GH-releasing Hormone Test Research Articles

Diagnostic value of growth hormone-releasing hormone test in children and adolescents with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency.

Average growth hormone (GH) peaks following an i.v. growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) 1-29 stimulation test were significantly lower in 48 children and adolescents with GH deficiency (GHD) than in 20 age-matched controls (15.2 + 12.7 vs 37.5 + 28.1 ng/ml, 2 P less than 0.001). Twelve patients exhibited a low GH peak (less than 5 ng/ml), 27 demonstrated a normal response (greater than 10 ng/ml) and 9 showed an intermediate rise in plasma GH (5-10 ng/ml). Six of the 12 patients with low GH response to the first GHRH stimulation failed to respond to two other tests immediately before and after a 1 week priming with s.c. GHRH. These subjects with subnormal GH increase at repeat testing had total GHD (TGHD) and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) and had suffered from perinatal distress. On the contrary, 26 of 27 patients with normal GH response to the first test had isolated GHD and only a minority (8/27) had signs of perinatal distress. It is concluded that perinatal injuries primarily damage pituitary structures and that a pituitary defect more probably underlies more severe forms (TGHD and MPHD) of GHD.

Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment in Short Normal Children: Absence of Influence of Time of Injection and Resistance to GH Autofeedback*

Forty prepubertal subjects (25 boys and 15 girls) with idiopathic short stature, aged 3.8-14.6 yr, were randomly allocated to receive sc injections of recombinant human GH (hGH) 6 days/week at a dose of 3 IU (1.25 mg)/m2.day either in the morning or in the evening. After 6 months of therapy, each subject was switched over to the other schedule of injection. After 12 months, treatment was stopped, and the subjects were followed for 6 months. For the whole group, regardless of the time of injection, height velocity (centimeters per yr) was 4.3 +/- 0.9 before hGH treatment, 8.3 +/- 1.9 during the first 6 months of treatment, and 6.9 +/- 1.6 during the last 6 months of treatment. Thirty-three of 38 subjects (87%) who completed 12 months of therapy presented an increase in height velocity greater than 2 cm/yr. Two patients (5%) developed antibodies to hGH and were among the nonresponders. There was no significant difference in growth response according to the schedule of injections. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) testing was performed before and after 6 and 12 months of hGH therapy. When the last hGH injection was performed 12 h before the GHRH test, there was a 36% decrease in the maximum GH response (P less than 0.01) and a 33% decrease (P less than 0.01) in the GH secretory area compared to those before therapy. When the last hGH injection was performed 24 h or more before the GHRH test, no significant differences were observed. Insulin-like growth factor-I levels were not significantly different when measured 12 or 24 h after hGH. During the 6 months after discontinuation of hGH therapy, catch-down growth was observed in 44% of the subjects. We conclude that the schedule of injection does not influence the growth response, which wanes after 6 months; this waning effect is not related to declining insulin-like growth factor-I levels or GH autofeedback, suggesting a peripheral mechanism. Likewise, the catch-down phenomenon after hGH is discontinued is not related to a persistent diminution of pituitary responsiveness to GHRH.

Effects of pyridostigmine on spontaneous and growth hormone‐releasing hormone stimulated growth hormone secretion in children on daily glucocorticoid therapy after liver transplantation

