Global Point Prevalence Survey Research Articles

Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance: 2015-2018 longitudinal survey results from Nigeria

Background: Nigeria joined the global community in monitoring antimicrobial prescribing practices since 2015. Results of individual hospital Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) have stimulated efforts at instituting hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. We report the trends of antimicrobial prescribing rates and quality indicators for 3 surveillance periods; 2015, 2017 and 2018.Methodology: The web-based Global-PPS for surveillance of antimicrobial use in hospitals (www.globalpps.com) was completed by each participating hospital site for all inpatients receiving antimicrobials on a selected day in 2015, 2017 and 2018. Data included details on antimicrobial agents, reasons and indications for treatment and a set of quality prescribing indicators. Data were validated by the web-based data management system of University of Antwerp, exported into Microsoft Excel and analyzed with EPI INFO version 7.2.Results: Thirteen hospitals participated in the survey involving a total of 5,174 inpatients. Mean weighted overall antimicrobial prescribing prevalence was 70.7% which declined over the years from 71.7% in 2015 to 59.1% in 2018 (p<0.001). The rate of documentation of date for post prescription review improved from 27.9% in 2015 to 48.5% in 2018 (p<0.001) while the rates of targeted treatment declined from 12.0% in 2015 to 5.2% in 2018 (p<0.001). There was no significant change in the choice of parenteral drug administration (64.5% in 2015, 65.1% in 2017 and 62.6% in 2018; p=0.6803), and but there was significant increase in documentation of reasons for prescription in case notes (62.2% in 2015, 74.5% in 2017, and 70.9% in 2018; p=0.008). Overall, the main indications for therapeutic prescribing were skin and soft tissue infections (20.8%), sepsis (15.9%) and pneumonia (11.6%). The top three antibiotics for therapeutic use were ceftriaxone (18.2%), metronidazole (15.3%) and ciprofloxacin (10.4%).Conclusions: The survey showed reduction in the overall antimicrobial prescribing rate especially in hospitals that had introduced AMS programmes. Among the quality prescribing indicators, documentation of post prescription review date showed improvement. The Global-PPS serves as a cost effective, flexible and userfriendly tool in instituting AMS programmes in hospitals.
 Keywords: antimicrobial prescribing, hospital, global-point prevalence survey, quality indicators

Roll out of a successful antimicrobial stewardship programme in Lagos University Teaching Hospital Nigeria using the Global-Point Prevalence Survey

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a public health emergency with increasing rates and spread globally. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has been advocated to reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance, promote rational and appropriate use of antibiotics and improve clinical outcomes. Education and training are one of the AMS interventions to improve antimicrobial use. We present the roll out of a successful AMS programme with education and training using the Global-PPS as data collection tool to measure AMS interventions and impact.Methodology: This was a cross sectional study on the implementation of an AMS programme at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Global PPS was conducted in 2015 to collect baseline data which was used to identify targets for quality improvement in AMS and was repeated in 2017 and 2018 to measure impact of AMS interventions. AMS interventions included education, feedback of Global-PPS result and writing of the hospitalwide antibiotic policy based on the baseline data.Results: Out of the 746 inpatients surveyed, 476 (68.3%) had received at least one antimicrobial on the days of Global-PPS. The antimicrobial prescribing rates reduced significantly over the three time periods. In 2015, 82.5% were placed on antimicrobials, 65.5% in 2017 and 51.1% in 2018 (p<0.00001). The documentation of indication for treatment significantly improved from 53.4% in 2015 to 97.2% in 2018 (p<0.0001). Stop review date also significantly improved from 28.7% to 70.2% in 2018 (p<0.00001). Surgical prophylaxis for more than 24 hours reduced significantly from 93.3% in 2015 to 65.7% in 2018 (p=0.002) even though the prevalence was still high. The three most commonly administered antimicrobial groups were third generation cephalosporins, imidazole derivatives and quinolones. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis were ceftriaxone and metronidazole in 2015 and ceftriaxone in 2017.Conclusion: The use of education and training as AMS intervention in a limited resource setting clearly made impact on antimicrobial prescribing patterns in the hospital. Global-PPS is useful to set quality improvement targets and for monitoring, evaluation and surveillance of an AMS programme.
 Keywords: Antibiotic, Stewardship, Resistance, Education, Global-PPS

