GH-releasing Activity Research Articles

The inhibitory effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-antagonist on GHRH, L-dopa, and clonidine-induced GH secretion in normal subjects.

The relative inhibitory potency of GHRH-Antagonist (GHRH-Ant) to GHRH(1-44)NH2 and mechanism of L-dopa- or clonidine-induced GH release were studied in seven normal subjects using GHRH-Ant. One hundred micrograms of GHRH-Ant (iv for 75 min) did not inhibit plasma GH responses to bolus injection of 100 micrograms and 10 micrograms GHRH or simultaneous infusion of 5 micrograms GHRH (iv for 75 min). However, 200 micrograms GHRH-Ant (iv for 75 min) significantly inhibited GH release, which was induced by simultaneous infusion of 5 micrograms GHRH. Although 100 micrograms GHRH-Ant could not significantly inhibit L-dopa-induced GH release, 200 micrograms GHRH-Ant almost completely inhibited the response. Similarly, the same dose of GHRH-Ant markedly inhibited the GH-releasing activity of clonidine. It is concluded that the inhibitory potency of GHRH-Ant on GHRH(1-44)NH2 is relatively weak (about 1/60 in molar base), and that L-dopa- or clonidine-induced GH release seems to be mediated by the release of hypothalamic GHRH.

Hexarelin, a synthetic growth hormone releasing peptide, stimulates prolactin secretion in acromegalic but not in hyperprolactinaemic patients

In man, new synthetic peptides such as hexarelin have been shown to have a potent and dose dependent GH releasing activity. Furthermore, a significant PRL releasing activity has also been demonstrated, but this has been investigated in less detail. We have therefore evaluated the effect of hexarelin on PRL and GH secretion in patients with active acromegaly or pathological hyperprolactinaemia. Hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg i.v.), a modified derivative of GHRP-6 of the following structure: His-2-Me-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2, or placebo, was administered in random order on two separate occasions. Eight patients with active acromegaly (ACRO, 6 F and 2 M, mean age 61.7 years, range 56-73), 6 with macroadenomas and 2 without radiological signs of tumour, and 6 female patients with pathological hyperprolactinaemia (HPRL, mean age 31.2 years, range 18-47) 5 with microadenomas and 1 with empty sella, were studied. Fourteen normal subjects (NS, 8 F and 6 M, 27.1 years, 24-30) were studied as controls. GH and PRL levels were evaluated every 15 minutes for 2 hours after hexarelin or placebo. Both hormones were measured using commercial IRMA kits. Basal IGF-I was measured in all subjects using an RIA following acid-ethanol extraction. Hexarelin induced a significant increase in PRL levels in NS (median, range, delta peak HEX vs placebo: 150 (-14-402) vs 10 (-34-24) mU/l; delta AUC HEX vs placebo: 7710 (2,100-3 2540) vs 30 (-2,566-2,040) mU min/l, P < 0.01) and in ACRO (190 (-10-496) vs 6 (-100-34) mU/l; 10,170 (-5,310-51,436) vs -82 (-6,030-1,410) mU min/l, P < 0.02), but not in HPRL (10 (-180-80) vs 50 (-100-240) mU/l; -600 (-16,996-10,140) vs -1,950 (-8,540-14,160) mU min/l). Hexarelin also induced a lower increase of GH in HPRL (60 (30-82) vs 1.8 (-0.2-2.2) mU/l; 2,853 (1,477.6-4,372.6 vs 91.6 (-160.6-174) mU min/l, P < 0.05) than in NS (90.8 (50.6-181) vs 0.8 (-1.2-6.8) mU/l; 6642 (2,004-13,252.6 vs 42 (456-900) mU min/l, P < 0.01) or in ACRO (117.2 (21.2-420.6 vs 3.8 (-2.2-18) mU/l; 6645 (1,554-22,138.6 vs 334.6 (-324-1,065) mU min/l, P < 0.02). Our data show that the PRL releasing effect of hexarelin is preserved in acromegaly but lost in pathological hyperprolactinaemia. In contrast with acromegaly, the GH releasing effect of hexarelin is also blunted in hyperprolactinaemic patients. These data demonstrate that patients with pathological hyperprolactinaemia are partially refractory to the activity of hexarelin.

Exogenous growth hormone administration does not inhibit the growth hormone response to hexarelin in normal men.