We aimed to investigate both nocturnal spontaneous and morning growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion in children on daily glucocorticoid treatment after liver transplantation and to evaluate the effect of pyridostigmine (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor thought to reduce hypothalamic somatostatin tone) on GH secretion in these patients. We performed a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study. We studied three male and three female juvenile patients, within a year of orthotopic liver transplantation and under immunosuppressive glucocorticoid therapy (mean dose +/- SEM, 5.92 +/- 0.63 mg/day) and five normal children (four males, one female). Both nocturnal spontaneous and morning GHRH-induced GH secretion were evaluated after administration of placebo, 1 tablet p.o., or pyridostigmine, 2 mg/kg p.o. Spontaneous GH. Placebo: in liver transplanted children nocturnal GH secretion (mean GH level 10.8 +/- 2.0 mU/l) was not significantly different with respect to normal children (mean GH level 12.8 +/- 1.2 mU/l); pyridostigmine: nocturnal GH secretion was significantly increased as compared to placebo in subjects with liver transplantation but not in normal children. GHRH test. Placebo: liver transplanted patients showed a blunted GH response to GHRH with respect to normal children; pyridostigmine: the GH responses to GHRH (P less than 0.05) increased as compared to placebo and did not differ significantly in the two groups. Our data suggest a steroid-mediated increase in hypothalamic somatostatin tone in liver transplanted children.

Thirty-Second Sampling of Plasma Growth Hormone in Man: Correlation with Sleep Stages*

Both fasting and sleep increase the secretion of human GH and, therefore, might explain its predominantly nocturnal release. To study the precise temporal relationship between GH secretory episodes and cortical activity, GH measurements and electroencephalogram sleep stage recordings were performed every 30 s for 8 h in six young male volunteers fasted for 24 h. GH was measured in two drops of whole blood, which were directly sampled into the assay tube using a continuous blood withdrawal pump and a fraction collector. Concomitant serum sampling during a GH-releasing hormone test (n = 4) revealed a high correlation (r = 0.98) between GH measurements in serum and whole blood. GH pulses were objectively identified with Cluster analysis, and GH secretion rates were calculated with a waveform-independent deconvolution algorithm. When data were analyzed as replicates with 1-min intervals, the nocturnal pulse frequency was 1.2 pulses/h. Elimination of data points demonstrated 43% and 64% reductions in the number of GH pulses detected for 5- and 20-min sampling intervals, respectively. Mean GH concentrations and secretory rates were significantly higher during stage 3 and 4 sleep compared to stage 1, 2, and rapid eye movement sleep. GH secretory rates and peripheral GH concentrations were maximally correlated with sleep stage, with lags of 4.5 and 16 min, respectively, suggesting that maximal GH release occurs within minutes of the onset of stage 3 or 4 sleep. This temporal coincidence between pituitary GH secretion and delta sleep is consistent with cortical control over hypothalamic-pituitary function.

Association of Pharmacological Tests and Study of 24-Hour Growth Hormone Secretion in the Investigation of Growth Retardation in Children: Analysis of 257 Cases

Growth hormone (GH) secretion can presently be investigated by several methods: pharmacological provocative tests, study of 24-h GH secretion, measurement of somatomedin-C (Sm-C)/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, and the growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) test. In order to compare the results obtained, these methods were used in 257 children with growth retardation (169 boys, 88 girls). Their height SD was -2.7 +/- 0.2, chronological age 11 3/12 +/- 1 6/12 years, and bone age 8 4/12 +/- 1 4/12 years. Mean growth velocity was 4.5 +/- 1.5 cm/year. One hundred and thirty-eight boys and 80 girls were prepubertal, and 31 boys and 8 girls were pubertal (B2 G2). All children underwent the study of 24-h GH secretion (n = 257) and pharmacological provocative tests (two tests, n = 213; one test n = 44). Sm-C/IGF I was measured in prepubertal children (n = 131), and a GHRH test was carried out (n = 153). In addition, the mean integrated concentration of growth hormone secretion (IC-GH) was assessed in a control group of 23 children and was found to be 5.4 +/- 1.2 ng/ml/min. The IC-GH in the group as a whole was 2.6 ng/ml/min. The mean maximum peak during pharmacological tests varied considerably according to the test used, ranging from 7.8 ng/ml for the arginine test to 17.1 ng/ml for the glucagon and betaxolol test. The maximum peak and the 24-h IC-GH were not significantly correlated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone: Clinical Studies and Therapeutic Aspects

