Glenohumeral Arthritis Research Articles

Computed tomography–based three-dimensional modeling of glenoid bone preservation with augmented baseplates

BackgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a treatment option for a variety of shoulder pathologies, including rotator cuff arthropathy, glenohumeral arthritis, and irreparable rotator cuff tears and fractures. There has been substantial improvement in rTSA implants and surgical techniques, such as augmented baseplates that preserve bone tissue. In this study, we used three-dimensional modeling to determine the extent of bone preservation with augmented baseplates in rTSA. MethodsComputed tomography scans from 50 consecutive patients before they underwent rTSA were used to create three-dimensional models of each glenoid. The virtual positions of reverse shoulder baseplate implants followed strict parameters for adequate fixation as determined through consensus among 4 fellowship-trained shoulder specialists. Parameters for adequate fixations included 100% backside contact, neutral scapular version, and 10° of inferior tilt. The 4 baseplate options trialed on each glenoid were a nonaugmented baseplate, a small 10° half-wedge augment, a medium 20° half-wedge augment, and a large 30° half-wedge augment. The extent of volumetric glenoid bone removal and lateralization of the baseplate was calculated for each scenario. ResultsPreoperative computed tomography imaging showed a mean of 10.7° of retroversion and a reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle of 21.3°. A medium augment (20° half wedge) was determined as optimal in 29 cases, and a large augment (30° half wedge) was considered optimal for the remaining 21 cases. The use of augmented baseplates was calculated to preserve 54% glenoid bone stock (1989 ± 650 mm3 bone removal vs. 4439 ± 1636 mm3 with nonaugmented baseplate; P < .001). The surgeon-selected augmented baseplate was on average 4.1 mm lateral in comparison to the nonaugmented baseplate. ConclusionsThe use of augmented baseplates reduces the volume of bone that needs to be removed in rTSA. Furthermore, augmented baseplates result in relative lateralization of the glenosphere, which has been theorized to improve soft tissue tension and limit impingement and scapular notching. Further exploration of the impact of augmented baseplates on clinical outcomes is needed.

Glenohumeral Arthropathy After Arthroscopic Surgery for Shoulder Instability: Outcomes at 16-Year Follow-up

Glenohumeral arthropathy after surgery for traumatic shoulder instability is a condition whose etiology and long-term course are still unknown. To evaluate the risk factors for the onset of arthropathy and to assess the relationship between the degree of arthropathy and final outcomes. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We included patients who underwent surgery for a shoulder instability at a single institution between 2000 and 2004. The following variables were studied for relationship with functional outcomes: sex, age, body mass index, smoking at the time of surgery, number of episodes of shoulder dislocation, and time from first dislocation to surgery. The number of anchors used and their position were also evaluated. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and Rowe scores, and results were compared with the onset of arthropathy according to Buscayret classification. Spearman and Pearson correlations were performed for the association between glenohumeral arthritis (Buscayret grade) and the study variables, the Mann-Whitney U test and Student t test were used to compare outcome scores with the study variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare Buscayret grade and outcome scores. A total of 26 shoulders in 25 patients were analyzed, finding a high rate (54%) of arthropathy at a minimum follow-up of 16 years. Patients with Buscayret grade 4 had the worst functional results (P = .007). However, 80% of patients with Buscayret grade ≤3 had excellent Constant-Murley scores. A significant relationship was found between degree of arthropathy and patients who were smokers before surgery (P < .01). No relationship was found between the onset of arthropathy and the other variables analyzed. Postinstability glenohumeral arthropathy was not correlated with functional outcomes except in those patients with advanced arthroplasty (Buscayret grade 4). A direct relationship was found between smoking before surgery and the onset of glenohumeral arthropathy.

Considerations for Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Selection in Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis With Posterior Glenoid Deformity.

Glenoid deformity has an important effect on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The B2/B3 glenoid has particularly been associated with a poorer outcome with shoulder arthroplasty compared with other glenoid types. One of the primary challenges is striking a balance between deformity correction and joint line preservation. Recently, there has been a proliferation of both anatomic and reverse implants that may be used to address glenoid deformity. The purpose of this review was to provide an evidence-based approach for addressing glenoid deformity associated with primary glenohumeral arthritis.

Glenoid Bone Loss Determination: Validity and Reliability of the Constellation Technique Versus the Sagittal Best Fit Circle Technique.

