Abstract BACKGROUND The current WHO classification of Central Nervous System tumors recognizes several glioma types driven by the BRAFV600E mutation. These tumors mostly encompass pediatric low-grade gliomas. Nevertheless, a subset of them behaves as anaplastic gliomas and, currently, the unique predictive criterion linked to anaplasia is an elevated mitotic index (more than 2.5 mitoses/mm2). Histologically, the high-grade gliomas harboring BRAFV600E alteration mostly correspond to WHO grade 3 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, IDH wild-type glioblastoma, entering the WHO grade 4 subset like the epithelioid subtype, and the rarer high-grade gliomas with piloïd features. These tumor types share their histomolecular features making differential diagnoses difficult. In this setting, DNA methylation profiling may be very useful to precise the integrative diagnosis. However, some of those high-grade forms failed in our experience to be classified in any methylation class with v11b4 version of the Heidelberg classifier. METHODS To understand the reasons explaining this standard classification failure, we investigated with multi-omics approaches (epigenetics, next-generation sequencing, RNAseq, proteomics and metabolomics) a well clinical characterized cohort of 17 high-grade pediatric intracranial tumors harboring this mutation. RESULTS Interestingly, almost all tumors show similar morphological features and associated passenger molecular alterations mostly CDKN2A homozygous deletion. When using the new v12.5 brain tumor classifier, the methylation profiling of the 2/17 unclassified tumors was clustering with a new MPNST (Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor) methylation entity. The RNAseq and proteomics analyses were showing a different molecular pattern from standard BRAF-mutated high-grade gliomas, even the clinical, radiological and histomolecular characteristics were comparable. CONCLUSION So, methylation profiling should be part of the mandatory molecular assessments to perform when a BRAF-mutated tumor is seen by neuropathologists. Furthermore, the multiomics analyses helped us to define a specific molecular pattern of this new BRAF-driven entity, where frequency and prognosis need to be determined on another larger series.
Read full abstract