glnAp2 Promoter Research Articles

Abundant urinary amino acids activate glutamine synthetase-encoding glnA by two different mechanisms in Escherichia coli.

Growth of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the bladder induces transcription of glnA which codes for the ammonia-assimilating glutamine synthetase (GS) despite the normally suppressive high ammonia concentration. We previously showed that the major urinary component, urea, induces transcription from the Crp-dependent glnAp1 promoter, but the urea-induced transcript is not translated. Our purpose here was to determine whether the most abundant urinary amino acids, which are known to inhibit GS activity in vitro, also affect glnA transcription in vivo. We found that the abundant amino acids impaired growth, which glutamine and glutamate reversed; this implies inhibition of GS activity. In strains with deletions of crp and glnG that force transcription from the glnAp2 and glnAp1 promoters, respectively, we examined growth and glnA transcription with a glnA-gfp transcriptional fusion and quantitative reverse transcription PCR with primers that can distinguish transcription from the two promoters. The abundant urinary amino acids stimulated transcription from the glnAp2 promoter in the absence of urea but from the glnAp1 promoter in the presence of urea. However, transcription from glnAp1 did not produce a translatable mRNA or GS as assessed by a glnA-gfp translational fusion, enzymatic assay of GS, and Western blot to detect GS antigen in urea-containing media. We discuss these results within the context of the extremely rapid growth of uropathogenic E. coli in urine, the different factors that control the two glnA promoters and possible mechanisms that either overcome or bypass the urea-imposed block of glutamine synthesis during bacterial growth in urine.IMPORTANCEKnowledge of the regulatory mechanisms for genes expressed at the site of infection provides insight into the virulence of pathogenic bacteria. During urinary tract infections-most often caused by Escherichia coli-growth in urine induces the glnA gene which codes for glutamine synthetase. The most abundant urinary amino acids amplified the effect of urea which resulted in hypertranscription from the glnAp1 promoter and, unexpectedly, an untranslated transcript. E. coli must overcome this block in glutamine synthesis during growth in urine, and the mechanism of glutamine acquisition or synthesis may suggest a possible therapy.

Control of glnA (glutamine synthetase) expression by urea in non-pathogenic and uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

The bacteria that cause urinary tract infections often become resistant to antibiotic treatment, and genes expressed during an infection could suggest non-antibiotic targets. During growth in urine, glnA (specifying glutamine synthetase) expression is high, but our results show that urea induces glnA expression independent of the regulation that responds to nitrogen limitation. Although our results suggest that glnA is an unlikely target for therapy because of variation in urinary components between individuals, our analysis of glnA expression in urine-like environments has revealed previously undescribed layers of regulation. In other words, regulatory mechanisms that are discovered in a laboratory environment do not necessarily operate in the same way in nature.

Kinetics of transcription initiation directed by multiple cis-regulatory elements on the glnAp2 promoter.

Transcription initiation is orchestrated by dynamic molecular interactions, with kinetic steps difficult to detect. Utilizing a hybrid method, we aim to unravel essential kinetic steps of transcriptional regulation on the glnAp2 promoter, whose regulatory region includes two enhancers (sites I and II) and three low-affinity sequences (sites III-V), to which the transcriptional activator NtrC binds. By structure reconstruction, we analyze all possible organization architectures of the transcription apparatus (TA). The main regulatory mode involves two NtrC hexamers: one at enhancer II transiently associates with site V such that the other at enhancer I can rapidly approach and catalyze the σ54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme. We build a kinetic model characterizing essential steps of the TA operation; with the known kinetics of the holoenzyme interacting with DNA, this model enables the kinetics beyond technical detection to be determined by fitting the input-output function of the wild-type promoter. The model further quantitatively reproduces transcriptional activities of various mutated promoters. These results reveal different roles played by two enhancers and interpret why the low-affinity elements conditionally enhance or repress transcription. This work presents an integrated dynamic picture of regulated transcription initiation and suggests an evolutionarily conserved characteristic guaranteeing reliable transcriptional response to regulatory signals.

