 1b and 1c). No other prominent long term side effects, valued for the file recording, was found. Conclusion Budesonide treatment seems to be safe in consideration for maintaining long term remission in IBD. Relatively low number of patients, not considering the first two year’s follow up and dropping of the cases with earlier side effects, missed for the long-term judgement under budesonide, may explain the lacking of the other potential side effects (indicated in the literature).
Read full abstract