Administration of exogenous human growth hormone (GH) blunts the GH response to physiological as well as pharmacological stimuli, including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Hexarelin (Hex) is a new synthetic GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) similar to GHRP-6 with potent GH-releasing activity in animals and men. To determine whether the short-term administration of GH inhibits the Hex-induced GH release, we measured the GH response to Hex (2 micrograms/kg iv) in five normal adult males (age 26-32 yr) three h after an iv bolus of rhGH (2 IU) or saline. Mean incremental change of serum GH from value at time 0 was 47.5 +/- 5.5 and 41.5 +/- 4.1 micrograms/l after saline + Hex and GH + Hex, respectively. Mean incremental area under the curve over baseline was 3216 +/- 586 and 3735 +/- 506 micrograms.min.1 after saline + Hex and GH + Hex, respectively. One of the proposed mechanism of action of GHRPs is to serve as functional somatostatin (SRIH) antagonists, and it is known that GH feeds backs on the hypothalamus to stimulate SRIH release. Therefore, we speculate that antagonisms of SRIH function by Hex prevented the inhibitory effect of exogenous GH, thus lending further support to the hypotheses that SRIH is involved in the feedback regulation of GH secretion, and that GHRPs action involves inhibition of SRIH function.

Growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, before and during puberty.

The objective of this study was to verify the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, hexarelin (HEX), before and during puberty. Ninety-six children (54 boys and 42 girls, aged 4.1-17.4 yr) were studied. Fifty-two of the children were prepubertal, and the other 44 were in pubertal stage II-IV. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg HEX, iv (n = 56), was higher (P < 0.001) than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 33). The iv dose of 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX induced a greater GH increase (P < 0.02) than the 1.0 microgram/kg dose. The GH-releasing effect of 10 mg HEX, orally, was greater (P < 0.03) than that of 1.0 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 7). The iv dose of 2 micrograms/kg HEX elicited an increase in GH levels that was higher in pubertal children than in prepubertal children (77.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 39.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Before puberty, there was no sex-dependent difference in the GH response to HEX. It increased during puberty (P < 0.05 and P < 0.002 for boys and girls, respectively), when it was higher (P < 0.05) in girls than in boys. In contrast, GH responses to GHRH were not related to sex differences and/or puberty. In conclusion, HEX is a potent and reproducible stimulus of GH secretion in children. The effect of HEX increases in puberty, with girls showing a more marked GH response.

Influence of the DA D 2 antagonist (−) eticlopride on cocaine-induced hypermotility and sexual excitement in rat

Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are a class of small peptides that stimulate growth hormone (GH) release in several animal species, including the human. Moreover, GHRPs injected into the brain ventricles stimulate feeding in the rat. The aim of this study was to evaluate the GH-releasing properties of a series of novel GHRP analogs and the possible existence of functional correlations between the GH-releasing activity and the effects on feeding behavior. Two well-known hexapeptides, GHRP-6 and hexarelin, given s.c., dose dependently stimulated both GH release and feeding behavior in satiated rats. However, in a series of tri-, penta- and hexapeptide analogs of hexarelin, some compounds were active either on GH release or on eating behavior. Interestingly, even minor structural modifications resulted in major changes of the pharmacological profile. We conclude that GHRPs have orexigenic properties after systemic administration which are largely independent from the effects they exert on GH release.

Modulation of growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man.

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man is not fully elucidated. As for other GH-releasing peptides, an action on both the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus has been hypothesized. In the present study, we evaluated the modulation of GH-releasing activity of hexarelin in man. In a first experiment conducted on 6 healthy male volunteers, we studied the interaction of the maximally effective intravenous dose of hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg i.v.) with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) and somatostatin (2 micrograms/kg/h i.v.). In a second experiment involving another 6 male subjects, we evaluated the interaction of hexarelin with neuroactive substances, such as pirenzepine (0.6 mg/kg i.v.), pyridostigmine (120 mg p.o.) and arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v.), thought to modulate endogenous somatostatin secretion. Hexarelin induced a higher increase in GH levels as compared to GHRH (integrated output calculated as area under the curve AUC0-120 4,693 +/- 691 vs. 1,494 +/- 102 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01). Coadministration of hexarelin and GHRH produced a higher GH response than hexarelin alone (AUC0-120 7,395 +/- 450 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05). Somatostatin abolished the GH response to GHRH (AUC0-120 363 +/- 89 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01), while it only blunted that to hexarelin (AUC0-120 1,314 +/- 297 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hexarelin, a potent GHRP analogue: interactions with GHRH and clonidine in young and aged dogs.

