N this paper an improved model material for photoorthotropic-elasticity, with better transparency and more favorable fiber distribution, is described. A unidirectional ly reinforced circular ring, subjected to diametral compression at 0°, 45°, and 90° to the reinforcement direction, is investigated. The resulting isochromatic fringes are converted to tangential stresses on the inner and outer boundaries after correction for the residual birefringence of the model material. The stress distributions are compared with the corresponding values for an isotropic ring. Contents Two different methods have been employed so far in the preparation of unidirectiona lly reinforced model materials for transmission photoelastic applications. The method used by Pih and Knight1 as well as by Sampson2 involves filament winding and the application of vacuum to eliminate entrapped air. The method employed by Dally and Prabhakaran3 utilizes commercial glass fabrics and does not require the application of vacuum. However, the twist of the yarns in the glass fabric gives rise to two problems. First, air entrapped between the fibers is not completely removed by the simple squeezing operation and consequently maximum possible transparency is not achieved, in spite of careful matching of the refractive indices of the matrix and the glass reinforcement. Secondly, the glass fibers are grouped together in discrete bundles resulting in poor fringe resolution in regions of high fringe gradient.4 To eliminate the disadvantages of twisted yarns while retaining the simplicity of fabrication technique, in the present study woven roving has been used as the reinforcement. With only ten plies of the glass roving, a thicker laminate (0.18 in.) was obtained. Far greater transparency was achieved, without resorting to vacuum. Most important of all, the photoelastic response was much better, with improved fringe resolution. In Fig. 1 the lightfield isochromatic fringe pattern for a notched beam in four-point bending is presented for the old and new model materials. The reason for the difference in fringe resolution is apparent from the photomicrographs. The glass fibers in the material prepared from roving are more uniformly distributed, thus better justifying the treatment of the heterogeneous orthotropic material as a homogeneous orthotropic material. A circular ring, with the outside and inside diameters 3 in. and 1.5 in., respectively, was machined from a f-in.-thick unidirectionally-reinforeed laminate consisting of 35% volume fraction of glass fibers. The machining stresses were annealed by heating the