Global End-diastolic Volume Index Research Articles

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV)-A prospective intervention trial comparing haemodynamic parameters in intensive care patients.

Assisted mechanical ventilation may alter the pressure profile in the thorax compared to normal breathing, which can affect the blood flow to and from the heart. Studies suggest that in patients with severe lung disease, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) may be haemodynamically beneficial compared to other ventilator settings. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if APRV affects cardiac index in intubated intensive care patients without severe lung disease when compared to pressure support ventilation (PSV). The secondary aim comprised potential changes in other haemodynamic and ventilatory parameters. Twenty patients were enrolled in the intensive care unit (ICU) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Eligible patients met the inclusion criteria; 18 years of age or above, intubated and mechanically ventilated, triggering and stable on PSV mode, with indwelling haemodynamic monitoring via a pulse-induced continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) catheter. The study protocol started with a 30-min interval on PSV mode, followed by a 30-min interval on APRV mode, and finally a 30-min interval back on PSV mode. At the end of each interval, PiCCO outputs, ventilator outputs, arterial and venous blood gas analyses, heart rate and central venous pressure were recorded and compared between modes. There was no significant difference in cardiac index (3.42 vs. 3.39 L/min/m2) between PSV and APRV, but a significant increase in central venous pressure (+1.0 mmHg, p = .027). Furthermore, we found a significant reduction in peak airway pressure (-3.16 cmH2O, p < .01) and an increase in mean airway pressure (+2.1 cmH2O, p < .01). No statistically significant change was found in oxygenation index (partial pressure of O2 [pO2]/fraction of inspired oxygen) nor in other secondary outcomes when comparing PSV and APRV. There was no significant association between global end-diastolic volume index and cardiac index (R2 = 0.0089) or central venous pressure (R2 = 0.278). All parameters returned to baseline after switching the ventilator mode back to PSV. We could not detect any changes in cardiac index in ICU patients without severe lung disease during APRV compared to PSV mode, despite lower peak airwaypressure and increasedmean airway pressure.

Injection Site Matters: A Comparative Analysis of Transpulmonary Thermodilution via Simultaneous Femoral and Jugular Indicator Injections under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy.

Background: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) in acute lung failure has witnessed a notable increase. The PiCCO system is frequently used for advanced hemodynamic monitoring in this cohort. Our study aimed to investigate whether the choice of indicator injection site (jugular vs. femoral) in patients undergoing vv-ECMO therapy affects transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) measurements using the PiCCO® device (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany). Methods: In a retrospective single-center analysis, we compared thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters after simultaneous jugular and femoral injections in 28 measurements obtained in two patients with respiratory failure who were undergoing vv-ECMO therapy. Results: Elevated values of the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were observed following femoral indicator injection compared to jugular indicator injection (EVLWI: 29.3 ± 10.9 mL/kg vs. 18.3 ± 6.71 mL/kg, p = 0.0003; ITBVI: 2163 ± 631 mL/m2 vs. 806 ± 125 mL/m2, p < 0.0001; GEDVI: 1731 ± 505 mL/m2 vs. 687 ± 141 mL/m2, p < 0.0001). The discrepancy between femoral and jugular measurements exhibited a linear correlation with extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF). Conclusions: In a PiCCO®-derived hemodynamic assessment of patients on vv-ECMO, the femoral indicator injection, as opposed to the jugular injection, resulted in an overestimation of all index parameters. This discrepancy can be attributed to mean transit time (MTt) and downslope time-dependent (DSt) variations in GEDVI and cardiac function index and is correlated with ECBF.

Relationship between PiCCO parameters and achieving target blood pressure in early resuscitation of patients with septic shock at Khanh Hoa general hospital, Khanh Hoa province in 2023

Hemodynamic resuscitation guided by the Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO) system is an advanced, reliable and minimally invasive method. In prospective interventional study, 40 patients with septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Khanh Hoa General Hospital from August 2022 to September 2023. Measure PiCCO parameters at several times. The rate of achieving target blood pressure at the time 1 hour (T1) was 87.5% (n = 35), at the time 3 hours (T3) was 90.0% (n = 36). At T1 and T3, Global End-Diastolic Volume Index (GEDVI), Extravascular Lung Water Index (EVLWI) and Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI) were related to achieving target blood pressure (p &lt; 0.05). At T1, there were significant differences exist between two groups: GEDVI (764.2 ± 172.8 vs 659.4 ± 26.5mL/m2, p = 0.02); EVLWI (10.4 ± 2.6 vs 13.9 ± 2.79mL/kg, p = 0.02); SVRI (1658.8 ± 594.1 vs 1094.8 ± 135.2DS/ cm5/m2, p = 0.01). At T3, after urgent resuscitation, the significant differences between groups were: GEDVI (756.3 ± 141.1 vs 668.0 ± 10.3mL/m2, p = 0.01); EVLWI (10.9 ± 2.9 vs 14.1 ± 1.8mL/kg, p = 0.03); SVRI (1676.67 ± 628.3 vs 1127 ± 370.3DS/cm5/m2, p = 0.049). Early resuscitation according to the guidance of the PiCCO system helps achieve target blood pressure better in patients with septic shock. GEDVI, EVLWI and SVRI are indexes on the PiCCO system related to achieving target blood pressure.

