Geriatric Assessment Research Articles

Addition of Tilburg frailty indicator to the classic Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score improves its prognostic value in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Since the proper risk stratification in the growing population of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is challenging, the potential advantage of adding the elements of geriatric assessment to the commonly used Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scale in predicting the risk of 6-month death requires investigation. The study group included 196 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age 74.4 years), hospitalized for ACS. The risk of 6-months mortality was assessed with the GRACE scale, the frailty syndrome (FS) using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator questionnaire, the cognitive impairment (CI) using the Polish adaptation of the Mini Mental State Examination and multimorbidity with the CAD specific index. After 6 months, a follow-up telephone call was performed. To enable the assessment of whether adding TFI, MMSE, CAD specific index to the GRACE scale improves its prognostic value, normalization was carried out. In relation to GRACE (AUC 0.713), combination of GRACE (norms) and TFI (norms) had higher predictive power for 6 months mortality (AUC = 0.737). The risk of death was seven times greater [RR = 7.02] in patients with >55.8 points in the test based on GRACE and TFI score. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis the model based on GRACE 2.0, TFI and MMSE (the lowest AIC value) was best-performing in risk of death prediction. Adding the FS assessment to the traditional GRACE scale improves its prognostic value in elderly with ACS.

Current status and the future trajectory of geriatric services in Nigeria

The world population of people aged 65 and above, termed as older persons, is increasing rapidly. The number of people aged 65 years or older worldwide is projected to more than double, rising from 761 million in 2021 to 1.6 billion in 2050. The number of people aged 80 years or older is growing even faster. Population ageing is an irreversible global trend. It is the inevitable result of the demographic transition – the trend toward longer lives and smaller families – that is taking place even in countries with relatively youthful populations. In 2021, one in 10 people worldwide were aged 65 or above. In 2050, this age group is projected to account for one in six people globally [1]. People are living longer because of better nutrition, sanitation, healthcare, education, and economic well-being. With increasing age, older adults become at greater risk for diseases, disability, and side effects of medications. The common geriatric syndromes suffered by older persons include degenerative joint diseases, falls and mobility issues, sensory impairments (visual and hearing), dementia, sleep disturbances, frailty, and urinary incontinence. These syndromes are described as ‘Giants of Geriatrics’ on account of the impact on quality of life, and functional status of older persons. Geriatricians provide person-centered holistic care that attempts to preserve function and maintain a good quality of life by deploying the comprehensive geriatrics assessment and management approach which involves a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Nigeria has an increasing ageing population that will benefit from a healthcare system that is aligned to their peculiar care needs in the different settings care will be sought. This can be achieved by building capacity in the various disciplines involved in providing comprehensive care to older persons, and including geriatric medicine in the training curriculum for medical students, nurses and all allied health workers.

Prehabilitation in Frail Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes

Background: There is still limited evidence on the results of prehabilitation in very old frail patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and course of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients undergoing prehabilitation before surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: a prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2022. All patients diagnosed with CRC over 80 years old and proposed for surgery were included. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for frailty detection was performed, and the therapeutic decision was taken by the multidisciplinary tumor committee. Prehabilitation led by the geriatric team was performed. The rate of medical and surgical complications, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and first-year mortality were recorded. Results: CRC surgery was proposed in 184 patients >80 years. After a multidisciplinary decision, surgery was performed on 126 (68.5%) patients, of whom 12 (0.5%) were nonagenarians. Fifty percent of octogenarians and 86% of nonagenarians were frail. Prehabilitation consisted of the following: adapted physical exercise (100%); oral nutritional supplementation (73.8%); anemia treatment (59.5%); delirium prevention (5.6%); antidepressant treatment (15.9%); vitamin D supplementation (21.4%); and pharmacological deprescription (38.1%). The post-surgical complication rate was low (4.3% surgical and 29.4% medical complications), and in-hospital mortality was very low (3.2%). Nonagenarian patients had a higher rate of complications compared to octogenarians (OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.13–14.12))—mainly heart failure (OR 4.68 (95% CI 1.21–18.09))—but there were no differences in hospital stay or first-year mortality. Conclusions: prehabilitation in very old patients with CRC surgery is possible and provides good results.