The GH-releasing activity of hexarelin was evaluated in unanesthetized young and aged dogs. Hexarelin (15.6-250 micrograms/kg, i.v.) significantly stimulated GH secretion in a dose-dependent fashion in dogs of both age groups. The ability of hexarelin to potentiate the GH-releasing effect of GHRH (2 micrograms/kg, i.v) and clonidine (4 micrograms/kg, i.v.) was then tested. Hexarelin strikingly potentiated the effect of GHRH both in young and aged dogs, whereas it potentiated the effect of clonidine in young dogs only. Because clonidine acts on the hypothalamus to release GHRH, its failure to synergize with hexarelin in aged dogs is likely due to an age-related impairment of GHRH-secreting neurons.

Glucagon stimulates GH secretion after intramuscular but not intravenous administration. Evidence against the assumption that glucagon per se has a GH-releasing activity

In order to verify the true GH-releasing effect of glucagon and to explain the mechanism underlying this effect, we studied the effect of glucagon (GLU, 1 mg) administered either iv or im on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg)-induced GH rise in 48 normal short children and adolescents. Moreover, the in vitro effect of GLU on rat anterior pituitary cells was studied. Intravenous administration of GLU induced no significant GH rise. On the other hand, im GLU administration induced a clear-cut GH increase (mean +/- SE GH peak after GLU vs placebo = 25.7 +/- 3.9 vs 10.1 +/- 3.6 micrograms/L, p < 0.01). Intravenous administration of GLU failed to modify the GHRH-induced GH rise either when coadministered with the neurohormone (35.2 +/- 4.1 vs 34.1 +/- 6.0 micrograms/L) or when given 60 min earlier (20.2 +/- 5.8 vs 21.1 +/- 8.3 micrograms/L). Differently from iv GLU, im GLU strikingly potentiated the GH response to GHRH given 90 min later (57.5 +/- 6.3 vs 24.7 +/- 9.1 micrograms/L, p < 0.01). Mean plasma glucose levels increased 30 min after GLU, administered either iv or im, and returned to basal levels 60 min later. GH secretion from dispersed rat pituitary cells was unaffected by incubation with GLU (10(-10)-10(-4) mol/L). Incubation of the cells with 10(-7) mol/L GHRH induced instead a clear-cut stimulation of GH release. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that glucagon per se has not GH-releasing activity as indicated by its uneffectiveness to release GH in vitro and after intravenous administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth hormone-releasing activity of growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 is maintained after short-term oral pretreatment with the hexapeptide in normal aging

The reduced activity of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis in aging may contribute to changes in body composition. As this GH insufficiency is due to hypothalamic pathogenesis, the availability of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), such as GHRP-6 (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) which is active even after oral administration, might be useful to restore it. The aim of our study was to verify the effectiveness of oral administration of GHRP-6 in normal elderly subjects and to investigate whether its GH-releasing activity is maintained or vanishes after short-term oral treatment. Seven normal elderly women (aged 65-82 years) were studied. The effect of oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 on GH secretion was investigated before and after 4 days of treatment with the hexapeptide given twice daily. The GH response to the maximal effective dose of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) also was studied. Before treatment, oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 elicited a clear GH rise (peak 10.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/l; AUC 353.1 +/- 90.6 micrograms.l-1.h-1), which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that induced by intravenous GHRH (peak 5.1 +/- 1.5 micrograms/l; AUC 106.5 +/- 43.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1). After 4 days of treatment with GHRP-6, the GH response to the hexapeptide was maintained, with a trend towards an increase (peak 16.8 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l; AUC 499.8 +/- 107.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The IGF-I levels were not increased significantly after treatment (77.1 +/- 8.4 vs 84.1 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anomalous growth hormone response to vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine methionine in patients with prolactinoma or hypothalamic hyperprolactinemia