Internucleosomal Interactions Mediated by Histone Tails Allow Distant Communication in Chromatin

Action across long distances on chromatin is a hallmark of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. Although chromatin structure per se can support long-range interactions, the mechanisms of efficient communication between widely spaced DNA modules in chromatin remain a mystery. The molecular simulations described herein suggest that transient binary internucleosomal interactions can mediate distant communication in chromatin. Electrostatic interactions between the N-terminal tails of the core histones and DNA enhance the computed probability of juxtaposition of sites that lie far apart along the DNA sequence. Experimental analysis of the rates of communication in chromatin constructs confirms that long-distance communication occurs efficiently and independently of distance on tail-containing, but not on tailless, chromatin. Taken together, our data suggest that internucleosomal interactions involving the histone tails are essential for highly efficient, long-range communication between regulatory elements and their targets in eukaryotic genomes.

The glnAntrBC operon of Herbaspirillum seropedicae is transcribed by two oppositely regulated promoters upstream of glnA

Herbaspirillum seropedicae is an endophytic bacterium that fixes nitrogen under microaerophilic conditions. The putative promoter sequences glnAp1 (sigma70-dependent) and glnAp2 (sigma54), and two NtrC-binding sites were identified upstream from the glnA, ntrB and ntrC genes of this microorganism. To study their transcriptional regulation, we used lacZ fusions to the H. seropedicae glnA gene, and the glnA-ntrB and ntrB-ntrC intergenic regions. Expression of glnA was up-regulated under low ammonium, but no transcription activity was detected from the intergenic regions under any condition tested, suggesting that glnA, ntrB and ntrC are co-transcribed from the promoters upstream of glnA. Ammonium regulation was lost in the ntrC mutant strain. A point mutation was introduced in the conserved -25/-24 dinucleotide (GG-->TT) of the putative sigma54-dependent promoter (glnAp2). Contrary to the wild-type promoter, glnA expression with the mutant glnAp2 promoter was repressed in the wild-type strain under low ammonium levels, but this repression was abolished in an ntrC background. Together our results indicate that the H. seropedicae glnAntrBC operon is regulated from two functional promoters upstream from glnA, which are oppositely regulated by the NtrC protein.

Protein‐induced DNA bending clarifies the architectural organization of the σ54‐dependent glnAp2 promoter

Sigma54-RNA polymerase (Esigma54) predominantly contacts one face of the DNA helix in the closed promoter complex, and interacts with the upstream enhancer-bound activator via DNA looping. Up to date, the precise face of Esigma54 that contacts the activator to convert the closed complex to an open one remains unclear. By introducing protein-induced DNA bends at precise locations between upstream enhancer sequences and the core promoter of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter without changing the distance in-between, we observed a strong enhanced or decreased promoter activity, especially on linear DNA templates in vitro. The relative positioning and orientations of Esigma54, DNA bending protein and enhancer-bound activator on linear DNA were determined by in vitro footprinting analysis. Intriguingly, the locations from which the DNA bending protein exerted its optimal stimulatory effects were all found on the opposite face of the DNA helix compared with the DNA bound Esigma54 in the closed complex. Therefore, these results provide evidence that the activator must approach the Esigma54 closed complexes from the unbound face of the promoter DNA helix to catalyse open complex formation. This proposal is further supported by the modelling of activator-promoter DNA-Esigma54 complex.

Geometric and dynamic requirements for DNA looping, wrapping and unwrapping in the activation of E.coli glnAp2 transcription by NtrC.