Application of the world guidelines for falls prevention and management’s risk stratification algorithm to patients on a frailty intervention pathway and the potential utility of sensory impairment information

BackgroundThe 2022 world guidelines for falls prevention and management suggest measuring sensory function including dizziness, vision, and hearing. These variables are not included in the falls risk stratification algorithm. This study sought to investigate the utility of the guidelines and potential avenues for improvement. This study applied the falls risk stratification recommendations and reviewed the individual sensory impairment risk factor variables predictive of falls and falls risk grouping in those assessed by a frailty intervention team (FIT) based in an emergency department (ED).MethodsPatients over 65 years old who attended the ED and had a comprehensive geriatric assessment carried out by FIT over a period of four months were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Patient characteristics, medication, physical and sensory function status data was retrieved and analysed with respect to falls and falls risk grouping.ResultsData was gathered retrospectively from 392 patients. Excluding those with missing data, almost all attendees were in the high-risk of falls category (n = 170, 43.4%), or the low-risk category (n = 149, 38.0%). Few people were in the intermediate-risk category (n = 19, 4.8%). Hearing loss and dizziness were significantly associated with falls incidence, whereas vision and balance were not. Hearing loss, balance and dizziness were significantly associated with risk grouping, whereas vision was not.ConclusionsMost older adults included in the analysis fell into the low- or high-risk categories, with a minority in the intermediate-risk category. This suggests that the inclusion criteria for the intermediate category could be altered for greater sensitivity. While impaired balance and vision were the most common impairments, hearing status, balance and dizziness were associated with risk group. These results, through a practical application of the world guidelines for falls to an acute clinical sample, raise the possibility of refining the falls risk stratification criteria, and highlight the capacity for additional sensory intervention to mitigate falls risk.

Investigating Frailty, Polypharmacy, Malnutrition, Chronic Conditions, and Quality of Life in Older Adults: Large Population-Based Study.

Aging, a significant public health issue, is associated with multiple concurrent chronic diseases and aging-related conditions (geriatric syndromes). This study aims to investigate the impact of age and chronic conditions on geriatric syndromes and the intercorrelations between multiple geriatric syndromes and quality of life (QoL) in older adults (aged ≥65 years) at the population level. A large representative sample was randomly selected from a county in China, Feidong, with 17 towns and 811,867 residents. Multiple chronic conditions, geriatric syndromes (frailty, polypharmacy, and malnutrition), and QoL were assessed and compared. Associations of demographic information and chronic conditions with geriatric conditions and QoL in older adults were assessed using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression. Intercorrelations between age, multiple geriatric syndromes, and QoL were investigated using both correlation analysis and restricted cubic splines-based multivariable-adjusted dose-response analysis. Older adults comprised 43.42% (3668/8447) of the entire study population. The prevalence of frailty, premalnutrition or malnutrition, polypharmacy, and impaired QoL (median age 73, IQR 69-78 years; 1871/3668, 51% men) was 8.26% (303/3668), 15.59% (572/3668), 3.22% (118/3668), and 10.8% (396/3668), respectively. Different age and sex subgroups mostly had similar prevalence of geriatric syndromes (except that frailty occurred more often with older age). Premalnutrition or malnutrition were associated with a lower frequency of obesity and a higher frequency of constipation, polypharmacy with a higher frequency of diabetes and constipation, frailty with a higher frequency of constipation and hernia, and impaired QoL with a higher frequency of hypertension, diabetes, physical disability, and constipation. Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Groningen Frailty Indicator, and EQ-5D-5L scores, as well as the number of medications used, mostly predicted each other and QoL. Impaired QoL was associated with a higher frequency of frailty, premalnutrition or malnutrition, and polypharmacy, and frailty with a higher frequency of premalnutrition or malnutrition and polypharmacy. At a 1.5-year follow-up, impaired QoL was linked to polypharmacy and frailty at baseline, premalnutrition or malnutrition and polypharmacy were associated with frailty at baseline, and frailty was linked to both premalnutrition or malnutrition and polypharmacy at baseline. Causal mediation analyses showed that frailty mediated the link between polypharmacy and worse QoL and that polypharmacy mediated the link between frailty and worse QoL. In this large population-based study of older adults, multiple chronic conditions were associated with ≥1 of the investigated geriatric syndromes. Geriatric syndromes were mostly intercorrelated with, and well predictive of, each other and QoL; and causal relationships existed between geriatric syndromes and QoL, with other geriatric syndromes being mediators. The findings might be biased by residual confounding factors. It is important to perform personalized geriatric syndrome assessments stratified by chronic condition; active prevention of, or intervention for, any syndrome might help to reduce the others and improve QoL.

