ABSTRACT This article presents an empirically grounded argument on how democracy promoters adapt to the target country's autocratization, and whether these adaptations actually lead to a taming of democracy promotion. Focusing on Tanzania under President Magufuli (2015–2021), a case of deepening autocracy, it examines the work of the German Political Foundations (GPFs). According to existing literature, the GPFs represent a particularly interesting case of democracy promoters due to their long-term presence in more than 120 countries, their quasi-NGO status, and their large transnational network. Moreover, despite the recent autocratization of the GPFs’ target countries, the GPFs had to cease their work in only very few cases. 23 expert interviews were analysed through a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis, which distinguished three levels of adaptation: (1) the general approach (direct/indirect), (2) the instruments used (categories of democracy assistance by Bush, 2015), and (3) the underlying rationale. In total, six adaptation strategies with a particular emphasis on indirect, regime-compatible democracy promotion were identified, aiming to support democratic transformation long-term by empowering civil society and enabling exchange. Since this is in line with the GPFs’ general rationale of fostering democratic change through learning and socialization, I conclude therefore that the GPFs were not “tamed.”
Read full abstract