Evaluation of extravascular lung water index in critically ill patients based on lung ultrasound radiomics analysis combined with machine learning

To explore lung ultrasound radiomics features which related to extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), and to predict EVLWI in critically ill patients based on lung ultrasound radiomics combined with machine learning and validate its effectiveness. A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The lung ultrasound videos and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring results of critically ill patients admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from November 2021 to October 2022 were collected, and randomly divided into training set and validation set at 8:2. The corresponding images from lung ultrasound videos were obtained to extract radiomics features. The EVLWI measured by PiCCO was regarded as the "gold standard", and the radiomics features of training set was filtered through statistical analysis and LASSO algorithm. Eight machine learning models were trained using filtered radiomics features including random forest (RF), extreme gradient boost (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and Logistic regression (LR). Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to evaluate the predictive performance of models on EVLWI in the validation set. A total of 151 samples from 30 patients were enrolled (including 906 lung ultrasound videos and 151 PiCCO monitoring results), 120 in the training set, and 31 in the validation set. There were no statistically significant differences in main baseline data including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), cardiac function index (CFI), stroke volume index (SVI), global end diastolic volume index (GEDVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) and EVLWI. The overall EVLWI range in 151 PiCCO monitoring results was 3.7-25.6 mL/kg. Layered analysis showed that both datasets had EVLWI in the 7-15 mL/kg interval, and there was no statistically significant difference in EVLWI distribution. Two radiomics features were selected by using LASSO algorithm, namely grayscale non-uniformity (weight was -0.006 464) and complexity (weight was -0.167 583), and they were used for modeling. ROC curve analysis showed that the MLP model had better predictive performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the prediction validation set EVLWI was higher than that of RF, XGBoost, DT, KNN, LR, SVM, NB models (0.682 vs. 0.658, 0.657, 0.614, 0.608, 0.596, 0.557, 0.472). The gray level non-uniformity and complexity of lung ultrasound were the most correlated radiomics features with EVLWI monitored by PiCCO. The MLP model based on gray level non-uniformity and complexity of lung ultrasound can be used for semi-quantitative prediction of EVLWI in critically ill patients.

Central venous pressure and dynamic indices to assess fluid appropriateness in critically ill patients: A pilot study.

The correct identification of the appropriateness of fluid administration is important for the treatment of critically ill patients. Static and dynamic indices used to identify fluid responsiveness have been developed throughout the years, nonetheless fluid responsiveness does not indicate that fluid administration is appropriate, and indexes to evaluate appropriateness of fluid administration are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate if central venous pressure (CVP) anddynamic indices could correctly identify fluid appropriateness for critically ill patients. Data from 31 ICU patients, for a total of 53 observations, was included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the appropriateness of fluid administration. Fluid appropriateness was defined in presence of a low cardiac index (< 2.5 l/min/m2) without any sign of fluid overload, as assessed by global end-diastolic volume index, extravascular lung water index or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. For 10 patients, fluid administration was deemed appropriate, while for 21 patients it was deemed inappropriate. Central venous pressure was not different between the two cohorts (mean CVP 11 (4) mmHg in the fluid inappropriate group, 12 (4) mmHg in the fluid appropriate group, p 0.58). The same is true for pulse pressure variation (median PPV 5 [2, 9] % in the fluid inappropriate group, 4 [3, 13] % in the fluid appropriate group, p 0.57), for inferior vena cava distensibility (mean inferior vena cava distensibility 24 (14) % in the fluid inappropriate group, 22 (16) % in the fluid appropriate group, p 0.75) and for changes in end tidal carbon dioxide during a passive leg raising test (median d.ETCO2 1.5 [0.0, 2.0]% in the fluid inappropriate group, 1.0 [0.0, 2.0] % in the fluid appropriate group, p 0.98). There was no association between static and dynamic indices and fluid appropriateness. Central venous pressure, pulse pressure variation, changes in end tidal carbon dioxide during a passive leg raising test, inferior vena cava distensibility were not associated with fluid appropriateness in our cohorts.

