Gleason Score Research Articles

Cribriform intraductal carcinoma of the prostate may be more aggressive than cribriform conventional/acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma

It remains to be determined if the prognostic value of cribriform morphology (Crib) associated with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC) is equivalent to that in conventional/acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma (CPA). We herein assessed radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes in 732 men with Grade Group 2-4 CPA without any Gleason pattern 5. Our cases were divided into 4 cohorts according to the absence or presence of Crib within CPA and/or IDC: Cohort-1) no Crib (n=347; 47.4%); Cohort-2) Crib only in CPA (n=203; 27.7%); Cohort-3) Crib only in IDC (n=17; 2.3%); and Cohort-4) Crib in both CPA and IDC (n=165; 22.5%). Compared with that in CPA only (Cohort-2), Crib in both CPA and IDC (Cohort-4) was significantly associated with adverse histopathological features, including higher tumor grade/stage and larger tumor volume. Univariate analysis revealed significantly higher risks of postoperative recurrence in patients with Crib in IDC only [Cohort-3; hazard ratio (HR) 2.450, P=0.022] or both CPA and IDC (Cohort-4; HR=2.835, P<0.001) than in those with Crib in CPA only (Cohort-2), while the prognosis was analogous between Cohort-3 vs. Cohort-4 (P=0.913). In multivariable analysis [Crib in CPA only (Cohort-2) as a reference], Crib in IDC only (Cohort-3; HR=3.821, P=0.002) or both CPA and IDC (Cohort-4; HR=1.905, P=0.004) showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival. Compared with Crib in CPA only, its presence in both CPA and IDC was thus found to be independently associated with a poorer prognosis, suggesting a potentially greater clinical impact of Crib in IDC than in CPA.

EphA-Mediated Regulation of Stomatin Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells.

Tumor growth and progression are affected by interactions between tumor cells and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. We previously showed that the expression of an integral membrane protein, called stomatin, was increased in cancer cells following their association with stromal cells. Additionally, stomatin impaired the Akt signaling pathway to suppress tumor growth. However, it remains unclear how stomatin expression is regulated. To explore this, we examined the cell surface molecules that can transduce the intercellular communication signals between cancer cells and stromal cells. Among these molecules, EphA3 and EphA7 receptors and their ligand ephrin-A5 were found to be expressed in prostate cancer cells, but not in prostate stromal cells. Cell-to-cell contact of prostate cancer cells through the EphA-ephrin-A interaction suppressed stomatin expression, while knockdown of EphA3/7 or ephrin-A5 increased stomatin expression. This increase contributed to an inhibition of prostate cancer cell proliferation. Intracellularly, the binding of ephrin-A to EphA attenuated extracellular signaling-regulated kinase (ERK) activation that promoted stomatin expression. Furthermore, ELK1 and ELK4, which are Ets family transcription factors phosphorylated by ERK, were involved in the induction of stomatin expression. We also found that higher Gleason score prostate cancer tissue samples had increased activation of EphA, while the stomatin expression and activated ERK and ELK levels were all low. In the mouse xenograft tumor samples generated by implantation of prostate cancer cells, EphA3 phosphorylation was attenuated and the ERK-ELK signaling and stomatin expression were enhanced in the area where stromal cells infiltrated the tumor. The EphA-mediated signaling suppresses the ERK-ELK pathway, leading to the reduction of stomatin expression that affects prostate cancer malignancy.