Hospital antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients according to the WHO Access, Watch and Reserve classification (AWaRe): results from a worldwide point prevalence survey in 69 countries

ObjectivesThe WHO Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification has been developed to support countries and hospitals in promoting rational use of antibiotics while improving access to these essential medicines. We aimed to describe patterns of worldwide antibiotic use according to the AWaRe classification in the adult inpatient population.MethodsThe Global Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) collects hospital antibiotic use data using a standardized PPS methodology. Global-PPS 2015, 2017 and 2018 data, collected by 664 hospitals in 69 countries, were categorized into AWaRe groups to calculate proportional AWaRe use, Access-to-Watch ratios and the most common indications for treatment with selected Watch antibiotics. Only prescriptions for systemic antibiotics on adult inpatient wards were analysed.ResultsRegional Access use ranged from 28.4% in West and Central Asia to 57.7% in Oceania, whereas Watch use was lowest in Oceania (41.3%) and highest in West and Central Asia (66.1%). Reserve use ranged from 0.03% in sub-Saharan Africa to 4.7% in Latin America. There were large differences in AWaRe prescribing at country level. Watch antibiotics were prescribed for a range of very different indications worldwide, both for therapeutic and prophylactic use.ConclusionsWe observed considerable variations in AWaRe prescribing and high use of Watch antibiotics, particularly in lower- and upper-middle-income countries, followed by high-income countries. The WHO AWaRe classification has an instrumental role to play in local and national stewardship activities to assess prescribing patterns and to inform and evaluate stewardship activities.

Global Point Prevalence Survey in Five Teaching Hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq

Global Point Prevalence Survey in Five Teaching Hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq

Antimicrobial Prescription Pattern in Ho Teaching Hospital, Ghana: Seasonal Determination Using a Point Prevalence Survey.

A standardised Global Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) tool was used to determine the antimicrobial prescription pattern in the Ho Teaching Hospital on two separate occasions in a total of 14 wards in the hospital, including dedicated wards for paediatrics and neonates. Manually collected and anonymised data were entered, validated, analysed and reported using a web-based global PPS application. With 147 and 153 patients considered in the July 2019 and January 2020 surveys, respectively, 98 patients (66.7%) and 84 patients (54.9%) had received one or more antimicrobials. The prevalence of antimicrobial use in the adult wards was 64.3% (72/112) and 53.4% (63/118) in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence in the paediatric wards was 60.0% (12/20) and 62.5% (10/16), respectively, in the two surveys, while that in the neonatal wards was 93.3% (14/15) and 57.9% (11/19), respectively. β-lactams were the most used antibiotics in both periods. Malaria was the most common diagnosis requiring the use of antimicrobials in July 2019, accounting for 19.4% of the diagnoses, whereas in January 2020, it was skin and soft-tissue conditions (28.1%). This reflects a seasonal association between malaria and rainfall patterns. Out of the antimicrobials prescribed during each of the survey periods, 95% were used for empirical treatment, and this could be attributed to a number of reasons, including logistical challenges, among others, that require further exploration in the context of local, national and international policy recommendations.

Effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on antimicrobial prevalence and prescribing in a tertiary hospital in Singapore

BackgroundThe deployment of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic can lead to a loss of developed frameworks, best practices and leadership resulting in adverse impact on antimicrobial prescribing and resistance. We aim to investigate effects of reduction in AMS resources during the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial prescribing.MethodsOne of 5 full-time equivalent AMS pharmacists was deployed to support pandemic work and AMS rounds with infectious disease physicians were reduced from 5 to 2 times a week. A survey in acute inpatients was conducted using the Global Point Prevalence Survey methodology in July 2020 and compared with those in 2015 and 2017–2019.ResultsThe prevalence of antimicrobial prescribing (55% in 2015 to 49% in 2019 and 47% in 2020, p = 0.02) and antibacterials (54% in 2015 to 45% in 2019 and 42% in 2020, p < 0.01) have been reducing despite the pandemic. Antimicrobial prescribing in infectious disease wards with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases was 29% in 2020. Overall, antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators continued to improve (e.g. reasons in notes, 91% in 2015 to 94% in 2019 and 97% in 2020, p < 0.01) or remained stable (compliance to guideline, 71% in 2015 to 62% in 2019 and 73% in 2020, p = 0.08).ConclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no increase in antimicrobial prescribing and no significant differences in antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators.

Point prevalence survey on antimicrobial use in a tertiary private hospital in Malaysia

Background: The threat of antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings is globally recognized. To design and implement effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions, data regarding current antimicrobial prescribing patterns is pivotal. As such, this point prevalence survey aims to determine the baseline antimicrobial prescribing patterns at Sunway Medical Centre (SunMed), with the intention to formulate strategies for appropriate antimicrobial use through AMS programmes. Methods and materials: A consecutive 3-day cross-sectional survey was conducted in June 2019 using a convenient sampling method. The survey included all hospitalized patients of all ages from 17 non-critical care wards (total 416 beds) who were still receiving at least one oral or injectable antimicrobial at the time of the survey. Patients who were activated for discharge prior to the time of the survey and patients who admitted in daycare units and critical care units were excluded from the survey. Data was collected using a survey form modified from Global Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) tool designed by University of Antwerp, Belgium. Results: Out of 332 patients surveyed, 162 (49%) patients were on antimicrobials. 126 (78%) patients were on 1 antimicrobial while 36 (22%) patients were on multiple antimicrobials. A total of 69 (43%) patients had culture & sensitivity (C&S) taken prior to antimicrobials administration. Of 200 prescribed antimicrobials, 184 (92%) were used empirically (62.5% medical cases and 29.5% surgical cases), while 16 (8%) were targeted therapy. Cephalosporin, beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and macrolide were the top 3 antimicrobial class prescribed (39%, 30%, 12% respectively). The antimicrobials were prescribed for community-acquired infections (54%), followed by surgical prophylaxis (33%), internal healthcare-associated infection (HAI) (7.5%), external HAI (5%) and medical prophylaxis (0.5%). The three most common anatomical sites related infection treated with antimicrobials were pneumonia and respiratory tract infections (16%), bone/joint related surgical prophylaxis (13.8%) and gastrointestinal infections (13.8%). 11 (5.5%) antimicrobials prescribed were categorized as others while 2 (1%) were completely unknown indication. Conclusion: Our analysis indicated that the use of antimicrobials was high in SunMed, mainly empirically. There is a need to explore factors contributing to this and develop strategies for appropriate antimicrobial use through AMS programmes.

The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (GLOBAL-PPS): Comparison of results over the years2015–2019

The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (GLOBAL-PPS): Comparison of results over the years2015–2019

A multicentre point prevalence survey of hospital antibiotic prescribing and quality indices in the Kurdistan regional government of Northern Iraq: the need for urgent action

