Gleason Score Research Articles

Overdiagnosis for screen-detected prostate cancer incorporating patient comorbidities

Abstract Background Evidence regarding the likelihood of overdiagnosis in prostate cancer (CaP) screening with PSA are mainly based on clinical trials, which include younger population with fewer comorbidities than those receiving the test in clinical practice. We aimed to assess the likelihood of overdiagnosis and associated variables using real-world data. Methods Retrospective cohort of men >40 years with PCa, who had been diagnosed being asymptomatic and after a positive PSA test in the previous 12 months in two hospitals (2004-2022). The probability of overdiagnosis was estimated considering the life expectancy of the Spanish male in the year 2022 and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (lead time 10 years). PSA values and Gleason score were included as independent variables. Results Of the 2,331 patients in the cohort, 1,070 (46%) met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. The median follow-up time was 5.7 years (IQR 3.2-8.6). The median age was 71 years (IQR 65-78) and 37% had more than one comorbidity. At diagnosis, the median life expectancy was 12 years (IQR 4-18) and the probability of overdiagnosis was 30.8% (IQR 17.6-52.4). Patients with PSA levels >10 mg/dl tended to be older and with more comorbidities than those with PSA levels 4-10 mg/dl, and thus, with shorter life expectancy. The median probability of overdiagnosis was higher in patients with PSA levels >10 mg/dl (41.4%, IQR 21.5-73.9) than in those with PSA levels 4-10 mg/dl (20.1%, IQR 12.8-30.4), p < 0.001. Correspondingly, patients with Gleason score ≥8 were more likely to be overdiagnosed (median 42.6%, IQR 23.6-68.6) than those with Gleason score ≤6 (median 20.1%, IQR 12.8-30.4) (p < 0.001). Conclusions In clinical practice, older patients with comorbidities showed high PSA levels and Gleason score ≥8, presenting low life expectancy at diagnosis and, therefore, high probability of overdiagnosis. This highlights the importance of considering the patient’s comorbidities when ordering a new PSA test. Key messages • A detailed assessment of the prevalence of comorbidities among CaP patients in real-life settings has significant implications for patient management. • The decision to make an early diagnosis should be based on individual life expectancy, where comorbidity is at least as important as age.

Predicting time to castration resistance with androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: data from ULTRA-Japan Consortium.

Androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) become the new standard of care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). It is unknown whether time to castration resistance (TTCR), when using the first-line ARSIs, offers predictive value in mHSPC. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes for mHSPC patients treated with first-line ARSIs focusing on the TTCR. Data from the ULTRA-Japan study cohort from five academic institutes (496 mHSPC patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) in the total cohort was 80months with a median follow-up of 18months. Of 496 patients, 332 (67%), 82 (16.5%), and 82 (16.5%) were treated with first-line abiraterone acetate + prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, respectively. During the follow-up, a total of 155 (31%) were diagnosed with mCRPC with a median TTCR of 10months. In those 155 patients, TTCR > 12months is an independent predictor of longer OS from the first-line ARSIs. Cox regression analysis of the TTCR from initiating first-line ARSI in 496 mHSPC patients revealed three variables as independent predictors of shorter TTCR, including Gleason's score (GS) ≥ 9, the extent of disease (EOD) ≥ 2, and the presence of liver metastasis. Our results indicate that mHSPC patients with those three features are likely to have primary resistance to first-line ARSIs (doublet therapy), thus requiring consideration of other options, such as the recent triplet approach.

Machine learning discrimination of Gleason scores below GG3 and above GG4 for HSPC patients diagnosis