DNA polymorphisms in inflammatory and endocrine signals linked to frailty are also associated with obesity: data from the FRASNET cohort.

Obesity and frailty are prevalent geriatric conditions that share some pathophysiological mechanisms and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The relationship between frailty, obesity, and polymorphism remains inadequately explored. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) offer insights into genetic predispositions that may influence the development of both frailty and obesity. We aimed at investigating whether SNPs associated with frailty also play a role in obesity. Data were collected from the FRASNET cross-sectional study, which included community-dwelling older individuals residing in Milan and nearby areas. Participants were recruited through random sampling. They underwent multidimensional geriatric assessments, which included the collection of blood samples for SNP analysis. Frailty was assessed using the frailty index, and body composition was evaluated using bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometric measures. SNPs related to frailty and linked to the renin-angiotensin system (CYP11B2 rs1799998, AGT rs5051, and AGTR1 rs2131127), apoptosis pathways (CASP8 rs6747918), growth hormone signaling (GHR rs6180), inflammation (TLR4 rs5030717, CD33 rs3865444, and FN1 rs7567647), adducin (ADD3 rs3731566), and the 9p21-23 region (rs518054) were found to be associated with various measures of obesity in community-dwelling older adults. Frailty-related SNPs contribute to obesity in community-dwelling older adults. We identified a novel association between adducin SNPs and visceral fat, which has not been previously reported. Detecting genetic predispositions to obesity and frailty early could aid in identifying individuals at risk, facilitating the adoption of preventive interventions. This represents an initial step toward promoting early intervention strategies.

How do geriatricians practise comprehensive geriatric assessment in the outpatient setting: an analysis of geriatricians' letters and a comparison to the Medicare benefits schedule requirement.

Little is known about what components geriatricians routinely incorporate into outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs). This study explored what components of CGAs are routinely incorporated into geriatricians' letters and assessed their consistency with the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and a recently published survey of geriatricians. We completed a manual content analysis, supplemented by qualitative thematic analysis, of 34 letters from five geriatricians, collected as part of the GOAL Trial. While more than 80% of letters included each of the key clinical domains described in the Medicare Benefits Schedule and survey of geriatricians, only 62% included advanced care planning and 47% mentioned immunisations. Forty-seven percent of letters included goal setting. Few letters showed evidence of multidisciplinary working. Issues identified by the geriatrician centred around the themes of advance care planning, symptom identification and management, medical comorbidities, strategies to support quality of life and interventions to manage frailty. Patient concerns identified in the letters were cognition and mood, declining function, future planning and symptom management. Analysis of geriatricians' letters provides important and novel insights into usual CGA practice. The letters provide evidence of multidimensional assessments of physical, functional, social and psychological health, and most include use of standardised tools. However, less than 50% include evidence of goal setting or multidisciplinary working. The results allow consideration of how CGAs might be carried out in the outpatient setting, so that interventions focused on improving the quality and efficacy of this intervention can be implemented.

Assessing the Risk of Postoperative Delirium Through Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Postoperative delirium is especially common and often problematic among elderly patients undergoing surgery. This study aimed to explore factors that can predict postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. This cohort study included 255 patients age 75 years or older who underwent gastric cancer surgery between July 2010 and December 2020. All the patients underwent preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) evaluation by a geriatrician. In addition to the CGA items, this study investigated the association between postoperative delirium and clinicopathologic factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS). The most common postoperative complication was delirium, present in 31 patients (12.2%). The group with delirium was significantly more likely to have ECOG-PS≥2, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, or cerebral infarction. The CGA showed frailty in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Vitality Index (VI), and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15). In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for delirium were ECOG-PS ≥2 (P=0.002) and MMSE-frailty (P<0.001). Using an MMSE score of ≤23 and an ECOG-PS score of ≥2 as cutoffs, postoperative delirium was predicted with a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 74.1%. Postoperative delirium might be more easily predicted based on the combination of MMSE and ECOG-PS for elderly patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Individualized treatment of diabetes mellitus in older adults.