ObjectiveTo propose a new method for glenoid bone loss measurement, the constellation technique (CST); determine its reliability and accuracy; and compare the validity of CST with that of the conventional technique (CVT) and standard measurements for ratio calculation.Materials and MethodsSixty shoulders with intact glenoids and no glenohumeral instability and arthritis underwent CT scans. Simulated osteotomies were conducted on the 3D models of glenoids at two cutting locations, expressed as clock face times (2:30–4:20; 1:30–5:00). Two experienced surgeons compared three methods for glenoid bone loss measurement; CVT (best-fit circle), CST (‘5S’ steps), and standard measurement. Eight undergraduates remeasured five randomly chosen shoulders with moderate to severe bone loss. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for raters.ResultsWith a defect range between 2:30 and 4:20, all 60 glenoids demonstrated minimal bone loss (< 15%); while between 1:30 and 5:00, 42 shoulders were with moderate bone loss (15–20%), and 18 shoulders with severe bone loss (≥ 20%). For experienced raters, no significant differences were noted between protocos for all categories of bone loss (p ≥ 0.051), with good inter- and intraobserver reliability indicated by ICC. For novice raters, post hoc Tukey analysis found that CST was more accurate in one patient with a standard mean bone loss of 23.2% ± 1.9% compared with CVT.ConclusionThe CST turned the key step of glenoid defect evaluation from deciding an en face view to determining the glenoid inferior rim. The protocol is simple, accurate, and reproducible, especially for novice raters.

Does the transfusion rate following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty warrant aggressive perioperative blood management? An indications-based analysis

HypothesisWe hypothesized that certain operative conditions are more likely to require transfusion after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), but found no data comparing transfusion rates for traumatic, post-traumatic, and non-traumatic indications. MethodsRetrospective review identified 1083 patients with RTSA. After exclusion of revision and tumor cases, 783 patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: traumatic (acute fractures, fracture-dislocations), post-traumatic (nonunions, malunions, chronic dislocations), or non-traumatic (chronic rotator cuff insufficiency, glenohumeral arthritis with advanced glenoid wear). Demographics, operative indications, preoperative hematocrit, postoperative hematocrit, change in hematocrit, estimated blood loss, operative time, and blood transfusion rates were compared. We constructed a logistic regression model to determine the risk factors predicting blood transfusion. ResultsIndications were acute trauma in 83 patients, post-traumatic sequelae in 65, and non-traumatic conditions in 635. There were no statistically significant differences regarding body mass index (P = .5) or American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .11). There were more females in the traumatic and post-traumatic cohorts than in the non-traumatic cohort (P < .001). Surgical age was younger in the post-traumatic cases (P = .002). The overall frequency of blood transfusion was 4.6% (36/783): traumatic, 19% (16/83); post-traumatic, 17% (11/65); and non-traumatic, 1.4% (9/635). Both the traumatic and post-traumatic groups had significantly higher rates of blood transfusion than non-traumatic cases (P < .001). Preoperative hematocrit was lower in the traumatic group and estimated blood loss was higher in the traumatic and post-traumatic groups (P = .001). Post-traumatic patients experienced the greatest drop in postoperative hematocrit from preoperative levels. The multivariate logistic regression model showed that traumatic and post-traumatic indications for surgery were each an independent risk factor for blood transfusion, as was change in hematocrit, body mass index, surgical age, estimated blood loss, and preoperative hematocrit. ConclusionsOur results suggest that acute trauma as the indication for RTSA is the strongest independent risk factor for blood transfusion followed by post-traumatic sequelae. Surgeons should be aware of the markedly increased risk of transfusion based purely on these 2 surgical indications especially when in combination with other predictors of transfusion.

The role of shoulder arthroplasty after chronic brucellosis of glenohumeral joint septic arthritis. A case report and literature reviews.