We examined a possible GH-releasing activity of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and its homologous peptide, peptide histidine methionine (PHM), in 22 patients with hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) who comprised 19 cases of prolactinoma (PRLoma) and 3 cases of hypothalamic HPRL. Each patient underwent iv bolus injections of VIP (100 μg) and PHM (100 μg) on separate days, and plasma levels of GH and PRL were measured. The plasma GH response to VIP and PHM were considered positive (a paradoxical increase) when an increase over baseline of at least 50% occurred. In agreement with previous reports, the PRL-releasing activity of VIP and PHM in our patients with HPRL were subnormal. Thirteen (59%) patients showed a paradoxical rise in GH after VIP, and 4 (18%) patients did so after PHM. It is to be noted that all the 3 patients with hypothalamic HPRL responded to VIP with a significant rise in GH. 3 of the 4 PHM-responders were also responsive to VIP, which suggests that PHM may have activated VIP receptors in the pituitary of the PHM-responders as a partial agonist of the VIP receptor. The responders and nonresponders to VIP or PHM, respectively, had similar results with respect to the mean age, and the mean basal PRL and GH levels in the plasma. Since these paradoxical GH responses were observed in not only the patients with PRLoma but also those with hypothalamic HPRL, it may be that these anomalous GH responses in HPRL were due to the HPRL itself rather than due to the neoplastic lactotrophs. Although the pathophysiological significance of this phenomenon is open to question, it is suggested at least that VIP and/or PHM receptors may anomalously appear on somatotrophs in the pituitary of at least some patients with HPRL.

Growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral administration in man.

We evaluated the GH-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, after i.v. (1 and 2 micrograms/kg), sc (1.5 and 3 micrograms/kg), intranasal (20 micrograms/kg), and oral (po; 20 and 40 mg) administration to 12 healthy young volunteers. Reference treatments were i.v. saline and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg). GH release (mean +/- SEM) after the i.v. dose of 1 microgram/kg hexarelin [area under the curve (AUC), 3175 +/- 506 micrograms/min.L] was about 2 times higher than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH (AUC, 1544 +/- 161 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.001). Hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg, i.v.) elicited a further increase in GH levels (AUC, 4422 +/- 626 micrograms/min.L) compared to the 1 microgram/kg dose. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg hexarelin, i.v., was very reproducible (AUC, 4016 +/- 563 vs. 3959 +/- 803 micrograms/min.L). The sc administration of hexarelin produced a dose-dependent GH response (AUC, 3180 +/- 392 and 4459 +/- 566 micrograms.min.L with 1.5 and 3 micrograms/kg, respectively). Intranasal administration of 20 micrograms/kg hexarelin induced GH release (AUC, 2642 +/- 452 micrograms/min.L) similar to that caused by 1 microgram/kg, i.v. Twenty and 40 mg hexarelin, po, produced a dose-related increase in GH levels (AUC, 2278 +/- 442 and 4079 +/- 514 micrograms/min.L). Biological bioavailabilities were 77.0 +/- 10.5%, 4.8 +/- 0.9%, and 0.3 +/- 0.1% for the sc, intranasal, and po routes, respectively. This study shows that the GH response to hexarelin administered by the i.v. route has a limited variability and is superior to the response to GHRH. The GH-releasing activity appeared to be dose dependent. Thus, hexarelin could be clinically useful to stimulate GH secretion in humans.

Arginine enhances the growth hormone-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide (GHRP-6) in elderly but not in young subjects after oral administration

In man the GH-releasing hexapeptide His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 (GHRP-6) has been shown to be active even after oral administration. On the other hand, it has been shown that arginine (ARG) totally restores the reduced somatotropic responsiveness to GHRH observed in aging. Based on the foregoing, in this study we verified the GH-releasing activity of oral GHRP-6 (300 micrograms/kg) in normal aging and the possible enhancing effect of 8 g oral ARG on the GH-releasing effect of GHRP-6. Eight young (age 24-32 yr) and 8 elderly (age 66-85 yr) subjects were studied. In all the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) was also studied. Both IGF-I levels and the GH response to iv GHRH were lower in elderly than in young subjects (mean +/- SE, IGF-I: 65.1 +/- 9.1 vs 142.9 +/- 9.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001; GH peak: 5.4 +/- 1.0 vs 13.6 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001). Oral GHRP-6 administration induced a GH rise in elderly which was lower, though not significantly, than that in young subjects (GH peak: 9.9 +/- 2.0 vs 16.2 +/- 5.4 micrograms/L). Oral ARG administration enhanced the GHRP-6-induced GH rise in elderly (GH peak: 22.1 +/- 3.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.01 vs GHRP-6 alone) while failed to modify it in young subjects (GH peak: 13.5 +/- 3.4 micrograms/L). The GH response to oral ARG+GHRP-6 in elderly was higher than that to all stimuli in young adults (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

GH-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new growth hormone releasing peptide, in infant and adult rats