A deep learning model to identify the fluid overload status in critically ill patients based on chest X-ray images.

Recent studies have highlighted adverse outcomes of fluid overload in critically ill patients. Therefore, its early recognition is essential for the management of these patients. Our aim was to propose a deep learning (DL) model using data from noninvasive chest X‑ray (CXR) imaging associated with the fluid overload status. We collected data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC‑IV, v. 1.0) and MIMIC Chest X‑Ray (v. 2.0.0) databases for modeling, and from our hospital database for testing. The extravascular lung water index (ELWI) greater than 10 ml/kg and the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) greater than 700 ml/m2 were used as threshold values for the fluid overload status. A DL model with a transfer learning strategy was proposed to predict the fluid overload status based on CXR images, and compared with clinical and semantic label models. Additionally, a visualization technique was adopted to determine the important areas of features in the input images. The DL model showed a relatively strong performance for predicting the ELWI (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.896; 95% CI, 0.819-0.972 and AUC = 0.718; 95% CI, 0.594-0.822, respectively) and the GEDI status (AUC = 0.814; 95% CI, 0.699-0.930 and AUC = 0.649; 95% CI, 0.510-0.787, respectively) in both the primary and the test cohort. The performance was better than that of the clinical and semantic label models. As CXR is routinely used in the intensive care unit, a simple, fast, low‑cost, and noninvasive DL model based on this modality can be regarded as an effective supplementary tool for identifying fluid overload, and should be widely adopted in the clinical setting, especially when invasive hemodynamic monitoring is not available.

Transpulmonary thermodilution: A revised correction formula for global end-diastolic volume index derived after femoral indicator injection.

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is usually performed by jugular indicator injection. In clinical practice, femoral venous access is often used instead, resulting in substantial overestimation of global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI). A correction formula compensates for that. The objective of this study is to first evaluate the efficacy of the currently implemented correction function and then further improve this formula. The performance of the established correction formula was investigated in our prospectively collected dataset of 98 TPTD measurements from 38 patients with both, jugular and femoral venous access. Subsequently, a new correction formula was developed: cross validation revealed the favourite covariate combination and a general estimating equation provided the final version, which was tested in a retrospective validation on an external dataset. Investigating the current correction function revealed a considerable reduction of bias compared to no correction. Concerning the objective of formula development, the covariate combination of GEDVI obtained after femoral indicator injection, age and body surface area is even favoured, when compared to the parameters of the previously published correction formula, as a further reduction of mean absolute error (68 vs. 61 ml/m2), a better correlation (0.90 vs. 0.91) and an increased adjusted R2 (0.72 vs 0.78) is noticed in the cross validation results. Of particular clinical importance is, that more measurements were correctly assigned to the same GEDVI category (decreased / normal / increased) using the revised formula, compared with the gold standard of jugular indicator injection (72.4 vs. 74.5%). In a retrospective validation, the newly developed formula showed a greater reduction of bias (to 2 vs. 6 %) than the currently implemented formula. The currently implemented correction function partly compensates for GEDVI overestimation. Applying the new correction formula on GEDVI measured after femoral indicator administration enhances the informative value and reliability of this preload parameter.

Extravascular lung water index, pulmonary vascular permeability index, and global end-diastolic volume index in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients requiring prone position ventilation: a preliminary retrospective study.

There is a lack of data on extravascular lung water index (EVLWi), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPi), and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVi) during prone position ventilation (PPV) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The objectives of this study were to analyze trends in EVLWi, PVPi, and GEDVi during PPV and the relationships between these parameters and PaO2/FiO2. In this preliminary retrospective observational study, we performed transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in seven mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients without cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities requiring PPV for 18 hours, at specific times (30 minutes pre-PPV, 18 hours after PPV, and 3 hours after supination). EVLWi, PVPi and GEDVi were measured. The relationships between PaO2/FiO2 and EVLWi, and PVPi and GEDVi values, in the supine position were analyzed by linear regression. Correlation and determination coefficients were calculated. EVLWi was significantly different between three time points (analysis of variance, P=0.004). After 18 hours in PPV, EVLWi was lower compared with values before PPV (12.7±0.9 ml/kg vs. 15.3±1.5 ml/kg, P=0.002). Linear regression showed that only EVLWi was correlated with PaO2/FiO2 (β =-5.757; 95% confidence interval, -10.835 to -0.679; r=-0.58; R2 =0.34; F-test P=0.029). EVLWi was significantly reduced after 18 hours in PPV and values measured in supine positions were correlated with PaO2/FiO2. This relationship can help clinicians discriminate whether deterioration in gas exchange is related to fluid overload or disease progression. Further clinical research should evaluate the role of TPTD parameters as markers to stratify disease severity and guide clinical management.