This study aims to develop machine learning (ML)-assisted models for analyzing datasets related to Gleason scores in prostate cancer, conducting statistical analyses on the datasets, and identifying meaningful features. We retrospectively collected data from 717 hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients at Yunnan Cancer Hospital. Of these, data from 526 patients were used for modeling. Seven auxiliary models were established using Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (Adaboost), and artificial neural network (ANN) based on 21 clinical biochemical indicators and features. Evaluation metrics included accuracy (ACC), precision (PRE), specificity (SPE), sensitivity (SEN) or regression rate(Recall), and f1 score. Evaluation metrics for the models primarily included ACC, PRE, SPE, SEN or Recall, f1 score, and area under the curve(AUC). Evaluation metrics were visualized using confusion matrices and ROC curves. Among the ensemble learning methods, RF, XGBoost, and Adaboost performed the best. RF achieved a training dataset score of 0.769 (95% CI: 0.759—0.835) and a testing dataset score of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.660—0.760) (AUC: 0.786, 95%CI: 0.722—0.803), while XGBoost achieved a training dataset score of 0.755 (95% CI: 95%CI: 0.711—0.809) and a testing dataset score of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.660—0.764) (AUC: 0.777, 95% CI: 0.726—0.798). Adaboost scored 0.789 on the training dataset (95% CI: 0.782—0.857) and 0.774 on the testing dataset (95% CI: 0.651—0.774) (AUC: 0.799, 95% CI: 0.703—0.802). In terms of feature importance (FI) in ensemble learning, Bone metastases at first visit, prostatic volume, age, and T1-T2 have significant proportions in RF’s FI. fPSA, TPSA, and tumor burden have significant proportions in Adaboost’s FI, while f/TPSA, LDH, and testosterone have the highest proportions in XGBoost. Our findings indicate that ensemble learning methods demonstrate good performance in classifying HSPC patient data, with TNM staging and fPSA being important classification indicators. These discoveries provide valuable references for distinguishing different Gleason scores, facilitating more accurate patient assessments and personalized treatment plans.

Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact.

Telesurgery has been recently gaining momentum as a natural evolution of robotic surgery. Besides providing expert surgical care to patients who cannot geographically access it, telesurgery can also facilitate surgical collaboration between surgeons who might need urgent assistance or coaching experts. The idea of having two consoles, with one remote and one local, has been the ideal setup for such ecosystems. However collaborations can take on many forms and might require more than one remote surgeon, depending on procedure complexity and surgeon availability. The objective of the study was to describe our perspectives and experience performing telesurgery on one patient, using three surgeon consoles for three surgeons, operating from three separate cities. In November 2023, a triple-console, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was performed in a collaborative effort among three surgeons in three separate locations employing telesurgery using the Kangduo Endosopic Surgical Robot (KD-SR-01, Sagebot Medical). The furthest distance between participants was approximately 2600km between Beijing and Hainan. We described and illustrated the applications and outcomes of this procedure to treat a single patient with prostate cancer. The local surgeon, along with the operating room team, and the patient were in Hainan, while the other two surgeons were in Beijing and Hunan Telesurgery command centers. The procedure lasted approximately 120min and there were no intra- or postoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was 100ml. The patient was ambulating 4h after surgery and remained in the hospital for 2days secondary to the postoperative care protocol followed by the local team taking care of the patient. The Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 7 without complication. The final pathology was ISUP Grade Group 4 (Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8) T2cN0 with negative surgical margins. Our experience shows that telesurgery involving multiple surgeons at multiple remote locations is possible and can be completed safely with low-latency connections via available telecommunication networks.

Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography with biological factor expression and lymph node metastasis in aggressive prostate cancer.

This paper focused on probing the correlation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) manifestations with biological factor expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in aggressive prostate cancer (PCa). A total of 136 PCa patients underwent surgical treatment, and received CT and MRI examinations before surgery, whereby the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters were obtained. Patients were categorized into the non-aggressive PCa group and aggressive PCa group according to the postoperative pathological results and Gleason scores. The expression of biological factors [prostate-specific antigen (PSA), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p27, and ki-67] in both groups was tested. CT and MRI manifestations of aggressive PCa patients were analyzed. The qMRI parameters, biological factors levels and LNM were compared in two groups; the relationships between CT and MRI manifestations, qMRI parameters and positive expression of biological factors and LNM were probed in two groups. In the aggressive PCa group, MRI and CT presented different degrees of abnormal prostate changes. In the aggressive PCa group, PSA and p27 expression and ADC values were lower, and PCNA and ki-67, and LNM rates were higher. Patients' LNM rate was higher than that of ≤ 2 cm when the tumor diameter was > 2 cm. ADC values were positively correlated with PSA and p27 positive expression, and negatively correlated with PCNA, ki-67 and LNM in the aggressive PCa group. MRI and CT manifestations of aggressive PCa had certain characteristics; MRI manifestations and qMRI possessed a correlation with biological factors and LNM; ADC could be employed to assess the aggressiveness of PCa.