The population of older adults with diabetes mellitus is growing but heterogeneous. Because geriatric syndromes, comorbidity or multimorbidity, the complexity of glucose dynamics, and socioeconomic conditions are associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia and mortality, these factors should be considered in individualized diabetes treatment. Because cognitive impairment and frailty have similar etiologies and risk factors, a common strategy can be implemented to address them through optimal glycemic control, management of vascular risk factors, diet, exercise, social participation, and support. To prevent frailty or sarcopenia, optimal energy intake, adequate protein and vitamin intake, and resistance or multi-component exercise are recommended. For hypoglycemic drug therapy, it is important to reduce hypoglycemia, to use sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, taking into account the benefits for cardiovascular disease and the risk of adverse effects, and to simplify treatment to address poor adherence. Glycemic control goals for older adults with diabetes should be set according to three categories, based on cognitive function and activities of daily living, using the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 8-items. This categorization can be used to determine treatment strategies for diabetes when combined with the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Based on the CGA, frailty prevention, treatment simplification, and social participation or services should be implemented for patients in Category II and above. Measures against hypoglycemia and for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease should also be promoted. Treatment based on categorization and CGA by multidisciplinary professionals would be an individualized treatment for older adults with diabetes. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

A New Hospital-At-Home Model for Integrated Geriatric Care: Data from a Preliminary Italian Experience

ObjectiveHospital-at-home (HaH) has emerged as an alternative to conventional in-hospital care in older adults, possibly reducing hospital admissions and related complications. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients referred to “Gruppo di Intervento Rapido Ospedale-Territorio” (GIROT), a HaH service based on comprehensive geriatric assessment, developed in Florence, Italy, during the postpandemic period. DesignRetrospective longitudinal study. Setting and ParticipantsGIROT provided home-based care to patients with acute or exacerbated chronic diseases and a high risk of hospital-related complications (ie, patients with moderate-to-severe disability and/or dementia), referred from primary care, emergency departments, or in-hospital units. MethodsAll-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months, and predictors of 6-month mortality were investigated. ResultsAmong 391 patients (mean age, 88.4 years; 62.4% female) referred from emergency departments (58.6%), primary care (27.9%), and acute medical units (13.6%), the main diagnoses were respiratory failure (28.4%), acute heart failure (25.3%), and delirium (13.6%). Patients referred from primary care were older and showed a higher prevalence of severe disability and hypomobility. After 1, 3, and 6 months, mortality rates were 34.5%, 45.6%, and 53.8%, and hospitalization rates 7.2%, 21.5%, and 37.9%, respectively. Predictors of 6-month mortality included age [odds ratio (OR), 1.039], severe disability (OR, 3.446), impossible/assisted walking (OR, 4.450) and referral from primary care (OR, 2.066). High global satisfaction with the service was reported. Conclusions and ImplicationsThe GIROT model may help expanding acute health care capacity for older adults at high risk of hospital-related complications. Customized care plans are needed in patients with severe disability/hypomobility, considering also simultaneous palliative care.

Veteran comfort and satisfaction with comprehensive geriatric assessment via video telehealth to home.

The purpose of this project was to measure satisfaction with virtual comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) among older Veterans (OVs). The CGA involved five different healthcare providers and four one-hour VA Video Connect (VVC) calls. Using specific enrollment criteria, OVs were recruited in four cohorts separated by time. After completing the CGA, participants were asked to complete a 10-statement telephone questionnaire. Before analyses, responses to each statement were dichotomized as Agree (Agree/Strongly agree) or Do not Agree (Neutral/Disagree/Strongly Disagree). Descriptive statistics and Binomial generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to analyze the data. All 269 enrolled OVs completed all components of the CGA. This included 79, 57, 61, and 72 Veterans in cohorts 1 to 4, respectively. Their average age was 76.0 ± 5.9 years, and they were predominately white (82%), male (94%), and residents of rural settings (64%). Of the 236 (88%) OVs who completed the telephone survey, 57% indicated they were comfortable using VVC and 57% expressed willingness to use VVC again; 44% felt that VVC was easier than going to in-person visits. The OVs in Cohort 1 were more likely to agree with these statements than those in the remaining cohorts, especially Cohorts 2 and 4. Differences in demographics partially explained some of these findings. The majority (89% or higher) of survey participants agreed with the remaining seven survey statements indicating they were satisfied with the CGA program. OVs were very satisfied with their participation in a program of CGA, although not necessarily the mode of delivery. The percentage of participants who indicated discomfort using VVC for the CGA visits appeared to increase with time. Further work is needed to determine which OVs would be the best candidates to use VVC to complete all or part of a CGA.