Pilot study: advanced haemodynamic monitoring after acute spinal cord injury-Keep the pressure up?

BackgroundAlthough the use of vasopressors to maintain haemodynamic goals after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is still recommended, evidence regarding the target values and possible risks of this practice is limited, and data on haemodynamic parameters unaffected by catecholamines are rare. In this pilot study, we show the haemodynamic profile of patients with acute SCI mainly unaffected by vasopressor use and other factors that influence the cardiovascular system.MethodsFrom March 2018 to March 2020, we conducted a prospective, single-centre pilot study of 30 patients with acute SCI. Factors that could affect the cardiocirculatory system other than SCI (sepsis, pre-existing heart disease or multiple trauma) led to exclusion. A total of 417 measurements were performed using the PiCCO™ system.ResultsThe mean systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI, 1447.23 ± 324.71 dyn*s*cm−5*m2), mean central venous pressure (CVP, 10.69 ± 3.16) and mean global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, 801.79 ± 158.95 ml/m2) deviated from the reference range, while the mean cardiac index (CI), mean stroke volume index (SVI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and mean heart rate (HR) were within the reference range, as indicated in the literature. A mixed model analysis showed a significant negative relationship between norepinephrine treatment and MAP (83.97 vs. 73.69 mmHg, p < 0.001), SVRI (1463.40 vs. 1332.14 dyn*s*cm−5*m2, p = 0.001) and GEDVI (808.89 vs. 759.39 ml/m2, p = 0.001).ConclusionThese findings could lead to an adaptation of the target range for SVRI and MAP in patients with acute SCI and therefore reduce the use of vasopressors.

The Application of PiCCO-guided Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Traumatic Shock.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) in patients with traumatic shock. Seventy-eight patients with traumatic shock were included and grouped. The control group (CG, n = 39) underwent fluid resuscitation through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) monitoring, and the research group (RG, n = 39) received PiCCO-guided fluid resuscitation. The mechanical ventilation time, duration of vasoactive drug use, and duration of stay in the intensive care unit were lower in the RG compared to the CG (P < .05). At 72h after fluid resuscitation, the mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure in the RG were higher than those in the CG (P < .05). The stroke volume variation and distensibility index of the inferior vena cava were lower at 72h after fluid resuscitation, but the levels of extravascular lung water, global end-diastolic volume index, and intrathoracic blood volume index were higher in the RG (P < .05). The levels of endothelial 1, nitrogen monoxide, tumor necrosis factor-α, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide at 72h after fluid resuscitation in the RG were lower than those in the CG (P < .05). PiCCO-guided liquid resuscitation may help to accurately evaluate the volumetric parameters, alleviate symptoms of ischemia and hypoxia, regulate hemodynamics and blood gas analysis, reduce inflammatory reactions, improve endothelial functions, and effectively guide the usage of vascular active drugs.

The Glycocalyx Shedding Influences Hemodynamic and Metabolic Response to Fluid Load in Septic Shock.

Objective:Sepsis-associated endothelial dysfunction and degradation result in release of inflammatory mediators, compromise endothelial permeability, and impair alveolar fluid clearance leading to pulmonary edema. Excessive fluid therapy in septic shock damage the endothelial glycocalyx which will increase capillary leakage. The aim of our study was to assess the relationship of endothelial glycocalyx shedding with hemodynamic and metabolic response to fluid load in patients with septic shock.Methods:Eighteen adult patients were included in prospective observational study. To predict the response to infusion, we performed fluid load test by using crystalloids 7 mL kg−1 for 10 minutes. The plasma concentrations of endothelial glycocalyx components including heparan sulfate proteoglycan and syndecan 1 were measured at baseline, 2, 24 hours after fluid load test.Results:We observed associations of syndecan 1 with extravascular lung water index (rho = 0.48, P = .04) at baseline and of heparan sulfate proteoglycan with extravascular lung water index (rho = −0.56, P = .03) and pulse pressure variation (rho = 0.53, P = .04) at 24 hours after fluid load test. The plasma concentration of syndecan 1 correlated with lactate at baseline (rho = 0.51, P = .02) and at 24 hours after fluid load test (rho = 0.76, P = .009). At 2 hours after fluid load test, the concentration of syndecan 1 correlated with global end-diastolic volume index (rho= 0.93, P = .001) in normovolemic patients.Conclusions:The shedding of endothelial glycocalyx after fluid load test in septic shock is associated with hemodynamic and metabolic responses and related with the severity of pulmonary edema.