ABSTRACT Background Rationale antibiotic use is crucial to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats. No study has been undertaken in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) to document current antibiotic use/areas for improvement given the high AMR rates. Research design and methods Point prevalence survey (PPS), using the Global PPS methodology, was conducted among the three major public hospitals in KRG/northern Iraq from September–December 2019. Prevalence and quality of antibiotic use were assessed using agreed indicators. Results Prevalence of antibiotic use was high (93.7%; n = 192/205); third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics (52.6%; n = 140/266). Reasons for treatment were recorded for only 61.7% (n = 164/266) of antibiotics and high use (89.9%) of parenteral therapy was observed. All therapy was empirical, no stop/review dates were recorded, and no treatment guidelines were available. The majority of the prescribed antibiotics (62%; n = 165/266) were from the WHO Watch list. Conclusion Prevalence of antibiotic use was high not only versus other hospitals in the region but globally, coupled with significant evidence of sub-optimal prescribing. Swift action is needed to improve future prescribing to reduce AMR. One or two areas should initially be targeted for quality improvement including development of local guidelines, documentation of antibiotic indications, and/or stop/review dates.

Point Prevalence Surveys and Customized Interventions Are Good Strategies to Improve Antimicrobial Use: The Brazilian Experience

Background: Although antimicrobial stewardship is recommended by Brazilian government, data regarding prescription practices in the country are scarce. Objective: To describe the impact of 2 point-prevalence surveys and customized interventions on antimicrobial consumption among 8 hospitals in 3 regions of Brazil. Method: In 2017 and 2018, 8 tertiary-care Brazilian hospitals conducted the Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS). All enrolled hospitals were provided the 2017 results. The group discussed intervention strategies by WhatsApp and e-mail. Hospitals customized interventions, including feedback to prescribers, discussion with pharmacists, and antimicrobial use data in accreditation process. A web-based program was used for data entry, validation, and reporting of details on AMC prescriptions. The Global-PPS was developed by the University of Antwerp and was funded by bioMérieux. The 1-day prevalences in 2017 and 2018 are presented as risk ratios. The main outcomes are whole antimicrobial use in hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs). Prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) were reported. Results: Overall, 1,716 patients were evaluated, of whom 420 (52.5%) and 429 (46.8%) were using antimicrobials in 2017 and 2018, respectively (P = .02). In 33 ICUs, 170 patients (61.4%) and 204 patients (56.8%) were on antimicrobials, in 2017 and 2018, respectively (P = .20). Significant decreases of overall use were observed for vancomycin (from 11% to 7%; P =.01), meropenem (from 12% to 9%; P = .04), and linezolid (from 1.5% to 0.33%; P =.01). There was no significant increase in any singular drug or class of drugs. Within ICUs, vancomycin use decreased significantly (from 19% to 11%; P = .005), linezolid use decreased significantly (from 2.9% to 0.3%; P = .01), colistin use decreased significantly (from 4.3% to 1.7%; P = .05), and metronidazole use decreased significantly (from 6.5% to 2.8%; P = .03). We observed a nonsignificant decrease of infections caused by MDROs across the whole hospital (from 8.7% to 6.6%; P = .10) and in the ICUs (from 15.2% to 12.3%; P = .30). The most frequent infectious diagnoses were pneumonia (27%), intra-abdominal sepsis (14%), skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI) (9.4%), urinary tract infection (9.1%), and sepsis and septic shock with no identified focus (SSNIF) (7.4%). There was a significant increase in SST (from 7.6% to 11.4%; P = .03) and a decrease in SSNIF (from 10.7% to 4.1%; P = .00002). In 2018, there were significantly fewer antimicrobial prescriptions for healthcare-acquired infections (from 52.6% to 43.6%; P = .0007) and more antimicrobial prescriptions for community-acquired infections (from 27.4% to 34.6%; P = .003). We detected no difference for medical or surgical prophylaxis. Conclusions: Feedback of prescription practices might have had an impact on local policies of antimicrobial use, as demonstrated by an overall decrease is antimicrobial use and a decrease in the ICU.Funding: This study was supported by Biomérieux.Disclosures: None

Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Jordan: Results of an Internet-Based Global Point Prevalence Survey