Development and Implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Interdisciplinary Case-Based Educational Intervention for Cancer Care Providers.

To develop and implement a continuing professional development (CPD) activity focused on geriatric assessment (GA) in oncology for oncologists and geriatricians. We evaluated the impact of this activity on knowledge, skills, and performance regarding GA in oncology, as well as its feasibility and acceptability. We included teams composed of an oncologist and a geriatrician working in Mexico. Curriculum content was selected from geriatric oncology guidelines. We used Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcome (ECHO)'s model to create a 12-week online course. A one-group pretest post-test quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness. At baseline, participants answered a multiple-choice knowledge assessment, a survey on self-perceived competence in GA, and an adaptation of the Association for Community Cancer Centers Geriatric Oncology Gap Assessment Tool, evaluating self-perceived performance in conducting geriatric interventions. These assessments and a satisfaction questionnaire were also completed postintervention. Baseline and postintervention scores were compared using paired t-tests. We included 40 participants (20 oncologists and 20 geriatricians). Median attendance was 10 sessions (range 2-12). Thirty-eight participants completed the satisfaction questionnaire, with a median score of 10/10 (range 8-10). The mean baseline and postintervention knowledge scores were 59.5 ± 12.8 and 74.4 ± 9.7, respectively (P < .001, effect size 1.14). The mean baseline and postintervention competence scores were 6.42 ± 2.5 and 9.02 ± 0.8, respectively (P < .001, effect size 1.03). The mean baseline and postintervention performance scores were 2.58 ± 0.65 and 3.29 ± 0.5, respectively (P < .001, effect size 1.64). A CPD activity for oncologists and geriatricians on the basis of the Project ECHO model was feasible and acceptable, leading to increased knowledge, competence, and performance in geriatric oncology. This could represent a novel method for increasing the geriatric competence of the cancer care workforce in Latin America and globally.

Examining the relationships between pain, activities of daily living, and perceptions of overall health in older adults with breast cancer: Results from a brief geriatric screening.

273 Background: Geriatric assessment has been identified as an essential component to caring for patients with cancer who are over 65 years old. Prior research suggests that physical pain and illness perceptions each impact important health behaviors. This retrospective study utilized a brief geriatric screen to examine the relationships between pain levels, activities of daily living (ADLs), and perceptions of overall health for older adults with breast cancer. Implications for methods to improve the patient experience for this population are considered. Methods: The Senior Adult Oncology Program (SAOP) screening tool was administered to 429 patients age 65 or older at a breast oncology clinic. A total ADL score was computed by summing patient-reported responses to 13 ADL items, such as ability to dress oneself, feed oneself, and remember to take medications. A higher ADL score indicates greater difficulty with these responsibilities. Pain was assessed using a 10-point scale; scores were dichotomized to form a low-pain group (scores 0-4) and high-pain group (scores 5-10). Overall Health was assessed on a 1-10 scale, with higher scores indicating perceptions of greater health. Demographic and medical information was abstracted from patients’ electronic health records. Independent samples t-tests examined differences between the high-pain and low-pain groups in total ADL score and self-assessed Overall Health. Results: The average age of the sample was 76 years old (range = 65-89 years). Approximately half of the sample identified as White (48%); 20% identified as Black. In comparing the high-pain and low-pain groups, the high-pain group reported significantly greater difficulty with ADLs (M score = 3.25, 1.41, respectively; p=.026). Additionally, patients endorsing high pain levels reported significantly worse Overall Health as compared to patients endorsing low levels of pain (M= 7.50, 6.11, respectively; p=.001). Conclusions: Older adults with breast cancer experiencing high levels of pain demonstrated greater difficulty with ADLs and worse perceptions of overall health. It is critical that pain is assessed early and often for older adults with breast cancer. Early identification of high pain levels in this population could allow those in need to receive pharmacological and/or behavioral treatments for pain, which may maintain stability or promote improvement in ADLs and perceptions of one’s health. Incorporating brief pain assessments into future geriatric screening tools could improve the process of aging during and after breast cancer.