CRRT influences PICCO measurements in febrile critically ill patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) influences the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), cardiac index (CI), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) measured by Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PICCO) in febrile patients. Fifteen fever patients were included in this study. CI, GEDVI, EVLWI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at five time-points: before CRRT (T0), immediately after CRRT started (T1), 15 min after CRRT started (T2), immediately after CRRT stopped (T3), and 15 min after CRRT stopped (T4). Results have shown that CI and GEDVI were decreased significantly in T1 (CI: 4.09 ± 0.72 vs 2.81 ± 0.58 L/min m2, P = 0.000 and GEDVI: 727.86 ± 63.47 vs 531.07 ± 66.63 mL/m2, P = 0.000). However, CI and GEDVI were significantly increased in T3 (CI: 4.09 ± 0.72 vs 7.23 ± 1.32 L/min m2, P = 0.000 and GEDVI 727.86 ± 63.47 vs 1339.17 ± 121.52 mL/m2, P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in T2 and T4. Among the five-time points, no measurement errors were observed with regards to HR, MAP, and EVLWI. Therefore, the data herein contained suggests that PICCO measurements should begin 15 min after the start or stop of CRRT.

Resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock using normal saline does not damage the glycocalyx in the immediate resuscitation phase.

OBJECTIVES:The objectives were to study the effect of aggressive resuscitation using normal saline on hemodynamics, serum atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), syndecan-1 (marker of endothelial glycocalyx shedding), and extravascular lung water index (ELWI) following hemorrhagic shock.METHODS:Eleven male piglets (Sus scrofa) underwent blood drawing to create 20% drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Two-phase resuscitation was performed: Phase 1 using normal saline of an equal volume of blood drawn to create shock and Phase 2 using 40 ml/kg BW of normal saline to simulate hypervolemia and hemodilution. Heart rate, MAP, cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index, oxygen delivery (DO2), global end-diastolic volume index, ELWI, hemoglobin (Hb), lactate, ANP, and syndecan-1 at each phase and up to 60 min following Phase 2 resuscitation were recorded.RESULTS:Phase 2 resuscitation significantly decreased Hb concentration (P = 0.006), however, DO2 was maintained (P = 1.000). CI increased from shock to Phase 1 (P = 0.029) and further increase in Phase 2 resuscitation (P = 0.001). Overall, there was a transient increase of ANP following Phase 1 resuscitation, from 85.20 ± 40.86 ng/L at baseline to 106.42 ± 33.71 ng/L (P = 0.260). Serum syndecan-1 and ELWI change at all phases were not significant.CONCLUSIONS:We demonstrate compensatory protective mechanism despite overzealous fluid resuscitation. Compensatory increased CI despite decreased Hb maintained DO2. In the absence of inflammation, serum ANP did not increase significantly, no glycocalyx shedding occurred, subsequently no change in ELWI. We show that factors other than volume overload are more dominant in causing glycocalyx shedding.

Evaluation of volemic status during combined extracorporeal detoxification in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION: The morbidity and mortality of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains high. Intensive therapy aimed at stopping hypovolemia, systemic endotoxicosis is a debatable problem. OBJECTIVE: Improving treatment results in patients with SAP by assessing the dynamics of volumetric criteria and the degree of fluid therapy (FT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 25 patients. First, study group of 9 patient, used standard therapy in conjunction with selective hemoperfusion and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Second, control group of 16 patients, who received standard intensive care. FT in the groups was 2.5–3.5 ml/kg/h. Volemic parameters were measured by transpulmonary thermodilution. The central venous pressure and the diameter of the vena cava inferior were assessed. Comparative analysis was performed between two groups. RESULTS: FT in the amount of 58.7 (52.4–59.4) ml/kg/day in group 1, and 58.3 (54.2–61.4) ml/kg/day in group 2 in the first day, up to 83.9 (72.4–86.1) and 79.3 (72.4–84.1) ml/kg/day, was observed by day 3 (p &lt; 0.05), according to the results of transpulmonary thermodilution. From the 1st to the 3rd day, Global end-diastolic volume index increased from 345 (328–412) to 648 (590–690) ml/m2 in group 1, and from 375 (348–413) to 654 (599–701) ml/m2 in group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Intrathoracic blood volume index increased from 440 (420–510) to 780 (750–40) ml/m2 in group 1 and 430 (417.5–465) to 750 (665–780) ml/m2 in group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular permeability index by 5 days in group 2 increased by 1.8 — 11 (10.5–11.8) and 2.2 times — 6.5 (5.75–7), respectively (p &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FT 3.5 ml/kg/h, reaches isovolemia by the 3rd day of therapy. The use of extracorporeal detoxification methods in complex therapy is accompanied by an improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters.