Background: The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) provides a standardised method to conduct surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing and resistance at hospital level. The aim of the present study was to assess antimicrobial consumption and resistance in a Jordan teaching hospital as part of the Global-PPS network. Methods: Detailed antimicrobial prescription data were collected according to the Global Point Prevalence Survey protocol. The internet-based survey included all inpatients present at 8:00 am on a specific day in June–July 2018. Resistance data were based on microbiological results available on the day of the PPS. Results: Data were collected for 380 patients admitted to adult wards, 72 admitted children, and 36 admitted neonates. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial use in adult, paediatric, and neonatal wards was 45.3%, 30.6%, and 22.2% respectively. Overall, 36 patients (7.4%) were treated for at least one healthcare-associated infection (HAI). The most frequent reason for antimicrobial treatment was pneumonia. Cephalosporins and carbapenems were most frequent prescribed among adult (50.6%) and paediatric/neonatal wards (39.6%). Overall resistance rates among patients treated for a community or healthcare-associated infection was high (26.0%). Analysis of antibiotic quality indicators by activity revealed good adherence to treatment guidelines but poor documentation of the reason for prescription and a stop/review date in the notes. Conclusion: The present study has established baseline data in a teaching hospital regarding the quantity and quality of prescribed antibiotics in the hospital. The study should encourage the establishment of tailor-made antimicrobial stewardship interventions and support educational programs to enhance appropriate antibiotic prescribing.

The 2017 global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in Canadian hospitals

BackgroundPatient-level surveillance (indication, appropriate choice, dosing, route, duration) of antimicrobial use in Canadian hospitals is needed to reduce antimicrobial overuse and misuse. Patient-level surveillance has not been performed on a national level in Canada. The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) is an international collaborative to monitor antimicrobial use and resistance in hospitals worldwide. Global-PPS locally documents on a single day patient-level antimicrobial prescribing practices. This article presents the results of the 2017 Global-PPS in Canadian hospitals with established antimicrobial stewardship programs.MethodsHospitals part of the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program were invited to participate. Surveys could be performed any time in the 2017 calendar year. All in-patient wards in each hospital were surveyed by a physician, pharmacist or nurse with infectious disease training.ResultsFourteen Canadian hospitals participated in the survey. Of 4118 patients, 1400 patients (34.0%) received a total of 2041 antimicrobials. Overall, 73.1% (n = 1493) of antimicrobials were for therapeutic use, 14.2% (n = 288) were for medical prophylaxis, 8.3% (n = 170) were for surgical prophylaxis, 1.8% (n = 37) were for other reasons, and 0.2% (n = 3) were used as prokinetic agents. Only 2.5% (n = 50) were for unknown reasons. For antimicrobials for therapeutic use, 29.9% of patients were treated for lower respiratory tract (343/1147), 10.5% for intra-abdominal (120/1147), 9.3% for skin and soft tissue (107/1147) and 7.5% for gastro-intestinal (86/1147) infections.ConclusionsStandardized methodology amongst Global-PPSs allows the comparison of our results to the 2015 Global-PPS. The prevalence of antimicrobial use on medical, surgical, and intensive care wards are similar to those previously observed in North America. Indication of antimicrobials has not been previously reported on such a large scale in Canadian hospitals. This report serves as a comparison for further point prevalence surveys that are currently underway. It will be used for identifying opportunities and benchmarking in antibiotic stewardship.

A Multicentre Point Prevalence Survey of Hospital Antimicrobial Prescribing and Quality Indices in the Kurdistan Region Government of Northern Iraq: The Need for Urgent Action