Nodal radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma recurrence: predictive factors for efficacy.

Nodes are the second site for prostate cancer recurrence. Whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) has shown superiority over nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in two retrospective cohorts. We aimed to compare both modalities and assess factors associated with treatment outcomes. This retrospective multicentric cohort study included patients from five institutions spanning from 2010 to 2022. Patients had a history of prostatic adenocarcinoma classified as N0 M0 at diagnosis with a first nodal-only pelvic castration-sensitive recurrence. Failure-free survival (FFS) was defined as the time from the end of RT to the first failure event-biochemical or imaging recurrence, or death. A total of 147 patients (pts) were analyzed, mainly treated for a recurrence after initial prostatectomy (87%), with 64 (43.5%) undergoing SBRT and 83 (56.5%) undergoing WPRT. SBRT was chosen mainly for dosimetric constraints (67%) and was associated with a lower rate of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prescription. With a median follow-up of 68 months [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 51], FFS was significantly lower in the SBRT group (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, WPRT and ADT were associated with a longer FFS. Factors associated with a longer FFS after SBRT included associated ADT, lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a PSA doubling time >6 months, and a Gleason score <8. SBRT was associated with a lower rate of genitourinary and gastrointestinal grade ≥2 complications. For an isolated pelvic nodal prostate cancer recurrence, SBRT is associated with a shorter FFS compared to WPRT. SBRT is often more convenient for patients and leaves further pelvic salvage options available, so it can be explored as an option for well-informed patients.

A case of rapidly progressive prostate cancer with bone and lymph node metastasis after contact laser vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia

IntroductionProstate cancer is incidentally diagnosed in 6%–11% of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgeries.Case presentationA 79‐year‐old man was diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The prostate volume was 54.5 mL, and the prostate‐specific antigen level was 7.121 ng/mL. Magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy were not performed. He then underwent contact laser vaporization of the prostate. After 3 months, gross hematuria occurred, and the prostate‐specific antigen level was 62.495 ng/mL. Cystoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging revealed prostate cancer with bladder invasion. Prostate biopsy and transurethral resection were performed, revealing adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 5 + 5. The patient was diagnosed with prostate cancer T4N1M1b, and triplet therapy was initiated. After 6 months, the prostate‐specific antigen level was 0.037 ng/mL, and the metastases had shrunk.ConclusionVaporization for high‐grade prostate cancer can lead to rapid progression. Therefore, screening for prostate cancer before benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery is important.

Impact of Obesity on Gleason Score- Elderly and Very Elderly Patients with Prostate Cancer Indicated for Radical Radiotherapy

Introduction: Prostate cancer is an important public health concern in Brazil, especially among older men, with a significant mortality rate. In addition to advanced age, obesity emerges as a relevant risk factor, associated with a worse prognosis of the disease. Objective: To investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and Gleason score in older and very older patients with prostate cancer indicated for radiotherapy treatment. Methods: Prospective, descriptive, and longitudinal study with 258 patients with prostate cancer, evaluating age, initial PSA, BMI, race, and Gleason Score. Result: Findings revealed an association between a higher BMI and a more aggressive degree of disease, as indicated by higher Gleason scores. Conclusion: Overweight and obese patients have a higher and more evident Gleason score in older patients compared to the very older, being more notable in the older. This study is one of the few studies to examine the link between BMI and poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients

Low SMARCD3 expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer.