IntroductionThe main socioeconomic area in Thailand has been the agricultural endemic area, where brucellosis infection, one of the bacterial infectious diseases has been an overlooked diagnose.Presentation of caseA 50-year-old Thai woman was admitted to the hospital with pain and limited motion in her left shoulder. These symptoms have been prolonging with progressive clinical for two years. The physical examination revealed stiffness in all directions. The glenohumeral joint appeared to be narrowing on radiographic evaluation. The multiple loculate mass and septic glenohumeral joint arthritis were seen by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, the Brucellosis investigation specificity was Brucella IgM/IgG positive. This patient was treated with a combination of surgery and oral antimicrobial medication. We decided to perform a total shoulder arthroplasty because the patient was still in pain and stiff from secondary arthritis.DiscussionAs a result of the late treatment for osteoarticular involvement, secondary osteoarthritis develops until leading to significant cartilage loss. Therefore, even medical treatment and surgical debridement, the patient still suffers from secondary osteoarthritis, which causes pain and limited activity. The arthroplasty treatment method plays a role in the treatment of function following secondary osteoarthritis infection.ConclusionThe role of arthroplasty was selected in the treatment of brucellosis osteoarticular involvement, which is an uncommon and difficult to identify condition that can lead to maltreatment. So that this case report offers the treatment option if the patient was not responsible for the medical and surgical debridement therapy with secondary osteoarthritis at the glenohumeral joint, even though the brucellosis infection condition had completely resolved.

Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Arthropathy.

Arthroplasty is not an optimal treatment for massive rotator cuff tears in patients who are active and without glenohumeral arthritis. Several surgical techniques have been developed for these patients, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with single-/double-row repair (with or without interval slides, margin convergence, graft augmentation), graft bridging, superior capsular reconstruction, tuberoplasty, and tendon transfers. Complete, tension-free, anatomic repair is ideal; however, tendon atrophy and retraction associated with massive tears often complicate repairs. All surgical treatments significantly increase patient-reported functional outcomes 1 year after intervention, with many treatments demonstrating improved mid-term and long-term outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e1-e12.].

Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears in the setting of mild to moderate glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUNDRotator cuff pathology is a very common source of shoulder pain. Similarly, osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint can cause shoulder pain and produce similar symptoms. Surgical management can be indicated for both pathologies, however, outcomes data is limited when examining rotator cuff repair (RCR) in the setting of glenohumeral arthritis (GHOA). Thus, this study sought to determine outcomes for patients who undergo RCR in the setting of GHOA.AIMTo evaluate if a relationship exists between outcomes of RCR in the setting of GHOA.METHODSThis was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with concurrent glenohumeral osteoarthritis between 2010-2017. Patients were stratified based on rotator cuff tear size and glenohumeral osteoarthritis severity. Cohorts were paired 1:1 with patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients included had a minimum two year follow-up. Rate of conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty, complication rates following initial surgery, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected.RESULTSA total of 142 patients were included. The number of patients that required total shoulder arthroplasty within two years after index surgery was low. 2/71 (2.8%) patients with GHOA, and 1/71 (1.4%) without GHOA. Following rotator cuff repair, both groups showed favorable patient-reported outcomes.CONCLUSIONPatients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed comparable outcomes to patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Ultrasound-guided Treatments for the Painful Shoulder.

Shoulder pain is an extremely common condition. The painful shoulder may be the result of a wide spectrum of underlying pathological conditions, including calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff, subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, acromioclavicular or glenohumeral arthritis, tenosynovitis of the long biceps tendon, rotator cuff lesions, and many other less common conditions. Ultrasound imaging is an effective tool for the diagnosis and also for the image guidance of treatment of the majority of these conditions. Several ultrasound-guided procedures are effective for pain relief, such as percutaneous irrigation, intra-bursal or intra-articular drugs injection, fluid aspiration, neural block. This review article aims to summarize and discuss the most common treatment possibilities with ultrasound guidance for the painful shoulder.

Patient Age and Surgical Intervention as Risk Factors for the Development of Osteoarthritis After Posterior Shoulder Instability: A Population-Based Study.

Background:Diagnosis and treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) has improved with advances in imaging and surgical technique. However, the relationship between PSI and osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear.Purpose:To evaluate a population-based cohort to (1) determine the rate of symptomatic OA, (2) identify patient characteristic risk factors for OA, and (3) evaluate the effect of posterior capsulolabral repair on OA progression.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:After review of 324 patient records, we included 115 patients (14 female, 101 male) diagnosed with PSI between January 1994 and July 2012 with an average follow-up of 12.5 years (range, 5-23 years). Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, injury characteristics, surgical details (if any), and radiographic progression of OA. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to estimate survival free of OA; characteristics associated with OA progression were determined via univariate Cox regression models, and associated 95% CIs and hazard ratios (HRs) are presented.Results:Overall, 14% (16/115) of patients had radiographic progression of symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis, with 5-year survival of 88.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%). Older age at the time of instability diagnosis was associated with arthritis progression (10-year unit HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.26-3.03). Patients who underwent surgery demonstrated increased radiographic progression of OA (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.23-13.23). There was a trend of increased OA in patients treated with labral debridement compared with repair despite lower baseline levels of OA; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .09).Conclusion:Symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis is not seen routinely in patients with PSI. Although uncommon, an age of at least 30 years at the time of diagnosis and surgical intervention were identified as risk factors for developing symptomatic arthritis at long-term follow-up.