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global public health threat and rationale antimicrobial use through surveillance and monitoring is crucial to address AMR. To date, no study has been undertaken in Iraq using validated methodologies to document current antimicrobial use and areas for improvement given high AMR rates. Methods: Point prevalence survey (PPS), using the Global PPS methodology, conducted among the three major public hospitals in the largest city in Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq from September and December 2019. Adult inpatients receiving antibiotics on the day of the survey were included. Antibiotic prescribing quality was evaluated using agreed indicators. Findings: Prevalence of antibiotic use was high (93.7%; n=192/205) and prescribed, third generation cephalosporins were most commonly prescribed (52.6%; n=140/266). Of the 166 prescriptions with diagnosis recorded, respiratory tract infections (RTI) accounted for the majority (44%, n=73/166). Reasons for treatment was recorded for only 61.7% (n=164/266) of antibiotics and high use (89.9%) of parenteral therapy was observed. All therapy was empirical, no stop/review dates were recorded and no treatment guidelines were available. Majority of the prescribed antibiotics (62%; n=165/266) were from the WHO Watch list. Interpretation: Prevalence of antibiotic use was the highest not only in the region but globally including Africa and there was significant evidence of sub-optimal prescribing practice. Swift, action is needed to develop ASPs to improve future prescribing and reduce AMR. One-two areas should initially be targeted for quality improvement including development of local clinical guidelines, documentation of antibiotic indication and stop/review dates. Funding Statement: This study was self-funded. Declaration of Interests: Nothing to declare. Ethics Approval Statement: No unique patient identifiers were recorded and all study data were anonymised completely. The study did not involve any direct contact with patients; consequently, patient consent was not required. The study protocol was approved by the Research and Ethic Committee of Sulaymaniyah General Health Directorate.

Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and healthcare-associated infections in Belgian acute care hospitals: results of the Global-PPS and ECDC-PPS 2017

BackgroundThe point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use organized by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC-PPS) and the Global Point Prevalence Survey of antimicrobial consumption (Global-PPS) were simultaneously performed in Belgian acute care hospitals in 2017.MethodsBelgian acute care hospitals were invited to participate in either the ECDC or Global-PPS. Hospital/ward/patient-level data were collected between September–December 2017. All patients present in the wards at 8 a.m. on the day of the PPS were included. The data of the ECDC and Global-PPS on antimicrobial consumption were pooled. Detailed data on HAIs were analysed for ECDC-PPS.ResultsOverall, 110 Belgian acute care hospital sites participated in the ECDC and Global-PPS (countrywide participation rate: 81.4%, 28,007 patients). Overall, a crude prevalence of patients with at least one antimicrobial of 27.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5–27.6%) was found. The most frequently reported indications were pneumonia (23.2%), urinary tract infections (15.2%) and skin and soft tissue infections (11.9%). The reason for antimicrobial use was recorded for 81.9% of the prescriptions, a stop/review date for 40.8% and compliance with local antibiotic guidelines for 76.6%. In the ECDC-PPS, the crude prevalence of patients with at least one HAI was 7.3% (95%CI 6.8–7.7%). Most frequently reported HAIs were pneumonia (21.6%) and urinary tract infections (21.3%).ConclusionsHAI and antimicrobial use prevalence remained stable in comparison with the previous PPS (7.1% and 27.4% in 2011 and 2015, respectively). Belgian hospitals should be further stimulated to set local targets to improve antibiotic prescribing and reduce HAI.

Global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial consumption in Brazilian hospitals

The inappropriate use of antimicrobials and increased rates of antimicrobial resistance is a challenge all over the world. Although antibiotic stewardship is recommended by the Brazilian government, data regarding antibiotic use in Brazilian hospitals are scarce. The aim of this study was to conduct a point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use in 18 Brazilian hospitals. Eighteen Brazilian hospitals conducted the Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) in 2017. The study enrolled inpatients on antimicrobials. Data collection included details on the antimicrobial prescriptions. A web-based programme was used for data-entry, validation and reporting. The Global-PPS was developed by the University of Antwerp and bioMérieux provided funding support. A total of 1801 patients were evaluated, of which 941 (52.2%) were on antimicrobials. Four hundred (42.5%) patients were given at least two antimicrobials. Out of the 1317 antibacterials for systemic use, 514 (39%) were prescribed for community-acquired infections, 533 (40.5%) for healthcare-associated infections and 248 (18.8%) for prophylactic use. The most frequently used antimicrobials were ceftriaxone (12.8%), meropenem (12.3%) and vancomycin (10.3%). Pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection was the most common site of infection (29.2%). In general, antimicrobials were given mainly parenterally (91%) and empirically (81.2%). A high prevalence of antibiotic use was observed in the 18 Brazilian hospitals. The antibiotics were prescribed mainly empirically. Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics were the most frequent antimicrobials used, showing that reinforcement of de-escalation strategy is needed. The Global-PPS data can be very useful for monitoring stewardship programmes and intervention.