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulates GH secretion in man and the hormonal response is specific. The attenuation of GH response to bolus GHRH after prior exposure of GHRH of up to 24 h was not demonstrated in normal or GH-deficient subjects after more prolonged exposure. This suggests that the partial loss of responsiveness to GHRH may reflect short-term negative feedback by GH. The stimulatory effect of clonidine and L-dopa on GH release is mediated via GHRH. Other stimuli like hypoglycaemia, arginine and propranolol augment GH release in man by modulating hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Although GHRH test can differentiate between hypothalamic or pituitary cause of GH deficiency, it is of little diagnostic value in children with short stature. Favourable results have been observed in 60-70% of GH-deficient children treated with GHRH, but the dose and mode of administration are still being explored. We found that low dose (1-2 micrograms/kg) GHRH given subcutaneously every 3 h by a pump was effective in promoting growth in 5 of 7 patients after 1 year. Treatment was continued for 2-4 years in 4 patients and growth velocities ranging from 4.5 to 8.2 cm/year were maintained using a dose of 3 micrograms/kg/pulse.

PYRIDOSTIGMINE DOES NOT REVERSE DEXAMETHASONE‐INDUCED GROWTH HORMONE INHIBITION

Glucocorticoids inhibit the growth hormone (GH) response to a variety of stimuli, including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in vivo, but they increase GHRH-stimulated GH secretion when added, in vitro, to animal and human pituitary cells. This discrepancy has led to the hypothesis that glucocorticoids act in vivo by increasing somatostatin secretion from the hypothalamus. To examine this hypothesis, we used a cholinergic drug, pyridostigmine (PD), which reduces hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Eight normal volunteers were studied. They underwent four tests: (1) GHRH test; (2) Dex + GHRH (GHRH test after treatment the night before, with dexamethasone (Dex)); (3) PD + GHRH; (4) Dex + PD + GHRH. Dex significantly inhibited the GH response to GHRH expressed as area under the GH/time curve (AUC, microgram/1/min) (mean +/- SEM = 895.2 +/- 196.6 vs 1970.9 +/- 600.1, P less than 0.05). PD significantly increased the AUC of GH secretion in PD + GHRH compared with GHRH alone (3541.2 +/- 571.3 vs 1970.9 +/- 600.1, P less than 0.01) but by no means restored completely the normal GH response to GHRH, when given to Dex-pretreated subjects. Furthermore, the mean AUC of Dex + PD + GHRH was significantly lower than that of PD + GHRH (1621.7 +/- 500.6 vs 3541.2 +/- 571.3, P less than 0.01), demonstrating that Dex continues to exert its inhibitory effect on GH secretion in the presence of PD. These results suggest that glucocorticoid-induced GH inhibition does not act solely through an increase in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion.

Growth Hormone Does not Inhibit Its Own Secretion during Prolonged Hypoglycemia in Man

In man, continuous infusion of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) does not sustain GH secretion, unlike prolonged hypoglycemia. To further evaluate this difference in the stimulation of GH release we measured GH concentrations for 3 h during prolonged insulin-induced hypoglycemia and GHRH-(1-29)NH2 (100 micrograms/h) infusion in normal individuals. We also assessed the GH response to combined and separate administration of insulin and GHRH. Plasma GH levels increased during prolonged hypoglycemia and remained elevated for the third hour (22-24 micrograms/L). GH concentrations increased during GHRH infusion, peaked at 60 min (23.5 micrograms/L), and rapidly declined. Thus, our findings confirmed that prolonged hypoglycemia, unlike GHRH infusion, sustained elevated GH levels and that these high levels did not appear to influence GH secretion from the pituitary. Changes in FFA did not account for the sustained GH secretion. FFA levels initially declined during insulin infusion, but after 3 h of hypoglycemia they returned to near-basal values (basal, 0.1 +/- 0.02 g/L; 180 min, 0.09 +/- 0.02). The maximal GH concentration attained during the combined insulin and GHRH test was significantly higher than that with the insulin tolerance test or GHRH test (insulin plus GHRH, 71.9 +/- 13.5; insulin tolerance test, 34.2 +/- 2.9; P less than 0.025; GHRH test, 27.9 +/- 3.2; P less than 0.02), indicating an additive effect on GH secretion. These data suggest that insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion through a mechanism partly independent of GHRH. The release from somatostatin inhibition and stimulation through other neuropeptides (e.g. galanin) is suggested as possible causes of hypoglycemia-induced GH secretion.