A prospectively randomized controlled study of the effects of intensive insulin therapy combined with glutamine on nutritional metabolism, inflammatory response, and hemodynamics in severe burn patients

Objective: To observe the effects of intensive insulin therapy combined with glutamine on nutritional metabolism, inflammatory response, and hemodynamics in severe burn patients. Methods: Thirty-two severe burn patients who met the inclusion criteria and hospitalized in the Affiliated Huaihai Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2017 to January 2019 were recruited into a prospectively randomized controlled study. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into conventional insulin therapy alone group, conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group, intensive insulin therapy alone group, and intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group, with 8 patients in each group, with genders of 5 males and 3 females, 4 males and 4 females, 3 males and 5 females, 4 males and 4 females, and ages of (35±7), (36±9), (33±11), and (38±7) years, respectively. Patients in conventional insulin therapy alone group were treated with conventional insulin therapy on the basis of routine treatment to control the blood glucose. Patients in conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group were supplemented with alanyl-glutamine for more than 14 days in addition to the treatment in conventional insulin therapy alone group. Patients in intensive insulin therapy alone group were treated with intensive insulin therapy on the basis of routine treatment to control the blood glucose. Patients in intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group were supplemented with alanyl-glutamine in addition to the treatment in intensive insulin therapy alone group. On treatment day (TD) 1, 3, 7, and 14, the blood glucose, albumin, prealbumin, white blood cell count, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients in the 4 groups were detected. The cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) of patients in the 4 groups on TD 1, 3, and 7 were measured. Data were statistically analyzed with Fisher's exact probability test, one-way analysis of variance, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, and Bonferroni method. Results: All patients in the 4 groups successfully completed the study, and there were no withdrawal cases. On TD 3, 7, and 14, the blood glucose of patients in intensive insulin therapy alone group ((5.9±1.3), (5.8±0.6), (5.5±0.5) mmol/L) and intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group ((5.9±1.1), (5.6±1.1), (5.2±0.8) mmol/L) were significantly lower than those in conventional insulin therapy alone group ((9.1±0.5), (8.4±0.9), (7.4±1.1) mmol/L, P<0.05). Compared with those in conventional insulin therapy alone group, the levels of albumin of patients in conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group, intensive insulin therapy alone group, and intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group were significantly increased on TD 7 and 14 (P<0.05). Compared with the level of albumin of patients in intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group, the levels of albumin of patients in conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group and intensive insulin therapy alone group were significantly decreased on TD 14 (P<0.05). Compared with those in conventional insulin therapy alone group, the levels of prealbumin of patients in conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group and intensive insulin therapy alone group were significantly increased on TD 7 and 14 (P<0.05). Compared with those in intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group, the levels of prealbumin of patients in intensive insulin therapy alone group and conventional insulin therapy+glutamine group were significantly decreased on TD 1, 7, and 14 (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the white blood cell count, PCT, and CRP of patients in the 4 groups in pairwise comparison between groups on TD 1, 3, 7, and 14 (P>0.05). On TD 3 and 7, the levels of cardiac index, SVI, GEDVI, and SVRI of patients in intensive insulin therapy+glutamine group were significantly higher than those in conventional insulin therapy alone group (P<0.05), while the levels of EVLWI and PVPI were significantly lower than those in conventional insulin therapy alone group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Glutamine combined with intensive insulin therapy can improve the hypermetabolism in patients after severe burns, reduce the decomposition and consumption of endogenous nutrient substrates, and at the same time help the recovery of cardiac function and maintenance of hemodynamic stability.