Transcriptional activation by the E.coli NtrC protein can occur via DNA looping between a DNA-bound activator and the target sigma(54) RNA polymerase. NtrC forms an octamer on DNA that is capable of binding two DNA molecules. Its ATPase activity is required for open complex formation. Geometric requirements for activation were assessed using a library of DNA bending sequences created by random ligation of A-tract oligonucleotides, as well as several designed sequences. Thirty random or designed sequences with a variety of DNA lengths and bending geometries were cloned in plasmids, and the library was used to replace the spacer between the NtrC binding sites and the core glnAp2 promoter. The activity of each promoter construct under nitrogen limitation was determined in vivo, in a lambda phage lacZ reporter system integrated as a single-copy lysogen to avoid titrating NtrC or polymerase. A wide variety of bending geometries was found to support a similar level of transcriptional activation ( approximately 3-4-fold). Computer modeling of the DNA trajectories suggests that the most inactive promoters have short spacer DNA and the NtrC sites on the opposite side of the helix as the wild-type sites; otherwise, the loop can form effectively. Flexibility and multivalency of the NtrC-Esigma(54) interaction apparently provides substantial independence from DNA stiffness constraints, and in general activation requires less efficient looping than repression. However, none of the random templates were as active as wild-type promoter. Subsidiary activator binding sites in the wild-type were found to be required for full activity, but, surprisingly, these sites could not be functionally replaced by strong binding sites. This suggests that one or more protomers in the NtrC octamer must form and then release contacts with DNA in order to complete the ATPase cycle and act as an AAA(+) activator of the Esigma(54). This dynamic DNA wrapping around the NtrC octamer is proposed to be necessary for efficient activation, and the wrapping may also reduce adventitious activation of other promoters.

Governor of the glnAp2 promoter of Escherichia coli

Low-affinity sites for the activator NRI-P (NtrC-P) that map between the enhancer and the glnAp2 promoter were responsible for limiting promoter activity at high concentrations of NRI approximately P in intact cells and in an in vitro transcription system consisting of purified bacterial components. That is, the low-affinity sites constitute a 'governor', limiting the maximum promoter activity. As the governor sites are themselves far from the promoter, they apparently act either by preventing the formation of the activation DNA loop that brings the enhancer-bound activator and the promoter-bound polymerase into proximity or by preventing a productive interaction between the enhancer-bound activator and polymerase. The combination of potent enhancer and governor sites at the glnAp2 promoter provides for efficient activation of the promoter when the activator concentration is low, while limiting the maximum level of promoter activity when the activator concentration is high.

Binding affinity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase*sigma54 holoenzyme for the glnAp2, nifH and nifL promoters.

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase associated with the sigma54 factor (RNAP*sigma54) is a holoenzyme form that transcribes a special class of promoters not recognized by the standard RNA polymerase*sigma70 com plex. Promoters for RNAP*sigma54 vary in their overall 'strength' and show differences in their response to the presence of DNA curvature between enhancer and promoter. In order to examine whether these effects are related to the promoter affinity, we have determined the equilibrium dissociation constant K(d) for the binding of RNAP*sigma54 to the three promoters glnAp2, nifH and nifL. Binding studies were conducted by monitoring the changes in fluorescence anisotropy upon titrating RNAP*sigma54 to carboxyrhodamine-labeled DNA duplexes. For the glnAp2 and nifH promoters similar values of K(d) = 0.94 +/- 0.55 nM and K(d) = 0.85 +/- 0.30 nM were determined at physiological ionic strength, while the nifL promoter displayed a significantly weaker affinity with K(d) = 8.5 +/- 1.9 nM. The logarithmic dependence of K(d) on the ionic strength I was -Deltalog(K(d))/Deltalog(I) = 6.1 +/- 0.5 for the glnAp2, 5.2 +/- 1.2 for the nifH and 2.1 +/- 0.1 for the nifL promoter. This suggests that the polymerase can form fewer ion pairs with the nifL promoter, which would account for its weaker binding affinity.

Action of prokaryotic enhancer over a distance does not require continued presence of promoter-bound sigma54 subunit.

The mechanism by which an enhancer activates transcription over large distances has been investigated. Activation of the glnAp2 promoter by the NtrC-dependent enhancer in Escherichia coli was analyzed using a purified system supporting multiple-round transcription in vitro. Our results suggest that the enhancer-promoter interaction and the initiation complex must be formed de novo during every round of transcription. No protein remained bound to the promoter after RNA polymerase escaped into elongation. Furthermore, the rate of initiation during the first and subsequent rounds of transcription were very similar, suggesting that there was no functional 'memory' facilitating multiple rounds of transcription. These studies exclude the hypothesis that enhancer action during multiple-round transcription involves the memory of the initial activation event.