Poster 161: Consequence Athletes with Anterior Shoulder Instability: Consider Latarjet

Objectives:The Latarjet procedure has been shown to be effective in treating recurrent shoulder instability, especially in the setting of glenoid bone loss and after failed previous Bankart repair. Several studies have additionally shown a significant reduction in recurrent instability rates when compared to Bankart repair in contact athletes when the Latarjet procedure is performed in a primary setting. We have identified an additional population of patients that provides greater challenges beyond the common athlete including those involved in contact sports. Termed “consequence athletes,” these patients are defined as athletes who perform in high risk, uncontrolled environments for whom an injury is likely to threaten life or livelihood. This population includes elite military forces, law enforcement and federal agents, motocross, elite skiers/snowboarders, whitewater kayak and rafters, and rock climbers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate minimum 2-year outcomes of primary Latarjet procedure in consequence athletes with anterior shoulder instability.Methods:Consequence athletes who underwent open Latarjet by one of the three sports medicine trained senior surgeons between August 2006 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed from prospectively collected data. Minimum 24 follow up was obtained on all patients. Those younger than 18 at follow up, history of concomitant or prior remplissage procedure, glenoid reconstruction with allograft, severe glenohumeral arthritis, or hyperlaxity were excluded. Glenoid bone loss (GBL) was evaluated on preoperative MRI and the cohort divided into GBL 0-14% and ≥15%. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation (SANE) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Short Form–12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain score (0 - 10, 10 = worst pain). Postoperative patient satisfaction (1 - 10, 10 = very satisfied) was evaluated. Complications and revision surgeries were recorded. Failure was defined as a postoperative dislocation or a revision surgery.Results:Sixty-five consequence athletes were included (54 males, 11 females). The mean age at surgery was 28.5 ± 8.7 years (range 15.8-56.4). The most frequent professions included 17 skiers (26.2%), 17 rock climbers (26.2%), 10 snowboarders (15.4%), 9 white water kayakers/rafters (13.8%), and 8 federal agents/military (12.3%). Primary latarjet was performed in 30 (46.2%) without prior history of soft tissue stabilization procedures. Mean GBL was 13.7%; 27 (41.5%) had 0-14% GBL and 32 (49.2%) had ≥15% GBL. Significant improvement in PROs at minimum 2-year follow was demonstrated for SANE (57.9 ± 24.5 to 91.0 ± 9.5), SF12 PCS (45.5 ± 8.7 to 54.4 ± 7.1), ASES pain (41.5 ± 9.7 to 47.4 ± 5.3), ASES function (31.8 ± 12.6 to 46.2 ± 6.8), ASES total (73.0 ± 19.8 to 93.7 ± 10.0), and quickDASH (27.0 ± 14.0 to 10.0 ± 28.8). Median patient satisfaction was 10. One patient sustained a recurrent dislocation (1.5%), 2 (3%) patients underwent revision surgery. There was no significant correlation between PROs and GBL, number of previous dislocations, or prior soft tissue stabilization procedures.Conclusions:The latarjet procedure a reliable and safe treatment for shoulder instability in the high demand “consequence athlete” population with a post-operative dislocation rate of 1.5% and revision rate of 3%. Significant improvement in PROs was demonstrated for SANE, SF12 PCS, ASES, and DASH with median patient satisfaction score of 10. These findings support treatment of this population with the latarjet procedure, even in the setting of minimal preoperative GBL, where a recurrent instability event could be catastrophic to the individual patient or those working or participating along with them.