In recent years several synthetic peptides have been shown to be active in inducing GH secretion in different mammalian species. Among them GHRP-6, GHRP-1 and GHRP-2 have demonstrated high effectiveness and high selectivity in stimulating GH release. In the present paper we report studies on the GH-secreting properties of a GHRP analog in which Trp was substituted with the chemically more stable 2-Methyl-Trp. In studies performed in conscious 10-day old rats, the hexapeptide Hexarelin (His-D-2Me-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH 2) resulted very active in stimulating GH secretion. In anesthetized adult male rats, i.v. administration of GHRP-6 or Hexarelin elicited prompt GH release with peak GH levels occurring within 10 min At all the doses tested, the 2 peptides possessed similar effectiveness in stimulating GH release. Hexarelin given s.c. elicited a long-lasting GH release and was slightly more effective than GHRP-6. In conclusion, these findings indicate that Hexarelin is a highly effective GH releaser and might represent a valuable diagnostic and/or therapeutic tool in clinical practice.

Position 2 and position 2/Ala15-substituted analogs of bovine growth hormone-releasing factor (bGRF) with enhanced metabolic stability and improved in vivo bioactivity.

In order to prepare GRF analogs with high activity in vivo, a strategy was undertaken to stabilize the peptide to dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-IV), a protease found in plasma which inactivates native human and bovine GRF by cleavage of the Ala2-Asp3 bond. Replacement of the Ala2 residue with Ser, Thr, or Gly in [Leu27]bGRF(1-29)NH2 resulted in peptides greatly stabilized against proteolysis in plasma, but having low inherent GH-releasing activity when tested in bovine pituitary cell cultures. Replacement of Gly15 with Ala15 was marginally effective in improving the in vitro bioactivity of this group of peptides. When tested for GH-hormone release in steers, however, the Thr2,Ala15 analog was four times more potent than bGRF(1-44)NH2. Eleven additional analogs from the [X2,Ala15,Leu27]bGRF(1-29)NH2 series were synthesized and evaluated for metabolic stability in bovine plasma and for GH releasing activity in steers in vivo and in rat pituitary cells in vitro. Two compounds, [Val2,Ala15,Leu27]dGRF(1-29)NH2 and [Ile2,Ala15,Leu27]-bGRF(1-29)NH2, had increased GH-releasing activity in steers over that of [Thr2,Ala15,Leu27]-bGRF(1-29)NH2 and over a previously reported super-potent analog, [desNH2Tyr1,D-Ala2,Ala15]-hGRF(1-29)NH2.

Effect of Intravenous Administration of Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide on Plasma Growth Hormone in Patients with Short Stature

Synthetic hexapeptide His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2 (GHRP) is known to have remarkable GH releasing activity in a variety of species, especially in men. In this study, we examined the effects of GHRP (1μg/kg BW, iv) on plasma GH in 41 patients with short stature (29 males and 12 females, aged from 8-28 yrs) due to different causes (one after pituitary adenomectomy, nine with perinatal abnormality, two with Turner syndrome, 28 due to unknown causes), and compared the GH responses to GHRP with those to GHRH, L-dopa and insulin. GHRP did not cause any symptoms after the injection. Among 35 patients who had no organic abnormality at the hypothalamo-pituitary region in MRI, plasma GH rises of more than 7μg/L were observed in 34 patients after GHRP injection, 32 patients after GHRH, 21 patients after L-dopa and 24 patients after insulin-hypoglycemia. The mean±SE peaks of plasma GH were 26.6 ± 2.8 μg/L after GHRP, 24.0 ± 3.11/g/L after GHRH, 7.1±1.1 μg/L after L-dopa and 7.5 ± 1.1 μg/L after insulin. Plasma GH peaks appeared within 45 min after GHRP injection, which was earlier than the time of GH peaks in other provocation tests. On the other hand, GHRH slightly but consistently increased plasma GH levels in short patients with pituitary stalk transsection, whereas GHRP did not. Although the mechanism of this finding remains unclear, other factors may be necessary for GHRP to exert its full activity in GH release.In summary, GHRP increased the plasma GH level in patients with short stature more safely, consistently and quickly than other GH stimulants. The GHRP test will therefore be a useful and practical way to examine the GH secretory reserve in short stature.