Project on Geriatric Assessment in Nephrology Unit: Evaluation of Frailty and Vulnerability, Physical Capacity, and Kidney Function

Project on Geriatric Assessment in Nephrology Unit: Evaluation of Frailty and Vulnerability, Physical Capacity, and Kidney Function

Rationale and design of the multicentric randomized EVAOLD trial: evaluation of a strategy guided by imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with ischemia

BackgroundThe management of myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) in elderly patients remains challenging, in particular the benefit/risk balance of routine revascularization remains uncertain. Study designEVAOLD is s a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial with 2 parallel arms in NSTEMI patients ≥ 80 years of age. The aim of the trial is to test whether a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging (IMG group) will be non-inferior in preventing Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE, ie all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) rates at 1 year compared with a routine invasive strategy (INV Group). Geriatric assessment and cost- effectiveness analysis will also be performed. A sample size of 1756 patients (assuming a 10% rate of patients lost to follow-up) is needed to show non-inferiority with 80% power. Non-inferiority based on exponential survival curves will be declared if the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio is lower than 1.24, corresponding to a non-inferiority margin of 7% in absolute difference and an event rate of 40% in the INV group. ConclusionEVAOLD is a nationwide, prospective, open-label trial testing the non-inferiority of a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly NSTEMI patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03289728

Cluster randomized pilot of the Best Case/Worst Case-Geriatric Oncology (BC/WC-GeriOnc) communication tool for older adults with cancer.

226 Background: BC/WC-GeriOnc is a conversation framework and graphic aid that supports shared decision making (SDM) between oncologists and older adults with cancer. Oncologists are trained to use scenario planning to discuss treatment options by describing the range of plausible outcomes—including an individualized most-likely case—and to make a patient preference-aligned recommendation. Methods: To compare BC/WC-GeriOnc vs enhanced usual care (EUC; usual care plus geriatric assessment), we enrolled 7 medical oncologists from a Comprehensive Cancer Center, Veterans Affairs clinic, and safety-net hospital. For each oncologist, we first enrolled 2 EUC patients age ≥65 with any stage solid tumor and recorded decision-making discussions. Oncologists were then randomized 1:1 to BC/WC-GeriOnc training vs EUC. We enrolled up to 5 additional patients per oncologist and recorded discussions. Patients were followed for 2 months with surveys and a one-on-one semi-structured interview. Primary outcomes were feasibility of patient recruitment/retention and oncologist-reported feasibility of using BC/WC-GeriOnc (surveys and interview). Secondary outcomes were intervention adherence, fidelity, and oncologist- and patient-reported acceptability and appropriateness. Exploratory outcomes included patient-reported SDM, decisional conflict, and regret. We used descriptive statistics to summarize results. Results: Among 43 patients (15 intervention, 28 EUC), median age was 71 (IQR 68-77). The most common cancers were gastrointestinal (30%), thoracic (26%), breast (19%), and genitourinary (19%). Treatment was palliative in 58%. Patient recruitment rate was 70%. Retention was 98% post decision, 93% at 1 month, 86% at 2 months, and 73% at the patient interview. Mean oncologist feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness scores were each 4 out of 5, which corresponds to “agree.” Intervention adherence (93%) and fidelity were high (median score 14 out of 15, IQR 11-15). Oncologists reported that the tool improved communication: “It really kind of crystalized things in my mind and helped me communicate better.” Patients found that the tool clarified options, encouraged deliberation, and supported oncologist communication. Mean patient-reported SDM score was 85.6 (out of 100-best, SD 15) in the intervention arm and 77.5 (SD 22) in EUC (Cohen’s d 0.43). In the intervention arm, 15% of patients had high decisional conflict after the decision was made (score &gt;37.5/100) versus 21% in EUC. At 2 months, 22% in the intervention arm had high decision regret (score &gt;25/100) compared with 45% in EUC. Conclusions: It was feasible and acceptable for oncologists to use BC/WC-GeriOnc to support SDM for older adults with cancer. Promising patient-reported SDM and decisional outcomes support testing the tool in a full-scale efficacy trial. Clinical trial information: NCT05374304 .