1135. The 2018 Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance: Pediatric Results from 26 Canadian Hospitals

BackgroundInappropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) is strongly associated with antimicrobial resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) is a standardized tool that is used worldwide to characterize inpatient AMU. We report pediatric results from 26 Canadian hospitals that participated in the Global-PPS in 2018.MethodsThe survey was completed by each site on the Global-PPS website for all patients aged 0–17 years hospitalized in a neonatal or pediatric ward on a chosen day between January and December 2018. Data collected included ward type, demographics, antimicrobials prescribed, diagnosis, type of indication (community-acquired [CA] vs. healthcare-associated [HA]) and type of therapy (empiric vs. targeted). Quality indicators included guideline compliance, medical record documentation of diagnosis, antimicrobial stop/review date, and surgical prophylaxis (SP) duration.ResultsOf the 26 sites, 23 were mixed and 3 were pediatric hospitals, with data on 767 inpatients. Overall, 25.8% (n = 198) of patients received at least one antimicrobial, and 21.9% (n = 168) were on at least one antibiotic. The highest AMU was found in Hematology-Oncology (84%), Pediatric Intensive Care (55.3%) and surgical (42.1%) units. Of the 330 antimicrobial prescriptions, 40.9% were for CA infections, 23% for medical prophylaxis, 20% for HA infections and 2.7% for SP. The most commonly treated infections were sepsis (16%) and lower respiratory tract infection (12.1%). The top five prescribed antibiotics were aminopenicillins (20.4%), aminoglycosides (16.1%), third-generation cephalosporins (15.4%), piperacillin–tazobactam (7.5%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7.5%). Diagnosis and stop/review date were documented for 88.1% and 65.1% of prescriptions, respectively. Compliance to local guidelines was found in 91.5% of therapies. SP exceeded 24 hours in 88.9% of courses.ConclusionThe Global-PPS generated Canada-wide data on inpatient pediatric AMU, which will allow hospitals to benchmark and develop local quality improvement interventions to enhance appropriate AMU. Targets for improvement include suboptimal antimicrobial stop/review date documentation and prolonged SP.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2018. The Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance: Quantity and Quality of Antimicrobial Prescribing for Inpatients with Pneumonia in the Philippines in 2018

BackgroundPneumonia is the most common indication for prescription of antibiotics in hospitals in the Philippines. We describe the quality and quantity of antibiotic prescribing for hospitalized pneumonia patients in the Philippines in 2018 (www.global-PPS.com).MethodsA point prevalence survey was performed from September to December 2018 in 28 public and private hospitals in Luzon, Mindanao, and Visayas regions. Ward- and patient-level data were collected using a standardized methodology and entered through a web-based application. We analyzed all antibiotic (ATC J01) prescriptions for inpatients with pneumonia.ResultsOf all hospitalized patients, 16.2% (n = 1516) received one or more antibiotic (J01) for treatment of pneumonia, majority (78.3%) of which were for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In adults, the most commonly used antibiotics were azithromycin (19.5%), ceftriaxone (19.0%), and piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (13.2%) for CAP and meropenem (19.8%), piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (18.9%), and levofloxacin (8.6%) for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP). In neonates and children, cefuroxime was used most often (20.1%) for treatment of CAP, followed by ampicillin (16.7%) and amikacin (15.3%). Children and neonates with HAP were most commonly treated with amikacin (18.7%), meropenem (15.7%), and ampicillin (10.4%). Overall, 16.0% of all antibiotic prescriptions for pneumonia were based on microbiological results, 11.3% for CAP and 33.9% for HAP. Microbiology-based prescriptions were most commonly targeted at ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (8.4%). Further analysis of quality indicators showed that up to 80.0% of all prescriptions for pneumonia were compliant to local guidelines and reason in notes was documented for 81.0% of prescriptions. However, the stop or review date of antibiotic treatment for pneumonia was less documented (27.8%).ConclusionGlobal-PPS data provided valuable insights into the quantity and quality of antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia inpatients. These results will be fedback to the Department of Health, medical societies, and hospitals for prioritization of targets and policies toward the improvement of the Philippine antimicrobial stewardship program.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Use of the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve classification to define patterns of hospital antibiotic use (AWaRe): an analysis of paediatric survey data from 56 countries