HMGA2 regulates GPX4 expression and ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant global health burden and an increase in oxidative stress is associated with cancer progression. High Mobility Group A2 (HMGA2), a chromatin architectural protein, increases oxidative stress and promotes sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers, however, the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the role of HMGA2 in GPX4 regulation and the impact on cellular responses to oxidative stress and ferroptosis sensitivity. We conducted UALCAN database analysis, western blot analysis, and lipid peroxidation assays to determine the relationship between HMGA2 and GPX4 and the levels of lipid reactive oxygen species in a panel of PCa cell lines, including an enzalutamide-resistant cancer cell line (C4–2B MDVR). Our results show an inverse relationship between HMGA2 and GPX4 expression with high HMGA2 and low GPX4 expression associated with higher Gleason score and lower survival probability in prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) patients, while low/moderate HMGA2 expression is positively associated with increased GPX4 expression and higher survival probability. Cell lines showed a moderately negative but not statistically significant correlation between HMGA2 and GPX4 expression, however, PC3 and DU145 PCa cells display higher lipid peroxides concomitant with higher endogenous levels of HMGA2 and low GPX4. Overexpression of wild-type HMGA2 in LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells leads to higher HMGA2 expression compared to Neo control and is associated with higher SLC7A11 and GPX4 expression, while interestingly truncated HMGA2 overexpression in LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells coincides with higher HMGA2 and reduced GPX4 expression, leading to increased lipid peroxides and susceptibility to ferroptosis. Overexpression of wild-type and truncated HMGA2 in 22Rv1 cells increases SLC7A11 mRNA yet differing GPX4 protein expression suggests posttranslational regulation of GPX4. Moreover, enzalutamide-resistant C4–2B MDVR cells display higher HMGA2 levels compared to C4–2B cells, as well as sensitivity to RSL3 ferroptosis inducer, which is partially reversed by ferroptosis inhibitor, ferrostatin-1. Interestingly, GPX4 expression is higher in C4–2B MDVR cells compared to C4–2B, and HMGA2 knockdown further increases its expression but does not significantly alter its susceptibility to ferroptosis. In conclusion, our study shows that HMGA2 regulation of GPX4 expression is complex and truncated HMGA2 downregulates GPX4 and increases lipid peroxides. Moreover, HMGA2-expressing cells including enzalutamide-resistant cells are susceptible to RSL-3-induced ferroptosis. Thus, ferroptosis sensitivity offers promising insights for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions for aggressive PCa.

Clinico-Pathological Factors and AR-LBD Mutations in Early and Late Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is not well understood because of its enormous biological heterogeneity and unreliable progression. We conducted this retrospective analysis to examine the variables predicting early and late progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) for better management of this disease. This single institutional retrospective study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2022. A total of 98 consecutive men meeting with the diagnosis of CRPC as per the inclusion criteria were included in the study and were stratified in four quartiles on the basis of time to CRPC (time to castration resistance [TTCR]) development. Early CRPC (1st quartile, TTCR = 6-12 months) and late CRPC (4th quartile, TTCR = 38-120 months) were then compared on the basis of different clinical, pathological and AR-LBD sequence to find the correlation with response duration. Median time to develop castration resistance was 25 ± 26.44 months. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 9.20 years and median baseline PSA was calculated 100±685.06 ng/mL respectively. Higher Gleason score (≥7-10) was found to be significantly associated with early development of CRPC (p<0.001) and lower nadir PSA was significantly indicating late CRPC progression (p<0.005). No mutations were found in androgen receptor exon-5, 6, 7 except a homozygous mutation in the 7th intronic region, which is involved in splice variants formation playing noteworthy role in CRPC development. Time for metastatic PCa to CRPC ranges from 6-120 months revealing its heterogeneous nature. Early age presentation in the clinic and high initial PSA and high grade (GS>7) at diagnosis were positively associated with early CRPC while lower nadir PSA was correlated with late CRPC progression. No remarkable genomic mutations were discovered. Therefore, more data are needed and further research is required with large no. of patients to discover the predictive prognostic biomarkers for better patients' management.

Insight into prostate cancer osteolytic metastasis by RelB coordination of IL-8 and S100A4.

Although RANK-LRANK interaction is essential for osteoclastogenesis, the mechanisms by which cancer cells invade bone tissues and initiate osteolytic metastasis remain unclear. Here, we show that the hyperactivation of RelB fosters prostate cancer (PCa) osteolytic metastasis by coordinating interleukin-8 (IL-8) and calcium-binging protein A4 (S100A4). The factors promoting PCa bone metastasis were investigated in sera from PCa patients and tumour tissues derived from nude mice using immunohistochemical analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Cell mobility and mineralization were quantified using BioStation CT and Osteolmage assay. The relative cistrome was investigated in advanced PCa cells by standard transcriptional analyses, including the luciferase reporter response, site-directed mutagenesis, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. PCa cell-initiated tumour formation, expansion, and bone metastasis were validated in mice using multiple approaches, including orthotopic, intraskeletal, and caudal arterial implantation models. IL-8 and S100A4 correlated with patient Gleason scores and bone metastasis. RelB upregulated IL-8, facilitating androgen receptor (AR)-independent growth. RelB-Sp1 interaction enhanced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by activating Snail and Twist. RelB-NFAT1c super-enhancer upregulated S100A4 in the organization of the cytoskeleton and bone metastasis. The RelB-IL-8-S100A4 signalling axis was confirmed to promote osteolytic metastasis in nude mice. RelB-IL-8 reciprocally promoted EMT by activating inflammatory signalling and inactivating AR signalling. IL-8 is essential for provoking PCa metastasis but insufficient to drive bone metastasis. IL-8-S100A4 cooperation was necessary for metastatic cells to target the bone. RelB activates inflammatory signalling by upregulating IL-8 and suppressing AR. RelB upregulates S100A4 by cooperating with NFATC1. IL-8 boosts EMT by activating Snail 1 and Twist 1, and S100A4 exacerbates osteolytic metastasis via calcium consumption. RelB harnesses IL-8 and S100A4 to drive PCa osteolytic metastasis.

Preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging does not impact surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy

ABSTRACT Objective: We reviewed our institutional experience of radical prostatectomy with and without preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to assess the impact of preoperative prostate mpMRI on surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Methods: We identified patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) between January 2012 and December 2017 (n = 1044). Using propensity scoring analysis, patients who underwent preoperative mpMRI (n = 285) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive preoperative mpMRI (n = 285). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node yield, rates of complications within 30 days, and positive surgical margin (PSM). Results: There were no significant differences in operative time, EBL, PSM, lymph node yield, or complication rates between the two cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative mpMRI was not predictive of the measured perioperative outcomes. Significant comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3) was the sole predictor of perioperative complications (P = 0.015). Increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted increased lymph node yield (P &lt; 0.001). The probability of PSM was associated with increasing preoperative prostate-specific antigen (odds ratio 1.036, P = 0.009). Body mass index was a predictor of operative time (P = 0.016) and EBL (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Although preoperative mpMRI has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, it does not impact perioperative radical prostatectomy outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative mpMRI for surgical planning in patients already diagnosed with clinically localized PCa.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Radiomics and Machine Learning in Prostate Carcinoma.

Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting PET-imaging agents has been increasingly used over the past decade for imaging and directing prostate carcinoma treatment. Here, we summarize the available literature data on radiomics and machine learning using these imaging agents in prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores derived from biopsy and after resection are discordant in a large number of prostate carcinoma patients. Available studies suggest that radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-radioligand avid primary prostate carcinoma might be better performing than biopsy-based Gleason-scoring and could serve as an alternative for non-invasive GS characterization. Furthermore, it may allow for the prediction of biochemical recurrence with a net benefit for clinical utilization. Machine learning based on PET/CT radiomics features was also shown to be able to differentiate benign from malignant increased tracer uptake on PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT examinations, thus paving the way for a fully automated image reading in nuclear medicine. As for prediction to treatment outcome following 177Lu-PSMA therapy and overall survival, a limited number of studies have reported promising results on radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT images for this purpose. Its added value to clinical parameters warrants further exploration in larger datasets of patients.

Recurrence of mucinous prostate cancer in rectal wall due to needle-track seeding from previous transrectal prostate biopsy.

Needle-track seeding of prostate cancer into the rectal wall following transrectal prostate biopsy is exceedingly rare. We report a case of mucinous prostate cancer recurrence in the rectal wall due to biopsy needle seeding, discovered after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. A 67-year-old man underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for mucinous prostate cancer (clinical stage T2cN0M0, Gleason score of 4 + 4, and initial prostate-specific antigen level of 8.8 ng/mL). Five years postoperatively, endoscopy revealed a rectal tumor, which was diagnosed as needle-track seeding from the previous transrectal prostate biopsy. Following resection of this rectal tumor, the patient's prostate-specific antigen level fell to <0.008 ng/mL. No signs of recurrence or metastasis were observed 3 months postoperatively. While rare, transrectal prostate biopsies can pose a small risk of needle-track seeding into the rectal wall. Endorectal examination should be considered if biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer occurs following radical prostatectomy.