Transpulmonary thermodilution in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BackgroundWe tested the effect of different blood flow levels in the extracorporeal circuit on the measurements of cardiac stroke volume (SV), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) and extravascular lung water index derived from transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in 20 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).MethodsComparative SV measurements with transesophageal echocardiography and TPTD were performed at least 5 times during the treatment of the patients. The data were interpreted with a Bland–Altman analysis corrected for repeated measurements. The interchangeability between both measurement modalities was calculated and the effects of extracorporeal blood flow on SV measurements with TPTD was analysed with a linear mixed effect model. GEDVI and EVLWI measurements were performed immediately before the termination of the ECMO therapy at a blood flow of 6 l/min, 4 l/min and 2 l/min and after the disconnection of the circuit in 7 patients.Results170 pairs of comparative SV measurements were analysed. Average difference between the two modalities (bias) was 0.28 ml with an upper level of agreement of 40 ml and a lower level of agreement of -39 ml within a 95% confidence interval and an overall interchangeability rate between TPTD and Echo of 64%. ECMO blood flow did not influence the mean bias between Echo and TPTD (0.03 ml per l/min of ECMO blood flow; p = 0.992; CI − 6.74 to 6.81). GEDVI measurement was not significantly influenced by the blood flow in the ECMO circuit, whereas EVLWI differed at a blood flow of 6 l/min compared to no ECMO flow (25.9 ± 10.1 vs. 11.0 ± 4.2 ml/kg, p = 0.0035).ConclusionsIrrespectively of an established ECMO therapy, comparative SV measurements with Echo and TPTD are not interchangeable.Such caveats also apply to the interpretation of EVLWI, especially with a high blood flow in the extracorporeal circulation. In such situations, the clinician should rely on other methods of evaluation of the amount of lung oedema with the haemodynamic situation, vasopressor support and cumulative fluid balance in mind.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021050). Registered 03/30/2020https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017237

Application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in fluid resuscitation of severe burn patients in shock period

Objective: To investigate the application of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in fluid resuscitation of severe burn patients in shock period. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, 33 patients with severe burns who were hospitalized in Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, meeting the inclusion criteria, were recruited into a retrospective cohort study with their clinical information collected. The patients were divided into PiCCO monitoring group with 15 cases (13 males and 2 females, aged (43±13) years) and routine monitoring group with 18 cases (14 males and 4 females, aged (39±9) years) according to the monitoring method used. After admission, all the patients were rehydrated following the rehydration formula of the Third Military Medical University for shock period. In routine monitoring group, the fluid resuscitation of patients was performed by monitoring indicators such as urine volume and blood pressure, while PiCCO monitoring was performed among patients in PiCCO monitoring group, and their fluid resuscitation was guided by the patient's condition and the hemodynamic parameters (without pursuing normal levels of the parameters) of PiCCO monitoring on the basis of normal monitoring indicators in routine monitoring group. The colloids coefficients, the electrolyte coefficients (compared with the corresponding rehydration formula value of 0.75 mL·kg(-1)·% total body surface area (TBSA)(-1) of the Third Military Medical University for shock period during the first 24 h post injury), the total rehydration coefficients, and the urine volumes during the first and second 24 h post injury, the lactic acid level, the base excess level, and the oxygenation index at admission and 24, 48 h after admission, and the mechanical ventilation time, the wound healing time, and the death ratio of patients in the two groups were recorded. The cardiac index, the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), and the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) of patients in PiCCO monitoring group at post injury hour 24, 48, and 72 and the abnormal cases were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with Fisher's exact probability test, independent-sample or one-sample t test, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, and Bonferroni correction. Results: During the first 24 h post injury, the colloids coefficients of patients in PiCCO monitoring group was (0.69±0.15) mL·kg(-1)·%TBSA(-1), which was significantly less than (0.85±0.16) mL·kg(-1)·%TBSA(-1) in routine monitoring group (t=-2.612, P<0.05). Compared with the rehydration formula value of the Third Military Medical University for shock period, only the colloids coefficient of patients in routine monitoring group during the first 24 h post injury was significantly increased (t=2.847, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the colloids coefficients of patients during the second 24 h post injury, or the electrolyte coefficients, the total rehydration coefficients, the urine volumes of patients during the first and the second 24 h post injury (t=0.579, -0.011, 0.417, -1.321, -0.137, 0.031, 1.348, P>0.05). The lactic acid level, the base excess level, the oxygenation index of patients at admission and 48 h after admission, and the oxygenation index of patients at 24 h after admission between the two groups were similar (t=-1.837, 0.620, 0.292, -1.792, 1.912, -0.167, 1.695, P>0.05). The levels of lactic acid and base excess of patients in PiCCO monitoring group were (4.8±1.4) and (1.2±5.5)mmol/L, respectively, which were significantly better than (7.0±1.5) and (-2.8±3.0) mmol/L in routine monitoring group at 24 h after admission (t=-3.904, 2.562, P<0.05 or P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the mechanical ventilation time or the wound healing time of patients (t=-0.699, -0.697, P>0.05), or the death ratio of patients (P>0.05). In PiCCO monitoring group, the GEDVI, and the ITBVI of patients were lower than the normal low values at post injury hour 24 and 48, which were in the normal range at post injury hour 72; the cardiac index of patients increased gradually and recovered to normal at post injury hour 48; the SVRI of patients increased significantly at post injury hour 24 and then gradually decreased to normal; the EVLWI average of patients at all time points post injury were less than 10 mL/kg. At post injury hour 24, most of the hemodynamic parameters of more than or equal to 8/15 patients in PiCCO monitoring group were abnormal, and the abnormal proportion decreased later. Conclusions: On the basis of traditional monitoring indicators, the use of PiCCO monitoring technology combined with the patient's condition (without pursuing normal levels of the parameters) in guiding the fluid resuscitation in severe burn patients can reduce the usage of colloid and better improve tissue perfusion, with the resuscitation effect being better than conventional monitoring.