Brachial plexopathy following shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundAnatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are being performed with increasing frequency. While rare, postoperative brachial plexopathy can occur, and its incidence and natural history remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to report the epidemiology, patient characteristics, and clinical course of postoperative brachial plexopathies following shoulder arthroplasty. MethodsAll patients undergoing TSA or RSA at a single institution from April 2017 to May 2019 were included. Patients with postoperative brachial plexus sensorimotor deficits were identified based on postoperative physical examination, imaging, and/or electrodiagnostic data. Patient data including age, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgery performed, surgical indications, sensorimotor deficits, and date of onset and resolution of sensorimotor deficits were recorded. ResultsTwelve of 881 patients (1.4%; 8 female, 4 male) who underwent shoulder arthroplasty during the study period were identified with postoperative brachial plexopathy. The median age was 65 years, and median BMI was 24.4 kg/m2. The index procedure included 8 anatomic TSA and 4 RSA in patients with brachial plexopathy. Surgical indications included glenohumeral arthritis (8 patients), rotator cuff arthropathy (2 patients), avascular necrosis (1 patient), and proximal humerus fracture (1 patient). Nine of 12 patients recovered fully at a mean of 8.2 months, 2 patients had incomplete recovery with persistent sensory symptoms at a mean 12.4-month follow-up, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up at 1.3 months and, thus, recovery status is unknown. Patients who received a combination of general anesthesia and brachial plexus block experienced a higher rate of brachial plexopathy than those who received general anesthesia or brachial plexus block alone. ConclusionsThis institutional registry study provides a descriptive analysis of the patient demographics and course of recovery for patients with postoperative brachial plexopathy following shoulder arthroplasty. For this institutional cohort, patients with brachial plexus deficits had a significantly lower BMI and higher rate of receiving a combination of brachial plexus block and general anesthesia than the institutional registry cohort as a whole.

Treatment of Proximal Humerus Varus Deformity Secondary to Neonatal Glenohumeral Septic Arthritis: A Case Report

Background: Proximal humerus shortening and varus can occur secondary to neonatal shoulder septic arthritis and focal fibrocartilage dysplasia. Valgus osteotomy of the proximal humerus compensates for a little bite of shortening, and improves the shoulder joint's range of motion.&#x0D; Case Report: In this study, we present two patients with severe proximal humerus deformity following glenohumeral septic arthritis. Both of them underwent valgus osteotomy, and had a satisfactory result in terms of range of motions and cosmesis at five years follow-up.&#x0D; Conclusion: Treatment of varus deformity of proximal humerus is challenging issue. There are few reports of surgical treatment. Sever varus deformity of proximal humerus impacts the motion of shoulder. We reported a novel method of valgus osteotomy of proximal humerus in patients with severe varus deformity secondary to neonatal septic arthritis and long-term clinical follow-up.

3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of glenoid deformity in glenohumeral arthritis using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence.

To compare MRI with 3D reconstructions and 3D-CT with respect to assessment of glenoid wear in osteoarthritic shoulders. 3D reconstructions were generated for CT and MR (utilizing the Dixon technique) imaging performed on 29 osteoarthritic shoulders. Two reviewers independently performed glenoid morphometric measurements and evaluated glenoid erosion. Mean differences between the two modalities were calculated. Inter-observer agreement was calculated using kappa coefficient. The combined mean absolute difference (bias) in glenoid version between 3D-CT and 3D-MRI was 2.7° ± 1.6° (range 0.15-7.85, P value = 0.7). The combined mean absolute difference in glenoid inclination between 3D-CT and 3D-MRI was 6.8° ± 4.1° (range 0.8°-15.75°, P value = 0.17). No significant inter-reader variation in glenoid version and inclination measurements on 3D-CT and 3D-MRI was found (P > 0.05). The inter-reader reliability for both CT and MRI was high for Walch grading of glenoid bone loss (κ = 1, κ = 0.81, respectively). 3D-MRI is comparable to 3D-CT with respect to axial glenoid bone loss, as measured by glenoid version. However, for coronal bone loss estimation, measured by glenoid inclination, 3D-CT remains the gold standard. Thus, 3D-MR can be used as an alternative for preoperative assessment of glenoid version in arthritic shoulders.

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients under age 60 years.