Five-year Oncologic Outcomes Following Primary Partial Gland Cryo-ablation Prospective Cohort Study of Men With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer

To assess 5-year oncologic outcomes following primary partial gland cryo-ablation (PPGCA) in intermediate risk prostate cancer. Of 476 men undergoing PPGCA enrolled in our prospective oncologic and functional outcomes study, 313 had MRI concordant intermediate risk prostate cancer with no out-of-field Gleason Grade Group (GGG) ≥2, gross extracapsular extension or extreme apical disease on pre-treatment mpMRI. PSA was monitored every 6 months, and mpMRI at 6-12, 24, 42 and 60 months. Protocol biopsy at 6-12 months and 24 months were discontinued after interim analysis showing low rates of clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as any GGG≥2 disease. Freedom-from-failure (FFF) was defined as no prostate cancer specific mortality, metastatic disease, or whole-gland salvage treatment (WGST) RESULTS: csPCa was detected in 33 (10.5%) subjects. 91 had ≥4.5 years of follow-up data with a mean of 8.9, 3.4, and 2.0 surveillance PSA tests, MRIs, and prostate biopsies; none were lost to follow-up. At 5-years, rates of freedom-from-recurrence of in-field, out-of-field and overall csPCa were 86% (95% CI: 78-96), 85% (95% CI: 63-94), and 70% (95% CI: 57-84). The proportion with freedom-from-failure (FFF) at 5 years was 89% (95% CI: 83-95). None died from prostate cancer, 1 (1%) developed metastasis, 15 (16.5%) underwent WGST, and 15 (16.5%) underwent salvage focal therapy (FT). Only 3 of 91 (3.3%) eligible men were noncompliant with 5-year surveillance protocol. Very encouraging intermediate-term oncological outcomes following PPGCA were observed with very high compliance to a rigorous prospective protocol for identifying recurrent csPCa.

A Targeted Methylation-Based Multicancer Early Detection Blood Test Preferentially Detects High-Grade Prostate Cancer While Minimizing Overdiagnosis of Indolent Disease.

Indolent prostate cancer (PCa) is prevalent in the intended use population (adults age 50-79 years) for blood-based multicancer early detection (MCED) tests. We examined the detectability of PCa by a clinically validated, targeted methylation-based MCED test. Detectability by Gleason grade group (GG), clinical stage, association of detection status with tumor methylated fraction (TMeF), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in substudy 3 of Circulating Cell-Free Genome Atlas (CCGA; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02889978) and PATHFINDER (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04241796) studies. Test sensitivity for PCa in substudy 3 of CCGA was 11.2% (47/420). The test detected 0 (0%) of 58 low-grade (GG1), 3 (1.9%) of 157 favorable intermediate-grade (GG2), 4 (5.1%) of 78 unfavorable intermediate-grade (GG3), and 36 (31.9%) of 113 high-grade (GG4 and 5) cancers and 3 (3.2%) of 95 stage I, 11 (4.7%) of 235 stage II, 7 (14.9%) of 47 stage III, and 22 (81.5%) of 27 stage IV cases. The median TMeF was higher for detected than nondetected cases (2,106.0 parts per million [PPM]; IQR, 349.8-24,376.3 v 24.4 PPM; IQR, 17.8-38.5; P < .05). Nondetected cases had better OS (P < .05; hazard ratio [HR], 0.263 [95% CI, 0.104 to 0.533]) and detected cases had similar survival (P = .2; HR, 0.672 [95% CI, 0.323 to 1.21]) compared with SEER adjusted for age, GG, and stage. Performance was similar in PATHFINDER, with no detected GG1/2 (0/13) or stage I/II (0/16) cases. This MCED test preferentially detects high-grade, clinically significant PCa. Use in population-based screening programs in addition to standard-of-care screening is unlikely to exacerbate overdiagnosis of indolent PCa.

Prostate Specific Antigen Level and Gleason Score in Indonesian Prostate Cancer Patients

In Indonesia, the number of prostate cancer continues to increase and even becomes the most common malignancy in men in 2015. Delayed early detection of prostate cancer is a significant concern. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is found to be elevated in various conditions of prostate tissue damage, including prostate cancer. The extent of tissue damage in prostate cancer, represented by the Gleason score, is suspected to be related to the increase in the PSA level in the bloodstream. To investigate the relationship between the PSA level and Gleason scores in prostate cancer patients, a cross-sectional observational study was conducted. The study population consisted of 83 prostate cancer patients treated in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, Indonesia, from 2017 to 2021. Data collected were analyzed using Spearman correlation test was used with an alpha value of 5%. Results indicated that 37.3% patients had a PSA level above 200 ng/dL, and 25.3% had a PSA level between 10-50 ng/dL. The majority of patients (48.1%) had a Gleason score of 9-10 (ISUP 5), while 24.1% had a score of 8 (ISUP 4). Bivariate analysis showed no significant relationship between the PSA level and Gleason score (p-value=0.445). Further studies are needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PSA in diagnosing prostate cancer.

