SESSION TITLE: Obstructive Lung Disease Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters PRESENTED ON: October 18-21, 2020 PURPOSE: Asthma is a reversible airway obstructive disorder characterized by airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction with symptoms such as intermittent cough, wheeze and shortness of breath. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines are published annually to help in decreasing the morbidity and mortality associated with asthma by guiding management. In this study, we compared management in two different population subsets, patients from the indigent clinic and from the private insured clinic, and determined if there was a disparity in asthma management. METHODS: After approval from the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review was conducted among all patients with the diagnosis of asthma in two Internal Medicine resident-run community clinics from January 2016 to November 2019. Baseline demographics, asthma severity, number of exacerbations requiring hospital visits, and medication management were reviewed. RESULTS: Chart review of 128 patients between the indigent clinic (A), which included 94 patients, and private clinic (B), which included 34 patients, showed that there was no significant difference in management between the two clinics. Table 1, resulted below, shows whether asthma was managed appropriately between the two clinics based on the severity of asthma. If a patient is diagnosed with either cough variant or intermittent asthma, appropriate management would include the use of a SABA or as needed ICS, at minimum, for control of symptoms as per GINA guidelines. For patients diagnosed with persistent asthma, appropriate management included a stepwise approach with maintenance therapy and a rescue inhaler. 70 out of 80 patients (87.5%) at the indigent clinic (A) had appropriate management and 26 out of 33 patients (78.8%) at the private clinic (B) had appropriate management. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in healthcare do exist but between the two internal medicine resident-run clinics, there was no difference in appropriate management of asthma. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although there was no difference in management of asthma between the two clinics, education will be needed on proper management since neither clinic had complete adherence to GINA guidelines for management. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Saiara Choudhury, source=Web Response no disclosure on file for Jack Davitt; No relevant relationships by Reema George, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Salim Surani, source=Web Response
Read full abstract