Thyrotropin‐Releasing Hormone Mediates Growth Hormone Release Induced by Milk and Nursing in Neonatal Rats

Previous evidence from this laboratory suggested that growth hormone (GH) release induced by milk in vitro and by nursing in vivo from neonatal rat pituitary glands is mediated by an alternative GH-releasing factor(s) (GRF) distinct from GH-releasing hormone (GHRH(1-43) ). In the present experiments we tested whether thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) could fulfil the criteria of this alternative GRF in neonatal rats. The water-soluble fraction of rat milk (infranatant, prepared by ultracentrifugation) and its methanol/acetic acid extract (milk-borne peptides) stimulated GH release from perifused pituitary glands obtained from 2-day-old rats. Dialysis of the infranatant (mol wt cut-off: 2,000) against 500 volumes of culture medium at 4°C eliminated its GH-releasing activity in the perifusion system, while the infranatant retained its full GRF-like activity when incubated at 4°C without dialysis. The milk-borne GRF eluted as a single peak and coeluted with TRH in a combined gel permeation chromatography (Sephadex G-10) and perifusion set-up. Prolactin secretion was also stimulated simultaneously with the release of GH induced either by milk or by TRH. In a stepwise C(18) reversed-phase chromatography, milk-borne GRF was highly hydrophilic and coeluted with synthetic TRH. The in vitro GH-releasing bioactivities of synthetic TRH and a milk extract purified in C(18) reversed-phase chromatography were abolished by proline-specific endopeptidase. Thus, TRH and milk-borne GRF displayed similar molecular weights, hydropathic characteristics and proteolytic enzyme resistance. In vivo, nursing (which has been reported as a potent stimulus of GH secretion even in the absence of milk-intake) increased serum GH levels in 2-day-old pups. A supramaximal dose of TRH (10 ng/g intraperitoneally) stimulated GH release in 2-day-old pups separated from their mothers for 6 h to a similar extent as nursing. Nursing-induced levels of serum GH were not further elevated by TRH. This failure of TRH to further increase serum GH levels was not due to a maximal GH output by the neonatal pituitary gland, since the GH release induced by the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan was augmented either by TRH or by nursing. These data provide evidence that the milk-borne GRF-like activity in vitro is indistinguishable from TRH, and suggest that TRH (probably of hypothalamic origin) might be the mediator of the nursing-induced release of GH in vivo as a physiological GRF in neonatal rats.

Dopamine stimulates growth hormone release from the pituitary of goldfish, Carassius auratus, through the dopamine D1 receptors.

Previously, we have demonstrated that ip injection of apomorphine, a nonselective dopamine (DA) agonist, increases serum GH levels in the goldfish, suggesting a possible role of DA in GH regulation. In the present study, the effects of DA on GH release in the goldfish were further characterized using an in vitro perifusion system for pituitary fragments. DA increased GH release in a dose-dependent manner with an ED50 of 0.26 +/- 0.06 microM. SKF38393, a DA D1 agonist, mimicked the GH-releasing effect of DA with an ED50 of 0.41 +/- 0.12 microM. Stereoselectivity consistent with mammalian DA D1 systems was demonstrated for the GH response to SKF38393; only the (+)- but not (-)-enantiomer of SKF38393 induced a dose-dependent GH release. Two other D1 agonists, SKF77434 and SKF82958, were also found to have GH-releasing activity. In contrast, high doses (up to 1 microM) of the DA D2 agonists, bromocriptine and LY171555, did not affect basal GH levels. The receptor specificity for DA-stimulated GH release was further investigated by using D1 and D2 antagonists; the D1 antagonists SCH23390 and SKF83566 completely abolished the GH response to DA or the D1 agonist SKF38393, whereas the D2-specific antagonists domperidone and (-)-sulpiride were not effective in this respect. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that DA is stimulatory to GH release from the pituitary of goldfish, and its action is mediated through receptors resembling the mammalian DA D1 receptors. The apparent similarities of the DA D1 receptor pharmacology between the goldfish and the mammals also indicate that D1 receptor is highly conserved during vertebrate evolution.

Potent agonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone. Part I.