Acetate-inducible protein overexpression from the glnAp2 promoter of Escherichia coli.

The Ntr regulon in Escherichia coli has previously been engineered to control the expression of a heterologous metabolic pathway. In this study, we reengineered the same system for protein production. In the absence of NRII (glnL gene product), we showed that glnAp2 can be an effective promoter for protein production that is inducible by exogenous acetate, but both the induction ratio and the range of modulation are low. To deal with this issue, we inactivated phosphotransacetylase (pta gene product), which disrupts the acetate pathway and denies the cell the ability to synthesize acetate. With this additional modification, gene expression from glnAp2 can be controlled by directly adding acetate into the growth medium. Using a lacZ reporter fusion, we found that glnAp2 induction was modulatable over a range of potassium acetate concentrations, and the induction/noninduction ratio increased to 77 in the absence of pta. The extracellular acetate required for maximal induction is lower than the concentration that causes toxicity, and thus growth inhibition by acetate addition was not a matter of concern. Furthermore, compared to the P(tac) promoter, overexpression of a model protein using the modified glnAp2 promoter system did not cause significant growth inhibition, although a higher level of protein expression was achieved.

The CRP-cAMP complex and downregulation of the glnAp2 promoter provides a novel regulatory linkage between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli.

In Escherichia coli, glnA (encoding glutamine synthetase) is transcribed from two promoters (glnAp1 and glnAp2). The glnAp1 is a sigma(70)-dependent promoter that is activated by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP). Under nitrogen-deficient growth conditions, glnAp1 is repressed by NtrC-phosphate. The downstream glnAp2 promoter is sigma(54)-dependent and is activated by NtrC-phosphate. Here, we show that glnAp2 expression is affected by different carbon sources and that the CRP-cAMP complex inhibits the glnAp2 promoter activity. Primer extension and KMnO4 footprinting analysis indicate that the inhibitory effect is at the transcriptional level in vivo. When glnAp2 is activated by NifA, a similar inhibitory effect by CRP-cAMP is observed. Site-directed mutagenesis and deletion analysis indicate that the characterized and putative CRP-binding sites located in the upstream region of the glnAp2 promoter are not essential for the inhibitory effect. CRP-cAMP inhibits sigma(54)-dependent glnAp2 strongly, by 21-fold. By activating glnAp1 and downregulating glnAp2, the overall effect of CRP-cAMP on glnA expression is an approximately fourfold reduction, which correlates with the reduction of gamma-glutamyl transferase activities in the cells. We propose therefore that a physiological role of CRP-cAMP activation of glnAp1 is to partially compensate for CRP-cAMP downregulation of glnAp2, allowing a low but non-negligible level of expression of the important genes transcribed from it. A novel regulatory linkage between carbon and nitrogen regulons is proposed.

Simultaneous binding of two DNA duplexes to the NtrC-enhancer complex studied by two-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy.

The transcription activator protein NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C, also termed NR(I)) can catalyze the transition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase complexed with the sigma(54) factor (RNAP x sigma(54)) from the closed complex (RNAP x sigma(54) bound at the promoter) to the open complex (melting of the promoter DNA). This process involves phosphorylation of NtrC (NtrC-P), assembly of an octameric NtrC-P complex at the enhancer DNA sequence, interaction of this complex with promoter-bound RNAP x sigma(54) via DNA looping, and hydrolysis of ATP. Here it is demonstrated by two-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy measurements of 6-carboxyfluorescein and 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine-labeled DNA oligonucleotide duplexes that the NtrC-P complex can bind two DNA duplexes simultaneously. This suggests a model for the conformation of the looped intermediate that is formed between NtrC-P and RNAP. sigma(54) at the glnAp2 promoter during the activation process.

The hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 is essential for core RNA polymerase binding.

Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 contains motifs that resemble closely those used for RNA polymerase II in mammalian cells, including two hydrophobic heptad repeats, a very acidic region and a glutamine-rich region. Triple changes in hydrophobic or multiple changes in acidic residues in Region III are known to severely impair core-binding ability. To investigate whether all the changes in triple mutants are necessary for core binding, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to create single and double mutants in the leucine or isoleucine residues in the heptad repeat in Region III. Single mutants showed no discernible loss of function. Double mutants showed partial protection of the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter due to the partial loss of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase. These mutations were deleterious to the function of sigma 54, which retained only 30-40% of wild-type mRNA levels. However, double mutants retained nearly normal ability to form open complexes. Two triple mutants created during previous work lost most, if not all, of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase, to protect the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter and to open the transcription start site. The two triple mutants produced about 20% or less than 10% of the wild-type transcripts from the glnAp2 promoter. These results demonstrate that the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III is essential for core RNA polymerase binding. Progressive loss of hydrophobicity of the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of sigma 54 resulted in a progressive loss of core-binding ability, leading to the loss of -12 promoter element recognition and mRNA production.

An artificial enhancer with multiple response elements stimulates prokaryotic transcriptional activation medicated by various regulatory proteins.

Regulation of transcription by the form of RNA polymerase that contains sigma(N) involves activation at a distance by activators bound to sites located far upstream of the transcription start site, which contact RNA polymerase bound to the promoter via formation of a DNA loop. At the g/nAp2 promoter, binding sites for the activator NtrC show features characteristic of eukaryotic enhancers. A multiple response element containing binding sites for five sigma(N)-dependent activators from different systems has been cloned in different positions relative to the glnAp2 promoter. These promoter regions indeed allowed activation in vivo by each regulator, thus showing that transcription from an eubacterial promoter may be controlled in a very versatile way by different signals. The activation capability of each activator has been assessed in relation to its concentration, and the presence and relative positions of the corresponding binding sites in the DNA. Results show that most activators can function from any position. However, activation mediated by DctD-L64 was very sensitive to changes in the position of its binding sites. Transcriptional activation by combinations of two regulators was also tested and no significant synergism or interference was detected. Mapping of the 5' ends of the transcripts showed that neither the activator nor the position from which they activate influences selection of the transcription start site.

The Transcription Initiation Pathway of Sigma 54 Mutants That Bypass the Enhancer Protein Requirement: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF ACTIVATION

In vitro transcription, DNase I footprinting, and abortive initiation assays were used to characterize transcription using mutant forms of sigma 54 shown previously to bypass certain enhancer requirements in vitro. The holoenzymes containing these sigma mutants produce low levels of open complexes at both the glnAp2 and glnHp2 promoters. The open complexes are unusual in that they are destroyed by heparin. Enhancer protein and ATP convert them into a stable heparin-resistant state. The enhancer response occurs over a similar range of NtrC concentration as occurs with the wild-type holoenzyme, indicating that the activation determinants have been largely preserved within these mutants. One-round transcription assays show that the mutant holoenzymes can be driven to transcribe both promoters without NtrC. The unstable opening induced by these mutations apparently serves as a conduit that can shuttle templates into transcriptionally competent complexes. The results lead to a model in which activation occurs in two steps. First, the enhancer complex overcomes an inhibitory effect of the sigma 54 leucine patch and unlocks the melting activity of the holoenzyme. Second, different sigma 54 determinants are used to drive stabilization of the open complexes, allowing the full transcription potential to be realized.

Formation of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli under control of a nitrogen regulated promoter at low and high cell densities