Prognostic model for second progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate and androgen deprivation therapy.

To develop and validate a prognostic risk model for high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients treated with upfront abiraterone acetate (ABI). This retrospective multicenter study involved 233 high-risk mHSPC patients who received upfront ABI, developed by three academic centers. The model was externally validated with an independent cohort of 282 patients. To identify independent prognostic factors for second progression-free survival (PFS2) and develop the best-fitted model, Cox proportional hazards regression, followed by the Akaike information criterion, was used. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their risk scores. PFS2 and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to the risk groups in the discovery and validation cohorts. The median age was 72 (range 51-89) years, with a median follow-up duration of 27 months. Independent factors linked to PFS2 included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, a primary Gleason score of 5, an extent of disease score of ≥3 or liver metastasis, and lactate dehydrogenase >220 U/L. Median PFS2 for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups were not reached, 43 months, and 16 months, respectively. The median OS was 29 months in the poor-risk group, whereas it was not reached in the favorable- and intermediate-risk groups. The 2-year OS rates in the favorable-, intermediate- and poor-risk groups were 94.5%, 80.1%, and 60.3%, respectively. The validation cohort confirmed the risk model's relationship with PFS2 and OS. The median PFS2 and OS in the high-risk group were 21 months and 32 months, respectively. Our prognostic model, including five clinical factors, is useful for patient care and treatment selection in high-risk mHSPC patients treated with ADT plus ABI. The developed model could provide more accurate information, guide treatment decisions, or classify patients in future clinical trials.

Comparison of the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with isolated peripheral versus transitional zone PIRADS 3 lesions.

We sought to investigate the association between isolated PIRADS 3 lesions of the transitional zone (TZ) versus the peripheral zone (PZ) and the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on systematic and targeted prostate biopsy (SB, TB). We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary institutional database of patients who underwent mpMRI-fusion followed by TB + SB between 2016 and 2021. We compared the incidence of csPCa (Gleason Grade Group ⩾ 2) in patients with solitary TZ-only PIRADS 3 and PZ-only PIRADS 3 on SB and TB. We excluded patients with (1)known PCa, (2)PIRADS 4-5 and/or (3)lesions in both TZ and PZ. T-tests, Chi-square tests, were conducted to compare between the groups. Of 1913 patients, we identified 110 with PZ-only and 38 with TZ-only PIRADS 3 lesions. 73 patients in PZ-only and 19 in TZ-only met inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were observed between PZ and TZ groups in terms of age, median prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, median PSA-density, or median number of targeted cores obtained, all with p > 0.05.On SB, the incidence of csPCA was higher in patients with PZ rather than TZ PIRADS-3 lesions (10/73 vs 1/19, p = 0.28). Similarly, csPCA was more common in TB of PZ versus TZ PIRADS 3 lesions (7/73 vs 0/19, p = 0.33). Based on these results, the positive predictive values of PIRADS3 as a marker of csPCA were 5.3% and 0% for TZ lesions on SB versus TB, respectively, compared to 17.7% and 9.6% in the PZ. PIRADS 3 lesions are rarely associated with csPCA on SB and TB, particularly when located in the TZ, which is an important factor to consider when deciding on a biopsy in patients with isolated TZ lesions.

Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.