Analogs of the 29 amino acid sequence of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH) with agmatine (Agm) in position 29 have been synthesized by the solid phase method, purified, and tested in vitro and in vivo. The majority of the analogs contained desaminotyrosine (Dat) in position 1, but a few of them had Tyr1, or N-MeTyr1. Some peptides contained one or more additional L- or D-amino acid substitutions in positions 2, 12, 15, 21, 27, and/or 28. Compared to the natural sequence of GH-RH(1-29)NH2, [Dat1,Ala15]GH-RH(1-28)Agm (MZ-3-191) and [D-Ala2,Ala15]GH-RH(1-28)Agm (MZ-3-201) were 8.2 and 7.1 times more potent in vitro, respectively. These two peptides contained Met27. Their Nle27 analogs, [Dat1,Ala15,Nle27]GH-RH(1-28)Agm(MZ-2-51), prepared previously (9), and [D-Ala2,Ala15,Nle28]GH-RH(1-28)Agm(MZ-3-195) showed relative in vitro potencies of 10.5 and 2.4, respectively. These data indicate that replacement of Met27 by Nle27 enhanced the GH-releasing activity of the analog when the molecule contained Dat1-Ala2 residues at the N-terminus, but peptides containing Tyr1-D-Ala2 in addition to Nle27 showed decreased potencies. Replacement of Ser28 with Asp in multi-substituted analogs of GH-RH(1-28)Agm resulted in a decrease in in vitro potencies compared to the parent compound. Thus, the Ser28-containing MZ-2-51, and [Dat1,Ala15,D-Lys21,Nle27]GH-RH(1-28)Agm, its Asp28 homolog (MZ-3-149), possessed relative activities of 10.5 and 5.6, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Failure to confirm a growth hormone-releasing activity of corticotropin-releasing hormone in acromegaly: Comparison with the effects of other hypothalamic hormones

We re-examined whether CRH stimulates GH secretion in acromegaly. Human CRH (100 micrograms) was given as an iv bolus to 15 patients with active acromegaly, and plasma GH levels were measured before and at intervals up to 120 min after the injection. For comparison, we assessed in all the patients the effects of TRH (500 micrograms), GnRH (100 micrograms), vasoactive intestinal peptide (100 micrograms) and peptide histidine methionine (100 micrograms), which are known paradoxically to stimulate GH secretion in acromegaly. A paradoxical GH response (greater than 50% above the basal) to TRH, GnRH, vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine methionine was observed in 12 (80%), 4 (27%), 5 (33%) and 2 (13%) patients, respectively. All the patients were responsive to at least one of these 4 peptides. However, none of the patients showed a positive GH response to hCRH. These results do not support a GH-releasing activity of CRH in acromegaly. Even if CRH has such an effect, it does not appear as potent as TRH, GnRH, vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine methionine. However, the possibility cannot be excluded that our negative data might have been due to the use of hCRH vs ovine CRH in earlier studies.

Growth Hormone (GH) Responses to the Hexapeptide GH-Releasing Peptide and GH-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) in the Cynomolgus Macaque: Evidence for Non-GHRH-Mediated Responses*

GH-releasing peptide (GHRP; His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2), a hexapeptide derived from enkephalin, has been shown to have GH-releasing activity in man and several animal species. To characterize the GHRP dose-response curve and compare it with that of GH-releasing hormone [GHRH-(1-44)NH2], six unanesthetized young adult cynomolgus macaques were tested with a range of iv doses of GHRP or GHRH in random order. Animals were fitted with vests and tethers. Blood samples were obtained before and at 15-min intervals after the administration of drugs. Doses ranged from 0.03-3 mg/kg for GHRP and from 1-30 micrograms/kg for GHRH. The dose-response curves for the two peptides were not parallel. GHRP had lower potency, but evoked a much higher peak GH response than GHRH (greater than 55 vs. 12 micrograms/L). Because one of the proposed mechanisms of action of GHRP is the inhibition of somatostatin (SS), we tested the effects of propranolol, which inhibits SS, on the GH responses to GHRH and GHRP. Propranolol was given at a dose of 14 micrograms/kg, iv, 10 min before the injection of saline, GHRH (10 micrograms/kg), or GHRP (1 mg/kg). GH responses to propranolol alone did not differ from those to placebo (peak, 6 +/- 2 vs. 8 +/- 2 micrograms/L). However, propranolol pretreatment doubled the GH responses to both GHRH and GHRP compared with those to GHRH or GHRP alone 28 +/- 5 micrograms/L vs. 14 +/- 5 (P less than 0.05) and 54 +/- 2 vs. 25 +/- 6 micrograms/L (P less than 0.001), respectively]. These results show that GHRP causes a potent dose-dependent release of GH in this primate species. Since GHRP can produce a greater maximal GH response than GHRH, mechanisms other than release of endogenous GHRH must be involved.