The use of a modified Escherichia coli glnAP2 promoter results in the formation of both homologous and heterologous, cytoplasmic and periplasmic recombinant proteins in a nitrogen concentration dependent manner. As in the E. coli nitrogen regulatory system, glnAP2 controlled gene expression is induced when ammonium concentration in the growth medium is below 1 mM (nitrogen limitation), otherwise only extremely low expression of recombinant genes is observed. Both high cell density cultivations (HCDC) and /ow cell density cultivations (LCDC) gave similar results for inducibility and formation of the following recombinant proteins: chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase, phosphorylcholine binding mini-antibodies (scFv-dhlx of McPC603) and Kl-streptokinase. Recombinant proteins were formed in quantities of about 2–3% of total cellular protein. At low cell densities, slightly higher quantities resulted under partial nitrogen limitations than under total nitrogen limitation. In contrast, high cell density cultivations resulted in lower product concentrations at partial nitrogen limitation compared with total nitrogen limitation. These lowered product concentrations were probably due to the very high amounts of K + or Na + ions which accumulated during pH-regulation, thereby disturbing growth. HCDC under partial nitrogen limitation decreased proteolysis of recombinant proteins, therefore reduced amounts of proteases are considered to be responsible.

Regulation of the Caulobacter crescentus rpoN gene and function of the purified sigma 54 in flagellar gene transcription.

The sequential transcription of flagellar (fla) genes in the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle is controlled by the organization of these genes in a regulatory hierarchy of four levels (I-IV). Level III and level IV genes at the bottom of the hierarchy are dependent on level II genes and are transcribed late in the cell cycle from sigma 54-dependent promoters. To study the regulation of genes at levels III and IV, we have isolated and sequenced the rpoN gene in order to analyze its expression, purified the rpoN gene product, and examined the role of the RpoN protein in initiation of transcription from sigma 54-dependent promoters. We report here epistasis experiments that show rpoN is required for transcription of level III genes, but that the expression of the rpoN gene itself is not dependent on any of the fla genes examined; these results place rpoN at level II near the top of the hierarchy. Consistent with this conclusion were nuclease S1 assays that mapped the rpoN transcription start site and identified a sequence centered at -24, GTTA/TACCA/TT, which is similar to the core consensus sequence of the level IIB fliF, fliL, and fliQ promoters. We purified the full-length rpoN gene product to near homogeneity and demonstrated that the RpoN protein is required for transcription from the well-characterized sigma 54-dependent glnAp2 promoter of Escherichia coli and specifically recognizes the level III flbG gene promoter of C. crescentus. These last results confirm that rpoN encodes the C. crescentus sigma 54 factor and opens the way for the biochemical analysis of transcriptional regulation of level III and IV fla genes.

Abortive Cycling and the Release of Polymerase for Elongation at the σ54-dependent glnAp2 Promoter

Transcription initiation at the sigma 54-dependent glnAp2 promoter was studied to follow the state of polymerase as RNA synthesis begins. Sigma 54 polymerase begins transcription in abortive cycling mode, i.e. after the first bond is made, approximately 75% of the time the short RNA is aborted and synthesis must be restarted. Polymerase is capable of abortive initiation until it reaches a position beyond +3 and before +7, at which stage polymerase is released from its promoter contacts and an elongation complex is formed. INitial elongation is accompanied by two transcription bubbles, one moving with the polymerase and the other remaining at the transcription start site. The sigma 54-associated polymerase shows an earlier and more efficient transition out of abortive initiation mode than prior studies of sigma 70-associated polymerase.

The Domain Structure of Sigma 54 as Determined by Analysis of a Set of Deletion Mutants

Escherichia coli σ54 was analyzed by making a series of 16 internal deletions within its gene and analyzing the properties of the mutant proteins. All of the mutant proteins except one were strongly defective in a growth test that relied on σ54 function. Additional assays were applied to determine the causes of these defects. The assays monitored the following properties; the level of protein expression; ability to bind to the -24 promoter element of the glnAP2 promoter in vivo; the ability to bind to the -12 promoter element in vivo; ability to melt the promoter start site in vivo; ability to bind the Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoter in vitro; and the ability to form a sigma 54-core RNA polymerase complex (Eσ54 holoenzyme) in vitro. The analysis shows a modular structure in that certain regions of the protein predominate in contributing to each of these properties. A large carboxyl region of the protein is essential for promoter binding. A smaller amino-terminal segment is essential for DNA melting. An element essential for the forming the Eσ54 holoenzyme lies between these two regions. None of these domains resemble those of σ70 and this difference is discussed in view of the different transcription mechanisms directed by the two proteins.