SWI/SNF complexes represent a family of multi-subunit chromatin remodelers that are affected by alterations in >20% of human tumors. While mutations of SWI/SNF genes are relatively uncommon in prostate cancer (PCa), the literature suggests that deregulation of various subunits plays a role in prostate tumorigenesis. To assess SWI/SNF functions in a clinical context, we studied the mutually exclusive, paralogue accessory subunits SMARCD1, SMARCD2, and SMARCD3 that are included in every known complex and are sought to confer specificity. Performing immunohistochemistry (IHC), the protein levels of the SMARCD family members were measured using a tissue microarray (TMA) comprising malignant samples and matching healthy tissue of non-metastatic PCa patients (n = 168). Moreover, IHC was performed in castration-resistant tumors (n = 9) and lymph node metastases (n = 22). To assess their potential role as molecular biomarkers, SMARCD1 and SMARCD3 protein levels were correlated with clinical parameters such as T stage, Gleason score, biochemical recurrence, and progression-free survival. SMARCD1 protein levels in non-metastatic primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and castration-resistant samples were significantly higher than in benign tissues. Likewise, SMARCD3 protein expression was elevated in tumor tissue and especially lymph node metastases compared to benign samples. While SMARCD1 levels in primary tumors did not exhibit significant associations with any of the tested clinical parameters, SMARCD3 exhibited an inverse correlation with pre-operative PSA levels. Moreover, low SMARCD3 expression was associated with progression to metastasis. In congruence with previous literature, our results implicate that both SMARCD1 and SMARCD3 may exhibit relevant functions in the context of prostate tumorigenesis. Moreover, our approach suggests a potential role of SMARCD3 as a novel prognostic marker in clinically non-metastatic PCa.

Profiling of urinary extracellular vesicle protein signatures from patients with cribriform and intraductal prostate carcinoma in a cross-sectional study

Prognostic tests and treatment approaches for optimized clinical care of prostatic neoplasms are an unmet need. Prostate cancer (PCa) and derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) proteome changes occur during initiation and progression of the disease. PCa tissue proteome has been previously characterized, but screening of tissue samples constitutes an invasive procedure. Consequently, we focused this study on liquid biopsies, such as urine samples. More specifically, urinary small extracellular vesicle and particles proteome profiles of 100 subjects were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). We identified 171 proteins that were differentially expressed between intraductal prostate cancer/cribriform (IDC/Crib) and non-IDC/non-Crib after correction for multiple testing. However, the strong correlation between IDC/Crib and Gleason Grade complicates the disentanglement of the underlying factors driving this association. Nevertheless, even after accounting for multiple testing and adjusting for ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grading, two proteins continued to exhibit significant differential expression between IDC/Crib and non-IDC/non-Crib. Functional enrichment analysis based on cancer hallmark proteins disclosed a clear pattern of androgen response down-regulation in urinary EVs from IDC/Crib compared to non-IDC/non-Crib. Interestingly, proteome differences between IDC and cribriform were more subtle, suggesting high proteome heterogeneity. Overall, the urinary EV proteome reflected partly the prostate pathology.

4D pathology: translating dynamic epithelial tubulogenesis to prostate cancer pathology.

The Gleason score is the gold standard for grading of prostate cancer (PCa) and is assessed by assigning specific grades to different microscopical growth patterns. Aside from the Gleason grades, individual growth patterns such as cribriform architecture were recently shown to have independent prognostic value for disease outcome. PCa grading is performed on static tissue samples collected at one point in time, whereas in vivo epithelial tumour structures are dynamically invading, branching and expanding into the surrounding stroma. Due to the lack of models that are able to track human PCa microscopical developments over time, our understanding of underlying tissue dynamics is sparse. We postulate that human PCa expansion utilizes embryonic and developmental tubulogenetic pathways. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of developmental pathways of normal epithelial tubule formation, elongation, and branching, and relate those to the static microscopical PCa growth patterns observed in daily clinical practise. This study could provide a rationale for the discerned pathological interobserver variability and the clinical outcome differences between PCa growth patterns.

Prognostic Significance of Cribriform Architecture of Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinomas

Objective: Among prostate cancer patients, the Gleason score is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine whether cribriform architecture in prostate cancer patients without a history of treatment was related to prognosis in patients with Gleason pattern 4 of prostate cancer.  Material and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study included (n=450) consecutive prostate biopsy specimens between June 2014 and May 2015, out of which (n=237) had pattern 4 prostate adenocarcinoma. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up details were obtained. Patients (n = 86) with a treatment history were excluded from the study.  Results: Univariate Cox regression analysis of diagnostic biopsies from (n=151) patients with pattern 4 of prostate cancer who had been followed for an average of 70.3 months demonstrated that the cribriform architecture of prostate cancer with pattern 4 was independently associated with poorer disease-specific survival in biopsies with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.1, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 0.9-10.6, and P value of &lt;0.001.  Conclusion: It is concluded that a cribriform architecture of prostate cancer in biopsies with pattern 4 adenocarcinoma is associated with a lower disease- specific survival rate. Therefore, it is essential to report the presence and percentage of cribriform architecture in patients with pattern 4 prostate cancer.