Evaluation of the association between extravascular lung water and prognosis of sepsis: A protocol of systematic review.

Background:The purpose of this study is to explore the association between extravascular lung water (EVLW) and prognosis of sepsis (PS).Methods:We will carry out comprehensive literature search in electronic databases (PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, WorldSciNet, PsycINFO, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CBM, and CNKI) and additional sources. All electronic databases will be searched from their initial to the present without language restrictions. Case-controlled studies reporting the association between EVLW and PS will be evaluated for inclusion. Outcomes of interest will include mortality rate, extravascular lung water index, pulmonary vascular permeability index, blood lactate clearance, oxygenation index, blood gas analysis, PaO2/FiO2, cardiac output index, global end diastolic volume index, intrathoracic blood volume index, systemic resistance index, acute physiology and chronic health scoring system II, and infection-related organ failure scoring system. Study quality will be evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Tool, and statistical analysis will be performed utilizing RevMan 5.4 software.Results:This study will summarize the most recent evidence to investigate the association between EVLW and PS.Conclusions:The results of this study will provide an exhaustive view of the association between EVLW and PS.Study registration OSF:osf.io/vhnxw.

Physiologic and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing open abdominal cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the physiological and hemodynamic changes in patients who were undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) cytoreductive surgeries.MethodsThis prospective, observational study enrolled 21 patients who were undergoing elective cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC at our hospital over 2 years. We collected vital signs, hemodynamic parameters including global end-diastolic volume index (GEVI) and extravascular lung water index (ELWI) using the VolumeView™ system, and arterial blood gas analysis from all patients. Data were recorded before skin incision (T1); 30 minutes before HIPEC initiation (T2); 30 (T3), 60 (T4), and 90 (T5) minutes after HIPEC initiation; 30 minutes after HIPEC completion (T6); and 10 minutes before surgery completion (T7).ResultsPatients showed an increase in body temperature and cardiac index and a decrease in the systemic vascular resistance index. GEDI was 715.4 (T1) to 809.7 (T6), and ELWI was 6.9 (T1) to 7.3 (T5).ConclusionsHIPEC increased patients’ body temperature and cardiac output and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Although parameters that were extracted from the VolumeView™ system were within their normal ranges, transpulmonary thermodilution approach is helpful in intraoperative hemodynamic management during open abdominal cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC.Trial registry name: ClinicalTrials.govTrial registration number: NCT02325648URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=NCT02325648&term

Comparison of global end-diastolic volume index derived from jugular and femoral indicator injection: a prospective observational study in patients equipped with both a PiCCO-2 and an EV-1000-device

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) is a static marker of preload which better predicted volume responsiveness compared to filling pressures in several studies. GEDVI can be generated with at least two devices: PiCCO and EV-1000. Several studies showed that uncorrected indicator injection into a femoral central venous catheter (CVC) results in a significant overestimation of GEDVI by the PiCCO-device. Therefore, the most recent PiCCO-algorithm corrects for femoral indicator injection. However, there are no systematic data on the impact of femoral indicator injection for the EV-1000 device. Furthermore, the correction algorithm of the PiCCO is poorly validated. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed 14 datasets from 10 patients with TPTD-monitoring undergoing central venous catheter (CVC)- and arterial line exchange. PiCCO was replaced by EV-1000, femoral CVCs were replaced by jugular/subclavian CVCs and vice-versa. For PiCCO, jugular and femoral indicator injection derived GEDVI was comparable when the correct information about femoral catheter site was given (p = 0.251). By contrast, GEDVI derived from femoral indicator injection using the EV-1000 was obviously not corrected and was substantially higher than jugular GEDVI measured by the EV-1000 (846 ± 250 vs. 712 ± 227 ml/m2; p = 0.001). Furthermore, measurements of GEDVI were not comparable between PiCCO and EV-1000 even in case of jugular indicator injection (p = 0.003). This is most probably due to different indexations of the raw value GEDV. EV-1000 could not be recommended to measure GEDVI in case of a femoral CVC. Furthermore, different indexations used by EV-1000 and PiCCO should be considered even in case of a jugular CVC when comparing GEDVI derived from PiCCO and EV-1000.