We aimed to characterize the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients aged < 60 years. We hypothesized meaningful improvements in shoulder functionality and pain with TSA and an acceptably low rate of prosthesis complications and revisions. This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 patients (34 shoulders) undergoing TSA before age 60 years with a minimum follow-up period of 10 years. Shoulder range of motion, functionality (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores), and pain (visual analog scale score) were evaluated. Radiographs were assessed for lateral humeral offset, the acromiohumeral interval, and glenoid loosening. The mean age of the patients was 54.4±5.5 years (range, 35.5-59.8 years), with a mean follow-up period of 16.1±4.5 years (range, 10.0-26.1 years). In patients aged < 60 years, TSA significantly improved forward elevation (from 119°±26° to 146°±21°, P=.0002), external rotation (from 21°±25° to 52°±15°, P=.0001), and internal rotation (from L5 to L1, P=.002). Additionally, TSA significantly increased American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (from 32±20 to 64±27, P=.0008) and Simple Shoulder Test scores (from 3±2 to 7±4, P=.0004) and reduced visual analog scale pain scores (from 7±3 to 3±3, P=.0001). Radiographically, there was no significant difference in mean lateral humeral offset (13±6 mm vs. 10±12 mm, P=.472) or the mean acromiohumeral interval (20±4.2 mm vs. 16±6 mm, P=.061) between immediate postoperative and final follow-up radiographs. Radiographic evidence of glenoid loosening was noted in 2 patients. Complications occurred in 6 patients (17.6%), all of which were cases of aseptic glenoid loosening. Ultimately, 4 patients underwent conversion to a reverse TSA and 2 underwent arthroscopic glenoid removal. The rate of prosthesis survivorship was 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.4%-100%) at 10 years, 85.4% (95% CI, 73.7%-97.2%) at 15 years, and 80.1% (95% CI, 65.1%-98.4%) at 20 years. TSA consistently improved shoulder functionality and reduced pain while limiting the need for further revisions. These findings suggest that TSA is a viable treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis in younger patients.

Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ?

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or nonoperatively. Given the mixed results in the literature, the optimal treatment is unclear to surgeons. The purpose of this study was to survey orthopedic shoulder and trauma surgeons to identify the patient- and fracture-related characteristics that influence surgical decision-making. We distributed a 23-question closed-response email survey to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Questions posed to respondents included demographics, surgical planning, indications for ORIF and arthroplasty, and the use of surgical augmentation with ORIF. Numerical and multiple-choice responses were compared between shoulder and trauma surgeons using unpaired t-tests and χ2 tests, respectively. Respondents included 172 shoulder and 78 trauma surgeons. When surgery is indicated, most shoulder and trauma surgeons treat 2-part (69%) and 3-part (53%) PHFs with ORIF. Indications for managing PHFs with arthroplasty instead of ORIF include an intra-articular fracture (82%), bone quality (76%), age (72%), and previous rotator cuff dysfunction (70%). In patients older than 50 years, 90% of respondents cited a head-split fracture as an indication for arthroplasty. Both shoulder and trauma surgeons preferred RSA for treating PHFs presenting with a head-split fracture in an elderly patient (94%), pre-existing rotator cuff tear (84%), and pre-existing glenohumeral arthritis with an intact cuff (75%). Similarly, both groups preferred ORIF for PHFs in young patients with a fracture dislocation (94%). In contrast, although most trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in low functioning patients with a significantly displaced fracture or nonreconstructable injury nonoperatively (84% and 86%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either RSA (44% and 46%, respectively) or nonoperative treatment (54% and 49%, respectively) (P<.001). Similarly, although trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in young patients with a head-split fracture or limited humeral head subchondral bone with ORIF (98% and 87%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either ORIF (54% and 62%, respectively) or HA (43% and 34%, respectively) (P<.001). ORIF and HA are preferred for treating simple PHFs in young patients with good bone quality or fracture dislocations, whereas RSA and nonoperative management are preferred for complex fractures in elderly patients with poor bone quality, rotator cuff dysfunction, or osteoarthritis. The preferred management differed between shoulder and trauma surgeons for half of the common PHF presentations, highlighting the need for future research.