Focal Unspecific Bone Uptake on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET: Evaluation Analog PROMISE Criteria and Validation via PET/CT Follow-Up.

Background: Focal unspecific bone uptake (UBU) is common in [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT, yet its clinical significance remains unclear, causing uncertainty in treatment decisions. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 prostate cancer patients (age 69 ± 7) who underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans (3 MBq/kg; uptake time 70 ± 14 min) for staging and follow-up (after 13.0 ± 7.2 months). Semiquantitative assessment using the miPSMA score, analogous to the PROMISE criteria, evaluated the prevalence of UBU and bone metastases. Results: In the initial PET/CT scan, 56 patients had 230 lesions classified as UBU. A total of 19 patients were found to have bone metastases and UBU, while 24 patients had no focal bone uptake. UBU distribution was as follows: ribs (50%), spine (30%), pelvis (15%), and other sites (5%). There were no significant differences in age, Gleason score, injected tracer dose, uptake time, SUVpeak of UBU, or SUVmean in the spleen and parotid gland between patients with and without UBU. Follow-up showed stable miPSMA-score and CT appearance in 44/56 patients with UBU (79%), minor changes in 5/56 patients (8%), and new bone metastases in 7/56 patients (12%). Patient-specific analysis indicated at least one bone metastasis initially classified as UBU in 3/56 patients (5%) and new bone metastases in 4/56 patients (7%). In total, 4 of the 24 patients (17%) without initial focal uptake developed osseous metastases at follow-up. Conclusions: No significant differences were found between patients with or without UBU. Only a small portion of UBU (2%) evolved into metastases, a lower rate than the development of new osseous metastases, which appears to be independent of UBU.

Enhancing Prostate Cancer Staging: Association of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging with Histopathological Grading in Treatment-Naive Patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between 68Ga-PSMA uptake in PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer (PC) and its histopathological grading (Gleason score and ISUP grade). Additionally, we compared preoperative biopsy histopathological findings with definitive pathology results in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PC staging, of which 40 patients later underwent radical prostatectomy. PET/CT results, including SUVmax values, were correlated with GS and PSA concentrations. Histopathology reports were analyzed and compared between biopsy and final pathology results following RP. A significant positive correlation was observed between SUVmax and ISUP grades (Pearson's ρ = 0.34, p < 0.001), with higher SUVmax values associated with more advanced grades. A cut-off SUVmax value of 5.64 was determined to predict upstaging in patients, yielding a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 60% (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.94). Additionally, 57.5% of patients experienced a grade shift following RP, with a 35% upgrade and 22.5% downgrade in ISUP grades. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting high-risk prostate cancer, particularly in patients with GS > 7 or PSA levels ≥ 10 ng/mL. The findings suggest that this imaging modality may be less effective for the staging of patients with lower GS or PSA values, that is, low-risk PCa. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.

Clinical Factors Associated With Suspicious 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET Activity in Patients Initially Managed With Radical Prostatectomy Including Prostate-Specific Antigen < 0.5 ng/mL.

There are limited data on PSMA PET/CT for workup of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) at low PSA values. We evaluated a PSMA PET/CT cohort of patients with post-RP, focusing on patients with PSA < 0.5 ng/mL. We identified a retrospective cohort who underwent piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET/CT across an 11 hospital system from July 2021 to February 2023. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positivity was determined by radiology reports. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with suspicious PSMA activity. Median PSA was 0.37 ng/mL (IQR, 0.15-1.29 ng/mL), with 49% of patients overall having at least 1 suspicious PSMA-avid lesion. Rates of scan positivity among patients with PSA < 0.2 and 0.2 to 0.5 ng/mL were 34% and 38%, respectively. Among all patients, 25% (104/415) had pelvic disease (prostate bed or N1) and 24% (100/415) had M1 disease. Among patients with PSA < 0.5 ng/mL, prior postoperative radiation was associated with suspicious PSMA activity. In the overall cohort, age, PSA at PSMA PET/CT, and RP Gleason grade were associated with PSMA positivity. PSADT, EAU risk, and CAPRA-S were all associated with suspicious PSMA activity. Over one-third of patients with PSAs < 0.2 ng/mL had imaging findings concerning for recurrence. Prior postoperative radiation was associated with higher rates of PSMA positivity among patients with PSA < 0.5 ng/mL, and half of patients with evidence of PSMA avid distant metastatic disease underwent metastasis-directed therapy. PET-PSMA imaging at low PSAs can be considered to inform salvage therapies.