A new test for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency due to primary pituitary impairment: combined administration of pyridostigmine and growth hormone-releasing hormone

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is currently based on failure to increase plasma GH levels to an arbitrary cutoff point of 7 or 10 micrograms/l in response to two provocative stimuli. False negative responses to these tests, however, frequently occur thus reducing their diagnostic reliability. The aim of this study was to assess a combination of pyridostigmine (PD) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (60 mg oral PD 60 min before 1 microgram/Kg GHRH iv) as a reliable test probing pituitary somatotropic function. In fact PD, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, strikingly potentiates GH response to GHRH likely by inhibiting somatostatin release. The combination PD + GHRH was tested in normal children and adolescents (NS, n = 27) and in a large group of short children classified as having familial short stature (FSS, n = 24), constitutional growth delay (CGD, n = 34) and GH deficiency (organic, oGHD, n = 6; idiopathic, iGHD, n = 10). In all groups results obtained by PD + GHRH were compared with those obtained by testing with GHRH, clonidine (CLON) and PD alone and by studying spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion over 8 hours. Assuming 7 micrograms/l as minimum normal GH peak, a positive response occurred in only 18/24, 11/12 and 12/13 NS for GHRH, CLON, and PD, respectively. In contrast even assuming a minimum normal GH peak as high as 20 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH induced a positive response in 27/27 NS all having a nocturnal GH mean concentration (MC) greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. Therefore PD + GHRH test gave no false negative responses and this was true not only in NS but even in all FSS and CGD having a GH MC greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. On the other hand, PD + GHRH induced a negative GH response in all oGHD and in 8/10 iGHD patients. In the remaining two iGHD patients, PD + GHRH demonstrated a normal pituitary GH reserve in spite of a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l and low IGF-I level, thus pointing to a hypothalamic pathogenesis for the GHD. Considering FSS and CGD children having a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH showed a primary pituitary GH deficiency in 3/12 CGD with low plasma IGF-I levels. In conclusion, in slowly growing children PD + GHRH test is the most reliable provocative test for the diagnosis of primary pituitary GH deficiency being capable to discriminate between an unequivocally normal and impaired somatotropic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Evaluation of the Growth-Hormone-Releasing Hormone Test in Short Normal and Growth-Hormone-Deficient Children

Growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) tests were performed once [GHRH(1-29)NH2, 1 microgram/kg] or on 2 consecutive days [GHRH(1-44)NH2, 1 and 2 microgram/kg administered in random order] in 27 children with idiopathic, isolated growth hormone (GH)-deficiency and in 49 short normal children, all clinically prepubertal. No differences in GH release were found between the tests performed on the 1st and 2nd day or according to GHRH dose or sex, both in GH-deficient and control children. 80% of GH-deficient and 87% of control children responded (GH peak greater than 10 ng/ml) to GHRH(1-29)NH2, and 65% of GH-deficient and all control children to GHRH(1-44)NH2. No differences in GH release were found between GH-deficient GHRH responders and control children. 17% of GH-deficient and 10% of control children responded only to one of the two tests performed on 2 consecutive days; the lack of responsiveness was unrelated to GHRH dose and sequence of GHRH administration (1st or 2nd day). The GHRH test does not seem to be a reproducible test for the evaluation of GH release, nor is it useful to differentiate GH-deficient GHRH responders from short normal children.