Can the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provide as good of an outcome as an anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an excellent treatment option for a variety of shoulder pathologies. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains an excellent treatment for patients with glenohumeral arthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. RTSA has become a much more common procedure than TSA in recent times. It is currently unclear if patients who have a good outcome following TSA outperform patients who have a good outcome following RTSA. The purpose of this study was to compare the 2-year outcomes of patients with good outcomes, defined as having forward flexion of >130° and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of >70, following TSA and RTSA. MethodsAll patients who underwent TSA or RTSA between 2015 and 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Patients were included if their postoperative forward flexion was >130° and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was >70. Patients were excluded if they were a revision surgery, were treated with an arthroplasty for fracture, or had a latissimus transfer. Demographic variables were analyzed between groups. Range of motion (ROM), strength, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were compared between groups. ResultsOverall, 318 TSAs were included; 155 (49%) met the criteria for a “good” outcome. Among RTSAs, 428 were included; 154 (36%) met the criteria for a “good” outcome. When comparing PROs between groups, RTSA patients had worse preoperative and postoperative PRO scores (all P < .05). When comparing preoperative physical examination findings, RTSA patients had worse ROM and strength (all P < .05) and worse Constant Power scores and Constant scores (P < .001 in both cases). Postoperatively, RTSA patients had worse ROM and strength (all P < .05) and worse Constant scores (P = .028). The magnitude of change (delta) from preoperative to postoperative function was often greater following RTSA than TSA. There were no significant differences in whether expectations were met or exceeded between RTSA and TSA patients in regards to pain control (99% vs. 98%; P = .177), motion and strength (93% vs. 96%; P = .559), ability to return to activities of daily living (98% vs. 99%; P = .333), or return to sporting activities (95% vs. 91%; P = .268). ConclusionPatients do well following both TSA and RTSA. In patients who have a good outcome following either TSA or RTSA, those patients who underwent TSA have superior outcomes to patients following RTSA. However, the change in outcome scores from pre- to post-surgery is often more significant with RTSA, as they often start out with worse motion and clinical scores.

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Discussing Two Systematic Reviews With Opposing Conclusions on Shoulder Pain After Vaccine Administration.

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Discussing Two Systematic Reviews With Opposing Conclusions on Shoulder Pain After Vaccine Administration.

A Radiographic Analysis of Proximal Humeral Anatomy in Patients with Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis and Implications for Press-Fit Stem Length.

While short stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) preserve bone stock and facilitate revision surgery, they have been associated with higher rates of malalignment and loosening in some cases compared to standard length stems. The purpose of this study was to analyze the intramedullary canal in progressive increments distal to the greater tuberosity to provide anatomic information about the optimal length of press-fit short stems for alignment and stability in TSA. We hypothesized that the humeral canal diameter will remain variable for the first 50 to 75 mm distal to the greater tuberosity and will become consistent thereafter. A retrospective review of 99 consecutive patients undergoing TSA with CT scans was performed. Intramedullary anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) width as well as diameter were analyzed on two-dimensional computed tomography following multiplanar reconstruction. Measurements were taken at consistent distances distal to the greater tuberosity (GT). The transition point was measured at the proximal level of the humerus where endosteal borders of the medial and lateral cortices became parallel. The mean transition point was 73 mm from the GT (range: 53 to 109 mm). ML and AP widths became consistent 80 mm distal to the GT. IM diameter became consistent after 90 mm distal to the GT and a stem length of 90 mm extended past the transition point in 91.9% of cases. In TSA, a humeral stem length of 90 mm is required to predictably reach points at which the humeral canal becomes cylindrical and consistent in diameter. This information may aid data-driven decisions on humeral stem length during press-fit fixation, assuring consistency of alignment and implant stability, while maintaining ease of revision associated with a short stem implant. Level of evidence: III

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SHOULDER PAIN PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN CENTRAL INDIA

Background/Aim: Shoulder pain is a common yet etiologically diversified complaint amongst patients presenting to an orthopaedic facility. In present study we describe the epidemiology and profile of shoulder pain patients. Methodology: This study was carried out over a period of three months at a tertiary care facility in Central India and included a total of 72 adult patients (&gt;18 years) presenting with shoulder pain. Demographic profile, mode of injury, comorbidities, duration of pain, side involved, pain intensity (VAS) and Disability level (DASH) scores were noted. All the patients underwent clinical evaluation followed by radiological/MRI evaluation. Final diagnosis was based on MRI with clinical correlation. Mean age of patients was 47.88±12.56 years (range 23-69 years), majority were womenResults: (51.4%) with involvement of right side (55.6%). Mean duration of pain was 9.49±5.74 months. A total of 31 (43.1%) patients had no history of injury, Trauma (27.8%) and occupational injury (25%) were the most common modes. Diabetic history was positive in 37.5% patients. Mean pain and DASH scores were 7.36±70.88 and 54.40±14.80 respectively. Periarthritis shoulder (40.3%), rotator cuff injury (25%) and subacromial impingement (15.3%) were the most common diagnoses followed by ACJ and glenohumeral arthritis (8.3% each). There was 1 (1.4%) case each of calcific tendinitis and instable shoulder respectively. Shoulder pain patients presented with moderate to severe pain and aConclusion: high level of disability. Periarthritis shoulder and rotator cuff injury were the most common diagnoses.