Androgen deprivation therapy, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a multi-center real-world retrospective study.

Determining the potential benefit of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant ADT in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) undergoing complete resection. 139 patients diagnosed with cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC in Xiangya Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China from 2010 to 2021 were collected. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional risk analysis. We also analyzed the functional outcomes of two subgroups of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Of the 182 patients with cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC, 139 patients (76.4%) were enrolled in the study with a 5-year survival rate of 82.3%. 45 patients (32.4%) received ADT alone, 46 patients (33.1%) received neoadjuvant ADT before surgery, and the remaining 48 patients (34.5%) received surgery with adjuvant ADT. Neoadjuvant ADT before surgery and surgery with adjuvant ADT were associated with significantly improved survival compared with ADT alone. Multivariate Cox models showed that neoadjuvant ADT before surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.92) or surgery with adjuvant ADT (HR, 0.26; 95% CI 0.16-0.78) was associated with improved CSS compared with ADT alone. Regional lymph node metastasis, positive lymphovascular invasion, and Gleason score 9 + were independent predictors of LAPC CSS and OS. More patients in the neoadjuvant ADT before surgery group achieved final continence status within 12 months after surgery (93.48% v 77.08%). CSS and OS were significantly prolonged in cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC patients who received neoadjuvant ADT before surgery and surgery with adjuvant ADT compared to ADT alone.

Phase 3 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

BackgroundWhether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is noninferior to conventionally or moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to biochemical or clinical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer is unclear.MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Men with stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer, a Gleason score of 3+4 or less, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of no more than 20 ng per milliliter were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over a period of 1 or 2 weeks) or control radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions over a period of 7.5 weeks or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over a period of 4 weeks). Androgen-deprivation therapy was not permitted. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical or clinical failure, with a critical hazard ratio for noninferiority of 1.45. The analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population.ResultsA total of 874 patients underwent randomization at 38 centers (433 patients in the SBRT group and 441 in the control radiotherapy group) between August 2012 and January 2018. The median age of the patients was 69.8 years, and the median PSA level was 8.0 ng per milliliter; the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category was low for 8.4% of the patients and intermediate for 91.6%. At a median follow-up of 74.0 months, the 5-year incidence of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.3 to 97.4) in the SBRT group and 94.6% (95% CI, 91.9 to 96.4) in the control radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio for biochemical or clinical failure, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.48 to 1.12; P=0.004 for noninferiority), which indicated the noninferiority of SBRT. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxic effects was 26.9% (95% CI, 22.8 to 31.5) with SBRT and 18.3% (95% CI, 14.8 to 22.5) with control radiotherapy (P<0.001), and the cumulative incidence of late RTOG grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxic effects was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.2) and 10.2% (95% CI, 7.7 to 13.5), respectively (P=0.94).ConclusionsFive-fraction SBRT was noninferior to control radiotherapy with respect to biochemical or clinical failure and may be an efficacious treatment option for patients with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer as defined in this trial. (Funded by Accuray and others; PACE-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01584258.)

Application of a Modified SegFormer Architecture for Gleason Pattern Segmentation

A key element of morphological assessment in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics is the Gleason score, which is based on the architecture of tumor growth in biopsy or prostatectomy samples. During this process, biopsies from the prostate's pathological areas are evaluated to identify the most common and severe architectural patterns (referred to as Gleason patterns), each of which is assigned a score in the Gleason grading system. The resulting total score serves as a critical predictor for disease progression and metastasis. This research focuses on enhancing the efficiency of morphological examination in PCa by utilizing automatic segmentation of Gleason patterns in whole slide images (WSI) in *.svs format, with 40x magnification and an average spatial resolution of 0.258 microns per pixel. Segmentation was performed using a neural network with a SegFormer architecture, supplemented by an EdgeNeXt (small variant) subnet. The proposed solution successfully identified Gleason patterns of grades 3, 4, and 5. The best model performance for detecting combined Gleason patterns 3, 4, 5, and 4, 5 was achieved with input images sized 512x512 (tile size) and a batch size of 8, resulting in an F-score of 0.835 and 0.769, respectively.