The impact of ePRO presentation during MDTB on clinician discussion of patient fitness and preferences: The INSPIRE intervention pilot.

251 Background: Treatment of pancreatic cancer often entails multiple modalities (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiation) that vary in intensity, timing, and toxicity. While some options are only recommended for ‘fit’ patients regardless of age, formal fitness measures (such as the geriatric assessment [GA]) and patient preferences are seldom utilized during treatment decision-making. Methods: The INtegrating Systematic PatIent-Reported Evaluations into Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Board (INSPIRE-MDTB) intervention involves the presentation of GA and treatment preferences during MDTB discussions of patients with stage I-IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This qualitative study inductively analyzed, recorded and transcribed historical (November 2021 - February 2022) and intervention (September 2022 - June 2023) MDTBs using NVivo software. A constant comparative method was used to establish a grounded scheme representative of clinicians’ characterization of patients’ fitness and preferences during decision-making. Results: Recordings of the MDTB of 31 historical and 49 intervention patients with similar gender (52%; 53% female), age (m=68.1; 72.3), race (65%; 59% White), and cancer stage (26%; 22% stage IV) were included. The GA was not utilized in any historical case but was presented in 94% of intervention cases. Compared to historical controls, INSPIRE patients had more frequent discussions of (1) Cancer-Related Factors (e.g. size, location, progression speed; 35% vs. 43%), (2) Individual Risk Factors (e.g. age, comorbidities, tolerance; 90% vs 98%), and (3) Psychosocial Factors (e.g. health literacy, social support, substance use; 19% vs 33%) (Table 1). Preference domains were discussed in 39% of historical and 80% of intervention patients, with notable increases in patients’ concerns regarding physical (0%; 35%) and mental/emotional (0%; 20%) side effects, ability to work (0%; 10%), and the logistics and convenience of treatment (6%; 14%). Conclusions: INSPIRE-enhanced MDTB discussion of patient fitness and preferences represents a promising approach to providing a venue for consistent and systematic presentation and discussion of ePROs. Clinicians’ characterization of patients’ fitness during MDTB. Factors Impacting Fitness Baseline Intervention Cancer Related 11 (35%) 21 (43%) High Risk (size, location) 8 (26%) 16 (33%) Rapid Progression 0 (0%) 3 (6%) Prior or Concurrent Cancer 3 (10%) 3 (6%) Individual Risk Factor 28 (90%) 48 (98%) Age 19 (61%) 26 (53%) Comorbidities 24 (77%) 43 (88%) Weight Loss 11 (35%) 5 (10%) Tolerance 7 (23%) 9 (18%) Psychosocial Factor 6 (19%) 16 (33%) Insurance 2 (6%) 0 (0%) Language Barrier 0 (0%) 1 (2%) Health Literacy 0 (0%) 6 (12%) Social Support 3 (10%) 12 (24%) Substance use 1 (3%) 2 (4%)

Perioperative interventions to enhance surgical outcomes for older adults with cancer: A systematic review.