Improving the quality of hospital antibiotic use is a major goal of WHO's global action plan to combat antimicrobial resistance. The WHO Essential Medicines List Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification could facilitate simple stewardship interventions that are widely applicable globally. We aimed to present data on patterns of paediatric AWaRe antibiotic use that could be used for local and national stewardship interventions. 1-day point prevalence survey antibiotic prescription data were combined from two independent global networks: the Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Prescribing, and Efficacy in Neonates and Children and the Global Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance networks. We included hospital inpatients aged younger than 19 years receiving at least one antibiotic on the day of the survey. The WHO AWaRe classification was used to describe overall antibiotic use as assessed by the variation between use of Access, Watch, and Reserve antibiotics, for neonates and children and for the commonest clinical indications. Of the 23 572 patients included from 56 countries, 18 305 were children (77·7%) and 5267 were neonates (22·3%). Access antibiotic use in children ranged from 7·8% (China) to 61·2% (Slovenia) of all antibiotic prescriptions. The use of Watch antibiotics in children was highest in Iran (77·3%) and lowest in Finland (23·0%). In neonates, Access antibiotic use was highest in Singapore (100·0%) and lowest in China (24·2%). Reserve antibiotic use was low in all countries. Major differences in clinical syndrome-specific patterns of AWaRe antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infection and neonatal sepsis were observed between WHO regions and countries. There is substantial global variation in the proportion of AWaRe antibiotics used in hospitalised neonates and children. The AWaRe classification could potentially be used as a simple traffic light metric of appropriate antibiotic use. Future efforts should focus on developing and evaluating paediatric antibiotic stewardship programmes on the basis of the AWaRe index. GARPEC was funded by the PENTA Foundation. GARPEC-China data collection was funded by the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM2015120330). bioMérieux provided unrestricted funding support for the Global-PPS.

Variations in antibiotic use across India: multi-centre study through Global Point Prevalence survey

The aim of the study was to assess antimicrobial prescribing patterns, and variation in practice, in India. A point prevalence survey (PPS) was conducted in October to December 2017 in 16 tertiary care hospitals across India. The survey included all inpatients receiving an antimicrobial on the day of PPS and collected data were analysed using a web-based application of the University of Antwerp. In all, 1750 patients were surveyed, of whom 1005 were receiving a total of 1578 antimicrobials. Among the antimicrobials prescribed, 26.87% were for community-acquired infections; 19.20% for hospital-acquired infections; 17.24% for medical prophylaxis; 28.70% for surgical prophylaxis; and 7.99% for other or undetermined reasons. Antibiotic prescribing quality indicators, such as reason in notes and post-prescription review score, were low. This PPS showed widespread antibiotic usage, underlining the need for antibiotic stewardship to promote evidence-based practice.

Informing the development of a standardised approach to measure antibiotic use in secondary care: a systematic review protocol

IntroductionEcological and individual-level evidence indicates that there is an association between level of antibiotic exposure and the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey in 2015...