Predicting Metastasis and Mortality Risk in Prostate biopsy using genomics and biopsy related factors

Abstract Introduction/Objective Prostate cancer, the most prevalent cancer among men, is diagnosed through biopsy, yet its predictive accuracy for metastasis and mortality risk remains limited. An approach to stratifying this risk is by combining biopsy data and genetics. The Decipher genomic classifier aids in estimating such risks. This study investigates the correlation between Decipher, biopsy-related factors, and the risk of prostate cancer metastasis or mortality. Methods/Case Report 50 prostatic adenocarcinoma biopsies were analyzed. Patient age, average tumor volume in positive cores, PSA levels, and Gleason score were documented. Employing Tobit regression with maximum likelihood estimation, the study examined the link between various factors and metastasis/mortality risk of prostatic cancer. Dependent variables encompassed 5, 10, and 15-year risks, while the independent variable was patient age, positive to total core ratio, average tumor volume in positive cores, PSA level, and grade group of the prostate cancer. The model integrated three dummy variables-Grade Group 1, 3, and 4, with Grade Group 2 as reference. Coefficients gauged the distinct impact of Level 1, 3, and 4 diagnoses on outcomes relative to Level 2. Statistical significance was tested conventionally. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Grade Group 1 (Gleason score: 3 + 3): 2.35 percentage point increase in the risk of metastasis within 10 years. 3.51 percentage point increase in the risk of mortality within 15 years. Grade Group 2 Base level for comparison with other grade groups. Grade Group 3 (Gleason score: 4 + 3): No statistically significant difference in the predicting 5 or 10 year risk of metastasis compared to Grade Group 2. No statistically significant difference in the predicting 15 year risk of mortality compared to Grade Group 2. Grade Group 4 (Gleason score: 4 + 4): 10.07 percentage point increase in the risk of metastasis within 5 years. 17.27 percentage point increase in the risk of metastasis within 10 years. 18.48 percentage point increase in the risk of mortality within 15 years. Conclusion The findings suggest combining genomics and grade group can help predict the risk of metastasis and mortality in prostate biopsy. Grade Group 4 diagnosis greatly impacts metastasis and mortality in all timeframes.While Grade Group 1 has a smaller but still significant impact on the 10 and 15 year risk of metastasis and mortality. However, Grade Group 3 diagnosis does not significantly impact the risk of metastasis in any of the timeframes considered.

Enhancing Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Using PSA-Guided Screening in High-Risk Men Under 50

Abstract Background Prostate Cancer remains a significant global public health concern. It is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. Current guidelines, including those by the USPSTF, ACS and ASCO offer varying recommendations on PSA screening. Present clinical practice, primarily targeting men aged 50-69. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of using PSA for targeted screening in men under 50 who are at high risk, enhancing early detection of prostate cancer. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data from our hospital’s prostate cancer screening program collected from 2022 to 2023, including104 individuals under 50. Participants were categorized based on PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL (n=71) and over10 ng/mL (n=33). We analyzed the number of cases diagnosed with prostate cancer and the correlation with PSA levels, Gleason Scores (GS), family history, and ethnicity/race. Results In the104 participants, 88 of them were diagnosed with prostate cancer, highlighting an 84.6% detection rate. Among PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL group, 36 out of 43 White or Caucasian and 13 out of 13 Black or African American men were identified as GS 6-10. In the group PSA over 10 ng/mL, 18 White or Caucasian and 6 Black or African American individuals with more aggressive disease (GS 6-10). Importantly, a substantial fraction of these cases had a first-degree relative with prostate cancer, emphasizing the influence of family history on PSA screening decision. Conclusion Our findings suggest that PSA-guided screening in men under 50 at high risk can enhance the early detection of prostate cancer. The significant presence of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (GS 6 or 7) in populations at higher risk due to ethnicity/race and family history. Our study highlights the potential benefits of revisiting current screening guidelines to lower the age threshold for high-risk populations.