To evaluate MRI and histological concordance in prostate cancer (PCa) identification via mapped transperineal biopsies. Retrospective per-lesion analysis of patients undergoing MRI and transperineal biopsy at the Valencian Institute of Oncology (2016-2024) using CAPROSIVO PCa data. Patients underwent MRI, with or without regions of interest (ROI), followed by transperineal biopsies (3-5 cores/ROI, 20-30 systematic). Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, considering PI-RADS 3 lesions as positive or negative. Gleason Grade Group (GG) > 1 defined clinically significant PCa (csPCa). 1817 lesions were analyzed from 1325 patients (median age 67, median PSA 6.3 ng/ml). 53% MRI were negative, GG > 1 prevalence was 38.4%. MRI-negative cases showed varying PCa rates: 57.4% negative, 30.2% GG 1, and 12.4% GG > 1. PI-RADS 3 lesions had mixed outcomes: 45.6% benign, 13.1% GG 1, and 41.3% GG > 1. 9.2% PI-RADS 4-5 lesions were negative, 9% GG 1, and 81.7% GG > 1. For PI-RADS 3 lesions considered positive, Se, Sp, NPV, PPV, and AUC were 82.9%, 75%, 87.6%, 67.4%, and 0.79 respectively. Considering PI-RADS 3 as negative yielded 64.8% Se, 91% Sp, 80.6% NPV, 81.7% PPV, and 0.78 AUC. MRI and mapped prostate biopsies exhibited moderate concordance. MRI could miss up to one in five csPCa foci and misinterpret one in three ROIs. Careful MRI interpretation is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study

PurposeRecent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery.MethodsWe queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006–2010, 2011–2015, and 2016–2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading.Results610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8–14.1%), comorbidities (2.1–5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78–84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6–15%), intermediate (20–33%), and high-risk groups (42–58%) –p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45–59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups.ConclusionsRecent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety.

Application value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRSI) can distinguish between benign and malignant prostate diseases. This study investigated the potential of MRSI for diagnosing prostate cancer and guiding prostate biopsy. We retrospectively reviewed 234 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent MRSI with targeted prostate biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups according to their puncture pathology: prostate cancer (n = 103, 44.02%) and benign prostatic disease (n = 131, 55.98%). The t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test was used to compare the groups. The diagnostic abilities of MRSI, prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination, and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast for prostate cancer were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC); the ARC-ROC values were 0.831, 0.768, 0.692, and 0.656, respectively. The AUC-ROC value for diagnosing prostate cancer using the CC/c ratio was 0.853. CC/c ratio > 0.97 was identified as the optimal threshold for diagnosing prostate cancer (sensitivity, 86.5%; specificity, 78.6%; Youden index, 0.651). Spearman correlation analysis revealed a correlation between the CC/c ratio and Gleason score (r = 0.737, p < 0.001). Using the CC/c ratio of MRSI as an adjunct to targeted prostate biopsy can improve the detection rate of positive biopsies and evaluate prostate cancer invasiveness.

Efficacy of brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer–propensity score-matched comparison

ObjectiveThe brachytherapy (BT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) are two methods recommended in current guidelines for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). It is difficult to compare the oncological results of these two treatments because of differences in baseline characteristics and treatment selection.we sought to compare the efficacy of BT and RP after propensity score matching(PSM)analysis.MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2021, our institution treated 657 patients with localized PCa (BT: n = 198; RP: n = 459)and followed up for > 2 years. Biochemical recurrence was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for BT, and as PSA0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP. PSM was applied based on the age, body mass index, PSA, prostate volume, clinical T-stage, Gleason grade, percentage of positive puncture needles ≥ 1/2, maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 mm, and follow-up period.ResultsMedian follow-up was 63 months for BT and 52 months for RP. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 294 (147 each) patients remained for further analysis.Kaplan–Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in clinical relapse-free survivals (cRFS) (p = 0.637),overall survival (OS) (p = 0.726),and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.505).BT was associated with improved biochemical relapse-free survivals (bRFS) compared to RP (p = 0.022), Logistic multivariate analysis based on the whole cohort revealed that clinical T stage ≥ T2b (p = 0.043) and tumor maximum diameter ≥ 5 mm (p = 0.044) were associated with significantly bRFS.ConclusionThe BT and RP group patients exhibited similar cRFS, OS, and CSS. However, patients in the BT groups exhibited better bRFS than those in the RP group.Clinical T stage ≥ T2b and a maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 mm were independent prognostic factors.

PDIA2 is associated with the prognosis of prostate cancer, and downregulation of PDIA2 delays the progression of prostate cancer cells.