219 Background: Older adults with cancer have unique needs, particularly in the perioperative setting, which likely influence surgical outcomes in the geriatric oncology population. Little work has sought to describe available literature investigating perioperative interventions to enhance surgical outcomes for these individuals. Our systematic review sought to describe the literature on perioperative interventions in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search using the Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases, searching for literature published from 1/2010-10/2023 (search terms used relevant terminology for geriatric oncology in the perioperative setting). We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) focusing on patient-centered interventions that enrolled adults &gt;60 years old with cancer, excluding studies with pharmacologic, procedural, and radiographic interventions. Results: We included 11 RCTs with 2,177 patients. Patients’ age ranged from 60-95, and median number of patients per study was 147 (range: 44-690). Most studies included patients with colorectal cancer (81.8% [9/11]), all involving non-emergent elective surgeries. Half the studies (54.5% [6/11]) evaluated exercise interventions, and the remaining assessed geriatric assessment-guided interventions (27.2% [3/11]), nutrition optimization (9.1% [1/11]), and patient empowerment (9.1% [1/11]). Primary outcomes were as follows: postoperative complications, quality of life, feasibility of exercise programs, delirium incidence, inspiratory muscle endurance, hospital length of stay, and consistency of nutritional management. All studies had postoperative complications as a primary or secondary outcome. In studies with exercise-based interventions, all but one (83.3% [5/6]) found reduction in postoperative complications, and one showed improvement in quality of life (16.7% [1/6]). Studies focusing on geriatric assessment did not achieve significant differences in outcomes. We found implementation challenges that influenced several studies, including high drop-out rates and intervention fidelity. Conclusions: In this review, we found 11 studies focused on perioperative interventions in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery. Notably, interventions involved exercise, geriatric assessment-guided care, nutrition optimization, and patient empowerment. RCTs to date seem to primarily focus on exercise interventions and geriatric assessment-guided strategies. Although most studies met their primary endpoint, we found heterogeneity in intervention modality and outcome assessment, thus demonstrating a need for ongoing work to address the unique needs of the geriatric oncology population.

Predicting frailty domain impairments and mortality with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among older adults with cancer: the ELCAPA-EDS cohort study.

Automated frailty screening tools like the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) are primarily validated for care consumption outcomes. We assessed the predictive ability of the HFRS regarding care consumption outcomes, frailty domain impairments and mortality among older adults with cancer, using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool as a clinical benchmark. This retrospective, linkage-based study included patients aged ≥70years with solid tumor, enrolled in the Elderly Cancer Patients (ELCAPA) multicentre cohort study (2016-2020) and hospitalized in acute care within the Greater Paris University Hospitals. HFRS scores, which encompass hospital-acquired problems and frailty-related syndromes, were calculated using data from the index admission and the preceding 6months. A multidomain geriatric assessment (GA), including cognition, nutrition, mood, functional status, mobility, comorbidities, polypharmacy, incontinence, and social environment, was conducted at ELCAPA inclusion, with computation of the G8 score. Logistic and Cox regressions measured associations between the G8, HFRS, altered GA domains, length of stay exceeding 10days, 30-day readmission, and mortality. Among 587 patients included (median age 82years, metastatic cancer 47.0%), 237 (40.4%) were at increased frailty risk by the HFRS (HFRS>5) and 261 (47.5%) by the G8 (G8≤10). Both HFRS and G8 were significantly associated with cognitive and functional impairments, incontinence, comorbidities, prolonged length of stay, and 30-day mortality. The G8 was associated with polypharmacy, nutritional and mood impairment. Although showing significant associations with short-term care consumption, the HFRS could not identify polypharmacy, nutritional, mood and social environment impairments and showed low discriminatory ability across all GA domains.

Realising the right to rehabilitation-commentary on 'reablement, rehabilitation, recovery: everyone's business'.

Rehabilitation is a core component of comprehensive geriatric assessment and should be central to integrated care and support across the whole system. Yet access barriers and ageist practices still prevail within many rehabilitation services. This commentary reflects on a report and recommendations published by the British Geriatrics Society in May 2024. As lead author for the report, I share my personal reflection on the key messages and take this opportunity to thank the multidisciplinary contributors. Reablement, Rehabilitation, Recovery: everyone's business describes why rehabilitation matters to older people and their caregivers. It provides evidence and examples of practice at different care touchpoints and makes the case that rehabilitation is everyone's business and knows no boundaries, whether by condition, profession, care setting or taxonomy. The report sets out 12 key actions for health and care systems to deliver effective and integrated rehabilitation as a right for all older people, wherever and whenever they need it. To realise that right, health and care professionals must work together, and with their local community partners, to build capacity and capability for reablement, rehabilitation and recovery across the whole workforce. With population ageing and many more people living with frailty or multimorbidity, there is an urgent need for greater investment in rehabilitation to prevent, delay or reduce disability, caregiver burden and demand for long-term care. This timely BGS report should be essential reading for all who plan, commission, provide or assure health and care services for older people.