Growth hormone (GH) release after administration of GH-releasing hormone in relation to endogenous 24-h GH secretion in short children

Endogenous GH secretion was measured every 20 min for 24 h in 36 short children. This was immediately followed by an i.v. injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)(1-29)-NH2 (1 microgram/kg), and GH was estimated every 15 min for the following 2 h. The aim was to determine whether endogenous pulsatile GH secretion had any relation to, or influence on, the GH release induced by GHRH. A high variability was found both in the 24-h GH secretion expressed as area under the curve above the baseline (0-1588 mU/l x 24 h) and the maximal GH response to GHRH (5-296 mU/l), as well as after an arginine-insulin tolerance test (4-59 mU/l). We found a positive correlation (correlation coefficient of Spearman (rs) = 0.49; P less than 0.01) between the GH response to GHRH and the spontaneous GH secretion over a 24-h period, in spite of a negative correlation (rs = -0.80; P less than 0.01) with the GH secretion during the preceding 3 h. We conclude that the GH response to a GHRH test correlates with endogenous GH secretion in short children, and may be helpful in estimating the ability to release GH. It is important, however, to be aware of the influence of the spontaneous GH secretion during the 3 h immediately preceding administration of GHRH.

Diagnostic Value of Growth Hormone‐Releasing Hormone Tests in Short Children

The growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) test was applied to more than 230 children. Twenty-five out of 61 patients with proven growth hormone (GH) deficiency responded to GHRH with a GH increase of greater than 10 ng/ml. In most of the patients with idiopathic GH deficiency, a priming procedure using daily injections of GHRH improved the secretory response to GHRH. Nearly all children with familial shortness of stature showed a prompt increase in GH levels, with a mean peak level of 34.9 ng/ml (range 0.5-144 ng/ml). A second test was performed in five children with familial short stature because of failure to respond to the first test. Children with constitutional delay of growth and development did not differ in their GH response from patients with familial shortness of stature. Ten girls with Ullrich-Turner's syndrome responded with a mean increase of 22 ng/ml GH (range 10.1-34.0 ng/ml). Therapy with glucocorticoids, as well as endogenous hypersecretion of cortisol, suppressed the responsiveness of the pituitary gland to GHRH. Suppression was also observed following a single dose of dexamethasone during the steroid-suppression test in eight obese children. Low responsiveness of the pituitary gland was also seen in patients with thalassaemia and transfusion-induced haemosiderosis. It is concluded that it is not possible to detect GH deficiency with a single GHRH test. A full endocrinological evaluation is necessary to prove the diagnosis.

The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in acromegaly before and after adenomectomy.

The GHRH test may represent a new tool in the study of GH dynamics in acromegaly. GH responsiveness to GHRH 1-40 (50 micrograms iv) has been studied in 21 acromegalic patients. Nineteen out of 21 had active disease. Five patients were also studied 1-12 months after neurosurgery. Two apparently cured acromegalics were studied 1-2 yr after surgery. GH secretion has been evaluated in all patients by means of TRH, bromocriptine and insulin hypoglycemia tests, too. GH response to GHRH has also been performed in 14 normal subjects. In acromegaly, GH responses after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo) were variable. The GH peak ranged from 8 to 445 ng/ml in patients with active disease. Maximum GH increase after GHRH (calculated as peak/basal value ratio) was significantly reduced in acromegaly (2.9 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) in comparison to controls (34.1 +/- 10.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.01). No significant differences in GH pattern after GHRH were found between untreated and previously treated patients with active disease. A significant correlation was found between GH basal levels and GH incremental area (p less than 0.05) and between GH basal and peak levels (p less than 0.01) after GHRH. A significant increase in PRL secretion was observed in acromegalic patients after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo). No discernable variation was found in the other pituitary hormones pattern after the peptide administration. A positive correlation was observed between GH increase after GHRH and insulin hypoglycemia (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)