Protein Disulfide-Isomerase A2 (PDIA2) is a gene that encodes proteins, responsible for protein folding and modification within cells. The development and course of many disorders are intimately linked to the aberrant expression of PDIA2. Nevertheless, more research is necessary to fully understand PDIA2's biological significance in pan-cancer, notably in prostate cancer (PCa). PDIA2 expression is elevated in various tumors and closely related to patient prognosis. Patients with prostate cancer who express PDIA2 high in particular have a bad prognosis in terms of progression-free survival. In addition, the upregulation of PDIA2 expression in prostate cancer patients is accompanied by higher Gleason scores, advanced tumor staging, lymph node metastasis, and elevated PSA levels. Detailed experiments further demonstrate that PDIA2 is a carcinogenic gene affecting prostate cancer cells' response to dasatinib therapy. For patients with prostate cancer, there is a clear positive connection between the expression level of PDIA2 and a bad prognosis. The prostate cancer treatment efficacy of dasatinib is hampered by PDIA2, which is intimately linked to the growth, invasion, and metastasis of PCa cells. In summary, our research highlights the potential of PDIA2 as a biomarker for the diagnosis and management of PCa.

Determining Long-term Prostate Cancer Outcomes for Active Surveillance Patients Without Early Disease Progression: Implications for Slowing or Stopping Surveillance

Background and objectiveActive surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) is the standard of care for low-grade disease, but there is limited guidance on tailoring protocols for stable patients. We investigated long-term outcomes for patients without initial progression and risk factors for upgrade. MethodsMen on AS with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on three serial biopsies, ≥5 yr without progression, and ≥10 yr of follow-up were included. Outcomes were upgrade (GG ≥2), major upgrade (GG ≥3), progression to treatment, metastasis, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient characteristics and risk of upgrade. Key findings and limitationsA total of 774 men met the inclusion criteria. At 10, 12, and 15 yr, upgrade-free survival rates were 56%, 45%, and 21%; major upgrade–free survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 61%; treatment-free survival rates were 86%, 83%, and 73%; metastasis-free survival rates were 99%, 99%, and 98%; and overall survival rates were 98%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. PCa-specific survival was 100% at 15 yr. On a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis, age, body mass index (BMI), and biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade (all p < 0.01), whereas age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density were associated with major upgrade. Conclusions and clinical implicationsPatients without progression for 5 yr on AS had modest rates of upgrade and low rates of metastasis, and mortality at 15 yr of follow-up. Year of diagnosis, older age, increased BMI, and increased biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade, whereas older age and greater PSA density were associated with an increased risk of major upgrade. A subset of these patients may benefit from deintensification of AS protocols. Patient summaryThere are little reported data or clinical guidelines for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who are stable for many years on active surveillance (AS). We show, in a large cohort, that PCa patients without progression for 5 yr on AS have modest rates of upgrade and very low rates of metastasis, and mortality rates at 15 yr of follow-up, and that older age, increased body mass index, and increased PCa volume are associated with an increased likelihood of future upgrade. This study supports continued AS in this patient population and deintensification in select patients.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Their Current Role in the Identification and Comparison of Gleason Patterns in Prostate Cancer Histopathology: A Comprehensive Review.

The development of the Gleason grading system has proven to be an irreplaceable tool in prostate cancer diagnostics within urology. Despite the advancements and developments in diagnostics, there remains a discrepancy in the grading process among even the most experienced pathologists. AI algorithms have demonstrated potential in detecting cancer and assigning Gleason grades, offering a solution to the issue of significant variability among pathologists' evaluations. Our paper explores the evolving role of AI in prostate cancer histopathology, with a key focus on outcomes and the reliability of various AI algorithms for Gleason pattern assessment. We conducted a non-systematic review of the published literature to examine the role of artificial intelligence in Gleason pattern diagnostics. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to gather pertinent information about recent advancements in artificial intelligence and their impact on Gleason patterns. We found that AI algorithms are increasingly being used to identify Gleason patterns in prostate cancer, with recent studies showing promising advancements that surpass traditional diagnostic methods. These findings highlight AI's potential to be integrated into clinical practice, enhancing pathologists' workflows and improving patient outcomes. The inter-observer variability in Gleason grading has seen an improvement in efficiency with the implementation of AI. Pathologists using AI have reported successful outcomes, demonstrating its effectiveness as a supplementary tool. While some refinements are still needed before AI can be fully implemented in clinical practice, its positive impact is anticipated soon.